Phase II study of temozolomide monotherapy in patients with extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma

Efficacy and safety of temozolomide-based regimens in advanced pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent advances in the management of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (pNETs) highlight the potential benefits of temozolomide, an alkylating agent, for these patients. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the outcome of temozolomide, alone or in combination with other anticancer medications in patients with advanced pNET.

METHODS

Online databases of PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched systematically for clinical trials that reported the efficacy and safety of temozolomide in patients with advanced pNET. Random-effect model was utilized to estimate pooled rates of outcomes based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors criteria, biochemical response, and adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

A total of 14 studies, providing details of 441 individuals with advanced pNET, were included. The quantitative analyses showed a pooled objective response rate (ORR) of 41.2% (95% confidence interval, CI, of 32.4%-50.6%), disease control rate (DCR) of 85.3% (95% CI of 74.9%-91.9%), and a more than 50% decrease from baseline chromogranin A levels of 44.9% (95% CI of 31.6%-49.0%). Regarding safety, the results showed that the pooled rates of nonserious AEs and serious AEs were 93.8% (95% CI of 88.3%-96.8%) and 23.7% (95% CI of 12.0%-41.5%), respectively. The main severe AEs encompassed hematological toxicities.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, our meta-analysis suggests that treatment with temozolomide, either as a monotherapy or in combination with other anticancer treatments might be an effective and relatively safe option for patients with advanced locally unresectable and metastatic pNET. However, additional clinical trials are required to further strengthen these findings. This study has been registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023409280).

Selection of Chemotherapy in Advanced Poorly Differentiated Extra-Pulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma

Extra-pulmonary poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma is rare, and evidence for treatment has been limited. In this article, the evidence behind the cytotoxic chemotherapy choices used for metastatic or unresectable EP-PD-NEC is reviewed. In the first-line setting, etoposide and platinum chemotherapy or irinotecan and platinum have been demonstrated to be equivalent in a large phase III trial. Questions remain regarding the optimal number of cycles, mode of delivery, and the precise definition of platinum resistance in this setting. In the second-line setting, FOLFIRI has emerged as an option, with randomized phase 2 trials demonstrating modest, but significant, response rates. Beyond this, data are extremely limited, and several regimens have been used. Heterogeneity in biological behaviour is a major barrier to optimal EP-PD-NEC management. Available data support the potential role of the Ki-67 index as a predictive biomarker for chemotherapy response. A more personalised approach to management in future studies will be essential, and comprehensive multi-omic approaches are required to understand tumour somatic genetic changes in relation to their effects on the surrounding microenvironment.

Managing Metastatic Extrapulmonary Neuroendocrine Carcinoma After First-Line Treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EP-NEC) is a rare, aggressive malignancy that can arise from any organ and frequently presents with distant metastases. Advanced disease has a poor prognosis with median overall survival (OS) rarely exceeding 1 year even with systemic therapy. The management paradigm of advanced/metastatic EP-NEC has been extrapolated from small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and commonly consists of 1st line therapy with etoposide and platinum (cisplatin or carboplatin), followed by alternative cytotoxic regimens at the time of progression. Only a minority of patients are able to receive 2nd line therapy, and cytotoxics derived from the SCLC paradigm such as topotecan or lurbinectedin have very limited activity. We aimed to evaluate emerging therapeutic options in the 2nd and later lines and survey potential future developments in this space.

RECENT FINDINGS

After a long period of stagnation in treatment options and outcomes, more promising regimens are gradually being utilized in the 2nd line setting including systemic therapy combinations such as FOLFIRI, FOLFOX, modified FOLFIRINOX, CAPTEM, and, more recently, novel checkpoint inhibitors such as nivolumab and ipilimumab. Simultaneously, advances in the understanding of disease biology are helping to refine patient selection and identify commonalities between NEC and their sites of origin which may eventually lead to additional targeted therapy options. While many questions remain, contemporary developments give grounds for optimism that improved outcomes for EP-NEC will soon be within reach.

Lymphoproliferative disorder during temozolomide therapy; a representative case of a formidable complication and management challenges

BACKGROUND

Lymphoproliferative disorder represents a heterogeneous clinicopathological spectrum characterized by uncontrolled proliferation of lymphocytes. Immunodeficiency is a major trigger of its development. While induction of immunodeficiency is a well-known adverse effect of temozolomide therapy, development of lymphoproliferative disorder following temozolomide therapy has not previously been described.

CASE PRESENTATION

A patient with brainstem glioma developed constitutional symptoms, pancytopenia, splenomegaly and generalized lymphadenopathy during the 2nd cycle of maintenance therapy following induction therapy with temozolomide. Epstein-Barr virus-infected lymphocytes were observed histopathologically and "other iatrogenic immunodeficiency-associated lymphoproliferative disorder" (OIIA-LPD) was diagnosed. Although discontinuation of temozolomide led to rapid remission, relapse was observed 4 months later. CHOP chemotherapy was induced, resulting in secondary remission. Vigilant follow-up for another 14 months showed radiologically stable brainstem glioma and no further recurrence of OIIA-LPD.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report documenting OIIA-LPD during temozolomide administration. Timely diagnosis of the disease and discontinuation of the causative agent were considered to be the management of choice. Close monitoring for relapse should be continued. Finding a balance between glioma management and controlling the remission of OIIA-LPD remains to be clarified.

Gut microbiota mediated the individualized efficacy of Temozolomide via immunomodulation in glioma

BACKGROUND

Temozolomide (TMZ) is the preferred chemotherapy strategy for glioma therapy. As a second-generation alkylating agent, TMZ provides superior oral bio-availability. However, limited response rate (less than 50%) and high incidence of drug resistance seriously restricts TMZ's application, there still lack of strategies to increase the chemotherapy sensitivity.

METHODS

Luci-GL261 glioma orthotopic xenograft model combined bioluminescence imaging was utilized to evaluate the anti-tumor effect of TMZ and differentiate TMZ sensitive (S)/non-sensitive (NS) individuals. Integrated microbiomics and metabolomics analysis was applied to disentangle the involvement of gut bacteria in TMZ sensitivity. Spearman's correlation analysis was applied to test the association between fecal bacteria levels and pharmacodynamics indices. Antibiotics treatment combined TMZ treatment was used to confirm the involvement of gut microbiota in TMZ response. Flow cytometry analysis, ELISA and histopathology were used to explore the potential role of immunoregulation in gut microbiota mediated TMZ response.

RESULTS

Firstly, gut bacteria composition was significantly altered during glioma development and TMZ treatment. Meanwhile, in vivo anti-cancer evaluation suggested a remarkable difference in chemotherapy efficacy after TMZ administration. Moreover, 16s rRNA gene sequencing and non-targeted metabolomics analysis revealed distinct different gut microbiota and immune infiltrating state between TMZ sensitive and non-sensitive mice, while abundance of differential gut bacteria and related metabolites was significantly correlated with TMZ pharmacodynamics indices. Further verification suggested that gut microbiota deletion by antibiotics treatment could accelerate glioma development, attenuate TMZ efficacy and inhibit immune cells (macrophage and CD8α⁺ T cell) recruitment.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study confirmed the involvement of gut microbiota in glioma development and individualized TMZ efficacy via immunomodulation, hence gut bacteria may serve as a predictive biomarker as well as a therapeutic target for clinical TMZ application.

Future therapeutic strategies in the treatment of extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma: a review

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are rare malignancies arising most commonly in the gastrointestinal and bronchopulmonary systems. Neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs) are a subgroup of NENs characterised by aggressive tumour biology, poor differentiation and dismal prognosis. Most NEC primary lesions arise in the pulmonary system. However, a small proportion arise outside of the lung and are termed extrapulmonary (EP)-, poorly differentiated (PD)-NECs. Patients with local or locoregional disease may benefit from surgical excision; however, this is often not an option, due to late presentation. To date, treatment has mirrored that of small-cell lung cancer, with platinum-etoposide forming the basis of first-line treatment. There is a lack of consensus in relation to the most effective second-line treatment option. Low incidence, an absence of representative preclinical models and a lack of understanding of the tumour microenvironment all present challenges to drug development in this disease group. However, progress made in elucidating the mutational landscape of EP-PD-NEC and the observations made in several clinical trials are paving the way towards improving outcomes for these patients. The optimisation and strategic delivery of chemotherapeutic interventions according to tumour characteristics and the utilisation of targeted and immune therapies in clinical studies have yielded mixed results. Targeted therapies that complement specific genetic aberrations are under investigation, including AURKA inhibitors in those with MYCN amplifications, BRAF inhibitors in those with BRAFV600E mutations and EGFR suppression, and Ataxia Telangiectasia and Rad3-related inhibitors in patients with ATM mutations. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have conferred promising results in several clinical trials, particularly with dual ICIs and in combination with targeted therapy or chemotherapy. However, further prospective investigations are required to elucidate the impact of programmed cell death ligand 1 expression, tumour mutational burden and microsatellite instability on response. This review aims to explore the most recent developments in the treatment of EP-PD-NEC and contribute towards the requirement for clinical guidance founded on prospective evidence.

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma and pancreatic high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma: two sides of the moon

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma is the seventh leading cause of cancer death in the world and the most common type pf pancreatic cancer. Unfortunately, less than 20% of patients are surgically resectable and the great majority of cases are treated with palliative chemotherapy with unsatisfactory results. No targeted agents or personalized approaches have been validated in the last decades. On the other side, neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas are generally considered indolent tumours. However, high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma is a rare subtype of neuroendocrine neoplasm of the pancreas (accounting up to 10% of the neuroendocrine neoplasms of the pancreas), with particularly aggressive behaviour and poor prognosis. Even in this case, the treatment is represented by palliative chemotherapy with dismal results and no personalized therapies are available, so far. Notably, the quality of life of these patients is disappointingly low and the future perspectives of more personalized diagnostic and therapeutic strategies are scarce. In this review, we discuss relevant and current information on epidemiology, pathology, diagnosis, clinical presentation, treatment and ongoing clinical trials of these two entities, in order to illustrate the two sides of the moon.

Therapeutic strategies for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms: State-of-the-art and future perspectives

Although gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) have always been considered rare tumors, their incidence has risen over the past few decades. They represent a highly heterogeneous group of neoplasms with several prognostic factors, including disease stage, proliferative index (Ki67), and tumor differentiation. Most of these neoplasms express somatostatin receptors on the cell surface, a feature that has important implications in terms of prognosis, diagnosis, and therapy. Although International Guidelines propose algorithms aimed at guiding therapeutic strategies, GEP-NEN patients are still very different from one another, and the need for personalized treatment continues to increase. Radical surgery is always the best option when feasible; however, up to 80% of cases are metastatic upon diagnosis. Regarding medical treatments, as GEP-NENs are characterized by relatively long overall survival, multiple therapy lines are adopted during the lifetime of these patients, but the optimum sequence to be followed has never been clearly defined. Furthermore, although new molecular markers aimed at predicting the response to therapy, as well as prognostic scores, are currently being studied, their application is still far from being part of daily clinical practice. As they represent a complex disease, with therapeutic protocols that are not completely standardized, GEP-NENs require a multidisciplinary approach. This review will provide an overview of the available therapeutic options for GEP-NENs and attempts to clarify the possible approaches for the management of these patients and to discuss future perspectives in this field.

Chemotherapy in NEN: still has a role?

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) comprise a broad spectrum of tumors with widely variable biological and clinical behavior. Primary tumor site, extent of disease, tumor differentiation and expression of so matostatin receptors, proliferation and growth rates are the major prognostic factors that determine the therapeutic strategy. Treatment options for advanced disease have considerably expanded in recent years, particularly for well differentiated tumors (NETs). Novel drugs approved over the past decade in this context include somatostatin analogues and ¹⁷⁷Lu-oxodotreotide for somatostatin-receptor-positive gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) NETs, sunitinib for pancreatic NETs (P-NETs), and everolimus for P-NETs and non-functioning lung or gastrointestinal NETs. Nevertheless, chemotherapy remains an essential component of the treatment armamentarium of patients with NENs, particularly of patients with P-NETs or those with bulky, symptomatic or rapidly progressive tumors (generally G3 or high-G2 NENs). In this manuscript we will comprehensively review available evidence related to the use of chemotherapy in lung and GEP NENs and will critically discuss its role in the treatment algorithm of this family of neoplasms.

Phase II study of temozolomide monotherapy in patients with extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma

Extrapulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (EPNEC) is a lethal disease with a poor prognosis. Platinum-based chemotherapy is used as the standard first-line treatment for unresectable EPNEC. Several retrospective studies have reported the results of the utilization of temozolomide (TMZ) as a drug for the second-line treatment for EPNEC. Patients with unresectable EPNEC that were resistant to platinum-based combination chemotherapy were recruited for a prospective phase II study of TMZ monotherapy. A 200 mg/m2 dose of TMZ was given from day 1 to day 5, every 4 weeks. Response rate (RR) was evaluated as the primary end-point. The presence of O6 -methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) in EPNEC patients was also evaluated as exploratory research. Thirteen patients were enrolled in this study. Primary lesions were pancreas (n = 3), stomach (n = 3), duodenum (n = 1), colon (n = 1), gallbladder (n = 1), liver (n = 1), uterus (n = 1), bladder (n = 1), and primary unknown (n = 1). Each case was defined as pathological poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma from surgically resected and/or biopsied specimens. The median Ki-67 labeling index was 60% (range, 22%-90%). The RR was 15.4%, progression-free survival was 1.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0-2.7), overall survival (OS) was 7.8 months (95% CI, 6.0-9.5), and OS from first-line treatment was 19.2 months (95% CI, 15.1-23.3). No grade 3 or 4 hematological toxicity had occurred and there was one case of grade 3 nausea. One case presented MGMT deficiency and this case showed partial response. Temozolomide monotherapy is a feasible, modestly effective, and safe treatment for patients with unresectable EPNEC following platinum-based chemotherapy, especially those with MGMT deficiency.