German S3-Guideline on the treatment of Psoriasis vulgaris, adapted from EuroGuiDerm - Part 1: Treatment goals and treatment recommendations

Discontinuation of Fumaric Acid Esters is Affected by Depressive Symptomatology: A Retrospective Analysis

Fumaric acid esters (FAEs) remain a widespread therapy option for moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, drug survival of FAEs is limited by adverse events (AEs) or inadequate treatment response. Depressive disturbances are highly prevalent in psoriasis patients and are hypothesized to be associated with the reporting of AEs and therapy discontinuation. This study's aim was to analyze whether psoriasis patients with comorbid depressive symptomatology are more likely to discontinue treatment with FAEs due to AEs and/or inadequate treatment response. Data were retrospectively extracted from the records of patients starting therapy with FAEs in the Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, Germany between 2017 and 2022, covering the first 52 weeks of treatment. Psoriasis severity and depressive symptomatology, as well as AEs and therapy discontinuation, were analyzed. Psoriasis patients (N = 95, 47.37% female) with depressive symptomatology (42.11%) were more likely to discontinue therapy due to patient-reported AEs, while the total number of reported AEs was not associated with depression. The results support the hypothesis that among psoriasis patients with depressive symptoms, the associated introspection and somatization may result in increased sensitivity for AEs and thus in quicker therapy discontinuation. In these patients, the occurrence of nocebo effects should be minimized, e.g. by special communication techniques.

Non-biologic immunosuppressive drugs for inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases

Non-biologic immunosuppressive drugs, such as azathioprine, dapsone or methotrexate are fundamental treatment options for a wide range of autoimmune and chronic inflammatory skin diseases. Some of these drugs were initially used for malignancies (e.g., azathioprine or methotrexate) or infectious diseases (e.g., hydroxychloroquine or dapsone) but are nowadays mostly used for their immunosuppressive/immunomodulating action. Although dermatologists have years of clinical experience with these drugs, some of the mechanisms of action are not fully understood and are the subject of research. Although these drugs are commonly used, lack of experience or knowledge regarding their safety profiles and management leads to skepticism among physicians. Here, we summarize the mechanism of action and detailed management of adverse effects of the most commonly used immunosuppressive drugs for skin diseases. Furthermore, we discuss the management of these drugs during pregnancy and breastfeeding, as well as their interaction and handling during vaccination.

Nicht-Biologika-Immunsuppressiva bei entzündlichen und autoimmunen Hautkrankheiten: Non-biologic immunosuppressive drugs for inflammatory and autoimmune skin diseases

Nicht‐Biologika‐Immunsuppressiva wie Azathioprin, Dapson oder Methotrexat sind grundlegende Behandlungsmöglichkeiten für ein breites Spektrum von Autoimmunerkrankungen und chronisch‐entzündlichen Hauterkrankungen. Einige dieser Medikamente wurden ursprünglich bei malignen Erkrankungen (zum Beispiel Azathioprin oder Methotrexat) oder Infektionskrankheiten (zum Beispiel Hydroxychloroquin oder Dapson) eingesetzt, werden aber heute hauptsächlich wegen ihrer immunsuppressiven/immunmodulierenden Wirkung verwendet. Obwohl Dermatologen über jahrelange klinische Erfahrung mit diesen Arzneimitteln verfügen, sind einige der Wirkmechanismen noch nicht vollständig geklärt und noch Gegenstand der Forschung. Obwohl diese Medikamente häufig eingesetzt werden, führen mangelnde Erfahrung oder fehlendes Wissen über ihre Sicherheitsprofile und ihr Management zu einer skeptischen Haltung bei den Ärzten. Hier fassen wir den Wirkmechanismus und das detaillierte Management der Nebenwirkungen der am häufigsten verwendeten immunsuppressiven Medikamente für Hautkrankheiten zusammen. Darüber hinaus diskutieren wir den Umgang mit diesen Medikamenten während der Schwangerschaft und Stillzeit sowie ihre Wechselwirkung und Handhabung im Zusammenhang mit Impfungen.

Bibliometric analysis and description of research trends on T cells in psoriasis over the past two decades (2003-2022)

Background

It is now understood that T cells play a key role in the occurrence and development of psoriasis. Herein, a bibliometric analysis was conducted to summarize the content and trends of T cell-related research in psoriasis.

Methods

A bibliometric analysis was conducted on publications pertaining to T cells in psoriasis between 2003 and 2022 retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database using tools such as CiteSpace, the Bibliometrix R package, and VOSviewer.

Results

The study included a total of 3595 articles authored by 14,188 individuals, including all coauthors in article bylines. The Laboratory for Investigative Dermatology at Rockefeller University, led by James G Krueger, has made significant contributions to this field through focusing on the pathogenesis of psoriasis and exploring the potential of using biological agents to treat psoriasis. Furthermore, targeted inhibitors have significantly impacted the treatment of psoriasis, with researchers focusing on small-molecule targeted drugs as a new area of research that could potentially replace biological agents.

Conclusions

Research has established the efficacy and long-term safety of targeted inhibition of T cell-related targets. Deucravacitinib, a psoriasis treatment drug targeting TYK2 as an allosteric inhibitor, has attracted significant attention and raised high expectations.

Entwicklung der Patientencharakteristika und der Wirksamkeit der Biologika-Therapie bei Patienten des Österreichischen Psoriasis-Registers von 2004 bis 2022

Hintergrund und Ziele

In dieser Studie wurde untersucht, inwieweit die Einführung wirksamerer Medikamente in jüngster Zeit zu einer Verbesserung der Behandlungsergebnisse von Psoriasis‐Patienten im klinischen Alltag geführt hat.

Patienten und Methodik

Es wurden Patientencharakteristika und die Wirksamkeit der Therapie im ersten Behandlungsjahr bei Biologika‐naiven Patienten von 2004 bis heute analysiert, unabhängig von Therapiewechseln.

Ergebnisse

Die Daten von 2729 Patienten eigneten sich für die Analyse. Der Anteil der weiblichen Patienten stieg über die Jahre signifikant von 29,9% auf 36,2% (p < 0,028), während der Anteil der Patienten mit einer Psoriasis‐Arthritis von 36,6% auf 30,0% sank (p < 0,001). Außerdem nahm die Dauer der Psoriasis‐Erkrankung und der PASI‐Wert zu Beginn der Behandlung in Verlauf der Zeit signifikant ab. Die „letzte Beobachtung übernommen“ (LOCF)‐Analyse zeigte, dass das PASI‐90‐Ansprechen drei Monate nach Therapiebeginn von 18,9% auf 44,6% und 12 Monate nach Therapiebeginn von 32,9% auf 66,8% anstieg. Ebenso stiegen die PASI<3 Befunde von 33,2% auf 66,0% 3 Monate und von 41,9% auf 78,9% 12 Monate nach Behandlungsbeginn.

Schlussfolgerungen

Die kontinuierliche Einführung wirksamerer Biologika hat zu einer deutlichen Verbesserung des klinischen Ansprechens und der Patientenversorgung geführt. Dennoch erreicht auch heute noch, je nach gewähltem Endpunkt, jeder dritte bis fünfte Patient kein vollständig zufriedenstellendes Behandlungsergebnis (d.h. PASI 90 oder PASI ≤ 3).

Evolution of characteristics and biologic treatment effectiveness in patients of the Austrian psoriasis registry from 2004-2022

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study analyzed the extent to which the recent introduction of more effective treatments has led to an improvement in real-world psoriasis patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patient characteristics and the first-year treatment effectiveness in biologic-naive patients have been analyzed since 2004 until now, irrespective of treatment switches.

RESULTS

Data from 2,729 patients were eligible for this analysis. The proportion of female patients increased significantly over the years from 29.9% to 36.2% (p < 0.028), while the number of patients with psoriatic arthritis declined from 36.6% to 30.0% (p < 0.001). Moreover, the duration of psoriatic disease and PASI at the start of the treatment significantly decreased. Last observation carrief forward (LOCF) analysis indicated that PASI 90 response increased from 18.9 to 44.6% at 3 months and from 32.9 to 66.8% at 12 months after treatment started. Similary, the PASI ≤ 3 rates increased from 33.2% to 66.0% at 3 months and from 41.9% to 78.9% at 12 months after the treatment started.

CONCLUSIONS

The continuous introduction of more efficient biologics has led to significant improvements in patient care and clinical outcomes. Though one out of three to five patients, depending on the endpoint selected, nowadays still does not achieve an entirely satisfactory treatment response (i.e., PASI 90 or PASI ≤ 3).

Topical treatment of psoriasis vulgaris

Topical therapy plays an important role in the treatment of psoriasis. It is the gold standard in mild psoriasis cases and is also recommended in addition to UV and systemic therapy in cases of moderate to severe psoriasis. In this overview article we summarize the current therapeutic options, taking into account special localizations (scalp, facial, intertriginous/genital, or palmoplantar lesions) and situations (hyperkeratotic or inflammatory forms), as well as the therapy options during pregnancy and breastfeeding. In the initial phase, the combination of topical corticosteroids and vitamin D analogues has proven to be the therapy of choice, as well as monotherapy in each case. In maintenance therapy, fixed combination therapy is recommended once or twice a week. In addition to the right choice of active substances, the choice of the right formulation also plays an important role. To increase adherence, it is very important to consider the personal preferences and experiences of the patient. If topical therapy does not lead to a satisfactory result, additional UV therapy or systemic therapy should be considered.

COVID-19 vaccination in psoriasis patients receiving systemic treatment: A prospective single-center study

Background

The rate of seroconversion after COVID-19 vaccination in patients with moderate to severe psoriasis requiring systemic treatment is poorly understood.

Objectives

The aim of this prospective single-center cohort study performed between May 2020 and October 2021 was to determine the rate of seroconversion after COVID-19 vaccination in patients under active systemic treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis.

Methods

Inclusion criteria were systemic treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis, known COVID-19 vaccination status, and repetitive anti-SARS-CoV-2-S IgG serum quantification. The primary outcome was the rate of anti-SARS-CoV-2-S IgG seroconversion after complete COVID-19 vaccination.

Results

77 patients with a median age of 55.9 years undergoing systemic treatment for moderate to severe psoriasis were included. The majority of patients received interleukin- (n=50, 64.9%) or tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α inhibitors (n=16, 20.8%) as systemic treatment for psoriasis; nine patients (11.7%) were treated with methotrexate (MTX) monotherapy, and one patient each received dimethyl fumarate (1.3%), respectively apremilast (1.3%). All included patients completed COVID-19 vaccination with two doses over the course of the study. Serum testing revealed that 74 patients (96.1%) showed an anti-SARS-CoV-2-S IgG seroconversion. While all patients on IL-17A, -12 or -12/23 inhibitors (n=50) achieved seroconversion, three of 16 patients (18.8%) receiving MTX and/or a TNF-α inhibitor as main anti-psoriatic treatment did not. At follow-up, none of the patients had developed symptomatic COVID-19 or died from COVID-19.

Conclusions

Anti-SARS-CoV-2-S IgG seroconversion rates following COVID-19 vaccination in psoriasis patients under systemic treatment were high. An impaired serological response, however, was observed in patients receiving MTX and/or TNF-α inhibitors, in particular infliximab.

Eczematized psoriasis - a frequent but often neglected variant of plaque psoriasis

Psoriasis is a common chronic inflammatory skin disease that causes systemic inflammation and severely impacts the patient's quality of life. Several highly effective therapeutics for psoriasis have been approved in recent years. However, in real life, a high proportion of patients either do not experience the clinical improvement observed in clinical trials or develop a secondary loss of efficacy. This may be a result of unrecognized endotypes of psoriasis that need to be characterized in greater depth to enable selection of an appropriate therapy. Eczematized psoriasis, which occurs in approximately 5-10% of patients with psoriasis, is an often-neglected variant of psoriasis. The term "eczematized psoriasis" refers to patients developing psoriasis with similarities to eczema. These patients typically present with severe itching, and skin biopsies often reveal eosinophil granulocytes, serum crusts, or spongiosis, which are frequently observed in eczema. From an immunological perspective, additional signaling pathways that are responsible for eczema reactions might be activated in eczematized psoriasis compared to classical plaque psoriasis. This review summarizes the key clinical, histological, and immunological features of eczematized psoriasis, proposes diagnostic criteria, and evaluates the therapeutic options for eczematized psoriasis.

Pathogenesis-oriented therapy of psoriasis using biologics

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is currently regarded an immune-mediated inflammatory disease. The central pathogenic axis comprises interleukin-23, TH17-lymphocytes differentiating under its influence, and interleukin-17A as a key effector cytokine of these T-lymphocytes. All of these can selectively be targeted using biological therapies, thus potentially increasing efficacy and reducing adverse events when compared to conventional systemic therapeutics.

AREAS COVERED

We review the current concept of psoriasis as an immune-mediated inflammatory disease, assessing the evidence for a role of elements of the innate and adaptive immune system. We then correlate the pharmacological effects of biologics in psoriasis in light of the known physiologic as well as pathophysiological role of the respective targets. This is done on the basis of an extensive literature search of publications since 2018 which describe the role of the above-mentioned elements in health and disease or the effects of blocking these as an attempt to treat psoriasis.

EXPERT OPINION

Biologics targeting the above-mentioned central pathogenic axis provide a particularly effective and safe way to treat psoriasis. Given the impact of comorbidities on therapeutic decision-making, and the efficacy of some biologics also on certain comorbidities, these drugs represent a first step toward personalized medicine in the management of psoriasis.

Methotrexate Dosing Regimen for Plaque-type Psoriasis: An Update of a Systematic Review

Background Methotrexate (MTX) is a systemic treatment for plaque-type psoriasis. At the time of approval, no dose-ranging studies were performed. Nowadays, a uniform dosing regimen is lacking. This might contribute to suboptimal treatment with the drug.Objective To summarize the literature involving the MTX dosing regimens in psoriasis patients.Methods In this SR, RCTs and documents with aggregated evidence (AgEv) on the MTX dosing regimen in psoriasis were summarized. All randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which oral, subcutaneous or intramuscular MTX was used in patients with psoriasis and AgEv, were included. The MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL databases were searched up to June 20, 2022. This SR was registered in PROSPERO.Results Thirty-nine RCTs had a high risk of bias. Test dosages were given in only 3 RCTs. In the RCTs, MTX was usually prescribed in a start dose of 7.5 mg/week (n = 13). MTX was mostly given in a start dose of 15 mg/week, in the AgEv (n = 5). One guideline recommended a test dose, in other aggregated evidence a test dose was not mentioned or even discouraged.Conclusions There is a lack of high-quality evidence and available data for dosing MTX in psoriasis is heterogeneous.

Unmet Medical Needs in Chronic, Non-communicable Inflammatory Skin Diseases

An estimated 20-25% of the population is affected by chronic, non-communicable inflammatory skin diseases. Chronic skin inflammation has many causes. Among the most frequent chronic inflammatory skin diseases are atopic dermatitis, psoriasis, urticaria, lichen planus, and hidradenitis suppurativa, driven by a complex interplay of genetics and environmental factors. Autoimmunity is another important cause of chronic skin inflammation. The autoimmune response may be mainly T cell driven, such as in alopecia areata or vitiligo, or B cell driven in chronic spontaneous urticaria, pemphigus and pemphigoid diseases. Rare causes of chronic skin inflammation are autoinflammatory diseases, or rheumatic diseases, such as cutaneous lupus erythematosus or dermatomyositis. Whilst we have seen a significant improvement in diagnosis and treatment, several challenges remain. Especially for rarer causes of chronic skin inflammation, early diagnosis is often missed because of low awareness and lack of diagnostics. Systemic immunosuppression is the treatment of choice for almost all of these diseases. Adverse events due to immunosuppression, insufficient therapeutic responses and relapses remain a challenge. For atopic dermatitis and psoriasis, a broad spectrum of innovative treatments has been developed. However, treatment responses cannot be predicted so far. Hence, development of (bio)markers allowing selection of specific medications for individual patients is needed. Given the encouraging developments during the past years, we envision that many of these challenges in the diagnosis and treatment of chronic inflammatory skin diseases will be thoroughly addressed in the future.

The Inflammatory Factor SNP May Serve as a Promising Biomarker for Acitretin to Alleviate Secondary Failure of Response to TNF-a Monoclonal Antibodies in Psoriasis

Psoriasis is a common immune-mediated inflammatory skin disease. Although biological agents have achieved good clinical efficacy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, the phenomenon of secondary non-response (SNR) has been gradually recognized. SNR refers to the gradual decline of efficacy after the patient achieves clinical remission with biological agents such as TNF-α biologics. Acitretin, as an immunomodulatory systemic drug for psoriasis, can improve the SNR to biological agents with good tolerance, but there are still individual differences in efficacy. Single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of many related inflammatory cytokines have been shown to be important factors of individual differences in drug response in psoriasis, but there have been few reports on the use of pharmacogenomics to alleviate the SNR to biological agents. This study recruited 43 patients with psoriasis and 24 normal controls to investigate whether SNPs of inflammatory cytokines could be used as biomarkers for acitretin to alleviate SNR to TNF-α biologics in psoriasis, including rs1800795 (IL-6), rs6887695 (IL-12b), rs3212227 (IL-12b), rs10484879 (IL-17a), rs4819554 (IL-17ra), rs763780 (IL-17F), rs11209032 (IL23R), rs11209026 (IL23R), and rs2201841 (IL23R). The study also analyzed the correlation between the abovementioned SNPs and the efficacy of acitretin-only patients so as to understand whether the improvement is attributable to the intervention of acitretin on SNR or a simple response of acitretin. We found that in patients with homozygous AA (χ2 = 6.577, p = 0.02) at the SNP rs112009032 (IL-23R), acitretin could improve the SNR to TNFα monoclonal antibody. Patients with the genotype of TG (χ2 = 6.124, p = 0.035) at rs3212227 (IL-12B) were more sensitive to using acitretin in the treatment of psoriasis. Rs3212227 (χ2 = 7.664, p = 0.022) was also associated with the susceptibility to psoriasis. The study might provide a clinical decision reference for personalized treatment of secondary loss of response to psoriasis biologics.

General and Skin-Specific Health-Related Quality of Life in Patients With Atopic Dermatitis Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic

BACKGROUND

Few studies have investigated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) during the COVID-19 pandemic.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to compare HRQoL in adult AD patients before and during the pandemic and to assess measurement performance of 4 HRQoL measures.

METHODS

Between 2018 and 2021, a multicenter, cross-sectional survey was conducted, involving 218 adult AD patients. Health-related quality of life outcomes included the EQ-5D-5L, Skindex-16, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and DLQI-Relevant (DLQI-R). Severity was measured using objective SCORing Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema Area and Severity Index, and Investigator Global Assessment.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD EQ-5D-5L utility, Skindex-16, DLQI, and DLQI-R scores were 0.82 ± 0.22, 56.84 ± 27.46, 13.44 ± 8.46, and 13.76 ± 8.60, respectively. The patients reported more problems during the pandemic (P < 0.05) regarding pain/discomfort (odds ratio [OR], 1.78), worrying (OR, 1.89), concerns about persistence/reoccurrence of disease (OR, 1.88), and social relationships (OR, 1.69). The HRQoL outcomes showed strong correlations with each other (range of rs, |0.69| to |0.99|). The Skindex-16, DLQI, and DLQI-R were able to discriminate between severity groups with large (η2 = 0.20-0.23), whereas the EQ-5D-5L with moderate effect sizes (η2 = 0.08-0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Atopic dermatitis patients experienced significantly more problems in some areas of HRQoL during the pandemic. The EQ-5D-5L, Skindex-16, DLQI, and DLQI-R demonstrated good convergent and known-group validity and can be suitable instruments for HRQoL assessment in clinical and research settings.

Vergleich der fraktionierten laserunterstützten Medikamentengabe und der intraläsionalen Injektion von Triamcinolonacetonid bei Nagelpsoriasis

HINTERGRUND UND ZIELE

Die Behandlung der Nagelpsoriasis ist wegen mangelnder Penetration topischer Therapeutika durch die Nagelplatte häufig unbefriedigend. Daher sind innovative Methoden zur adäquaten Verabreichung des Arzneimittels in den Nagel erforderlich. In dieser Studie vergleichen wir die Wirksamkeit der intraläsionalen Corticosteroid-Injektion mit topischer Applikation nach fraktionierter CO₂ -Laser-Behandlung bei Fingernagelpsoriasis.

PATIENTEN UND METHODEN

In der Studie wurden 36 Patienten mit Fingernagelpsoriasis in zwei Gruppen eingeteilt. Bei Gruppe A wurden die Nägel mit intraläsionalen Injektionen von Triamcinolon behandelt, in Gruppe B durch fraktionierte CO₂ -Lasertherapie, gefolgt von topischer Applikation des Arzneimittels in sechs Sitzungen. Die Beurteilung erfolgte anhand des NAPSI und eines dermatoskopischen Scores.

ERGEBNISSE

Beide Modalitäten führten zu signifikanter Besserung der Psoriasis an Nagelmatrix und Nagelbett. Statistisch signifikante Unterschiede zwischen den Gruppen bestanden weder klinisch noch dermatoskopisch. Die Laserbehandlung war mit signifikant geringeren Schmerz-Scores (P = 0,03) und höherer Patientenzufriedenheit (P = 0,007) verbunden.

SCHLUSSFOLGERUNGEN

Die fraktionierte CO₂ -Laser-unterstützte Applikation topischer Steroide könnte eine effektive und gut verträgliche Therapie der Nagelpsoriasis sein, die eine der intraläsionalen Injektion vergleichbare Wirksamkeit hat.

Hepatitis Virus Reactivation in Patients with Psoriasis Treated with Secukinumab in a Real-World Setting of Hepatitis B or Hepatitis C Infection

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Biologics for psoriasis, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor-α therapies, may reactivate hepatitis B virus (HBV) or hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections, as well in inactive carriers or patients with occult infection. However, some biologics, including anti-interleukin-17 therapies such as secukinumab, seem to be less likely to cause hepatitis reactivation. This study assessed the safety of secukinumab treatment in patients with psoriasis with HBV or HBC infection.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with secukinumab at seven Italian centers. Patients serologically positive for one or more of the following viral hepatitis markers were included: HCV antibody (± HCV-RNA positivity) and/or hepatitis B surface antigen, and/or HBV core antibody and/or HBV surface antibody (± HBV-DNA positivity). Patients received secukinumab 300 mg subcutaneously at week 0/1/2/3/4 then every 4 weeks; prophylactic therapy before starting secukinumab was prescribed where indicated. The primary study endpoint was the reactivation of hepatitis viral infection, defined as conversion to HBV-DNA or HCV-RNA positivity, with or without elevation of transaminases.

RESULTS

Sixty patients (17 with concomitant psoriatic arthritis) were included. Thirteen subjects were hepatitis B surface antigen positive, 19 were HBV core antibody positive, and 30 were positive for the HCV antibody; however, all were HCV-RNA negative. After 53.5 ± 37.5 weeks of secukinumab therapy, hepatitis reactivation occurred in only one patient, who had a reactivation of both hepatitis B and hepatitis C. This patient had not undergone hepatitis B prophylaxis or hepatitis C treatment before secukinumab.

CONCLUSIONS

These real-world data support the safety of secukinumab in patients with positive markers of HBV or HCV infection, when administered together with dedicated prophylaxis.

Comparison of fractional laser-assisted drug delivery and intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide in nail psoriasis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

The treatment of nail psoriasis is often unsatisfactory due to poor penetration of topical therapeutics through the nail plate. The development of innovative methods that provide adequate delivery of the drug into the nail is warranted. In this study, we aim to compare the efficacy of intralesional corticosteroid injection versus its topical application after fractional CO₂ laser in the treatment of fingernail psoriasis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 36 patients with fingernail psoriasis divided into two groups. The nails in group A were treated with intralesional injection of triamcinolone acetonide while the nails in group B received fractional CO₂ laser therapy followed by topical application of the drug for six sessions. The evaluation was performed using NAPSI and dermatoscopic scores.

RESULTS

Both modalities yielded a significant improvement of the nail matrix and bed psoriatic signs. No statistically significant difference was found between the two groups by both clinical and dermatoscopic assessment. The laser treatment was associated with significantly lower pain scores (P = 0.03) and higher patient satisfaction (P = 0.007).

CONCLUSIONS

Fractional CO₂ laser-assisted delivery of topical corticosteroids can be a potentially effective and well-tolerated therapeutic modality in the treatment of nail psoriasis with comparable efficacy to intralesional injection.

A brief screening tool for depression in psoriasis patients: The Two Questions Test in clinical practice

Patients suffering from chronic inflammatory diseases such as psoriasis are prone to develop depressive symptoms. However, within the time constraints of dermatological clinics, depressive symptoms in psoriasis patients are often overlooked and thus underdiagnosed. The Two Questions Test may serve as a quick screening tool for an initial assessment of depressive burden in these patients. We evaluated its usefulness in the clinical context analyzing the records of patients starting systemic treatment for psoriasis with a selective interleukin (IL)23- or IL17A-inhibitor. In a total sample of N = 139 patients, baseline Two Questions Test scores were analyzed together with measures of psoriatic and psychiatric symptoms. In addition, the development of the Two Questions Test scores over the course of the first 28 weeks of treatment was assessed. No association was found between the Two Questions Test scores and skin symptoms measured by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index and the visibility of skin lesions. However, skin related quality of life analyzed with the Dermatology Life Quality Index was associated with the Two Questions Test scores. In addition, the longitudinal analysis revealed improvement in Two Questions Test outcomes over the course of patients' treatment. These results indicate the Two Questions Test's usefulness both as an initial screening tool of depressive symptoms, as well as in its use as a sensitive tool for the repeated assessment of depressive symptoms in psoriasis patients.

Anti-Psoriatic Effects of Antimony Compounds In Vitro

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by hyperproliferation of keratinocytes and a pro-inflammatory milieu in the skin. While patients with moderate to severe psoriasis are treated using targeted therapies (small molecules and monoclonal antibodies), patients suffering from milder forms are still in need of effective topical products without adverse effects. Antimony compounds (ACs) are regularly used as anti-inflammatory compounds in traditional and anthroposophic medicine and as antiprotozoan drugs. Here, we examined the effect of metallic antimony, natural antimony(III) sulfide and potassium antimonyl(III) tartrate in vitro on psoriasis-like keratinocytes and the human dendritic cell line THP-1 using qPCR, immunocytochemistry, ELISA and flow cytometry. In psoriatic keratinocytes, ACs inhibited the overexpression of the antimicrobial peptide β-defensin 2 and glucose transporter 1, as well as the hyperproliferation marker keratin 17. Furthermore, ACs mediated anti-inflammatory effects by reducing nuclear translocation of the p65 subunit of NF-κB and pSTAT3 and inhibited pro-inflammatory cytokine secretion by keratinocytes. In addition, ACs displayed anti-psoriatic effects by reducing the activation of IFN-α-treated THP-1 cells as well as the expression of the psoriasis-promoting master cytokine IL-23 by these cells. While all ACs showed anti-psoriatic effects, the most prominent results were seen with potassium antimonyl(III) tartrate. In summary, ACs display numerous anti-psoriatic effects in vitro at subtoxic concentrations. We conclude that ACs are interesting compounds for the topical treatment of psoriasis that warrant further investigation in clinical studies.

Expectation-induced enhancement of pain, itch and quality of life in psoriasis patients: study protocol of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Experimental and clinical data demonstrate that skin diseases like psoriasis are affected by psychological factors and can be modulated by interventions other than conventional drug therapy. The expectation of patients towards the benefit of a forthcoming treatment as well as treatment pre-experiences have been demonstrated as crucial factors mediating placebo responses in inflammatory skin diseases. However, it is unknown whether and to what extent treatment outcomes of psoriasis patients under therapy with monoclonal antibodies like secukinumab can be experimentally modulated at subjective and physiological levels by modifying the expectation of patients via verbal instruction or prior experience.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Treatment expectations will be modulated in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis undergoing treatment with the anti-interleukin-17A monoclonal antibody secukinumab. Patients with a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) >12 will be randomly allocated to one of three groups (N=40 each). As a standard schedule, patients in the pharmacological control group (group 1) will be treated weekly with 300 mg secukinumab, while patients in groups 2 and 3 will receive only 75 mg secukinumab (75% dose reduction) during all treatment weeks. In addition to the injections, patients in group 3 will ingest a novel tasting drink, with a cover story explaining that previous studies showed additional beneficial effects of this combination (drug and drink). Patients will be assessed and treated at nine visits over a 16-week period, during which the severity of pain and itch symptoms, skin lesions and quality of life will be analysed with standardised questionnaires and the PASI.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Ethics committee of the Medical Faculty of the University Duisburg-Essen. Study outcomes will be published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.