Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Associated Central Nervous System Autoimmunity

Central nervous system adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may trigger immune-related adverse events which rarely affect the central nervous system (CNS-irAEs). Over the past few years, cumulative data have led to the characterization of well defined syndromes with distinct cancer and antibody associations as well as different outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The most frequent CNS-irAE is encephalitis, which includes three main groups: meningoencephalitis, a nonfocal syndrome usually responsive to corticosteroids; limbic encephalitis, associated with high-risk paraneoplastic neurological syndromes (PNS) antibodies (e.g. anti-Hu, anti-Ma2) and neuroendocrine cancers, characterized by poor treatment response and outcomes; and cerebellar ataxia, with variable outcomes (worse when high-risk PNS antibodies are detected). Additionally, a diffuse encephalopathy without inflammatory findings, with poor response to corticosteroids and high mortality has been described. The spectrum of CNS-irAEs also includes meningitis, myelitis, and rarer presentations. A subset of CNS-irAEs (i.e. limbic encephalitis and/or rapidly progressive cerebellar ataxia) is undistinguishable from ICI-naïve PNS.

SUMMARY

The clinical and outcomes diversity of CNS-irAEs suggests different pathogenic mechanisms, which need to be understood to establish more effective and specific treatment modalities. It is crucial to identify biomarkers able to predict which patients will experience severe CNS-irAEs, to anticipate their diagnosis, and to predict long-term outcomes.

Autoimmune Movement Disorders Complicating Treatment with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) may trigger autoimmune neurological conditions, including movement disorders (MD).

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to characterize MDs occurring as immune-related adverse events (irAEs) of ICIs.

METHODS

A systematic literature review of case reports/series of MDs as irAEs of ICIs was performed.

RESULTS

Of 5682 eligible papers, 26 articles with 28 patients were included. MDs occur as a rare complication of cancer immunotherapy with heterogeneous clinical presentations and in most cases in association with other irAEs. Inflammatory basal ganglia T2/fluid attenuated inversion recovery abnormalities are rarely observed, but brain imaging is frequently unrevealing. Cerebrospinal fluid findings are frequently suggestive of inflammation. Half of cases are associated with a wide range of autoantibodies. Steroids and ICI withdrawal usually lead to improvement, even though some patients experienced relapses or a severe clinical course.

CONCLUSION

MDs are a rare complication of ICIs that should be promptly recognized to offer patients a correct diagnosis and treatment.

Paraneoplastic Calmodulin Kinase-Like Vesicle-Associated Protein (CAMKV) Autoimmune Encephalitis

OBJECTIVES

To report an autoimmune paraneoplastic encephalitis characterized by immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody targeting synaptic protein calmodulin kinase-like vesicle-associated (CAMKV).

METHODS

Serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples harboring unclassified antibodies on murine brain-based indirect immunofluorescence assay (IFA) were screened by human protein microarray. In 5 patients with identical cerebral IFA staining, CAMKV was identified as top-ranking candidate antigen. Western blots, confocal microscopy, immune-absorption, and mass spectrometry were performed to substantiate CAMKV specificity. Recombinant CAMKV-specific assays (cell-based [fixed and live] and Western blot) provided additional confirmation.

RESULTS

Of 5 CAMKV-IgG positive patients, 3 were women (median symptom-onset age was 59 years; range, 53-74). Encephalitis-onset was subacute (4) or acute (1) and manifested with: altered mental status (all), seizures (4), hyperkinetic movements (4), psychiatric features (3), memory loss (2), and insomnia (2). Paraclinical testing revealed CSF lymphocytic pleocytosis (all 4 tested), electrographic seizures (3 of 4 tested), and striking MRI abnormalities in all (mesial temporal lobe T2 hyperintensities [all patients], caudate head T2 hyperintensities [3], and cortical diffusion weighted hyperintensities [2]). None had post-gadolinium enhancement. Cancers were uterine adenocarcinoma (3 patients: poorly differentiated or neuroendocrine-differentiated in 2, both demonstrated CAMKV immunoreactivity), bladder urothelial carcinoma (1), and non-Hodgkin lymphoma (1). Two patients developed encephalitis following immune checkpoint inhibitor cancer therapy (atezolizumab [1], pembrolizumab [1]). All treated patients (4) demonstrated an initial response to immunotherapy (corticosteroids [4], IVIG [2]), though 3 died from cancer.

INTERPRETATION

CAMKV-IgG is a biomarker of immunotherapy-responsive paraneoplastic encephalitis with temporal and extratemporal features and uterine cancer as a prominent oncologic association. ANN NEUROL 2024.

Immune-Related Adverse Events Due to Cancer Immunotherapy: Immune Mechanisms and Clinical Manifestations

The landscape of cancer treatment has undergone a significant transformation with the introduction of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs). Patients undergoing these treatments often report prolonged clinical and radiological responses, albeit with a potential risk of developing immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Here, we reviewed and discussed the mechanisms of action of ICIs and their pivotal role in regulating the immune system to enhance the anti-tumor immune response. We scrutinized the intricate pathogenic mechanisms responsible for irAEs, arising from the evasion of self-tolerance checkpoints due to drug-induced immune modulation. We also summarized the main clinical manifestations due to irAEs categorized by organ types, detailing their incidence and associated risk factors. The occurrence of irAEs is more frequent when ICIs are combined; with neurological, cardiovascular, hematological, and rheumatic irAEs more commonly linked to PD1/PD-L1 inhibitors and cutaneous and gastrointestinal irAEs more prevalent with CTLA4 inhibitors. Due to the often-nonspecific signs and symptoms, the diagnosis of irAEs (especially for those rare ones) can be challenging. The differential with primary autoimmune disorders becomes sometimes intricate, given the clinical and pathophysiological similarities. In conclusion, considering the escalating use of ICIs, this area of research necessitates additional clinical studies and practical insights, especially the development of biomarkers for predicting immune toxicities. In addition, there is a need for heightened education for both clinicians and patients to enhance understanding and awareness.

Neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors and the development of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes

Immune checkpoint inhibitors, a class of oncological treatments that enhance antitumour immunity, can trigger neurological adverse events closely resembling paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Unlike other neurological adverse events caused by these drugs, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes predominantly affect the CNS and are associated with neural antibodies and cancer types commonly found also in spontaneous paraneoplastic neurological syndromes. Furthermore, post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes have poorer neurological outcomes than other neurological adverse events of immune checkpoint inhibitors. Early diagnosis and initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are likely to be crucial in preventing the accumulation of neurological disability. Importantly, the neural antibodies found in patients with post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes are sometimes detected before treatment, indicating that these antibodies might help to predict the development of neurological adverse events. Experimental and clinical evidence suggests that post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes probably share immunological features with spontaneous paraneoplastic syndromes. Hence, the study of post-immune checkpoint inhibitor paraneoplastic neurological syndromes can help in deciphering the immunopathogenesis of paraneoplastic neurological syndromes and in identifying novel therapeutic targets.

Effects of High Efficacy Multiple Sclerosis Disease Modifying Drugs on the Immune Synapse: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Co-signaling and adhesion molecules are important elements for creating immune synapses between T lymphocytes and antigen-presenting cells; they positively or negatively regulate the interaction between a T cell receptor with its cognate antigen, presented by the major histocompatibility complex.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review on the effects of High Efficacy Disease Modifying Drugs (HEDMDs) for Multiple Sclerosis (MS) on the co-signaling and adhesion molecules that form the immune synapse.

METHODS

We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE, and other sources to identify clinical or preclinical reports on the effects of HEDMDs on co-signaling and adhesion molecules that participate in the formation of immune synapses in patients with MS or other autoimmune disorders. We included reports on cladribine tablets, anti- CD20 monoclonal antibodies, S1P modulators, inhibitors of Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase, and natalizumab.

RESULTS

In 56 eligible reports among 7340 total publications, limited relevant evidence was uncovered. Not all co-signaling and adhesion molecules have been studied in relation to every HEDMD, with more data being available on the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (that affect CD80, CD86, GITR and TIGIT), cladribine tablets (affecting CD28, CD40, ICAM-1, LFA-1) and the S1P modulators (affecting CD86, ICAM-1 and LFA-1) and less on Natalizumab (affecting CD80, CD86, CD40, LFA-1, VLA-4) and Alemtuzumab (affecting GITR and CTLA-4).

CONCLUSION

The puzzle of HEDMD effects on the immune synapse is far from complete. The available evidence suggests that distinguishing differences exist between drugs and are worth pursuing further.