Use of Nakanuma staging and cytokeratin 7 staining for diagnosing recurrent primary biliary cholangitis after living-donor liver transplantation

Posttransplant immune-mediated cholangiopathies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver transplantation (LT) is the treatment of end-stage chronic liver diseases, mainly decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Biliary complications can be schematically classified into macroscopic versus microscopic lesions. Immune-related cholangiopathies include rejection, graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) and recurrence of pre-LT auto-immune biliary diseases, i.e. primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Here, we review the various types of posttransplant immune-related cholangiopathies, and discuss their clinical implications, especially diagnostic issues.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recurrence of PBC and PSC after LT is increasingly well described in large cohorts and long-term follow-up. In this setting, the preventive effect of ursodeoxycholic acid on PBC recurrence, as well as the deleterious role of tacrolimus are now well documented. In addition, the significant negative impact of recurrent PBC on survival after LT has recently been demonstrated. With respect to rejection-associated biliary injury, a growing body of evidence is emerging on the role of anti-HLA antibody-mediated rejection.

SUMMARY

Immune-mediated cholangiopathies occurring after LT can be divided in two main nosologic groups: biliary lesions due to recurrence of PBC or PSC, or in the context of rejection, either acute or chronic, T-cell- or antibody-mediated. GVHD is very rare. Final diagnosis is strongly based on clinical context (indication for LT, delay since transplantation, biological abnormalities, imaging) but also and to an even greater extent on biopsy of liver graft. Clinico-pathological discussions are recommended, hearing in mind that diseases can be intertwined.

Early histopathologic changes in primary biliary cholangitis: does 'minimal change' primary biliary cholangitis exist? A pathologist's view

Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC), formerly known as primary biliary cirrhosis, is an autoimmune, slowly progressive, cholestatic liver disease characterized by nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis, and interlobular bile duct destruction. Necroinflammatory activities of the hepatic parenchyma and limiting plates of milder form along with late liver fibrosis may develop. Serum liver tests include elevated serum alkaline phosphatase along with a positive antimitochondrial antibody (AMA) in nearly 95% of patients. Liver biopsies are an important confirmatory and staging tool and are additionally very helpful when AMA is negative. More specifically, the earliest changes in liver biopsy suspicious for PBC can be detected, namely loss of the canals of Hering (CoH), as proposed by various authors recently. CoH loss has been described as an early feature of PBC. We focus on early histologic features of PBC, investigating through the literature the possible role of 'minimal change' supporting the clinical diagnosis of PBC, even in the absence of characteristic granulomatous duct destructive lesions.

The ursodeoxycholic acid response score predicts pathological features in primary biliary cholangitis

AIM

The ursodeoxycholic acid response score (URS) can predict the biochemical response to 12 months of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) treatment in patients with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC). We investigated the relationship between the URS and the histopathological features before and after UDCA treatment.

METHODS

Patients with PBC (n = 126) were examined for the association between the probability of response (POR) to UDCA based on the URS formulas and clinicopathological features. Furthermore, 30 patients were examined for the association between the POR and pathological changes.

RESULTS

The POR area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for predicting the biochemical response to UDCA was 0.861. The PORs of stage 1 in the Nakanuma system and grade 0 in the CK7 grading in hepatocytes were significantly higher than those of stage 3 and grade 3, respectively. The AUROCs for the prediction of stage ≥2, stage ≥3 and stage 4 in the Nakanuma system at pretreatment were 0.592, 0.710 and 0.817, respectively. The AUROCs for the prediction of grade ≥1, grade ≥2 and grade 3 in the CK7 hepatocyte grading were 0.741, 0.824 and 0.970, respectively. Furthermore, the AUROC for predicting the histological stage progression after UDCA treatment in the Scheuer classification and the Nakanuma system were 0.712 and 0.799, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The URS not only predicts the biochemical response, but also reflects the Nakanuma system and the CK7 hepatocyte grading at pretreatment. This scoring system can identify an inadequate histological response to UDCA treatment in the Scheuer classification and the Nakanuma system.