Effect of prior treatment with different statins on stroke severity and functional outcome at discharge in patients with acute ischemic stroke

Prestroke statin use enhances collateralization in acute ischemic stroke patients

BACKGROUND

Statin therapy has been shown to be effective in the prevention of ischemic stroke. In addition, recent studies have suggested that prior statin therapy could lower the initial stroke severity and improve stroke functional outcomes in the event of stroke. It was speculated that prestroke statin use may enhance collateral circulation and result in favorable functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to investigate the association of prestroke statin use with leptomeningeal collaterals and to determine the association of prestroke statin use with stroke severity and functional outcome in acute ischemic stroke patients.

METHODS

We prospectively and consecutively enrolled 239 acute ischemic stroke patients with acute infarction due to occlusion of the middle cerebral artery within 24 h in the neurology department of West China Hospital from May 2011 to April 2017. Computed tomographic angiography (CTA) imaging was performed for all patients to detect middle cerebral artery thrombus; regional leptomeningeal collateral score (rLMCS) was used to assess the degree of collateral circulation; the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) was used to measure stroke severity at admission; the modified Rankin scale (mRS) was used to measure outcome at 90 days; and premorbid medications were recorded. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 239 patients met the inclusion criteria. Fifty-four patients used statins, and 185 did not use statins before stroke onset. Prestroke statin use was independently associated with good collateral circulation (rLMCS > 10) (odds ratio [OR], 4.786; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.195-19.171; P = 0.027). Prestroke statin use was not independently associated with lower stroke severity (NIHSS score≤14) (OR, 1.955; 95% CI, 0.657-5.816; p = 0.228), but prestroke statin use was independently associated with favorable outcome (mRS score≤2) (OR, 3.868; 95% CI, 1.325-11.289; P = 0.013).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that prestroke statin use was associated with good leptomeningeal collaterals and clinical outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients presenting with occlusion of the middle cerebral artery. However, clinical studies should be conducted to verify this claim.

Low-dose statin pretreatment reduces stroke severity and improves functional outcomes

OBJECTIVES

Pre-stroke statin use reduces stroke severity and improves functional outcomes; however, whether low-dose statins as a primary preventive measure have similar effects on the Chinese population remains unclear.

METHODS

Consecutive cases of ischaemic stroke between May 2011 and January 2017 were retrospectively analysed. The primary endpoints were stroke severity on admission and functional outcomes at 90 days. The secondary endpoints were factors related to lower stroke severity on admission. Propensity score matching and logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Of the 1878 patients, 6.4% and 23.8% were pre-stroke statin users before and after propensity matching, respectively, reducing the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score on admission from 5 (2-9) to 3 (2-4) (P < 0.001). Patients receiving pretreatment with low-dose statins tended to have a better mRS distribution (median mRS score 2 [1-3] vs. 3 [2-4], P = 0.007) and a higher likelihood of favourable functional outcomes (FFOs) at 90 days (61 [65.6%] vs. 151 [50.8%], P = 0.005). The logistic regression analysis showed that low-dose statins taken before stroke (odds ratio [OR] = 0.15, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.08-0.27, P < 0.001) and being male (OR = 0.81, 95% CI = 0.66-0.99, P = 0.035) were related to a lower stroke severity on admission but not among patients with atrial fibrillation (OR = 1.65, 95% CI = 1.12-2.44, P = 0.012) or elevated white blood cell (WBC) counts (OR = 1.12, 95% CI = 1.08-1.17, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with low-dose statins reduced initial stroke severity, improved functional outcomes at 90 days and was independently associated with a lower stroke severity on admission among Chinese patients.

Comparative effects of more versus less aggressive treatment with statins on the long-term outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There are no studies that compared the effects of different intensities of statin treatment on the long-term outcome of patients with recent ischemic stroke. We aimed to evaluate these effects.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 436 consecutive patients who were discharged after acute ischemic stroke (39.2% males, age 78.6 ± 6.7 years). Statin treatment was categorized in equipotent doses of atorvastatin. One year after discharge, the functional status was assessed with the modified Rankin scale (mRS). Adverse outcome was defined as mRS between 2 and 6. The occurrence of ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction and death was recorded.

RESULT

Adverse outcome rates were lower in patients treated with atorvastatin 20 mg/day or more potent doses of statins than in patients treated with atorvastatin 10 mg/day (63.5, 38.2 and 48.2%, respectively; p = 0.004). In binary logistic regression analysis, independent predictors of adverse outcome were the mRS at discharge (relative risk (RR) 2.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.77-3.07, p < 0.001) whereas more aggressive treatment with statins independently predicted favorable outcome (atorvastatin 20 vs. 10 mg/day, RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.11-0.87, p = 0.026; atorvastatin 40 mg/day or more potent dose of statins vs. atorvastatin 10 mg/day, RR 1.66, 95% CI 0.62-4.44, p = NS). The incidence of cardiovascular events and all-cause mortality showed a trend for being lower in patients treated with atorvastatin 40-80 mg/day or rosuvastatin 10-40 mg/day than in those treated with less potent doses of statins.

CONCLUSION

More aggressive statin treatment improves the long-term functional outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke more than less aggressive treatment.

Splenic responses in ischemic stroke: new insights into stroke pathology

In the past decade, the significant contribution of the spleen to ischemic brain damage has gained considerable attention in stroke research. As the largest natural reservoir of immune cells, the spleen establishes critical connections with the ischemic brain during the progression of stroke and mobilizes its cells to the site of injury. Multiple "alarm" signals released from the injured brain are essential for the initiation of brain-spleen communication. Spleen-derived cells, including neutrophils, lymphocytes, and monocytes/macrophages, are known to contribute significantly to ischemic brain damage. Understanding the dynamic splenic responses to stroke will not only provide insights into the evolvement of ischemic brain injury but will also identify potential targets for stroke treatment. Here, we review recent studies on the functions of the spleen in ischemic stroke. We have included a discussion of several therapeutic strategies that target splenic responses and reduce acute ischemic brain damage in preclinical studies. Future investigations on the effects of the spleen on long-term stroke recovery are highly warranted.

Antidiabetic treatment, stroke severity and outcome

Ischemic stroke is a leading cause of mortality and long-term disability worldwide. Given the detrimental effects of acute stroke, several neuroprotective agents have been evaluated in these patients. However, the benefits of the evaluated agents appear to be limited and none is currently recommended for clinical use. On the other hand, prior treatment with agents that are used for the primary and secondary prevention of stroke, including statins and antiplatelets, has been associated with better outcome in patients who experience an acute stroke. In contrast, there are limited data as to whether prior treatment with antidiabetic agents is beneficial in diabetic patients who suffer a stroke. In this context, the findings of a recent study that showed reduced stroke size following pretreatment with linagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DDP-4) inhibitor, compared with glimepiride, in both diabetic and non-diabetic mice, appear promising. Despite these preclinical findings suggesting neuroprotective effects of DPP-4 inhibitors in acute stroke, it is still unclear whether these actions will also be observed in humans. Of note, two recent large randomized, placebo-controlled studies did not show any effect of DPP-4 inhibitors on cardiovascular events, including stroke. Several other ongoing trials are evaluating the effects of DPP-4 inhibitors on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. These studies also provide a major opportunity to assess whether patients treated with this class of antidiabetic agents will suffer from less severe strokes and whether their outcome after stroke will be more favorable.