Clinical trial: comparison of the gastrointestinal safety of lumiracoxib with traditional nonselective nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs early after the initiation of treatment--findings from the Therapeutic Arthritis Research and Gastrointestinal Event Trial

Endoscopic evaluation of the gastro-duodenal tolerance of short-term analgesic treatment with 25 mg diclofenac-K liquid capsules

BACKGROUND

Diclofenac-potassium (diclofenac--K) 25 mg liquid capsule is absorbed more quickly than the tablet formulation. It offers potential for rapid pain relief, but may alter gastro-duodenal tolerability.

AIM

To evaluate the gastro-duodenal tolerance of diclofenac-K 25 mg liquid capsules vs. diclofenac-K 12.5 mg tablets, acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 500 mg tablets and ibuprofen 200 mg liquid capsules.

METHODS

In an endoscopist-blinded, randomised, parallel-group study, volunteers received 15 doses of diclofenac-K 25 mg liquid capsules (n = 36), diclofenac-K 2 × 12.5 mg tablets (n = 36), ibuprofen 2 × 200 mg liquid capsules (n = 24) or ASA 2 × 500 mg tablets (n = 36) over 5 days. The primary outcome was the incidence of erosive gastro-duodenal lesions at Day 6. Secondary outcomes included modified Lanza score and change in gastric mucosal prostaglandin synthesis.

RESULTS

The lowest incidence of erosive gastro-duodenal lesions was with diclofenac-K liquid capsules (53%), compared to 61% with diclofenac-K tablets (P = 0.52), 75% with ibuprofen (P = 0.08) and 94% with ASA (P = 0.001). Results were similar for the Lanza scores, although diclofenac-K liquid capsules were significantly superior to ibuprofen liquid capsules (P = 0.04). Diclofenac-K liquid capsules inhibited prostaglandin synthesis by 52% compared to 64% for diclofenac-K tablets (P = 0.10), 50% for ibuprofen (P = 0.85) and 79% for ASA (P = 0.002). With respect to safety, adverse events were most frequent in the ASA group, predominantly gastrointestinal events.

CONCLUSIONS

Mucosal injury with diclofenac-K liquid 25 mg liquid capsules was similar to diclofenac-K 25 mg tablets, significantly lower than ASA 1 g tablets and showed some superiority over ibuprofen 400 mg liquid capsules (EudraCT Number 2009-011278-14).

A randomised, double-blind study comparing lumiracoxib with naproxen for acute musculoskeletal pain

BACKGROUND

Some selective cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors have been shown to provide analgesic efficacy in patients with acute pain.

AIM

To compare the efficacy and safety of the COX-2 inhibitor lumiracoxib 400 mg once daily (qd) and naproxen 500 mg twice daily (bid) in patients with acute musculoskeletal pain caused by uncomplicated soft tissue injury.

METHODS

This was a randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, non-inferiority study set in 39 primary care centres in the UK. Patients were randomised to lumiracoxib 400 mg qd or naproxen 500 mg bid and took the study medication for as long as they felt that it was needed, up to day 7. The primary efficacy analysis was the sum of the pain intensity difference (0-100 mm visual analogue scale) determined morning and evening over the first 5 days of treatment (SPID-5).

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat population comprised 406 patients [lumiracoxib 400 mg qd (n = 207); naproxen 500 mg bid (n = 199)]. Both treatments were effective in reducing pain intensity over 5 days. The mean SPID-5 scores were 117.0 mm.day for lumiracoxib and 118.2 mm.day for naproxen [the treatment difference based on adjusted means from the ANCOVA was -2.78 mm.day, 95% confidence interval (CI) -17.4, 11.9]. The lower margin of the 95% CI was above the predetermined non-inferiority margin (-50 mm.day) for SPID-5, indicating non-inferiority of lumiracoxib compared with naproxen. Both treatments were well tolerated.

CONCLUSION

Lumiracoxib 400 mg qd is as effective as naproxen 500 mg bid for the management of moderate-to-severe acute musculoskeletal pain.

A 6-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, active-controlled, clinical safety study of lumiracoxib and rofecoxib in osteoarthritis patients

Background

Lumiracoxib is a selective cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor effective in the treatment of osteoarthritis (OA) with a superior gastrointestinal (GI) safety profile as compared to traditional non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs, ibuprofen and naproxen). This safety study compared the GI tolerability, the blood pressure (BP) profile and the incidence of oedema with lumiracoxib and rofecoxib in the treatment of OA. Rofecoxib was withdrawn worldwide due to an associated increased risk of CV events and lumiracoxib has been withdrawn from Australia, Canada, Europe and a few other countries following reports of suspected adverse liver reactions.

Methods

This randomised, double-blind study enrolled 309 patients (aged greater than or equal to 50 years) with primary OA across 51 centres in Europe. Patients were randomly allocated to receive either lumiracoxib 400 mg od (four times the recommended dose in OA) (n = 154) or rofecoxib 25 mg od (n = 155). The study was conducted for 6 weeks and assessments were performed at Weeks 3 and 6. The primary safety measures were the incidence of predefined GI adverse events (AEs) and peripheral oedema. The secondary safety measures included effect of treatment on the mean sitting systolic and diastolic blood pressure (msSBP and msDBP). Tolerability of lumiracoxib 400 mg was assessed by the incidence of AEs.

Results

Lumiracoxib and rofecoxib displayed similar GI safety profiles with no statistically significant difference in predefined GI AEs between the two groups (43.5% vs. 37.4%, respectively). The incidence and severity of individual predefined GI AEs was comparable between the two groups. The incidence of peripheral oedema was low and identical in both the groups (n = 9, 5.8%). Only one patient in the lumiracoxib group and three patients in the rofecoxib group had a moderate or severe event. At Week 6 there was a significantly lower msSBP and msDBP in the lumiracoxib group compared to the rofecoxib group (p < 0.05). A similar percentage of patients in both groups showed an improvement in target joint pain and disease activity. The tolerability profile was similar in both the treatment groups.

Conclusion

Lumiracoxib 400 mg od (four times the recommended dose in OA) provided a comparable GI safety profile to rofecoxib 25 mg od (therapeutic dose). However, lumiracoxib was associated with a significantly better BP profile as compared to rofecoxib.

Trial registration number -

NCT00637949