Normal values for the satiety drinking test in healthy children between 5 and 15 years

Gastric accommodation: Physiology, diagnostic modalities, clinical relevance, and therapies

BACKGROUND

Gastric accommodation is an essential gastric motor function which occurs following ingestion of a meal. Impaired gastric fundic accommodation (IFA) is associated with dyspeptic symptoms. Gastric accommodation is mediated by the vagal pathway with several important physiologic factors such as duodenal nutrient feedback playing a significant role. IFA has been described as a pathophysiologic factor in several gastrointestinal disorders including functional dyspepsia, diabetic gastropathy, post-Nissen fundoplication, postsurgical gastrectomy, and rumination syndrome. Modalities for gastric accommodation assessment include gastric barostat, intragastric meal distribution via scintigraphy, drinking tests (eg, water load), SPECT, MRI, 2D and 3D ultrasound, and intragastric high-resolution manometry. Several treatment options including sumatriptan, buspirone, tandospirone, ondansetron, and acotiamide may improve symptoms by increasing post-meal gastric volume.

PURPOSE

Our aim is to provide an overview of the physiology, diagnostic modalities, and therapies for IFA. A literature search was conducted on PubMed, Google Scholar, and other sources to identify relevant studies available until December 2020. Gastric accommodation is an important gastric motor function which if impaired, is associated with several upper gastrointestinal disorders. There are an increasing number of gastric accommodation testing modalities; however, each has facets which warrant consideration. Evidence regarding potentially effective therapies for IFA is growing.

Nutrient Drinking Test as Biomarker in Functional Dyspepsia

INTRODUCTION

Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a prevalent condition with multifactorial pathophysiology, including impaired gastric accommodation (GA), hypersensitivity to gastric distention, and delayed gastric emptying. Drink tests (DT) have been proposed as a potential biomarker for the presence and severity of gastric sensorimotor dysfunction. Thus, we aimed to summarize the state of knowledge on different DT and their potential as a biomarker for FD.

METHODS

A PubMed and MEDLINE search was conducted for English language articles, reviews, meta-analyses, case series, and randomized controlled trials, including also published meeting abstracts.

RESULTS

Several DT have been described in literature (e.g., different type of liquid, number of calories used, pace of drinking, and subject's awareness of the amount of liquid drunk). FD patients ingest significantly less volume in the different variants of the tests. The slow nutrient ("satiety drinking") test (SDT) studies show the most consistent separation between health and FD and correlation with GA. However, sensitivity to distention may be correlated with rapid DT. SDTs were used to evaluate the effect of several pharmacological agents, often showing concordance between their effects on GA and tolerated nutrient volume. This correlation was not found mainly for agents with central actions.

DISCUSSION

An SDT is a potential diagnostic biomarker in FD, reflecting GA. Additional studies are required to confirm its role as a predictive biomarker for treatment outcome in FD.

The water load test in school children and adolescents with functional gastrointestinal disorders

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We hypothesize that patients with functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGID) drink less water volume than healthy subjects during water load test. We evaluated and compared the water load test in students with and without FGID using the Rome III questionnaire.

METHODS

We performed the water load test in 142 students from two schools in Colombia. Students were diagnosed using the Spanish version of the Rome III questionnaire. Students drank water ad libitum for 3 min or until pain, satiety, or vomiting occurred. We correlated anthropometric variables with water volumes drunk. We recorded symptoms like pain and nausea, before and after the water load test.

RESULTS

We evaluated 142 students, with a mean age of 12.1 ± 0.2 years and 59.9% girls. Mean water volume drunk was 459 ± 22 mL. There was no significant difference between water volume drunk by students with and without FGID (466 ± 36 vs. 453 ± 27 mL, p = 0.108). We found a significant correlation between water volume drunk and gender, age, weight, height, and body mass index.

CONCLUSIONS

Students with and without FGID ingest similar volumes of water. Test adverse effects are minimal, and the test is safe to perform and well tolerated.

Reference values for the water load test in healthy school children and adolescents

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM

The water load test (WLT) is an easy and cheap tool, useful in evaluating gastric accommodation and visceral hypersensitivity. This test can be used in diagnosing functional gastrointestinal disorders, like functional dyspepsia. Our main aim was to propose reference values for the WLT. Our secondary aim was to correlate the water volume drunk with the students' gender, age, and anthropometric measures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed the WLT in students aged 8 to 17 years. Students drank water ad libitum for 3 minutes or until pain, satiety or vomiting occurred. We correlated anthropometric variables with water volumes drunk. Upper and lower limit for the maximum tolerated volume were calculated as the 5th and 95th percentile. Pain and nausea were recorded before and after the test.

RESULTS

We evaluated 99 students, with a median age (inter quartile range) of 11 years 10-13 years) and 55.6 % were girls. Median water volume drank was 380 ml (190-540 ml). Boys (523 ml, interquartile range : 275-760 ml) drank more water than girls (380 ml, interquartile range : 190-570 ml) (p = 0.016). There was a significant correlation between water volume drank and students´ age, weight, height, and body mass index. Of the students that completed the WLT, 22.2 % had nausea and 30.3 % had mild abdominal pain after the test.

CONCLUSIONS

We proposed reference values for the WLT in children aged 8 to 17 years. Adverse effects are minimal, it is safe to perform, and well tolerated.

Nutrient drink test: Normative values in Indian children

BACKGROUND

Nutrient drink test (NDT) is a simple, non-invasive method to assess gastric function including accommodation. However, data on normal satiety drink volume (SDV) in children is scanty with no information about postprandial symptoms (PPS). Our aims were to establish normal values of NDT in healthy children and evaluate its correlation with age, gender, and anthropometry.

METHODS

Six- to 18-year-old healthy children underwent the NDT. The nutrient drink (0.94 kcal/mL) was given at a constant rate of 15 mL/min in 6-12-year-old subjects and at 30 mL/min in 13-18-year-old subjects till satiety score of 5 was reached. Postprandial symptoms (30 min) of fullness, nausea, bloating, and pain were scored using a visual analogue scale (0-100 mm) individually and as aggregate score.

RESULTS

Sixty-seven children (40 boys, age 12 [6-18 years]) were enrolled. Median SDV was 360 [180-960 mL], higher in 13-18-year-olds in comparison to 6-12-year-old children (360 [240-1002] vs. 300 [148-960] mL; p=0.005). SDV showed significant correlation with age, weight, and height. SDV was higher in boys than girls (450 [240-1074] vs. 330 [240-480] mL; p=0.02) in the older children (13-18 y), but it was similar in the younger children. Mild fullness (40 [0-80]) was the only PPS seen in 85% children and none had pain. PPS were not different between boys and girls or younger and older children.

CONCLUSION

The study provides normative data of SDV and PPS by NDT in 6-18-year-old children. SDV correlated with age and was higher in adolescent boys than girls.

The Intragastric Pressure Measurement: A Novel Method to Assess Gastric Accommodation in Functional Dyspepsia Children

BACKGROUND

Impaired gastric accommodation (GA) is proposed as a main pathophysiological mechanism for functional dyspepsia (FD). At present, the gastric barostat is the criterion standard to measure GA. Hence, this procedure is invasive and it may alter gastric physiology. Recently, we proposed the measurement of intragastric pressure (IGP) by means of high-resolution manometry during nutrient intake as a potential alternative for assessing GA in adults.

OBJECTIVES

Our aim was first to study the feasibility of the IGP measurement with nutrient tolerance in children with FD and second to compare these results with young healthy adults.

METHODS

A high-resolution manometry probe and a feeding tube were positioned in the proximal stomach. The IGP was measured before and during intragastric infusion of a nutrient drink (ND, 300 kcal, 60 mL/min). Subjects were asked to score their satiation and epigastric symptoms. The test ended when the subjects scored maximal satiation.

RESULTS

A total of 15 healthy volunteers (HVs, 21.7 ± 4.7 years, 21.1 ± 0.3 kg/m) and 17 patients with FD (14.4 ± 0.7 years, 19.6 ± 0.7 kg/m) participated. Patients with FD experienced mainly from postprandial fullness (86%), epigastric pain (71%), and bloating (62%). In both groups, intragastric infusion of ND induced a drop in IGP (area above the IGP curve FD: -15.5 ± 3.5 mmHg vs HVs: -18.0 ± 8.7 mmHg; P = 0.57). Patients showed impaired nutrient tolerance compared with HVs (587.6 ± 80.2 vs 936 ± 66.2 kcal; P = 0.003). All patients and HVs tolerated the catheters and could finalize the study.

CONCLUSIONS

The measurement of IGP during intragastric ND infusion was well tolerated in children. Nutrient tolerance was reduced in children with FD compared with HVs. In the future, this may be a useful tool to assess GA accommodation and nutrient tolerance in children.

Assessment of gastric motor function in childhood functional dyspepsia and obesity

BACKGROUND

The aim was to compare gastric emptying rate and nutrient tolerance during a satiety drinking test in children with functional dyspepsia (FD) and obesity and to study the relationship between daily caloric intake and the satiety drinking test.

METHODS

A total of 28 dyspeptic children (22 girls, mean age 12.5 ± 3.1 years) and 15 obese children (five girls, 13.3 ± 1.8 years) were studied. The patients underwent an octanoic acid gastric emptying breath test and a satiety drinking test. Prior to both tests, a dyspepsia questionnaire was filled out to calculate the mean calorie intake.

KEY RESULTS

The most prevalent dyspeptic symptoms were early satiety (96.4%), postprandial fullness (89.2%), and epigastric pain (78.6%), followed by nausea (50%). All dyspeptic and obese children (n = 43) started the satiety drinking test and 41 children completed the test until a score of 5 was reached. The maximum ingested volume in FD was significantly lower than in obesity or in age-matched healthy controls (252 ± 85 vs 479 ± 199 and 359 ± 29 mL respectively, both P < 0.05). As a group, dyspeptic children had significantly slower gastric emptying than obese children (89.7 ± 54.8 min vs 72.5 ± 26.0 min, P = 0.05). Daily calorie intake was significantly higher in obese children than that in dyspeptic children (2325 ± 469 vs 1503 ± 272 cal, P < 0.0001). The endpoint of the satiety drinking test was significantly correlated with body weight or BMI (both R = 0.41, P = 0.04), but not with daily calorie intake, gastric emptying rate or age.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The satiety drinking test is a potentially useful non-invasive tool in the investigation of children with FD and obesity.