Dieulafoy's disease treated by endoscopic haemostatic clipping

The use of endoclips in the treatment of nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2009;19:2-10. [PMID: 19238058 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e31818e9297]

Acute nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding is the most common emergency managed by endoscopists and the endoscopic therapy has generally been recommended as the first-line treatment. Traditionally, endoscopic treatment included injections of epinephrine and sclerosing solutions or the use of thermocoagulation. In the last decade with the introduction of hemoclips and band ligators, we have witnessed a significant improvement in the clinical outcome of nonvariceal gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoclipping is a safe and effective technique that contributes to hemostasis of bleeding lesions of the gastrointestinal tract.

Double Dieulafoy-like lesion in the stomach

Dieulafoy's lesion is an uncommon cause of major gastrointestinal bleeding and may be difficult to recognize. It consists of an arteriole that protrudes through a tiny mucosal defect usually within 6 cm of the gastroesophageal junction on the lesser curve of the stomach. Despite widespread awareness of this entity, it remains a diagnostic challenge for gastroenterologists because of its small size and hidden location. Emergency endoscopy is the most effective method of diagnosing the disease. We report a patient, with double Dieulafoy-like lesion, who was successfully treated endoscopically using hemostatic clip application. The characteristics of the Dieulafoy's lesion, its current diagnosis, and its treatment are discussed.

Endoclips versus heater probe in preventing early recurrent bleeding from peptic ulcer: a prospective and randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic application of hemoclips (HC) was prospectively compared with heat probe (HP) treatment in patients with bleeding ulcers.

METHODS

One hundred thirteen patients with major stigmata of ulcer hemorrhage were randomly assigned to receive HP (n = 57) or HC (n = 56). Clinical and endoscopic features were comparable in both groups. Recurrent bleeding was retreated with the modality previously used. Patients in whom treatment or retreatment was unsuccessful underwent emergency surgery.

RESULTS

Hemostasis, adequate treatment of visible vessel, 30-day mortality, and emergency surgery rates were similar for both groups. Recurrent bleeding was 21% for HP and 1.8% for HC (p < 0.05). Length of hospital stay and transfusion requirements were significantly lower in the HC group. There was no evidence of clip-induced tissue injury or impaired ulcer healing. Clips dislodged spontaneously in most patients within 8 weeks of treatment. No further hemorrhage occurred on a median follow-up of 11 months (range 1-23).

CONCLUSIONS

The hemoclip is safe and effective in the treatment of severe ulcer bleeding and is superior to HP in preventing early recurrent bleeding.