Assessment of left ventricular function after radiofrequency and direct current atrioventricular node ablation

Current role of atrioventricular junction (AVJ) ablation

Atrioventricular junction ablation with permanent pacemaker insertion is a highly effective treatment approach in patients with atrial fibrillation that is resistant to other treatment modalities, especially in the elderly or those with severe comorbidities. This effect likely reflects reversal of rapid ventricular rates and regularizing ventricular rates. There is increasing evidence that cardiac resynchronization therapy devices may be beneficial in selected populations after atrioventricular node ablation. The limitations of this approach include continued need for anticoagulation and lifelong pacemaker therapy.

Clinical results with catheter ablation: AV junction, atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia

With the limitations of pharmacologic and device therapies for atrial fibrillation and ventricular tachycardia, catheter ablation is assuming a larger role in the management of patients with these common arrhythmias. Multiple case series and clinical trials have helped to define the evolving role of these techniques for ablation of the atrioventricular node, atrial fibrillation, and ischemic ventricular tachycardia. Based on very low complication rates, excellent efficacy and proven outcomes with radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node, this approach with permanent pacing should play a larger role in the treatment of symptomatic patients with permanent atrial fibrillation. While linear ablation of atrial fibrillation has limited clinical utility for the treatment of this common arrhythmia, the results of multiple case series of focal atrial fibrillation ablation indicate the potential for an expanding role of this curative technique. Catheter ablation techniques for ventricular tachycardia in the setting of coronary artery disease have a role as supplemental therapy to the implantable cardioverter defibrillator in patients with recurrent pharmacologically refractory ventricular arrhythmias requiring frequent device interventions.

Clinical outcomes after ablation and pacing therapy for atrial fibrillation : a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Radiofrequency ablation of the atrioventricular node and permanent pacing are used for symptomatic relief in patients with medically refractory atrial fibrillation. In this study, meta-analysis was used to clarify clinical outcomes and survival after ablation and pacing therapy using data from the published literature.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We used 21 studies with a total of 1181 patients in the meta-analysis. All patients had medically refractory atrial tachyarrhythmias, primarily atrial fibrillation (97%). Nineteen measures of clinical outcome, encompassing quality of life, ventricular function, exercise duration, and healthcare use, were derived from the studies. The meta-analysis demonstrated significant improvement after ablation and pacing therapy in all outcome measures except fractional shortening, which demonstrated a trend toward improvement (P=0.08). Ejection fraction did show significant improvement (P<0.001). The calculated 1-year total and sudden death mortality rates after ablation and pacing therapy were 6.3% and 2.0%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Ablation and pacing therapy improves a broad range of clinical outcomes for patients with medically refractory atrial fibrillation. The calculated 1-year mortality rates after this therapy are low and comparable with medical therapy.