Safety of high energy internal cardioversion for atrial fibrillation

Complete atrioventricular block following internal electrical cardioversion during atrial fibrillation ablation

BACKGROUND

Complete atrioventricular block (C-AVB) following internal electrical cardioversion (IEC) during atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation has not been fully investigated. We aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of C-AVB following IEC during AF ablation.

METHODS

C-AVB (non-conducted sinus impulse after IEC) and ventricular pause (VP) (the interval between IEC and the QRS complex) following the first attempt of IEC, and baseline electrocardiographic parameters were investigated in patients who underwent first-time AF ablation.

RESULTS

We investigated the first attempt of IEC in 124 patients (mean age:70 ± 11 years, 81 men, 99 non-paroxysmal AF). AF was terminated in 109/124 (88%) patients, with a VP of 1590 [1014-2208] (maximum, 8780) ms. Transient C-AVB following IEC occurred in 14/109 (13%) patients. The VP was longer in patients with transient C-AVB than in those without transient C-AVB (2418 [1693-4425] vs. 1530 [876-2083] ms, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, the left atrial diameter (Odds ratio [OR]:1.21; 95% confidence interval (95%CI):1.06-1.39; p = 0.005) and preexisting intraventricular conduction abnormality (OR:9.22; 95%CI:1.60-53.3; p = 0.013) were predictors of transient C-AVB following IEC.

CONCLUSION

Left atrial diameter and preexisting intraventricular conduction abnormalities were predictors of transient C-AVB following IEC during AF ablation.

Treatment of Acute Atrial Fibrillation: Ventricular Rate Control and Restoration of Sinus Rhythm

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a familiar arrhythmia seen in the emergency department and the general population. In the past it was treated in the majority of cases by controlling the ventricular rate, whether the AF is acute or chronic. However, ventricular rate control alone does not address the underlying problem and the patients still remain in AF, cardiac output and symptoms have not been optimally corrected. There is definite risk of thromboembolism. Restoration of sinus rhythm is the only way of resuming the normal conduction physiology of the heart and correcting these problems This article provides a review of the two major principles of rhythm treatment of acute AF: rate control and restoration of sinus rhythm. Transthoracic electrical cardioversion is the mainstay of treatment in haemodynamically unstable AF, whereas in stable AF, there is a choice between rate control and restoration of sinus rhythm, or they can be carried out in conjunction with each other.

Transient complete atrioventricular block following transvenous electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in a horse

Transvenous electrical cardioversion was attempted in a horse with drug refractory atrial fibrillation. A temporary pacing catheter and two defibrillation catheters were inserted transvenously into the right ventricular apex, the right atrium and the pulmonary artery, respectively. Under general anaesthesia 100, 200, 300 and 360 J monophasic shocks were delivered between both defibrillation catheters but sinus rhythm could not be restored. Immediately after the 200, 300 and 360 J shock, transient third-degree atrioventricular block occurred for a period of, respectively, 15, 40 and 55 s. These periods of profound bradycardia were corrected by temporary right ventricular pacing until spontaneous conduction resumed. It is concluded that temporary right ventricular pacing should be available during electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in horses.

Ibutilide in persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to conventional cardioversion methods

BACKGROUND

Electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation seems to be enhanced by pretreatment with ibutilide, but only few is known about the effects of ibutilide in atrial fibrillation which failed to convert with class III antiarrhythmic agents and electrical cardioversion. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibutilide administration in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation refractory to long-term therapy with class III antiarrhythmic drugs and transthoracic cardioversion.

METHODS

Prospective study in 22 patients (16 men and 6 women, mean age 63+/-9 years) with structural heart disease and persistent atrial fibrillation for a mean duration of 39+/-50 (range 1-145) months. All patients had failed to convert to sinus rhythm after transthoracic cardioversion while on treatment with class III antiarrhythmic drugs (amiodarone in 82%, sotalol in 18%). One milligram of ibutilide was administered in all patients and electrical cardioversion was performed again, if necessary.

RESULTS

The total conversion rate to sinus rhythm was 95% (21 of 22 patients). Two patients (9%) were successfully converted after ibutilide alone and 19 patients (86%) when transthoracic cardioversion was repeated after ibutilide. The QTc intervals increased from 451+/-28 to 491+/-49 ms (p<0.001) after ibutilide. No adverse effects occurred. The rate of freedom from atrial fibrillation after 1 month of follow-up was 64%.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of concomitant use of ibutilide infusion and, if necessary, repeated transthoracic cardioversion for restoration of sinus rhythm in long-term persistent atrial fibrillation and previously failed antiarrhythmic and electrical cardioversion was 95%. There were no adverse effects associated with ibutilde administration. Our results suggest that this combined strategy may be safe and successful in patients with atrial fibrillation resistant to conventional cardioversion methods and may be an alternative to internal cardioversion.

[Biphasic low-energy internal cardioversion in atrial fibrillation induced during electrophysiologic study]

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation is observed in 10% of electrophysiological studies. Previous studies have shown the efficacy of biphasic low energy internal cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm. We studied the efficacy and safety of low-energy internal cardioversion and the biphasic curve, in sustained atrial fibrillation (>15 min) during electrophysiologic procedures.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From January 1997 to August 1998, 320 patients underwent an electrophysiological study. An internal cardioversion was done on those patients who developed sustained atrial fibrillation. We delivered biphasic shocks between electrodes-catheters positioned in the right atrium and the coronary sinus. Increasing energy was applied until restoration of sinus rhythm or a maximum of 10 joules were achieved with no result. A right ventricle electrode was used to synchronize the V wave and for temporary pacing.

RESULTS

Thirty one episodes of sustained atrial fibrillation were observed in 26 patients (1,23 episodes/patient) and a mean of 2,58 internal cardioversions were applied per every patient. Sinus rhythm was restored in twenty three patients. The mean energy delivered was 4.1 joules. The mean time for the recovery was 3,200 ms. Temporary pacing was used in 16% of the patients for up to 1 minute. No AV blocks were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Internal cardioversion successfully restored sinus rhythm in 88.5% of the patients who presented sustained atrial fibrillation (88.5%). Temporary pacing was necessary for the treatment of postsinus shock pauses.

Facilitating transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation with ibutilide pretreatment

BACKGROUND

Atrial fibrillation cannot always be converted to sinus rhythm by transthoracic electrical cardioversion. We examined the effect of ibutilide, a class III antiarrhythmic agent, on the energy requirement for atrial defibrillation and assessed the value of this agent in facilitating cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation that is resistant to conventional transthoracic cardioversion.

METHODS

One hundred patients who had had atrial fibrillation for a mean (+/-SD) of 117+/-201 days were randomly assigned to undergo transthoracic cardioversion with or without pretreatment with 1 mg of ibutilide. We designed a step-up protocol in which shocks at 50, 100, 200, 300, and 360 J were used for transthoracic cardioversion. If transthoracic cardioversion was unsuccessful in a patient who had not received ibutilide pretreatment, ibutilide was administered and transthoracic cardioversion attempted again.

RESULTS

Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 36 of 50 patients who had not received ibutilide (72 percent) and in all 50 patients who had received ibutilide (100 percent, P<0.001). In all 14 patients in whom transthoracic cardioversion alone failed, sinus rhythm was restored when cardioversion was attempted again after the administration of ibutilide. Pretreatment with ibutilide was associated with a reduction in the mean energy required for defibrillation (166+/-80 J, as compared with 228+/-93 J without pretreatment; P<0.001). Sustained polymorphic ventricular tachycardia occurred in 2 of the 64 patients who received ibutilide (3 percent), both of whom had an ejection fraction of 0.20 or less. The rates of freedom from atrial fibrillation after six months of follow-up were similar in the two randomized groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The efficacy of transthoracic cardioversion for converting atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm was enhanced by pretreatment with ibutilide. However, use of this drug should be avoided in patients with very low ejection fractions.

Internal right atrial cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation: effects of low-energy biphasic shocks

This study evaluates the efficacy and safety of internal right atrial cardioversion of atrial fibrillation using a defibrillation right atrial catheter and 2 thoracic patches with low-energy biphasic shocks.

Effect of ventricular shock strength on cardiac hemodynamics

INTRODUCTION

The effect of implantable defibrillator shocks on cardiac hemodynamics is poorly understood. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that ventricular defibrillator shocks adversely effect cardiac hemodynamics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The cardiac index was determined by calculating the mitral valve inflow with transesophogeal Doppler during nonthoracotomy defibrillator implantation in 17 patients. The cardiac index was determined before, and immediately, 1 minute, 2 minutes, and 4 minutes after shocks were delivered during defibrillation energy requirement testing with 27- to 34-, 15-, 10-, 5-, 3-, or 1-J shocks. The cardiac index was also measured at the same time points after 27- to 34-, and 1-J shocks delivered during the baseline rhythm. The cardiac index decreased from 2.30 +/- 0.40 L/min per m2 before a 27- to 34-J shock during defibrillation energy requirement testing to 2.14 +/- 0.45 L/min per m2 immediately afterwards (P = 0.001). This effect persisted for > 4 minutes. An adverse hemodynamic effect of similar magnitude occurred after 15 J (P = 0.003) and 10-J shocks (P = 0.01), but dissipated after 4 minutes and within 2 minutes, respectively. There was a significant correlation between shock strength and the percent change in cardiac index (r = 0.3, P = 0.03). The cardiac index decreased 14% after a 27- to 34-J shock during the baseline rhythm (P < 0.0001). This effect persisted for < 4 minutes. A 1-J shock during the baseline rhythm did not effect the cardiac index.

CONCLUSION

Defibrillator shocks > 9 J delivered during the baseline rhythm or during defibrillation energy requirement testing result in a 10% to 15% reduction in cardiac index, whereas smaller energy shocks do not affect cardiac hemodynamics. The duration and extent of the adverse effect are proportional to the shock strength. Shock strength, and not ventricular fibrillation, appears to be most responsible for this effect. Therefore, the detrimental hemodynamic effects of high-energy shocks may be avoided when low-energy defibrillation is used.