Neutron induced break-points in human chromosomes have a similar location as X-ray induced break-points

Radiation-Induced Chromosomal Breaks may be DNA Repair Fragile Sites with Larger-scale Correlations to Eight Double-Strand-Break Related Data Sets over the Human Genome

In this work, we compared the genomic distribution of common radiation-induced chromosomal breaks to eight different data sets covering the whole human genome. Sites with a high probability of chromatid breakage after exposure to low and high ionization density radiations were often located inside common and rare fragile sites, indicating that they may be a new and more local type of DNA repair-related fragility. Breaks in specific chromosome bands after acute exposure to oil and benzene also showed strong correlation with these sites and fragile sites. In addition, close correlation was found with cytologically detected chiasma and MLH1 immunofluorescence sites and with the HapMap recombination density distributions. Also, of interest, copy number changes occurred predominantly at radiation-induced breaks and fragile sites, at least for breast cancers with poor prognosis, and they decreased weakly but significantly in regions with increasing recombination and CpG density. An increased CpG density is linked to regions of high gene density to secure high-fidelity reproduction and survival. To minimize cancer induction, cancer-related genes are often located in regions of decreased recombination density and/or higher-than-average CpG density. It is compelling that all these data sets were influenced by the cells' handling of double-strand breaks and, more generally, DNA damage on its genome. In fact, the DNA repair genes systematically avoid regions with a high recombination density, as they need to be intact to accurately handle repairable DNA lesions.

Three-Color Chromosome Painting as Seen through the Eyes of mFISH: Another Look at Radiation-Induced Exchanges and Their Conversion to Whole-Genome Equivalency

Whole-chromosome painting (WCP) typically involves the fluorescent staining of a small number of chromosomes. Consequently, it is capable of detecting only a fraction of exchanges that occur among the full complement of chromosomes in a genome. Mathematical corrections are commonly applied to WCP data in order to extrapolate the frequency of exchanges occurring in the entire genome [whole-genome equivalency (WGE)]. However, the reliability of WCP to WGE extrapolations depends on underlying assumptions whose conditions are seldom met in actual experimental situations, in particular the presumed absence of complex exchanges. Using multi-fluor fluorescence in situ hybridization (mFISH), we analyzed the induction of simple exchanges produced by graded doses of ¹³⁷Cs gamma rays (0–4 Gy), and also 1.1 GeV ⁵⁶Fe ions (0–1.5 Gy). In order to represent cytogenetic damage as it would have appeared to the observer following standard three-color WCP, all mFISH information pertaining to exchanges that did not specifically involve chromosomes 1, 2, or 4 was ignored. This allowed us to reconstruct dose–responses for three-color apparently simple (AS) exchanges. Using extrapolation methods similar to those derived elsewhere, these were expressed in terms of WGE for comparison to mFISH data. Based on AS events, the extrapolated frequencies systematically overestimated those actually observed by mFISH. For gamma rays, these errors were practically independent of dose. When constrained to a relatively narrow range of doses, the WGE corrections applied to both ⁵⁶Fe and gamma rays predicted genome-equivalent damage with a level of accuracy likely sufficient for most applications. However, the apparent accuracy associated with WCP to WGE corrections is both fortuitous and misleading. This is because (in normal practice) such corrections can only be applied to AS exchanges, which are known to include complex aberrations in the form of pseudosimple exchanges. When WCP to WGE corrections are applied to true simple exchanges, the results are less than satisfactory, leading to extrapolated values that underestimate the true WGE response by unacceptably large margins. Likely explanations for these results are discussed, as well as their implications for radiation protection. Thus, in seeming contradiction to notion that complex aberrations be avoided altogether in WGE corrections – and in violation of assumptions upon which these corrections are based – their inadvertent inclusion in three-color WCP data is actually required in order for them to yield even marginally acceptable results.

Studies on chromosome aberration induction: What can they tell us about DNA repair?

Many, if not the majority of spontaneous or induced mutations in somatic mammalian cells associated with cancer are large chromosome level changes. For exposure to carcinogenic agents, certain specific chromosomal aberrations are likely to lie early along the pathway leading from initial molecular damage to cancer. The kinds of aberrations that occur, and the positions of breakpoints involved in their formation, can reveal not only genes and controlling elements whose expression or suppression underlie the molecular nature of the initiation of malignant transformation, but also how structural and functional features of chromatin can affect processes involved in repair or mis-repair of initial DNA damage. Thus, cytogenetics can provide information in ways that are not readily appreciated in studies requiring disruption of chromatin organization as it exists in the cell and its tissue context, and where DNA repair assays measure effects averaged over the entire genome. Examples include the fact that in contrast to a more efficient repair of single strand or base damage in transcriptionally active chromatin, after ionizing radiation exposure, the preponderance of translocation breakpoints indicating mis-repair occur in transcriptionally active or potentially active chromatin. Cytogenetic studies have led to the recognition that processing of DNA ends - both ends resulting from breaks along chromosomes and natural chromosomal termini, or telomeres - share very interesting similarities and differences. Further, direct observation of chromatin in cells during interphase can speak directly to early stages of aberration formation where processes occur within the context of intact cells, and to the role (or lack thereof) of cell cycle checkpoint responses that often accompany DNA damage. The superior resolution of many of the current molecular cytogenetics approaches, combined with immunocytochemical detection of proteins involved in DNA damage processing, and the availability of repair deficient mutants or knockdown strategies such as RNA interference, suggest that cytogenetics may still provide useful information and set certain restrictions important for rational interpretation of studies of DNA repair and associated protein interactions that can only be carried out in vitro. The intent of this paper is to focus on contributions of studies on the production of chromosomal aberrations following ionizing radiation exposure regarding important insights on associated DNA repair processes involved, and further, on guidelines or constraints they provide for the interpretation of in vitro DNA repair studies that would have been difficult to appreciate without the cytogenetics. We will first briefly summarize some early studies that serve as a reminder of the background on which current studies are based, and then carry forward to the present day certain interesting facets of these studies.

Localization of radiation-induced chromosomal breakpoints along human chromosome 1 using a combination of G-banding and FISH

PURPOSE

To determine the exact location of radiation-induced chromosomal breakpoints along the euchromatic or heterochromatic regions: G-light and G-dark bands, respectively.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The distribution of radiation-induced chromosomal breakpoints was scored in human lymphocytes irradiated in vitro with 3 Gy of gamma-radiation. Image analysis was applied to combine G-banded and FISH-painted images of the human chromosome 1.

RESULTS

A total of 195 chromosomal breakpoints in 176 cells with structural chromosomal aberrations was used for the present analysis. Radiation-induced breakpoints were found to be distributed randomly with respect to the p or q arms of chromosome 1 and specific band or band length, but more breakpoints were mapped to G-light than to G-dark bands, the difference being statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The results can well be interpreted in terms of concepts of existing models of nuclear architecture, chromatin structure and transcriptional activities of the chromatin, which can influence the induction of primary chromosomal aberrations by gamma-rays. Differential repair of randomly produced primary aberrations may also explain the non-random distribution of radiation-induced breakpoints.

Induction of BCR-ABL fusion genes by in vitro X-irradiation

The Philadelphia chromosome consists of a reciprocal translocation between the ABL oncogene at chromosome 9q34 and the BCR gene at chromosome 22q11, resulting in the expression of chimeric BCR-ABL mRNAs specific to chronic myelogenous leukemia (CML). Presence of the fusion gene can be detected with high specificity and sensitivity by means of reverse transcription and polymerase chain reaction. Using this assay, it was possible to detect BCR-ABL fusion genes induced among HL60 cells after 100 Gy of X-irradiation in vitro. In total, five fusion gene transcripts were obtained among 10(8) cells examined. These fusion genes contained not only CML-specific BCR-ABL rearrangements, but also other forms of BCR-ABL fusions. These latter genes had junctions of BCR exon 4/ABL exon 2 intervened by a segment of DNA of unknown origin, BCR exon 5/ABL exon 2, and BCR exon 4/ABL exon 2. The results appear to be direct evidence for the induction of the BCR-ABL fusion gene by X-irradiation. In terms of leukemogenesis, it appears that only those cells bearing certain CML-related BCR-ABL fusion genes are positively selected by virtue of a growth advantage in vivo.