A genetic approach to idiotypic vaccination for B cell lymphoma

DNA and mRNA Vaccines for Chronic Viral Infections and Cancer: Rationale, Mechanisms, and Progress

Interest in the capabilities of nucleic acid vaccines, (DNA and mRNA vaccines) for both prophylactic and therapeutic uses have greatly increased following the successful deployment of two mRNA and, on a more limited scale, one DNA vaccine for COVID-19. In addition to targeting other pathogens for prophylactic vaccines, efforts are also being made towards using them for therapies for chronic infections and cancer. An examination of past and current successes for such therapies using other technologies with an emphasis on the immunological mechanisms will be provided followed by an assessment of the relevant characteristics of DNA and mRNA vaccines to predict their utility for therapies for chronic viral infections and cancer. Efforts and progress for these targets will be described.

Lymphoma Immunotherapy: Current Status

The rationale to treat lymphomas with immunotherapy comes from long-standing evidence on their distinctive immune responsiveness. Indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, in particular, establish key interactions with the immune microenvironment to ensure prosurvival signals and prevent antitumor immune activation. However, reports of spontaneous regressions indicate that, under certain circumstances, patients develop therapeutic antitumor immunity. Several immunotherapeutic approaches have been thus developed to boost these effects in all patients. To date, targeting CD20 on malignant B cells with the antibody rituximab has been the most clinically effective strategy. However, relapse and resistance prevent to cure approximately half of B-NHL patients, underscoring the need of more effective therapies. The recognition of B-cell receptor variable regions as B-NHL unique antigens promoted the development of specific vaccines to immunize patients against their own tumor. Despite initial promising results, this strategy has not yet demonstrated a sufficient clinical benefit to reach the regulatory approval. Several novel agents are now available to stimulate immune effector functions or counteract immunosuppressive mechanisms, such as engineered antitumor T cells, co-stimulatory receptor agonist, and immune checkpoint-blocking antibodies. Thus, multiple elements can now be exploited in more effective combinations to break the barriers for the induction of anti-lymphoma immunity.

Follicular lymphomas

Follicular lymphomas constitute approximately 30% of all non-Hodgkin lymphomas. These lymphomas are characterized by at least partially follicular growth pattern, but diffuse areas may be present. The proportions of follicular or diffuse areas vary also from case to case, which seems to be associated with prognosis. Follicular lymphomas should not be divided into distinct subtypes, but rather shows a continuous gradation in the number of large cells. On the bases of this grading, three groups have been defined: grades 1-3. There is a consensus that grade 3 follicular lymphomas, namely grade 3b, should be discriminated from lower-grade cases. The cells of follicular lymphomas express surface immunoglobulin, more frequently IgM+/-IgD>IgG>IgA, B-cell-associated antigens, CD10+/-; they are CD5-, CD23-/+, CD43-, and CD11c-. Follicular lymphomas express bcl-2 proteins, which is useful in distinguishing reactive from neoplastic follicles. t(14;18) is present in 70-95% of follicular lymphomas, involving rearrangement of bcl-2 gene. Clinical behavior of follicular lymphomas is heterogeneous and differs according to the histologic grade and extension of disease. Moreover, the evaluation of these malignancies is conditioned by therapeutic decision, which is also determined by main prognostic factors. The International Prognostic Index for aggressive lymphomas is not optimal for follicular lymphomas. Conversely, the Italian Lymphoma Intergroup Index and, more recently, the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI), designed in pre-rituximab era, seem to correlate well with outcome. Several active therapeutic approaches from the "wait and watch" strategy to the allogeneic transplantation are available for management of patients with follicular lymphoma. Therapeutic decision is mostly conditioned by patient's characteristics, stage, histologic grade, tumor burden, and risk-predicting factors.

DNA vaccines: precision tools for activating effective immunity against cancer

DNA vaccination has suddenly become a favoured strategy for inducing immunity. The molecular precision offered by gene-based vaccines, together with the facility to include additional genes to direct and amplify immunity, has always been attractive. However, the apparent failure to translate operational success in preclinical models to the clinic, for reasons that are now rather obvious, reduced initial enthusiasm. Recently, novel delivery systems, especially electroporation, have overcome this translational block. Here, we assess the development, current performance and potential of DNA vaccines for the treatment of cancer.

Anti-idiotype antibodies in cancer treatment

As a cancer immunotherapy tool, idiotypes (Ids) have been used in different ways over the last three decades, depending on the actual human tumor cell target. It all started with passive, monoclonal, anti-Id antibody treatment of B-cell lymphoma, a setting in which results were tantalizing, but logistics unsustainable. It then moved toward the development of anti-Id vaccines for the treatment of the same tumors, a setting in which we have recently provided the first formal proof of principle of clinical benefit associated with the use of a human cancer vaccine. Meanwhile, it also expanded in the direction of exploiting the antigenic mimicry of some Ids with Id-unrelated, tumor-associated antigens for the immunotherapy of a number of solid tumors, a setting in which clinical results are still far from being consolidated. All in all, over the years Id-based immunotherapy has paved the way for a number of seminal therapeutic improvements for cancer patients, including the development of most if not all Id-unrelated monoclonal antibodies that have recently revolutionized the field.

Therapeutic cancer vaccines: an emerging treatment option

Therapeutic cancer vaccines treat disease by stimulating the body's immune system. They are a form of active immunotherapy with the goal of producing an immune response that involves the cellular and humoral components of the immune system. These two components appear to be complementary and work together to induce tumor regression and long-lasting immunity to the disease being treated. This article reviews the history of cancer vaccine development, autologous and allogeneic vaccines, vaccine targets, carrier proteins, adjuvants, and clinical trial data of studies evaluating cancer vaccines. Knowledge of this emerging cancer treatment option will enable oncology nurses to be informed about cancer vaccines and accurately provide information about them to patients.

The development of a bicistronic plasmid DNA vaccine for B-cell lymphoma

Tumor vaccines are a promising alternative to chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic cancer. To be effective and safe, a therapeutic cancer vaccine should specifically target antigens expressed only on metastatic tumor cells. A vaccine directed against the unique surface immunoglobulin or idiotype expressed on non-Hodgkin's B-cell lymphoma fulfills these criteria, as both primary and metastatic tumor cells express tumor specific immunoglobulins. Using the murine 38C13 B-cell lymphoma tumor as a model system, a plasmid DNA vaccine was designed to express a bicistronic mRNA encoding both the light and heavy tumor immunoglobulin (idiotype) proteins expressed on the surface of the 38C13 tumor. To increase the immunogenicity of the plasmid DNA vaccine, each of the murine variable domains (light and heavy) were fused to their respective human immunoglobulin constant domains. In addition, a eukaryotic expression cassette was constructed to effect both high-level expression of the mouse/human chimeric immunoglobulin, and to elicit a protective immune response in vivo. Unique Sfi I restriction sites were used for the rapid cloning of any tumor specific immunoglobulin idiotype domains and a series of plasmid constructs were made to test changes to the J domain and/or the human C domain to insert the Sfi I restriction sites. Such changes were found to have significant effects on both expression and immunogenicity. Vaccination of mice with prototype idiotype vaccines was found to generate a protective immune response to the 38C13 tumor. This study indicates that a novel bicistronic plasmid DNA-based vaccine can be used to develop a tumor specific vaccine against B-cell lymphoma.

An array of immunotherapeutic strategies for B-cell lymphomas

With FDA approval of monoclonal antibodies (mAb) against the B-cell-specific cell surface molecule CD20, immunotherapy in B-cell non-Hodgkin's-lymphomas (NHL) has gained momentum. Since the first description of the CD20 mAb and its use in a single patient, it has taken more than 20 years to implement this in current treatment options. NHLs are of particularly interest to the research community, since a whole array of novel immunotherapeutic strategies are currently in development. Unconjugated and radioconjugated mAbs are either approved, or in Phase III trials with very promising results. Adoptive transfer of polyclonally activated, tumour-specific or antigen-specific T-cells are in Phase I and II trials. Even antisense approaches have reappeared in the treatment of NHL. However, it is not only passive immunotherapy that has evolved. There are several new strategies for vaccination in NHL, whilst older approaches are under revision. Vaccine strategies targeting the tumour cell specific clonal idiotype (Id) have been refined and, with the identification of T-cell responses against shared epitopes, vaccination against the clonal Id might finally become clinically applicable. Significant progress has also been made in the development of cellular vaccines. Malignant B-cells are turned into 'tumour-APC' and are used to stimulate T-cell responses in Phase I trials. Moreover, with the identification of universal tumour antigens, another antigen-specific vaccine for NHL can be envisioned. By combining this array of very promising tools, immunotherapy might finally become a standard modality for the treatment of B-cell malignancies.

Cytokines and costimulatory molecules as genetic adjuvants

DNA vectors expressing an antigen derived from a pathogen or a cancerous cell have been shown, after inoculation into experimental animals, to trigger de novo synthesis of foreign proteins, which induce an immune response. This immune response can be modulated by coinoculation of vectors encoding either cytokines or costimulatory molecules. A variety of cytokines such as granulocyte/macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), IL-2, IL-4, IL-12 and IFN-gamma, as well as the costimulatory molecule B7.1, have been tested to date for their ability to amplify the immune response to genetic vaccines. Although the results obtained thus far clearly show that coadministration of vectors expressing immunomodulatory molecules, such as cytokines, may increase the efficacy of genetic vaccines, this approach is currently considered unsuitable for use in human patients due to the potential side effects of persistent cytokine expression.

Vaccination as immunotherapy for B cell lymphoma

Current therapy does not cure the majority of patients with B cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) and further intensification does not benefit the patient. Therefore, new approaches are necessary. Immunotherapy has become again a major interest as a new treatment modality for B cell lymphoma since the discovery that the lymphoma specific Id can be presented to antigen-specific T cells. Vaccination of the tumour-bearing host is one of the major strategies to induce a T cell mediated anti-tumour immunity in vivo. For B cell lymphomas the lymphoma specific Id can be used as a tumour-specific antigen to stimulate T cells. Alternatively, the malignant B cells can be modified to become efficient antigen presenting cells (APCs) and present peptides from their own tumour-specific antigens to the autologous T cells. Currently explored and future vaccination strategies for B cell lymphoma will be discussed here.

DNA vaccines

Immunization with plasmid DNA encoding antigenic proteins elicits both antibody and cell-mediated immune responses. This method of producing the protein antigens of interest directly in host cells can provide appropriate tertiary structure for the induction of conformationally specific antibodies, and also facilitates the induction of cellular immune responses. DNA immunization has provided effective protective immunity in various animal models. The immune responses induced by DNA vaccines may in some instances be preferable to those produced by immunization using conventional methods. DNA vaccination appears to be applicable to a variety of pathogens and is a useful method of raising immune responses. Thus this approach to vaccination has the potential to be a successful method of rapidly screening for antigens capable of inducing protective immunity, and of inducing protective immunity against pathogens of clinical importance.