Geriatricians: The Super Specialists

[The role of private geriatricians in the health care system (2/2): comprehensive qualitative analysis using semi-structured interviews]

Private geriatricians report heterogeneous practices, while the specialty as a whole is questioning its model. We conducted semi-structured interviews to understand how private geriatricians viewed their role in the health care system. They report a certain homogeneity in their conception of their role, which corresponds to that of geriatricians as a whole: there seems to be a professional identity for geriatrics.

[Role of private geriatricians in the health care system (1/2): quantitative descriptive analysis by questionnaire]

Private practice geriatrics is a little known practice modality. We conducted a questionnaire survey to try to describe the role of private geriatricians in the health care system. Although few in number, private geriatricians report very different practices, including their conception of their role. This is the first monograph on the activity of private geriatricians, and the results have motivated us to propose a comprehensive analysis of this role.

Hospital volunteers: An innovative pipeline to increase the geriatrics workforce

Objectives: There is an urgent need to expand the geriatrics workforce. By providing volunteers meaningful experiences with older adults, we hoped to stimulate interest in geriatrics.Design: Electronic mixed methods survey of volunteers from April 2018-October 2019Setting: Academic medical centerParticipants: 32 volunteersMeasurements: We conducted a mixed methods survey of volunteers to understand their experiences in the program, in part using a Likert scale. Two coders independently compared themes to ensure consensus.Results: Thirty-six percent (n = 32) completed surveys; 69% (n = 22) were women; most (59%) were first in their family to work in healthcare, and 81% (n = 26) had prior healthcare experience. Volunteers found patients to be engaging, and recognized that older adults need attention. Almost half (47%, n = 15) expressed interest in working with older adults before starting the program, which increased to 63% (n = 20) after the program. Most volunteers (n = 30, 94%) answered 'definitely yes' or 'probably yes' for feeling appreciated by patients, and 88% (n = 28) felt appreciated by patients' families.Conclusion: A volunteer program pairing companions with older age inpatients increased interest and appreciation for older adults. While additional research should examine whether such experiences influence career choices, this intervention proposes an innovative pipeline to increase the geriatrics workforce.

Outcomes of Care by Geriatricians and Non-geriatricians in an Academic Hospital

Introduction

While hospitalist and internist inpatient care models dominate the landscape in many countries, geriatricians and internists are at the frontlines managing hospitalized older adults in countries such as Singapore and the United Kingdom. The primary aim of this study was to determine outcomes for older patients cared for by geriatricians compared with non-geriatrician-led care teams.

Materials and Methods

A retrospective cohort study of 1,486 Internal Medicine patients aged ≥75 years admitted between April and September 2021 was conducted. They were either under geriatrician or non-geriatrician (internists or specialty physicians) care. Data on demographics, primary diagnosis, comorbidities, mortality, readmission rate, Hospital Frailty Risk Score (HFRS), Age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index, Length of Stay (LOS), and cost of hospital stay were obtained from the hospital database and analyzed.

Results

The mean age of patients was 84.0 ± 6.3 years, 860 (57.9%) females, 1,183 (79.6%) of Chinese ethnicity, and 902 (60.7%) under the care of geriatricians. Patients under geriatrician were significantly older and had a higher prevalence of frailty, dementia, and stroke, whereas patients under non-geriatrician had a higher prevalence of diabetes and hypertension. Delirium as the primary diagnosis was significantly higher among patients under geriatrician care. Geriatrician-led care model was associated with shorter LOS, lower cost, similar inpatient mortality, and 30-day readmission rates. LOS and cost were lower for patients under geriatrician care regardless of frailty status but significant only for low and intermediate frailty groups. Geriatrician-led care was associated with significantly lower extended hospital stay (OR 0.73; 95% CI 0.56–0.95) and extended cost (OR 0.69; 95% CI 0.54–0.95).

Conclusion

Geriatrician-led care model showed shorter LOS, lower cost, and was associated with lower odds of extended LOS and cost.

Job satisfaction among physicians providing health care to the elderly in Japan: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Physicians' job satisfaction plays an important role in service delivery. Japan is a country with a higher number of elderly people and their medical care is a crucial issue. To date, no study has been conducted on the job satisfaction of geriatricians serving the elderly in Japan. This study aims to explore the job satisfaction and motivation of physicians providing health care to the elderly working at different hospitals in Japan.

METHODS

In-depth interview of 23 geriatric physicians was conducted and data were coded and analysed. Qualitative content analysis was conducted to identify the response themes.

RESULTS

Three major themes emerged from the analysis and they are: satisfaction as a primary care provider, career development, and suitable communication with patients. Geriatric physicians enjoy their work with inter-professional collaboration and are satisfied to provide primary health care to elderly people. Geriatrics is a very promising career to them and they enjoy the communication and empathetic doctor-patient relationship in their service.

CONCLUSIONS

Japanese physicians providing health care to the elderly are enjoying their work due to a suitable environment, multi-professional collaboration, work-life balance, and patient-doctor relationship.

Geriatric Trauma Mortality: Does Trauma Center Level Matter?

BACKGROUND

Given their mostly rural/suburban locations, level II trauma centers (TCs) may offer greater exposure to and experience in managing geriatric trauma patients. We hypothesized that geriatric patients would have improved outcomes at level II TCs compared to level I TCs.

METHODS

The Pennsylvania Trauma Outcome Study (PTOS) database was retrospectively queried from 2003 to 2017 for geriatric (age ≥65 years) trauma patients admitted to level I and II TCs in Pennsylvania. Patient demographics, injury severity, and clinical outcomes were compared to assess differences in care between level I and II TCs. A multivariate logistic regression model assessed the adjusted impact of care at level I vs II TCs on mortality, complications, and functional status at discharge (FSD). The National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) was retrospectively queried for geriatric (age ≥65 years) trauma admissions to state-accredited level I or level II TCs in 2013.

RESULTS

112 648 patients met inclusion criteria. The proportion of geriatric trauma patients across level I and level II TCs were determined to be 29.1% and 36.2% (P <.001), respectively. In adjusted analysis, there was no difference in mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.13; P = .375), complications (AOR: 1.25; P = .080) or FSD (AOR: 1.09; P = .493) when comparing level I to level II TCs. Adjusted analysis from the NTDB (n = 144 622) also found that mortality was not associated with TC level (AOR: 1.04; P = .182).

DISCUSSION

Level I and level II TCs had similar rates of mortality, complications, and functional outcomes despite a higher proportion (but lower absolute number) of geriatric patients being admitted to level II TCs. Future consideration for location of centers of excellence in geriatric trauma should include both level I and II TCs.

[Characteristics of pharmacotherapy in older patients with rheumatism]

Due to medical advances and the availability of efficient immunosuppressive therapies, the life-expectancy of people suffering from inflammatory rheumatic diseases is continuously increasing. In Germany, geriatric patients (definition: age older than 70 years combined with geriatric multimorbidity) affected, e. g. by rheumatoid arthritis (RA) frequently receive corticosteroids and less often biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) and conventional DMARDs (cDMARDs), which is justified by additionally existing comorbidities and polypharmacy. Using geriatric typical assessments as well as detailed medication regimens the treatment risk of bDMARD and cDMARD administration can be properly evaluated. Current data on biological therapy in older patients with rheumatism support this recommendation. Following the "choosing wisely" initiative of the German Association of Internal Medicine the authors listed 5 positive and 5 negative recommendations concerning the pharmacotherapy of older patients suffering from rheumatism (e. g. RA) as practical guidance towards safer bDMARD and cDMARD treatment for geriatric RA patients.