Parental decision regret in childhood hypospadias surgery: A systematic review

Should we correct hypospadias during childhood? Decision Regret And QUality of Life Assessment (DRAQULA) study

AIM OF THE WORK

To evaluate patient's satisfaction, Decision Regret And QUality of Life Assessment (DRAQULA) among adolescents (older than 15 years) and adults after hypospadias surgery in childhood.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

234 Patients operated on hypospadias as children in our center and their parents were contacted after they reached the age of 15 years to complete a questionnaire survey to assess satisfaction with the operative result, the regret with the operative decision and the health related quality of life (HRQOL). The survey is based on the Decision Regret Scale available in the literature with a score of 100 meaning maximum dissatisfaction or regret, and on the Kidscreen10 index. Satisfaction was measured on a scale from 1 to 5 with 5 signifying full satisfaction.

RESULTS

81 of 234 patients from 15 to 43 years (mean age 19.7 years) completed the survey (34.6 %). 44 Patients had distal, and 17 proximal hypospadias and the remaining 20 patients could not remember the type of hypospadias they had. The patient's satisfaction with the operative result was 5 (full satisfaction) in 74.1 %, 4 in 18.5 %, 3 in 6.2 % and 2 in 1.2 % (mean satisfaction score 4.7 of 5). Regarding decision regret among patients, 64/81 patients (79.0 %) had no decision regret. Only 14.8 % reported mild and 6.2 % moderate decisional regret (mean decisional regret score 4.8). 71 of 234 parents answered the parents' questionnaire (30.0 %). Fifty-eight (81.7 %) had no decision regret. 13 parents (18.3 %) had decision regret; 10 parents (14.1 %) reported mild, 2 parents (2.8 %) moderate, and only one parent (1.4 %) reported strong decisional regret. The mean HRQOL T-score was 55.9 (SD 10, control Group of adolescent males from 12 to 18 years.) and thus corresponded to the average of the reference normal population.

DISCUSSION

In this study, only 19.7 % had decision regret as compared to 50-65 % reported in literature. The decision regret scale of O'Connor needs to be revalidated as even candidates who approve of the decision of early surgery have a score less than 25 and considered to have decision regret.

CONCLUSION

The results of the survey showed that 90 % of the patients were satisfied with early hypospadias surgery with average HRQOL and low level of decisional regret in patients as well as parents. The findings support the current practice of operating hypospadias in early childhood.

A multi-site pilot study of a parent-centered tool to promote shared decision-making in hypospadias care

BACKGROUND

Using a user-centered design approach, we conducted a two-site pilot study to evaluate a decision aid (DA) website, the Hypospadias Hub, for parents of hypospadias patients.

OBJECTIVES

The objectives were to assess the Hub's acceptability, remote usability, and feasibility of study procedures, and to evaluate its preliminary efficacy.

METHODS

From June 2021-February 2022, we recruited English-speaking parents (≥18 years old) of hypospadias patients (≤5 years) and delivered the Hub electronically ≤2 months before their hypospadias consultation. We collected website analytic data using an ad tracker plug-in. We inquired about treatment preference, hypospadias knowledge, and decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale) at baseline, after viewing the Hub (pre-consultation), and post-consultation. We administered the Decision Aid Acceptability Questionnaire (DAAQ) and the Preparation for Decision-Making Scale (PrepDM) which assessed how well the Hub prepared parents for decision-making with the urologist. Post-consultation, we assessed participants' perception of involvement in decision-making with the Shared Decision-making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9) and the Decision Regret Scale (DRS). A bivariate analysis compared participants' baseline and pre/post-consultation hypospadias knowledge, decisional conflict, and treatment preference. Using a thematic analysis, we analyzed our semi-structured interviews to uncover how the Hub impacted the consultation and what influenced participants' decisions.

RESULTS

Of 148 parents contacted, 134 were eligible and 65/134 (48.5%) enrolled: mean age 29.2, 96.9% female, 76.6% White (Extended Summary Figure). Pre/post-viewing the Hub, there was a statistically significant increase in hypospadias knowledge (54.3 vs. 75.6, p < 0.001) and decrease in decisional conflict (36.0 vs. 21.9, p < 0.001). Most participants (83.3%) thought Hub's length and amount of information (70.4%) was "about right", and 93.0% found most or everything was clear. Pre/post-consultation, there was a statistically significant decrease in decisional conflict (21.9 vs. 8.8, p < 0.001). PrepDM's mean score was 82.6/100 (SD = 14.1); SDM-Q-9's mean score was 82.5/100 (SD = 16.7). DCS's mean score was 25.0/100 (SD = 47.03). Each participant spent an average of 25.75 min reviewing the Hub. Based on thematic analysis, the Hub helped participants feel prepared for the consultation.

DISCUSSION

Participants engaged extensively with the Hub and demonstrated improved hypospadias knowledge and decision quality. They felt prepared for the consultation and perceived a high degree of involvement in decision-making.

CONCLUSION

As the first pilot test of a pediatric urology DA, the Hub was acceptable and study procedures were feasible. We plan to conduct a randomized controlled trial of the Hub versus usual care to test its efficacy to improve the quality of shared decision-making and reduce long-term decisional regret.

Hypospadias: lessons learned. An overview of incidence, epidemiology, surgery, research, complications, and outcomes

Hypospadias is a common condition and familiar, though sometimes challenging territory for the pediatric urologist. This review is a summary of hypospadias incidence, epidemiology, surgery, research, and complications intended for the non-specialist. It outlines the history, the principles of surgery for hypospadias, and the long-term outcomes.

Hypospadias surgery: understanding parental emotions, decisions and regrets

This paper builds an argument about genital surgery in the context of medical treatment of children and young people with variations in sex characteristics. First, I set out what is known from existing research including psychological research, surgical follow-up studies and parental regret studies. Second, I present an analysis of surgeons' talk about children, young people and parents in relation to genital surgery. This paper focuses most specifically on hypospadias surgery, but the argumentation is relevant for other kinds of genital surgery carried out in the context of genital variations. The questions guiding this paper are: what research evidence supports hypospadias surgery and what research evidence brings this surgery into question? How might a new interpretation of the evidence, in light of psychosocial research and human rights concerns, contribute to a new perspective on elective genital surgery on minors with variations in sex characteristics? I draw out implications for clinicians supporting parents to decide whether a surgical pathway is the best option for their child.

Co-creating a suite of patient decision aids for parents of an infant or young child with differences of sex development: A methods roadmap

Introduction

Parents and guardians of infants and young children with differences of sex development (DSD) often face numerous health and social decisions about their child's condition. While proxy health decisions can be stressful in any circumstance, they are further exacerbated in this clinical context by significant variations in clinical presentation, parental lack of knowledge about DSD, irreversibility of some options (e.g., gonadectomy), a paucity of research available about long-term outcomes, and anticipated decisional regret. This study aimed to engage clinicians, parents, and an adult living with DSD to collaboratively develop a suite of patient decision aids (PDAs) to respond to the decisional needs of parents and guardians of infants and young children diagnosed with DSD.

Methods

We used a systematic co-development process guided by the Ottawa Decision Support Framework and the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS). The five steps were: literature selection, establish the team, decisional needs assessment, create the PDAs, and alpha testing.

Results

We developed four PDAs to support parents/guardians of infants or young children diagnosed with DSD about four priority decisions identified through our decisional needs assessment: genetic testing, gender of rearing, genital surgery and gonadal surgery. All four PDAs include information for parents about DSD, the options, reasons to choose or avoid each option, and opportunities for parents/guardians to rate the importance of features of each option to clarify their values for these features. Qualitative feedback was positive from clinicians, parents and an adult living with DSD.

Conclusions

These PDAs are clinical tools designed to support parents/guardians and to promote making an informed and shared DSD-related decision. While these tools are specific to DSD, they contain themes and elements translatable to other pediatric populations.

Parental decision regret among Australian parents after consenting to or refusing hypospadias repair for their son: Results of a survey with controls

INTRODUCTION

Parental decision regret in hypospadias surgery is a recognised source of long-lasting psycho-social morbidity. High parental decision regret after their child's hypospadias repair is reported. The aim of this study is to report on decision regret in Australian parents, who accepted and declined surgery for their son and explore underlying factors for decision-making, satisfaction, and regret.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

An online anonymous survey was administered to three groups of parents: 1) parents who consented for hypospadias repair, 2) parents who declined repair and 3) a control group who requested circumcision for their child. Operations occurred between 2010 and 2020 in two paediatric hospitals in New South Wales, Australia. The survey included a validated decision regret assessment tool and additional questions to explore the possible basis of the opinions.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen parents (invited - 381, completed - 116, response rate - 31%) participated in the survey. Decision regret was present in group 1 (n = 89) - 55% (moderate-to-severe 15%), in group 2 (n = 14) - 71% (moderate-to-severe 57%), and in the control group (n = 15) - 15% (moderate-to-severe 8%) of parents. There was a significant difference in the median decision regret score between all three groups. Parents who chose hypospadias repair were mostly concerned about function.

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of decision regret among Australian parents who consented for their son's hypospadias repair was lower compared with the mean decision regret reported in the literature to date (55% vs 65%). Decision regret and its severity were highest among parents who declined hypospadias repair. New strategies are needed to reduce decision regret in parents whether they elect for surgery or not.

[Health care reality of selected pediatric urologic surgeries in Germany from 2006 to 2019]

Hintergrund

Die konservative und chirurgische Behandlung von Kindern ist in der urologischen Facharztweiterbildung fest verankert und stellt eine Kernkompetenz der urologischen Versorgung dar. Berufspolitisch wird seit vielen Jahren ein zunehmender Verlust dieses Schwerpunkts befürchtet. Ziel dieser Studie ist es, reale Fallzahlen und eine mögliche Dynamik in der Verteilung kinderurologischer Eingriffe auf die Fachabteilungen für Urologie und Kinderchirurgie in Deutschland zu prüfen.

Material und Methoden

Als Index-Eingriffe definierten wir Operationen des Hodenhochstands, der Hypospadie und des vesikoureteralen Refluxes (VUR). Mithilfe der Software reimbursement.INFO (RI Innovation GmbH, Hürth) werteten wir die öffentlich zugänglichen Qualitätsberichtsdaten der deutschen Krankenhäuser von 2006 bis 2019 aus und wiesen sie den entsprechenden Fachrichtungen zu.

Ergebnisse

Die Orchidopexie erfolgt häufiger in der Urologie, wohingegen die Hypospadiekorrektur und die operative Therapie des VUR häufiger in der Kinderchirurgie durchgeführt werden. Anteilig zeigte sich für die Orchidopexie und die operative Refluxtherapie keine relevante Verschiebung zwischen urologischen und kinderchirurgischen Kliniken im Untersuchungszeitraum. Bei den Hypospadiekorrekturen nimmt der Anteil der Operationen in kinderchirurgischen Einheiten zu (p < 0,0001). In der Kinderchirurgie erfolgen 84–93 % der analysierten Eingriffe in High-volume-Abteilungen während dieser Anteil in der Urologie bei 56–73 % liegt. Insbesondere die operative Refluxtherapie in der Urologie erfolgt zu einem hohen Anteil als Gelegenheitseingriff (30 % „very low volume“).

Schlussfolgerung

Die Qualitätsberichtsdaten ermöglichen die Erfassung der Fallzahlen und die Analyse der Verteilung zwischen Urologie und Kinderchirurgie in Deutschland. Dabei ist für die Hypospadiekorrektur eine relevante Verschiebung in Richtung der Kinderchirurgie zu beobachten. Die Ursachen und möglichen berufspolitischen Konsequenzen dieser ersten Erhebung sind komplex und bedürfen weiterer Analysen.