Esophageal sensitivity to acid in patients with Barrett's esophagus is not related to preserved esophageal mucosal integrity

Advances in Screening for Barrett Esophagus and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), the primary form of esophageal cancer in the United States, is a lethal cancer with exponentially increasing incidence. Screening for Barrett esophagus (BE), the only known precursor to EAC, followed by endoscopic surveillance to detect dysplasia and early-stage EAC and subsequent endoscopic treatment (to prevent progression of dysplasia to EAC and to treat early-stage EAC effectively) is recommended by several society guidelines. Sedated endoscopy (the primary current tool for BE screening) is both invasive and expensive, limiting its widespread use. In this review, we aim to provide a comprehensive review of recent innovations in the nonendoscopic detection of BE and EAC. These include swallowable cell sampling devices combined with protein and epigenetic biomarkers (which are now guideline endorsed as alternatives to sedated endoscopy), tethered capsule endomicroscopy, emerging peripheral blood-sampled molecular biomarkers, and exhaled volatile organic compounds. We also summarize progress and challenges in assessing BE and EAC risk, which is an important complementary component of the process for the clinical implementation of these innovative nonendoscopic tools, and propose a new paradigm for the strategy to reduce EAC incidence and mortality.

The Effect of STW5 (Iberogast) on Reflux Symptoms in Patients With Concurrent Dyspeptic Symptoms: A Double-blind Randomized Placebo-controlled Crossover Trial

Background/Aims

It has been suggested that STW5 (Iberogast) reduces heartburn symptoms in patients with functional dyspepsia, but underlying mechanisms of action are unclear. The aim of this study is to investigate whether STW5 affects esophageal sensitivity or esophageal motility, thereby reducing occurrence and perception of reflux events.

Methods

We performed a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial in patients with functional dyspepsia (Rome IV) and reflux symptoms. After 4 weeks of treatment with either placebo or STW5, patients were studied with an esophageal acid perfusion test and ambulatory 24-hour pH-impedance monitoring.

Results

A total of 18 patients (7 men, median age 54, range [19-76]), were included in the study. Although we found no statistical difference in our primary outcome the total Reflux Disease Questionnaire score 2.33 (0.25-4.33) vs 2.67 (1.17-4.00), P = 0.347, "gastroesophageal reflux disease" and "regurgitation" subscale scores were lower after STW5 treatment compared to placebo (P = 0.049 and P = 0.007). There was no statistical difference in number of reflux events, acid exposure time and acid sensitivity scores between STW5 and placebo. In a subgroup analysis of patients with pH-metry confirmed gastroesophageal reflux disease, treatment with STW5 significantly reduced the total number of acidic reflux events (P = 0.028). Moreover, in patients with reflux esophagitis, the median lag time to acid perception increased after STW5 treatment (P = 0.042).

Conclusions

We found some indications pointing towards a beneficial effect of STW5 on reflux symptoms in dyspeptic patients, with reduction of esophageal hypersensitivity as a potential underlying mechanism. Our findings will have to be confirmed in larger studies.

The clinical effect of benesco™ on reflux symptoms: A double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is one of the most prevalent gastrointestinal diseases in the western world. Lifestyle modifications and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) form the basis of the management of GERD. A subset of patients seeks for (natural) alternative therapies besides PPIs. benesco™ is an over-the-counter nutrition based on quercetin which has a presumed positive effect on esophageal barrier function. Therefore we aim to assess the effect of benesco™ on reflux symptoms.

METHODS

We performed a double-blind randomized placebo-controlled trial in participants with reflux symptoms. Participants were assigned randomly (1:1) to receive 6 weeks of benesco™ (three times daily one lozenge containing 200 mg of quercetin) or placebo. The primary outcome was treatment success (≥50% reduction in Reflux Disease Questionnaire Score). Secondary outcomes included GERD-related quality of life, reflux-free days and nights, and participant-reported treatment success.

KEY RESULTS

One hundred participants were randomized. Treatment success was seen in 18 (39%) of 46 participants in the intervention group versus 21 (47%) of 45 in the placebo group (p = 0.468). In the intervention group 10 (1-21) reflux-free days were reported compared to 10 (2-25) in the placebo group (p = 0.673). In addition, 38 (34-41) versus 39 (35-42) reflux-free nights were reported (p = 0.409).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

In our trial benesco™ showed no significant benefit over placebo at group level.

Causal relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's esophagus, and epilepsy: A bidirectional Mendelian randomization study

BACKGROUND

The incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) has been shown to be elevated in individuals with epilepsy. Traditional observational studies have led to a limited understanding of the effects of GERD and BE on epilepsy due to the interference of reverse causation and potential confounders.

METHODS

We conducted a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis to determine whether GERD and BE can increase the risk of epilepsy. Genome-wide association study data on epilepsy and its subgroups were obtained from the International League Against Epilepsy consortium for primary analysis using three MR approaches and the FinnGen consortium for replication and meta-analysis. We calculated causal estimates between the two esophageal diseases and epilepsy using the inverse-variance weighted method. Sensitivity analysis was conducted to detect heterogeneity and pleiotropy.

RESULTS

We found a potential effect of genetically predicted GERD on the risk of epilepsy (odds ratio [OR] = 1.078; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.014-1.146, p = .016). Specifically, GERD showed an effect on the risk of generalized epilepsy (OR = 1.163; 95% CI, 1.048-1.290, p = .004) but not focal epilepsy (OR = 1.059, 95% CI, 0.992-1.131, p = .084). Notably, BE did not show a significant causal relationship with the risks of generalized and focal epilepsy.

CONCLUSIONS

Under MR assumptions, our findings suggest a potential risk-increasing effect of GERD on epilepsy, especially generalized epilepsy. Considering the exploratory nature of our study, the association between GERD and epilepsy needs to be confirmed by future prospective studies.

Features of the Parameters of 24-Hours pH-Impedance and High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus on Proton Pump Inhibitors

Аim: to identify predictors of insufficient effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors based on the evaluation of the results of 24-hour pH-impedance and high-resolution esophageal manometry in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Materials and methods. 52 patients with histologically confirmed Barrett's esophagus who are on therapy with proton pump inhibitors were examined. All patients underwent daily pH-impedance and high-resolution esophageal manometry.

Results. According to daily pH-impedance, group 1 consisted of 37 patients who responded satisfactorily to antisecretory therapy, group 2 of 15 patients who demonstrated insufficient response to acid-suppressive therapy, 11 of whom had no clinical manifestations. The total number of reflux averaged 55 in group 1 and 106 in group 2. The average number of acid reflux in group 1 was 5.68, in group 2 — 48.5. The average number of non-acid reflux prevailed in patients of group 2 and averaged 58, in group 1 the indicator averaged 47. Evaluation of the results of high-resolution esophageal manometry showed that violations of the structure and function of the esophago-gastric junction were detected in 21 patients out of 52. Disorders of the motility of the thoracic esophagus were detected in 31 patients out of 52. When comparing the frequency of motor disorders from the thoracic esophagus in groups 1 and 2, no significant differences were obtained. However, significantly more frequent registration of violations of the structure and/or function of the esophago-gastric junction was found in the group with unsatisfactory effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors.

Conclusion. In a number of patients with Barrett's esophagus, there is an insufficient effect of acid-suppressive therapy and at the same time an asymptomatic course of the disease, which may increase the risk of its progression. Predictors of insufficiently successful treatment of patients with Barrett's esophagus may be both insufficient pharmacological effect of proton pump inhibitors themselves, and motility disorders that cause the presence of non-acid reflux, decreased esophageal clearance, which in turn may cause the patient's symptoms to persist and adversely affect the condition of the esophageal mucosa.

Features of the Parameters of 24-Hours pH-Impedance and High-Resolution Esophageal Manometry in Patients with Barrett's Esophagus on Proton Pump Inhibitors

Аim: to identify predictors of insufficient effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors based on the evaluation of the results of 24-hour pH-impedance and high-resolution esophageal manometry in patients with Barrett's esophagus.

Materials and methods. 52 patients with histologically confirmed Barrett's esophagus who are on therapy with proton pump inhibitors were examined. All patients underwent daily pH-impedance and high-resolution esophageal manometry.

Results. According to daily pH-impedance, group 1 consisted of 37 patients who responded satisfactorily to antisecretory therapy, group 2 of 15 patients who demonstrated insufficient response to acid-suppressive therapy, 11 of whom had no clinical manifestations. The total number of reflux averaged 55 in group 1 and 106 in group 2. The average number of acid reflux in group 1 was 5.68, in group 2 — 48.5. The average number of non-acid reflux prevailed in patients of group 2 and averaged 58, in group 1 the indicator averaged 47. Evaluation of the results of high-resolution esophageal manometry showed that violations of the structure and function of the esophago-gastric junction were detected in 21 patients out of 52. Disorders of the motility of the thoracic esophagus were detected in 31 patients out of 52. When comparing the frequency of motor disorders from the thoracic esophagus in groups 1 and 2, no significant differences were obtained. However, significantly more frequent registration of violations of the structure and/or function of the esophago-gastric junction was found in the group with unsatisfactory effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors.

Conclusion. In a number of patients with Barrett's esophagus, there is an insufficient effect of acid-suppressive therapy and at the same time an asymptomatic course of the disease, which may increase the risk of its progression. Predictors of insufficiently successful treatment of patients with Barrett's esophagus may be both insufficient pharmacological effect of proton pump inhibitors themselves, and motility disorders that cause the presence of non-acid reflux, decreased esophageal clearance, which in turn may cause the patient's symptoms to persist and adversely affect the condition of the esophageal mucosa.

Pathophysiology of Pediatric Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: Similarities and Differences With Adults

Gastroesophageal reflux (GOR) is defined as "the passage of gastric contents into the esophagus with or without regurgitation and vomiting" and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GORD) is defined "when GOR leads to troublesome symptoms affecting the daily functioning and/or complications." This definition was first developed in 2006 by the Montreal consensus group (1) and later on adopted by pediatric gastroenterology societies such as ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN in 2009 (2). The definition of gastroesophageal reflux reveals little about its pathophysiology and is focused on symptomatology. In this way, it acts as an umbrella term for the multifactorial causes of the disease and the various phenotypes encountered; from functional heartburn to hypersensitive esophagus and nonerosive reflux disease, to erosive esophagitis and Barrett's esophagus. This article is devoted to the pathophysiology of pediatric GORD in comparison to adult GORD and is divided in 2 parts. In the first part, we will systematically describe the different mechanisms for the generation and clearance of reflux events, while on the second part we will discuss the mechanisms involved in symptoms generation. Finally, we will discuss the similarities and differences between pediatric and adult GORD.

Complex assessment of esophageal acidification and motor function in patients with Barrett's esophagus on antisecretory therapy

Aim. To determine predictors of insufficient effectiveness of proton pump inhibitors based on the parameters of 24-hours pH-impedance and features of motor function of the esophagus in patients with Barrett's esophagus. Materials and methods. 17 patients with histologically verified Barrett's esophagus undergoing acid-suppressive therapy were examined. All patients underwent 24-hours pH-impedance and high-resolution esophageal manometry. Results. According to daily pH-impedance, group 1 consisted of 11 patients with an adequate response to antisecretory therapy, group 2 6 patients with insufficient effectiveness of antisecretory therapy, 5 of whom had no clinical manifestations. The total number of reflux averaged 52 and 91, respectively, in groups 1 and 2. The average number of acid reflux in group 1 was 4.36, in group 2 40.5. The average number of non-acid reflux prevailed in patients of group 2, averaging 58, compared with group 1, where the average was 47. According to the results of high-resolution esophageal manometry, when assessing the structure and function of the esophageal-gastric junction, violations were detected in 6 out of 17 patients. Disorders of the motor function of the thoracic esophagus were detected in 10 out of 17 patients. The tone of the lower esophageal sphincter in group 1 patients was significantly higher in comparison with patients in group 2. Conclusion. A number of patients with Barrett's esophagus have insufficient effectiveness of antisecretory therapy, which may not manifest itself clinically and thereby increase the risk of progression. There was a tendency to more frequent motor disorders in the group with insufficient effectiveness of antisecretory therapy, as well as significantly lower tone of the lower esophageal sphincter, which may be a potential predictor of suboptimal effectiveness of antisecretory therapy.

Bioelectric, tissue, and molecular characteristics of the gastric mucosa at different times of ischemia

Gastrointestinal ischemia may be presented as a complication associated with late shock detection in patients in critical condition. Prolonged ischemia can cause mucosal integrity to lose its barrier function, triggering alterations that can induce organ dysfunction and lead to death. Electrical impedance spectroscopy has been proposed to identify early alteration in ischemia-induced gastric mucosa in this type of patients. This work analyzed changes in impedance parameters, and tissue and molecular alterations that allow us to identify the time of ischemia in which the gastric mucosa still maintains its barrier function. The animals were randomly distributed in four groups: Control, Ischemia 60, 90, and 120 min. Impedance parameters were measured and predictive values were determined to categorize the degree of injury using a receiver operating characteristic curve. Markers of inflammatory process and apoptosis (iNOS, TNFα, COX-2, and Caspase-3) were analyzed. The largest increase in impedance parameters occurred in the ischemia 90 and 120 min groups, with resistance at low frequencies (RL) and reactance at high frequencies (XH) being the most related to damage, allowing prediction of the occurrence of reversible and irreversible tissue damage. Histological analysis and apoptosis assay showed progressive mucosal deterioration with irreversible damage (p < 0.001) starting from 90 min of ischemia. Furthermore, a significant increase in the expression of iNOS, TNFα, and COX-2 was identified in addition to apoptosis in the gastric mucosa starting from 90 min of ischemia. Tissue damage generated by an ischemia time greater than 60 min induces loss of barrier function in the gastric mucosa.

Screening for Barrett's Oesophagus: Are We Ready for it?

Purpose of review

The targeted approach adopted for Barrett’s oesophagus (BO) screening is sub-optimal considering the large proportion of BO cases that are currently missed. We reviewed the literature highlighting recent technological advancements in efforts to counteract this challenge. We also provided insights into strategies that can improve the outcomes from current BO screening practises.

Recent findings

The standard method for BO detection, endoscopy, is invasive and expensive and therefore inappropriate for mass screening. On the other hand, endoscopy is more cost-effective for screening a high-risk population. A consensus has however not been reached on who should be screened. Risk prediction algorithms have been tested as an enrichment pre-screening tool reporting modest AUC’s but require more prospective evaluation studies. Less invasive endoscopy methods like trans-nasal endoscopy, oesophageal capsule endsocopy and non-endoscopic cell collection devices like the Cytosponge coupled with biomarker analysis have shown promise in BO detection with randomised clinical trial evidence.

Summary

A three-tier precision cancer programme whereby risk prediction algorithms and non-endoscopic minimally invasive cell collection devices are used to triage test a wider pool of individuals may improve the detection rate of current screening practises with minimal cost implications.

Current Status of Chemoprevention in Barrett's Esophagus

Candidates for chemoprevention in Barrett's esophagus have long been suggested and there has been observational data to support many drugs, including statins, hormone replacement therapy, metformin, proton pump inhibitor therapy, and aspirin. Proton pump inhibitor therapy and aspirin are the most promising agents. Data suggest that aspirin and proton pump inhibitor therapy can decrease the risk of neoplastic progression in Barrett's esophagus. Further, the combination of aspirin and proton pump inhibitor therapy decrease all-cause mortality by approximately 33%. Future guideline groups need to evaluate the evidence rigorously, but the combination of proton pump inhibitor therapy and aspirin is promising.

Pathophysiology and treatment options for gastroesophageal reflux disease: looking beyond acid

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is a disorder due to the retrograde flow of refluxate into the esophagus. Although GERD is a common clinical diagnosis, its pathogenesis is quite complex. As a result of its multifactorial development, many patients continue to experience adverse symptoms due to GERD despite prolonged acid suppression with proton pump inhibitor therapy. The pathogenesis of GERD involves an interplay of chemical, mechanical, psychologic, and neurologic mechanisms, which contribute to symptom presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. As such, GERD should be approached as a disorder beyond acid. This review will investigate the major factors that contribute to the development of GERD, including factors related to the refluxate, esophageal defenses, and factors that promote pathologic reflux into the esophagus. In reviewing GERD pathogenesis, this paper will highlight therapeutic advances, with mention of future opportunities of study when approaching GERD.

Esophageal Function Abnormalities in Patients With Barrett's Esophagus

Various esophageal functional abnormalities have been described in patients with Barrett's esophagus (BE). A significantly higher esophageal acid exposure especially in the supine position has been documented in BE, as compared with the other gastroesophageal reflux disease phenotypes. In addition, weakly acidic reflux and duodenogastroesophageal reflux are more common in BE patients. The presence of Barrett's mucosa reduces esophageal mucosal impedance, occasionally to a level that prevents detection of reflux episodes. Reduced amplitude contractions and lower esophageal sphincter basal pressure are more common in BE patients as compared with the other gastroesophageal reflux disease groups. Ineffective esophageal motility is the most commonly defined motor disorder in BE. Reduced chemoreceptor and mechanoreceptor sensitivity to acid and balloon distention, respectively, have been suggested to explain lack or significantly less reports of reflux-related symptoms by BE patients.

Lubiprostone protects esophageal mucosa from acid injury in porcine esophagus

Esophageal injury from acid exposure related to gastroesophageal reflux disease is a common problem and a risk factor for development of Barrett's esophagus and esophageal adenocarcinoma. Our previous work highlights the benefits of using porcine esophagus to study human esophageal disease because of the similarities between porcine and human esophagus. In particular, esophageal submucosal glands (ESMGs) are present in human esophagus and proximal porcine esophagus but not in rodent esophagus. Although CFTR is expressed in the ducts of ESMGs, very little is known about CFTR and alternate anion channels, including ClC-2, in the setting of acid-related esophageal injury. After finding evidence of CFTR and ClC-2 in the basal layers of the squamous epithelium, and in the ducts of the ESMGs, we developed an ex vivo porcine model of esophageal acid injury. In this model, esophageal tissue was placed in Ussing chambers to determine the effect of pretreatment with the ClC-2 agonist lubiprostone on tissue damage related to acid exposure. Pretreatment with lubiprostone significantly reduced the level of acid injury and significantly augmented the recovery of the injured tissue (P < 0.05). Evaluation of the interepithelial tight junctions showed well-defined membrane localization of occludin in lubiprostone-treated injured tissues. Pretreatment of tissues with the Na⁺-K⁺-2Cl^- cotransporter inhibitor bumetanide blocked lubiprostone-induced increases in short-circuit current and inhibited the reparative effect of lubiprostone. Furthermore, inhibition of ClC-2 with ZnCl₂ blocked the effects of lubiprostone. We conclude that ClC-2 contributes to esophageal protection from acid exposure, potentially offering a new therapeutic target.NEW & NOTEWORTHY This research is the first to describe the presence of anion channels ClC-2 and CFTR localized to the basal epithelia of porcine esophageal mucosa and the esophageal submucosal glands. In the setting of ex vivo acid exposure, the ClC-2 agonist lubiprostone reduced acid-related injury and enhanced recovery of the epithelial barrier. This work may ultimately provide an alternate mechanism for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Esophageal acid sensitivity in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease: Does esophageal hypomotility matter?

BACKGROUND/AIM

Esophageal acid sensitivity plays a role in symptomatic manifestation of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Esophageal hypomotility is common in patients with GERD. We aimed to determine whether esophageal acid sensitivity may differ between patients with and without esophageal hypomotility.

METHODS

We prospectively enrolled 41 consecutive patients (10 females, mean age 53 years, range 32-79) with typical reflux symptoms and 10 healthy subjects (5 females, mean age 45 years, range 28-56) for esophageal acid sensitivity and motility tests. Demographics, body mass index (BMI), and reflux symptoms using a validated questionnaire (GERDQ) were recorded. All subjects underwent infusion of 0.1 N hydrochloric acid in the esophagus at a rate of 10 mL/min for 10 minutes. The parameters for esophageal acid infusion included lag time, intensity rating, and acid sensitivity score.

RESULTS

Esophageal motility diagnosis included 24 patients with normal motility and 17 patients with ineffective esophageal motility (IEM). Lag time was similar between the patient groups. No differences between patients with normal motility and IEM were found for any of other acid infusion parameters. There was a positive correlation between lag time and BMI (r = .33, P = .04). GERDQ was negatively correlated to lag time (r = -.73, P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Esophageal acid sensitivity was similar in GERD patients with and without hypomotility. Decreased acid sensitivity in individuals with increasing body mass index may play a pathological role in symptomatic modulation of patients with GERD.