Mismatch epitope load predicts de novo-DSA-free survival in pediatric liver transplantation

Impact of HLA Eplet Mismatch on De Novo Donor Specific Antibody Formation After Kidney Transplantation

BACKGROUND

HLA eplet mismatching is an alternative approach to assess the risk of developing de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) in kidney transplantation. This strategy may offer more precise risk stratification than conventional approaches. This study aimed to find the association between HLA eplet mismatches and dnDSA formation in Thai kidney transplant recipients.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of kidney transplant recipients transplanted between 2000 and 2021 at Ramathibodi Hospital was performed. Recipients with pretransplant panel reactive antibody >0% or without DSA testing post-transplant were excluded. One hundred fifty recipients were included in the final study. High-resolution HLA typing was imputed by the HaploStat application. HLA eplet mismatch analysis was conducted using HLAMatchmaker. The association between the number of eplet mismatches and the risk of dnDSA formation was assessed by Cox regression analysis.

RESULTS

Of 150 recipients, 43 were dnDSA-positive, and 107 were dnDSA-negative patients. Compared with the dnDSA-negative group, patients with class II dnDSA had significantly more HLA-DR/DQ antibody (Ab)-verified eplet mismatches (6 [IQR 4-8] vs 4 [IQR 1-7], P = .045). The receiver operating characteristics analysis showed that the HLA-DQ Ab-verified eplet mismatches ≥2 were the best predictive of HLA class II dnDSA development. The number of HLA-DQ Ab-verified eplet mismatches ≥2 had the highest hazard rate of HLA class II dnDSA occurrence (adjusted HR, 3.74; 95%CI, 1.24-11.24, P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

HLA-DQ Ab-verified eplet mismatches are significantly associated with class II dnDSA development. Our data supports the utility of HLA eplet mismatching for donor-recipient risk assessment.

T-cell infiltrate intensity is associated with delayed response to treatment in late acute cellular rejection in pediatric liver transplant recipients

BACKGROUND

Late acute cellular rejection (ACR) is associated with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) development, chronic rejection, and allograft loss. However, accurate predictors of late ACR treatment response are lacking. ACR is primarily T-cell mediated, yet B cells and plasma cells (PC) also infiltrate the portal areas during late ACR. To test the hypothesis that the inflammatory milieu is associated with delayed response (DR) to rejection therapy, we performed a single-center retrospective case-control study of pediatric late liver ACR using multiparameter immunofluorescence for CD4, CD8, CD68, CD20, and CD138 to identify immune cell subpopulations.

METHODS

Pediatric liver transplant recipients transplanted at <17 years of age and treated for biopsy-proven late ACR between January 2014 and 2019 were stratified into rapid response (RR) and DR based on alanine aminotransferase (ALT) normalization within 30 days of diagnosis. All patients received IV methylprednisolone as an initial rejection treatment. Immunofluorescence was performed on archived formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) liver biopsy tissue.

RESULTS

Liver biopsies from 60 episodes of late ACR in 54 patients were included in the analysis, of which 33 were DR (55%). Anti-thymocyte globulin was only required in the DR group. The frequency of liver-infiltrating CD20+ and CD8+ lymphocytes and the prevalence of autoantibodies were higher in the DR group. In univariate logistic regression analysis, serum gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT) level at diagnosis, but not ALT, Banff score or presence of DSA, predicted DR.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher serum GGT level, presence of autoantibodies, and increased CD8+ T-cell infiltration portends DR in late ACR treatment in children.

Importance of human leukocyte antigen antibodies and leukocyte antigen/killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor genes in liver transplantation

Many mechanisms have been proposed to explain the hypothetical state of hepatic tolerance, which is described by eventual imbalances or deregulation in the balance of cytokines, mediators, effectors, and regulatory cells in the complex milieu of the liver. In this section, we will comment on the importance of donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (DSA) as well as the compatibility and pairings of HLA and killer-cell immunoglobulin-like receptor (KIR) genotypes in the evolution of liver transplantation. Thus, HLA compatibility, viral infections, and HLA-C/KIR combinations have all been linked to liver transplant rejection and survival. There have been reports of increased risk of acute and chronic rejection with ductopenia, faster graft fibrosis, biliary problems, poorer survival, and even de novo autoimmune hepatitis when DSAs are present in the recipient. Higher mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) values of the DSAs and smaller graft size were associated with poorer patient outcomes, implying that high-risk patients with preformed DSAs should be considered for selecting the graft placed and desensitization methods, according to the investigators. Similarly, in a combined kidney-liver transplant, a pretransplant with a visible expression of several DSAs revealed that these antibodies were resistant to treatment. The renal graft was lost owing to antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). The HLA antigens expressed by the transplanted liver graft influenced antibody elimination. Pathologists are increasingly diagnosing AMR in liver transplants, and desensitization therapy has even been employed in situations of AMR, particularly in patients with DSAs in kidney-hepatic transplants and high-class II MFI due to Luminex. In conclusion, after revealing the negative impacts of DSAs with high MFI, pretransplant virtual crossmatch techniques may be appropriate to improve evolution; however, they may extend cold ischemia periods by requiring the donor to be typed.