Correlation between Luminex donor-specific crossmatches and levels of donor-specific antibodies in pretransplantation screening

Low Expression Loci and the Use of Pronase in Flow Cytometry Crossmatch

Pronase treatment of lymphocytes has been used to improve the specificity and sensitivity of flow cytometric crossmatch, especially B-cell flow cytometric crossmatch, due to the presence of Fc receptors on the cell surface. Some limitations have been reported in the literature: false negatives due to the reduction of major histocompatibility complex expression and false-positive T cells in HIV+ patients due to exposure to cryptic epitopes. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of pronase in our assays, using untreated and treated cells with 2.35 U/mL of pronase to improve flow cytometric crossmatch specificity and sensitivity. The study was carried out with donor-specific IgG antibodies (DSAs) to low expression loci (HLA-C, -DQ, or -DP) because, in our laboratory practice, patients with virtual crossmatch (LABScreen single antigen assays) to DSA against antigen HLA-A, B, and DR are excluded from cellular crossmatch. Our results showed that, for T-cell flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), a cutoff value of 1171 median fluorescence intensity (MFI), an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.926 (P < .0001), and 0.834 (P < .0001), a sensitivity of 100% and 85.7%, and a specificity of 77.5% and 74.4%, without and with pronase treatment, respectively. For B-cell FCXM without pronase treatment, the best cutoff was 2766 MFI, an AUC of 0.731 (P < .0001), a sensitivity of 69.6%, and a specificity of 66.7%, whereas for B cells treated with pronase, the cutoff value was 4496 MFI, an AUC of 0.852 (P < .0001), a sensitivity of 86.4%, and a specificity of 77.8%. Our analysis of 128 FCXM showed a better performance using the untreated lymphocytes for FCXM with the prerequisite of a higher cutoff value (≈5000 MFI) to reach a better sensitivity and specificity due to the loss of HLA expression.

Improved detection of donor-specific HLA-class II antibody in kidney transplant recipients by modified immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis

Immunocomplex capture fluorescence analysis (ICFA) which basic principle is same as Luminex crossmatch (LXM), could detect donor-specific HLA antibody (DSA). The advantages of ICFA are (i) detection of DSA and (ii) no requirement of viable cells over the flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM). However, FCXM has been widely used because of its higher sensitivity than ICFA, in particular HLA-class II antibody detection. In this study the accuracy of DSA detection against HLA-class II was investigated by modifying the original method of ICFA. Increment of the sensitivity was found when purified peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were used instead of whole blood. An ICFA-PBMC in addition to FCXM-T/B was conducted for 118 patients before kidney transplantation and 13 patients with de novo DSA against HLA-class II after transplantation. Significantly positive correlation was observed between the values of ICFA-PBMC and DSA mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) targeting class II (p < 0.0001). When the cutoff level of 1.4 was determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, the average DSA MFI was found to be significantly higher in the ICFA-PBMC (class II) positive group comparing to that in the negative group (12,217 vs 3885, p = 0.0027). ICFA-PBMC and optimized cutoff level could provide valid information in cases of suspected DSA.

Flow cytometry crossmatching to investigate kidney-biopsy-proven, antibody-mediated rejection in patients who develop de novo donor-specific antibodies

INTRODUCTION

The appearance of de novo donor-specific anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (dnDSAs) after kidney transplantation is independently associated with poor long-term allograft outcomes. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the predictive value of a flow cytometry crossmatching (FC-XM) assay after the appearance of dnDSAs related to antibody-mediated allograft rejection (ABMR) after kidney transplantation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 89 recipients with dnDSAs after transplantation were included. The crossmatching results were compared with the dnDSA profile (the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI), the complement-binding activity, and the IgG subclass profile) and the biopsy's morphological features.

RESULTS

Of the 89 patients, 59 (66%) were positive in an FC-XM assay, 17 (19%) had complement-binding DSAs, 55 (62%) were positive for IgG1 and/or IgG3 in a solid phase assay, and 45 (51%) had morphological biopsy features linked to ABMR.

CONCLUSION

An FC-XM assay was unable to discriminate between cases with or without ABMR on biopsy findings; it had a low positive predictive value (<70%) and a low negative positive predictive value (<42.9%), taking into account the sensitivity of our assay (limit of detection: DSAs with an MFI >3000). In this context, the height of the MFI of the dnDSAs might be enough for a high positive predictive value for ABMR and additional testing for complement binding activity can remain optional.

Comparison of two peripheral mononuclear cell isolation protocols for flow cytometry crossmatching

In clinical organ transplantation, flow cytometry crossmatching can be performed on total blood with a hemolysis step or after a preliminary mononuclear cell separation step using a standard Ficoll-Hypaque protocol. Here, we compared the Ficoll-Hypaque step with a faster technique for isolating mononuclear cells (the SepMate tube), using the same samples (collected and stored at room temperature for 0, 24, 48 or 72 hours). We found that the SepMate separation protocol is easily applied to flow cytometry crossmatching (with or without pronase treatment), provided that the samples have been stored at room temperature for 48 hours or less. Conversely, the Ficoll-Hypaque protocol should be used if the samples have been stored for more than 48 hours at room temperature.

Relevance of Flow Cytometric Auto-Crossmatch to the Post-transplant Course of Kidney Transplant Recipients

INTRODUCTION

The crossmatch test is essential prior to kidney transplantation (tx) to confirm compatibility between the donor and the recipient. However, its results can be misleading due to "undetectable antibodies" in the recipient's serum. To establish if undetectable autoantibodies are responsible for a positive result, an auto-crossmatch test can be performed. In this study, we aim to determine the long-term prognostic value of auto-flow cytometric auto-crossmatch (FCXM) test on kidney survival in kidney tx recipients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The primary outcome variable was reduced renal function. Secondary endpoints were incidence of biopsy-confirmed chronic antibody-mediated rejection (CAMR) and recurrent glomerulonephritis (GN).

RESULTS

There were no differences regarding initial serum creatinine levels between the study and control groups (P = .441). Patients who had positive auto-B FCXM had a significantly reduced renal function compared with the control group (P = .016). Four patients developed biopsy-confirmed CAMR in the study group and 1 patient in the control group (P = .047). Five patients had biopsy-confirmed recurrent GN in the GN study group, and only 1 patient had recurrent GN in the GN control group (P = .026).

DISCUSSION

Kidney transplant recipients with positive auto-FCXM test had significantly reduced renal function and a higher incidence of recurrent GN and CAMR compared with the control group. The findings of this study suggest a potential role of auto-antibody causing positive auto-FCXM test result, meanwhile increasing the risk of CAMR, recurrent GN, and new-onset diabetes after tx.

Unexpected Positive Prospective Crossmatches in Organ Transplant

Preformed donor-specific antibodies against human leukocyte antigen can induce antibody-mediated rejection after organ transplant. Hence, future transplant recipients undergo pretransplant screening for preformed antibodies (ie, virtual crossmatch). Subsequently, prospective (analytic) crossmatching is performed using conventional, complement-dependent cytotoxicity assays and/or flow cytometry-based methods. The present article reviews factors that must be considered when unexpected, positive, prospective crossmatches are observed. First, the prozone effect caused by the interference of complement or immunoglobulin M must be abrogated by treating the serum with moderate heat, dilution, hypotonic dialysis, EDTA, or dithiothreitol. Second, the physician must check for the presence of potentially interfering autoantibodies (in a context of autoimmune disease or human immunodeficiency virus infection) or therapeutic antibodies (such as rituximab and antithymocyte globulin). In conclusion, knowledge of each assay's technical characteristics will enable the physician to reliably interpret any discrepancies. The reasons for an unexpected, positive, prospective crossmatch must be elucidated before transplant to ensure efficient organ allocation and optimize patient outcomes.

Detection of HLA Antibodies in Organ Transplant Recipients - Triumphs and Challenges of the Solid Phase Bead Assay

This review outlines the development of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibody detection assays and their use in organ transplantation in both antibody screening and crossmatching. The development of sensitive solid phase assays such as the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay technique, and in particular the bead-based technology has revolutionized this field over the last 10-15 years. This revolution however has created a new paradigm in clinical decision making with respect to the detection of low level pretransplant HLA sensitization and its clinical relevance. The relative sensitivities of the assays used are discussed and the relevance of conflicting inter-assay results. Each assay has its advantages and disadvantages and these are discussed. Over the last decade, the bead-based assay utilizing the Luminex® fluorocytometer instrument has become established as the "gold standard" for HLA antibody testing. However, there are still unresolved issues surrounding this technique, such as the presence of denatured HLA molecules on the beads which reveal cryptic epitopes and the issue of appropriate fluorescence cut off values for positivity. The assay has been modified to detect complement binding (CB) in addition to non-complement binding (NCB) HLA antibodies although the clinical relevance of the CB and NCB IgG isotypes is not fully resolved. The increase sensitivity of the Luminex® bead assay over the complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch has permitted the concept of the "virtual crossmatch" whereby the crossmatch is predicted to a high degree of accuracy based on the HLA antibody specificities detected by the solid phase assay. Dialog between clinicians and laboratory staff on an individual patient basis is essential for correct clinical decision making based on HLA antibody results obtained by the various techniques.

False Positive B-Cells Crossmatch after Prior Rituximab Exposure of the Kidney Donor

Crossmatching is essential prior to kidney transplantation to confirm compatibility between the donor and the recipient, particularly to prevent acute antibody-mediated rejection. An unexpected positive crossmatch may be obtained in recipients with an autoimmune disease or preexisting antibodies not detected by single-antigen bead array due to complement interference or who have been previously treated by desensitization protocols such as rituximab, antithymocyte globulin, or intravenous immunoglobulins. We report donor and recipient investigations that revealed unexpected positive B-cells crossmatch, probably due to donor cells, as the donor had received rituximab therapy shortly before organ harvesting, in a context of severe idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura. We consequently detected unexpected Class II IgG complement-dependent cytotoxicity for all sera tested. Other laboratory investigations failed to elucidate the reasons for this recipient-related positivity.