Living kidney donor evaluation for all candidates with normal estimated GFR for age

End-proximal tubule phosphate concentration increases as GFR falls in humans: measurement by means of a lithium clearance-based methodology

BACKGROUND

Microscopic nephrocalcinosis secondary to intratubular calcium phosphate (CaP) precipitation is thought to accelerate progression to end-stage renal failure in chronic kidney diseases. In phosphorus (P)-loaded uninephrectomized rats, intratubular CaP crystal formation and progressive tubular damage occurred when end-proximal tubule P concentration (ePTpc) increased above a threshold level.

METHODS

We have calculated ePTpc in humans by urine P and creatinine concentration, with the end-proximal tubule fluid volume calculated either as lithium (Li) clearance (ePTpc-Li) or as a fixed 0.7 fraction of glomerular filtration rate (GFR), as published (ePTpc-70). Healthy people undergoing living transplant kidney donation before (DON-pre, n = 70) and after (DON-post, n = 64) nephrectomy and 25 patients with stage 2-5 CKD were investigated while on regular free diet.

RESULTS

ePTpc showed a stepwise increase with decreasing functional renal mass (DON-pre 2.51 ± 0.99 and 1.56 ± 0.47 mg/dL for ePTpc-Li and -70 calculation, respectively; DON-post 3.43 ± 1.14 and 2.18 ± 0.44;  CKD 5.68 ± 3.30 and 3.00 ± 1.30, P < .001 for all); ePTpc was inversely correlated with Ccr and directly with PTH, fractional P excretion and excretion (UpV) corrected for GFR (P < .001 for all), but not with Pp. ePTpc-Li and ePTpc-70 were significantly correlated (r = 0.62, P < .001), but ePTpc-70 was lower than the corresponding ePTpc-Li. Levels of ePTpc increased above a suggested dangerous threshold when daily UpV/GFR was higher than about 10 mg/mLCcr.

CONCLUSIONS

ePTpc progressively increases in humans as functional renal mass falls independently from plasma P levels. Main determinants of ePTpc rise are GFR fall, degree of phosphaturia per unit GFR and P intake corrected for GFR. It may become a novel, potentially useful, indicator to guide management of CKD patients.

Assessing Renal Function for Kidney Donation. How Low Is Too Low?

Kidney transplantation (KT) is the treatment of choice for patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) with decreased morbi-mortality, improved life quality, and reduced cost. However, the shortage of organs from deceased donors led to an increase in KT from living donors. Some stipulate that living donors have a higher risk of ESKD after donation compared with healthy non-donors. The reason for this is not clear. It is possible that ESKD is due to the nephrectomy-related reduction in glomerular filtration rate (GFR), followed by an age-related decline that may be more rapid in related donors. It is essential to assess donors properly to avoid rejecting suitable ones and not accepting those with a higher risk of ESKD. GFR is a central aspect of the evaluation of potential donors since there is an association between low GFR and ESKD. The methods for assessing GFR are in continuous debate, and the kidney function thresholds for accepting a donor may vary according to the guidelines. While direct measurements of GFR (mGFR) provide the most accurate evaluation of kidney function, guidelines do not systematically use this measurement as a reference. Also, some studies have shown that the GFR decreases with age and may vary with gender and race, therefore, the lower limit of GFR in patients eligible to donate may vary based on these demographic factors. Finally, it is known that CrCl overestimates mGFR while eGFR underestimates it, therefore, another way to have a reliable GFR could be the combination of two measurement methods.