Elevated skin and core temperatures both contribute to reductions in tolerance to a simulated haemorrhagic challenge

Post-exercise Body Cooling: Skin Blood Flow, Venous Pooling, and Orthostatic Intolerance

Athletes and certain occupations (e.g., military, firefighters) must navigate unique heat challenges as they perform physical tasks during prolonged heat stress, at times while wearing protective clothing that hinders heat dissipation. Such environments and activities elicit physiological adjustments that prioritize thermoregulatory skin perfusion at the expense of arterial blood pressure and may result in decreases in cerebral blood flow. High levels of skin blood flow combined with an upright body position augment venous pooling and transcapillary fluid shifts in the lower extremities. Combined with sweat-driven reductions in plasma volume, these cardiovascular alterations result in levels of cardiac output that do not meet requirements for brain blood flow, which can lead to orthostatic intolerance and occasionally syncope. Skin surface cooling countermeasures appear to be a promising means of improving orthostatic tolerance via autonomic mechanisms. Increases in transduction of sympathetic activity into vascular resistance, and an increased baroreflex set-point have been shown to be induced by surface cooling implemented after passive heating and other arterial pressure challenges. Considering the further contribution of exercise thermogenesis to orthostatic intolerance risk, our goal in this review is to provide an overview of post-exercise cooling strategies as they are capable of improving autonomic control of the circulation to optimize orthostatic tolerance. We aim to synthesize both basic and applied physiology knowledge available regarding real-world application of cooling strategies to reduce the likelihood of experiencing symptomatic orthostatic intolerance after exercise in the heat.

Impact of environmental stressors on tolerance to hemorrhage in humans

Hemorrhage is a leading cause of death in military and civilian settings, and ~85% of potentially survivable battlefield deaths are hemorrhage-related. Soldiers and civilians are exposed to a number of environmental and physiological conditions that have the potential to alter tolerance to a hemorrhagic insult. The objective of this review is to summarize the known impact of commonly encountered environmental and physiological conditions on tolerance to hemorrhagic insult, primarily in humans. The majority of the studies used lower body negative pressure (LBNP) to simulate a hemorrhagic insult, although some studies employed incremental blood withdrawal. This review addresses, first, the use of LBNP as a model of hemorrhage-induced central hypovolemia and, then, the effects of the following conditions on tolerance to LBNP: passive and exercise-induced heat stress with and without hypohydration/dehydration, exposure to hypothermia, and exposure to altitude/hypoxia. An understanding of the effects of these environmental and physiological conditions on responses to a hemorrhagic challenge, including tolerance, can enable development and implementation of targeted strategies and interventions to reduce the impact of such conditions on tolerance to a hemorrhagic insult and, ultimately, improve survival from blood loss injuries.

Small reductions in skin temperature after onset of a simulated hemorrhagic challenge improve tolerance in exercise heat-stressed individuals

We investigated whether small reductions in skin temperature 60 s after the onset of a simulated hemorrhagic challenge would improve tolerance to lower body negative pressure (LBNP) after exercise heat stress. Eleven healthy subjects completed two trials (High and Reduced). Subjects cycled at ~55% maximal oxygen uptake wearing a warm water-perfused suit until core temperatures increased by ~1.2°C before lying supine and undergoing LBNP to presyncope. LBNP tolerance was quantified as cumulative stress index (CSI; product of each LBNP level multiplied by time; mmHg·min). Skin temperature was similarly elevated from baseline before LBNP and remained elevated 60 s after the onset of LBNP in both High (37.72 ± 0.52°C) and Reduced (37.95 ± 0.54°C) trials (both P < 0.0001). At 60%CSI skin temperature remained elevated in the High trial (37.51 ± 0.56°C) but was reduced to 34.97 ± 0.72°C by the water-perfused suit in the Reduced trial ( P < 0.0001 between trials). Cutaneous vascular conductance was not different between trials [High: 1.57 ± 0.43 vs. Reduced: 1.39 ± 0.38 arbitrary units (AU)/mmHg; P = 0.367] before LBNP but decreased to 0.67 ± 0.19 AU/mmHg at 60%CSI in the Reduced trial while remaining unchanged in the High trial ( P = 0.002 between trials). CSI was higher in the Reduced (695 ± 386 mmHg·min) relative to the High (441 ± 290 mmHg·min; P = 0.023) trial. Mean arterial pressure was not different between trials at presyncope (High: 62 ± 10 vs. Reduced: 62 ± 9 mmHg; P = 0.958). Small reductions in skin temperature after the onset of a simulated hemorrhagic challenge improve LBNP tolerance after exercise heat stress. This may have important implications regarding treatment of an exercise heat-stressed individual (e.g., soldier) who has experienced a hemorrhagic injury.