Development of a novel mouth model as an alternative tool to test the effectiveness of an in vivo EPR dosimetry system

In a large-scale radiation event, thousands may be exposed to unknown amounts of radiation, some of which may be life-threatening without immediate attention. In such situations, a method to quickly and reliably estimate dose would help medical responders triage victims to receive life-saving care. We developed such a method using electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) to make in vivo measurements of the maxillary incisors. This report provides evidence that the use of in vitro studies can provide data that are fully representative of the measurements made in vivo. This is necessary because, in order to systematically test and improve the reliability and accuracy of the dose estimates made with our EPR dosimetry system, it is important to conduct controlled studies in vitro using irradiated human teeth. Therefore, it is imperative to validate whether our in vitro models adequately simulate the measurements made in vivo, which are intended to help guide decisions on triage after a radiation event. Using a healthy volunteer with a dentition gap that allows using a partial denture, human teeth were serially irradiated in vitro and then, using a partial denture, placed in the volunteer's mouth for measurements. We compared dose estimates made using in vivo measurements made in the volunteer's mouth to measurements made on the same teeth in our complex mouth model that simulates electromagnetic and anatomic properties of the mouth. Our results demonstrate that this mouth model can be used in in vitro studies to develop the system because these measurements appropriately model in vivo conditions.

IN-VIVO RADIATION DOSIMETRY USING PORTABLE L BAND EPR: ON-SITE MEASUREMENT OF VOLUNTEERS IN FUKUSHIMA PREFECTURE, JAPAN

The aim of this study was to make direct measurements of the possible radiation-induced EPR signals in the teeth of volunteers who were residents in Fukushima within 80 km distance from the Fukushima Nuclear Power plant at the time of the disaster, and continued to live there for at least 3 month after the disaster. Thirty four volunteers were enrolled in this study. These measurements were made using a portable L-band EPR spectrometer, which was originally developed in the EPR Center at Dartmouth. All measurements were performed using surface loop resonators that have been specifically designed for the upper incisor teeth. Potentially these signals include not only radiation-induced signals induced by the incident but also background signals including those from prior radiation exposure from the environment and medical exposure. We demonstrated that it is feasible to transport the dosimeter to the measurement site and make valid measurements. The intensity of the signals that were obtained was not significantly above those seen in volunteers who had not had potential radiation exposures at Fukushima.

Dielectric-Backed Aperture Resonators for X-Band in vivo EPR Nail Dosimetry

A new resonator for X-band in vivo EPR nail dosimetry, the dielectric-backed aperture resonator (DAR), is developed based on rectangular TE₁₀₂ geometry. This novel geometry for surface spectroscopy improves at least a factor of 20 compared to a traditional non-backed aperture resonator. Such an increase in EPR sensitivity is achieved by using a non-resonant dielectric slab, placed on the aperture inside the cavity. The dielectric slab provides an increased magnetic field at the aperture and sample, while minimizing sensitive aperture resonance conditions. This work also introduces a DAR semi-spherical (SS)-TE₀₁₁ geometry. The SS-TE₀₁₁ geometry is attractive due to having twice the incident magnetic field at the aperture for a fixed input power. It has been shown that DAR provides sufficient sensitivity to make biologically relevant measurements both in vitro and in vivo Although in vivo tests have shown some effects of physiological motions that suggest the necessity of a more robust finger holder, equivalent dosimetry sensitivity of approximately 1.4 Gy has been demonstrated.

Evaluating the Special Needs of The Military for Radiation Biodosimetry for Tactical Warfare Against Deployed Troops: Comparing Military to Civilian Needs for Biodosimetry Methods

The aim of this paper is to delineate characteristics of biodosimetry most suitable for assessing individuals who have potentially been exposed to significant radiation from a nuclear device explosion when the primary population targeted by the explosion and needing rapid assessment for triage is civilians vs. deployed military personnel. The authors first carry out a systematic analysis of the requirements for biodosimetry to meet the military's needs to assess deployed troops in a warfare situation, which include accomplishing the military mission. Then the military's special capabilities to respond and carry out biodosimetry for deployed troops in warfare are compared and contrasted systematically, in contrast to those available to respond and conduct biodosimetry for civilians who have been targeted by terrorists, for example. Then the effectiveness of different biodosimetry methods to address military vs. civilian needs and capabilities in these scenarios was compared and, using five representative types of biodosimetry with sufficient published data to be useful for the simulations, the number of individuals are estimated who could be assessed by military vs. civilian responders within the timeframe needed for triage decisions. Analyses based on these scenarios indicate that, in comparison to responses for a civilian population, a wartime military response for deployed troops has both more complex requirements for and greater capabilities to use different types of biodosimetry to evaluate radiation exposure in a very short timeframe after the exposure occurs. Greater complexity for the deployed military is based on factors such as a greater likelihood of partial or whole body exposure, conditions that include exposure to neutrons, and a greater likelihood of combined injury. These simulations showed, for both the military and civilian response, that a very fast rate of initiating the processing (24,000 d) is needed to have at least some methods capable of completing the assessment of 50,000 people within a 2- or 6-d timeframe following exposure. This in turn suggests a very high capacity (i.e., laboratories, devices, supplies and expertise) would be necessary to achieve these rates. These simulations also demonstrated the practical importance of the military's superior capacity to minimize time to transport samples to offsite facilities and use the results to carry out triage quickly. Assuming sufficient resources and the fastest daily rate to initiate processing victims, the military scenario revealed that two biodosimetry methods could achieve the necessary throughput to triage 50,000 victims in 2 d (i.e., the timeframe needed for injured victims), and all five achieved the targeted throughput within 6 d. In contrast, simulations based on the civilian scenario revealed that no method could process 50,000 people in 2 d and only two could succeed within 6 d.