Purdue Pharma to plead guilty and pay $8.3bn over opioid marketing

Factors related to opioid misuse among patients undergoing elective surgery in Poland

In many countries, the consumption of illicit opioids is rising, becoming a major public health issue called the "opioid crisis". Many reasons contribute to this phenomenon. One of them is opioid misuse, defined as the use of legally prescribed opioids for a purpose different than pain treatment. This matter has not been well studied in Poland, where the opioid crisis has not been identified so far. This study was conducted among patients admitted for elective surgery with opioid-based postoperative pain treatment. The frequency of opioid misuse was found to be 10.8% in a sample comprising 92 patients. The group of individuals with potential opioid use disorder had a more frequent history of inadequately controlled postoperative pain compared to the group of non-misusers (p = 0.023). Furthermore, this group asked to receive additional pain treatment almost six times more often than the control group (p < 0.000). Also, patients declaring opioid misuse reported substantial differences concerning their knowledge and opinions about pain treatment and opioid analgesics: supporting the administration of opioids for pain when needed, finding opioids less harmful, and supporting messages that opioids are safe, effective, well-tolerated, easy to cutoff more often than control. There is an urgent need for the education of patients to avoid the spreading of the opioid crisis.

Neuropathic pain: Mechanisms and therapeutic strategies

The physiopathology and neurotransmission of pain are of an owe inspiring complexity. Our ability to satisfactorily suppress neuropathic or other forms of chronic pain is limited. The number of pharmacodynamically distinct and clinically available medications is low and the successes achieved modest. Pain Medicine practitioners are confronted with the ethical dichotomy imposed by Hippocrates: On one hand the mandate of primum non nocere, on the other hand, the promise of heavenly joys if successful divinum est opus sedare dolorem. We briefly summarize the concepts associated with nociceptive pain from nociceptive input (afferents from periphery), modulatory output [descending noradrenergic (NE) and serotoninergic (5-HT) fibers] to local control. The local control is comprised of the "inflammatory soup" at the site of pain origin and synaptic relay stations, with an ATP-rich environment promoting inflammation and nociception while an adenosine-rich environment having the opposite effect. Subsequently, we address the transition from nociceptor pain to neuropathic pain (independent of nociceptor activation) and the process of sensitization and pain chronification (transient pain progressing into persistent pain). Having sketched a model of pain perception and processing we attempt to identify the sites and modes of action of clinically available drugs used in chronic pain treatment, focusing on adjuvant (co-analgesic) medication.

Twenty-year trends in pharmaceutical fentanyl and illicit fentanyl deaths, Australia 2001-2021

BACKGROUND

Increasing overdose deaths attributable to illicitly manufactured fentanyl and fentanyl analogues in North America has driven international concern about the expansion of these substances into drug markets elsewhere. This paper investigates 20-year trends in fentanyl deaths in Australia, distinguishing between deaths attributable to pharmaceutical, and to illicitly manufactured fentanyl and fentanyl analogues.

METHODS

Analysis of fentanyl overdose deaths (2001-2021), extracted from the National Coronial Information System (NCIS).

RESULTS

833 fentanyl-related deaths were identified, predominantly occurring among males (73%), and people with a history of injecting drug use (67%). Rates of fentanyl deaths significantly increased between 2001 and 2014 and declined between 2015 and 2021. Drug dependence remained the most significant factor in deaths among people with a history of injecting drug use (87% vs 23% without such a history), while having died by suicide was the most significant factor for those without a history of injecting drug use (20% vs 4% respectively). Three quarters (72%) of deaths were attributable to pharmaceutical fentanyl and 21% to probable pharmaceutical fentanyl, with 5% attributable to fentanyl analogues (3%) (predominantly furanylfentanyl and acetylfentanyl) and illicitly manufactured fentanyl (2%). Deaths attributable to illicitly manufactured fentanyl and fentanyl analogues occurred from 2013 onwards.

CONCLUSION

Pharmaceutical fentanyl deaths in Australia have declined since 2015, in parallel with overall declines in pharmaceutical opioids (including fentanyl) dispensed since 2014. Deaths continue to occur among people with a history of injecting drug use and drug dependence. Deaths attributable to illicit fentanyl have emerged since 2013 but remain low in comparison to pharmaceutical fentanyl deaths.

The iatrogenic opioid crisis: An example of 'institutional corruption of pharmaceuticals'?

RATIONALE

Prescribed opioids are major contributors to the international public health opioid crisis. Such widespread iatrogenic harms usually result from collective decision failures of healthcare organizations rather than solely of individual organizations or professionals. Findings from a system-wide safety analysis of the iatrogenic opioid crisis that includes roles of pertinent healthcare organizations may help avoid or mitigate similar future iatrogenic consequences. In this retrospective exploratory study, we report such an analysis.

METHODS

The study population encompassed the entire age spectrum and included those in whom opioids prescribed for chronic pain (unrelated to malignancy) were associated with death or morbidity. Root cause analysis, incorporating recent suggestions for improvement, was used to identify possible contributory factors from the literature. Based on their mandated roles and potential influences to prevent or mitigate the iatrogenic crisis, relevant organizations were grouped and stratified from most to least influential.

RESULTS

The analysis identified a chain of multiple interrelated causal factors within and between organizations. The most influential organizations were pharmaceutical, political, and drug regulatory; next: experts and their related societies, and publications. Less influential: accreditation, professional licensing and regulatory, academic and healthcare funding bodies. Collectively, their views and decisions influenced prescribing practices of frontline healthcare professionals and advocacy groups. Financial associations between pharmaceutical and most other organizations/groups were common. Ultimately, patients were adversely affected. There was a complex association with psychosocial variables.

LIMITATIONS

The analysis suggests associations not causality.

CONCLUSION

The iatrogenic crisis has multiple intricately linked roots. The major catalyst: pervasive pharma-linked financial conflicts of interest (CoIs) involving most other healthcare organizations. These extensive financial CoIs were likely triggers for a cascade of erroneous decisions and actions that adversely affected patients. The actions and decisions of pharma ranged from unethical to illegal. The iatrogenic opioid crisis may exemplify 'institutional corruption of pharmaceuticals'.