1
|
Pollard S, Weymann D, Loewen R, Nuk J, Sun S, Schrader KA, Hessels C, Regier DA. Development and early-stage evaluation of a patient portal to enhance familial communication about hereditary cancer susceptibility testing: A patient-driven approach. Health Expect 2023; 26:774-784. [PMID: 36660874 PMCID: PMC10010078 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13702] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Genetic testing for hereditary cancer syndromes (HCSs) can improve health outcomes through cancer risk mitigation strategies. Effective communication between tested individuals and their family members is key to reducing the hereditary cancer burden. Our objective was to develop a patient portal to improve familial communication for patients undergoing HCS genetic testing, followed by an early-phase evaluation. METHODS The portal was developed following the completion of 25 semistructured interviews with individuals having undergone HCS susceptibility testing at BC Cancer. Following initial development, we recruited patients and healthcare providers to provide critical feedback informing portal refinement. Quantitative feedback was summarized using descriptive statistics, and qualitative feedback was synthesized by two reviewers who engaged in iterative discussion within the research team to prioritize recommendations for integration. RESULTS The patient portal includes four key components consisting of (a) targeted educational information about hereditary cancer and HBOC syndrome associated risks and testing process overview, (b) a general frequently asked questions 'FAQ' page informed by the qualitative interviews, patient partner feedback, and consultation with the HCP, (c) guidance to support familial communication including a video developed with a patient partner describing their lived experience navigating the communication process and (d) a series of lay summaries of genetic test findings to support information transfer among family members. Thirteen healthcare providers and seven patients participated in user testing. Domains within which participant recommendations were provided included presentation, educational content and process clarification. CONCLUSIONS This investigation demonstrates the value of continual integration of patient and provider preferences through the development of tools endeavouring to assist with complex genomics-informed decision-making. Our work aims to broaden the population-wide impact of HCS testing programs by improving communication processes between probands and their potentially affected family members. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION This work involved a patient partner who was actively engaged in all aspects of the research investigation including protocol development, review and editing of all study documentation (including that of the previously published qualitative investigation), interpretation of results, as well as reviewing and editing the manuscript. Patient partners and healthcare professionals were recruited as research participants to provide critical feedback on the patient portal.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samantha Pollard
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Deirdre Weymann
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Rosalie Loewen
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jennifer Nuk
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sophie Sun
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Division of Medical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,Department of Molecular Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Chiquita Hessels
- Li-Fraumeni Syndrome Association Canada, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Dean A Regier
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.,School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Whiwon L, Salma S, Daniel A, Stephanie L, Marc C, Cherith S, Abby T, Angela S, Robin H, Yvonne B. Patient-facing digital tools for delivering genetic services: a systematic review. J Med Genet 2023; 60:1-10. [PMID: 36137613 DOI: 10.1136/jmg-2022-108653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
This study systematically reviewed the literature on the impact of digital genetics tools on patient care and system efficiencies. MEDLINE and Embase were searched for articles published between January 2010 and March 2021. Studies evaluating the use of patient-facing digital tools in the context of genetic service delivery were included. Two reviewers screened and extracted patient-reported and system-focused outcomes from each study. Data were synthesised using a descriptive approach. Of 3226 unique studies identified, 87 were included. A total of 70 unique digital tools were identified. As a result of using digital tools, 84% of studies reported a positive outcome in at least one of the following patient outcomes: knowledge, psychosocial well-being, behavioural/management changes, family communication, decision-making or level of engagement. Digital tools improved workflow and efficiency for providers and reduced the amount of time they needed to spend with patients. However, we identified a misalignment between study purpose and patient-reported outcomes measured and a lack of tools that encompass the entire genetic counselling and testing trajectory. Given increased demand for genetic services and the shift towards virtual care, this review provides evidence that digital tools can be used to efficiently deliver patient-centred care. Future research should prioritise development, evaluation and implementation of digital tools that can support the entire patient trajectory across a range of clinical settings. PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020202862.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee Whiwon
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shickh Salma
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Assamad Daniel
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Luca Stephanie
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Clausen Marc
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Somerville Cherith
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tafler Abby
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Shaw Angela
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hayeems Robin
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bombard Yvonne
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bombard Y, Ginsburg GS, Sturm AC, Zhou AY, Lemke AA. Digital health-enabled genomics: Opportunities and challenges. Am J Hum Genet 2022; 109:1190-1198. [PMID: 35803232 PMCID: PMC9300757 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2022.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Digital health solutions, with apps, virtual care, and electronic medical records, are gaining momentum across all medical disciplines, and their adoption has been accelerated, in part, by the COVID-19 pandemic. Personal wearables, sensors, and mobile technologies are increasingly being used to identify health risks and assist in diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of health and disease. Genomics is a vanguard of digital healthcare as we witness a convergence of the fields of genomic and digital medicine. Spurred by the acute need to increase health literacy, empower patients' preference-sensitive decisions, or integrate vast amounts of complex genomic data into the clinical workflow, there has been an emergence of digital support tools in genomics-enabled care. We present three use cases that demonstrate the application of these converging technologies: digital genomics decision support tools, conversational chatbots to scale the genetic counseling process, and the digital delivery of comprehensive genetic services. These digital solutions are important to facilitate patient-centered care delivery, improve patient outcomes, and increase healthcare efficiencies in genomic medicine. Yet the development of these innovative digital genomic technologies also reveals strategic challenges that need to be addressed before genomic digital health can be broadly adopted. Alongside key evidentiary gaps in clinical and cost-effectiveness, there is a paucity of clinical guidelines, policy, and regulatory frameworks that incorporate digital health. We propose a research agenda, guided by learning healthcare systems, to realize the vision of digital health-enabled genomics to ensure its sustainable and equitable deployment in clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Bombard
- University of Toronto, Genomics Health Services Research Program, St. Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada,Corresponding author
| | - Geoffrey S. Ginsburg
- All of Us Research Program, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Amy C. Sturm
- 23andMe, 223 North Mathilda Avenue, Sunnyvale, CA 94086, USA
| | - Alicia Y. Zhou
- Color Health, Inc, 831 Mitten Road, Burlingame, CA 94010, USA
| | - Amy A. Lemke
- Norton Children’s Research Institute, Affiliated with the University of Louisville School of Medicine, 571 South Floyd Street, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shickh S, Hirjikaka D, Clausen M, Kodida R, Mighton C, Reble E, Sam J, Panchal S, Aronson M, Graham T, Armel SR, Glogowski E, Elser C, Eisen A, Carroll JC, Shuman C, Seto E, Baxter NN, Scheer A, Shastri-Estrada S, Feldman G, Thorpe KE, Schrader KA, Lerner-Ellis J, Kim RH, Faghfoury H, Bombard Y. Genetics Adviser: a protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial evaluating a digital platform for genetics service delivery. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e060899. [PMID: 35487723 PMCID: PMC9058789 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-060899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The high demand for genetic tests and limited supply of genetics professionals has created a need for alternative service delivery models. Digital tools are increasingly being used to support multiple points in the genetic testing journey; however, none are transferable across multiple clinical specialties and settings nor do they encompass the entire trajectory of the journey. We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of the Genetics Adviser, an interactive, patient-facing, online digital health tool that delivers pre-test counselling, provides support during the waiting period for results, and returns results with post-test counselling, encompassing the entire patient genetic testing journey. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will compare the Genetics Adviser paired with a brief genetic counselling session to genetic counselling alone in a randomised controlled trial. One hundred and forty patients who previously received uninformative genetic test results for their personal and family history of cancer will be recruited from familial cancer clinics in Toronto and offered all clinically significant results from genomic sequencing. Participants randomised into the intervention arm will use the Genetics Adviser to learn about genomic sequencing, receive pre-test counselling, support during the waiting period and results, supplemented with brief counselling from a genetic counsellor. Participants in the control arm will receive standard pre-test and post-test counselling for genomic sequencing from a genetic counsellor. Our primary outcome is decisional conflict following pre-test counselling from the Genetics Adviser+genetic counsellor or counsellor alone. Secondary outcomes include: knowledge, satisfaction with decision-making, anxiety, quality of life, psychological impact of results, empowerment, acceptability and economic impact for patients and the health system. A subset of patients will be interviewed to assess user experience. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by Clinical Trials Ontario Streamlined Research Ethics Review System (REB#20-035). Results will be shared through stakeholder workshops, national and international conferences and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04725565.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Shickh
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Daena Hirjikaka
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Clausen
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rita Kodida
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chloe Mighton
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emma Reble
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jordan Sam
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Seema Panchal
- Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melyssa Aronson
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Zane Cohen Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tracy Graham
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Randall Armel
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Christine Elser
- Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - June C Carroll
- Ray D Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Cheryl Shuman
- Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emily Seto
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for Global eHealth Innovation, Techna Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Nancy N Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Adena Scheer
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Geoff Feldman
- Ontario Disability Coalition, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin E Thorpe
- Applied Health Research Centre (AHRC), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jordan Lerner-Ellis
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raymond H Kim
- The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Hanna Faghfoury
- Fred A Litwin and Family Centre in Genetic Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Shickh S, Mighton C, Uleryk E, Pechlivanoglou P, Bombard Y. The clinical utility of exome and genome sequencing across clinical indications: a systematic review. Hum Genet 2021; 140:1403-1416. [PMID: 34368901 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-021-02331-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 07/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Exome sequencing and genome sequencing have the potential to improve clinical utility for patients undergoing genetic investigations. However, evidence of clinical utility is limited to pediatric populations; we aimed to fill this gap by conducting a systematic review of the literature on the clinical utility of exome/genome sequencing across disease indications in pediatric and adult populations. MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Library were searched between 2016 and 2020. Quantitative studies evaluating diagnostic yield were included; other measures of clinical utility such as changes to clinical management were documented if reported. Two reviewers screened, extracted data, and appraised risk of bias. Fifty studies met our inclusion criteria. All studies reported diagnostic yield, which ranged from 3 to 70%, with higher range of yields reported for neurological indications and acute illness ranging from 22 to 68% and 37-70%, respectively. Diagnoses triggered a range of clinical management changes including surveillance, reproductive-risk counseling, and identifying at-risk relatives in 4-100% of patients, with higher frequencies reported for acute illness ranging from 67 to 95%. The frequency of variants of uncertain significance ranged from 5 to 85% across studies with a potential trend of decreasing frequency over time and higher rates identified in patients of non-European ancestry. This review provides evidence for a higher range of diagnostic yield of exome/genome sequencing compared to standard genetic tests, particularly in neurological and acute indications. However, we identified significant heterogeneity in study procedures and outcomes, precluding a meaningful meta-analysis and certainty in the evidence available for decision-making. Future research that incorporates a comprehensive and consistent approach in capturing clinical utility of exome/genome sequencing across broader ancestral groups is necessary to improve diagnostic accuracy and yield and allow for analysis of trends over time.Prospero registration CRD42019094101.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Shickh
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chloe Mighton
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Petros Pechlivanoglou
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, 30 Bond Street, Toronto, ON, M5B 1W8, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bean LJH, Scheuner MT, Murray MF, Biesecker LG, Green RC, Monaghan KG, Palomaki GE, Sharp RR, Trotter TL, Watson MS, Powell CM. DNA-based screening and personal health: a points to consider statement for individuals and health-care providers from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG). Genet Med 2021; 23:979-988. [PMID: 33790423 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01083-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/15/2023] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lora J H Bean
- Department of Human Genetics, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Maren T Scheuner
- Division of Medical Genetics, Department of Pediatrics, and Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Clinical Genetics Program, San Francisco VA Health Care System, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael F Murray
- Department of Genetics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Leslie G Biesecker
- Medical Genomics and Metabolic Genetics Branch, National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Robert C Green
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.,Division of Genetics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.,The Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | | | - Glenn E Palomaki
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Alpert Medical School, Brown University, Providence, RI, USA.,Women and Infants Hospital, Providence, RI, USA
| | | | - Tracy L Trotter
- San Ramon Valley Primary Care Medical Group, San Ramon, CA, USA
| | | | - Cynthia M Powell
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.,Division of Genetics and Metabolism, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shickh S, Rafferty SA, Clausen M, Kodida R, Mighton C, Panchal S, Lorentz J, Ward T, Watkins N, Elser C, Eisen A, Carroll JC, Glogowski E, Schrader KA, Lerner-Ellis J, Kim RH, Chitayat D, Shuman C, Bombard Y. The role of digital tools in the delivery of genomic medicine: enhancing patient-centered care. Genet Med 2021; 23:1086-1094. [PMID: 33654192 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-021-01112-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2020] [Revised: 01/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Alternative models of genetic counseling are needed to meet the rising demand for genomic sequencing. Digital tools have been proposed as a method to augment traditional counseling and reduce burden on professionals; however, their role in delivery of genetic counseling is not established. This study explored the role of the Genomics ADvISER, a digital decision aid, in delivery of genomic counseling. METHODS We performed secondary analysis of 52 pretest genetic counseling sessions that were conducted over the course of a randomized controlled trial evaluating the effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER. As part of the trial, participants were randomized to receive standard counseling or use the tool and then speak with a counselor. A qualitative interpretive description approach using thematic analysis and constant comparison was used for analysis. RESULTS In the delivery of genomic counseling, the Genomics ADvISER contributed to enhancing counseling by (1) promoting informed dialogue, (2) facilitating preference-sensitive deliberation, and (3) deepening personalization of decisions, all of which represent fundamental principles of patient-centered care: providing clear high-quality information, respecting patients' values, preferences, and expressed needs, and providing emotional support. CONCLUSION This study demonstrates that our digital tool contributed to enhancing patient-centered care in the delivery of genomic counseling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Shickh
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sara A Rafferty
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Marc Clausen
- St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rita Kodida
- St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chloe Mighton
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Seema Panchal
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Thomas Ward
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Christine Elser
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - June C Carroll
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Jordan Lerner-Ellis
- Lunenfeld Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raymond H Kim
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Chitayat
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cheryl Shuman
- Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,St. Michael's Hospital, Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Etchegary H, Winsor M, Power A, Simmonds C. Public engagement with genomic medicine: a summary of town hall discussions. J Community Genet 2021; 12:27-35. [PMID: 32865775 PMCID: PMC7846649 DOI: 10.1007/s12687-020-00485-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 08/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Engaging with the public for their input about genomic medicine is critical before it is implemented into routine healthcare practice. In order to inform discussion and planning for the introduction of genome sequencing into clinical care in an Eastern Canadian province, we implemented a program of public engagement activities. Here, we report a qualitative summary of two town hall discussions utilizing a hybrid information-consultation approach with 20 residents of the province of Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada. Discussion revealed largely positive attitudes towards genomic medicine; however, critical reflection around informed consent models, the return of sequencing findings, and access to qualified healthcare professionals revealed numerous public concerns. Public support will be important to realize the potential benefits of genomics and precision medicine to health outcomes. Our findings highlight public concerns that must be addressed in educational and informed consent documents related to sequencing. Town hall attendees endorsed ongoing public education and awareness-building initiatives which could help foster transparency and trust as genomics is integrated into healthcare systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Holly Etchegary
- Faculty of Medicine, Craig Dobbin Centre for Genetics, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6 Canada
| | - Mercy Winsor
- Health Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Craig Dobbin Centre for Genetics, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6 Canada
| | - Angela Power
- Newfoundland and Labrador Centre for Health Information, St. John’s, NL A1B 2C7 Canada
| | - Charlene Simmonds
- Health Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Craig Dobbin Centre for Genetics, Memorial University, St. John’s, NL A1B 3V6 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Vu M, Degeling K, Martyn M, Lynch E, Chong B, Gaff C, IJzerman MJ. Evaluating the resource implications of different service delivery models for offering additional genomic findings. Genet Med 2020; 23:606-613. [PMID: 33214711 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-020-01030-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the resource implications of different delivery models for the provision of additional findings (AF) in genomics from a health-care purchaser perspective. METHODS Data from the Additional Findings study were used to develop and validate a discrete event simulation model that represented the pathway of delivering AF. Resource implications were estimated by microcosting the consultations, sample verifications, bioinformatics, curation, and multidisciplinary case review meetings. A proof-of-concept model was used to generate costing, and then the simulation model was varied to assess the impact of an automated analysis pipeline, use of telehealth consultation, full automation with electronic decision support, and prioritizing case review for cases with pathogenic variants. RESULTS For the proof-of-concept delivery model, the average total cost to report AF was US$430 per patient irrespective of result pathogenicity (95% confidence interval [CI] US$375-US$489). However, the cost of per AF diagnosis was US$4349 (95% CI US$3794-US$4953). Alternative approaches to genetic counseling (telehealth, decision support materials) and to multidisciplinary case review (pathogenic AF cases only) lowered the total per patient cost of AF analysis and reporting by 41-51%. CONCLUSION Resources required to provide AF can be reduced substantially by implementing alternative approaches to counseling and multidisciplinary case review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Vu
- Centre for Cancer Research and Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Koen Degeling
- Centre for Cancer Research and Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Melissa Martyn
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Elly Lynch
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Belinda Chong
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Victorian Clinical Genetics Services, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Clara Gaff
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia.,Melbourne Genomics Health Alliance, Melbourne, Australia.,Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Maarten J IJzerman
- Centre for Cancer Research and Centre for Health Policy, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. .,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia. .,Department of Cancer Research, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rego S, Grove ME, Cho MK, Ormond KE. Informed Consent in the Genomics Era. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2020; 10:cshperspect.a036582. [PMID: 31570382 DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a036582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Informed consent, the process of gathering autonomous authorization for a medical intervention or medical research participation, is a fundamental component of medical practice. Medical informed consent assumes decision-making capacity, voluntariness, comprehension, and adequate information. The increasing use of genetic testing, particularly genomic sequencing, in clinical and research settings has presented many new challenges for clinicians and researchers when obtaining informed consent. Many of these challenges revolve around the need for patient comprehension of sufficient information. Genomic sequencing is complex-all of the possible results are too numerous to explain, and many of the risks and benefits remain unknown. Thus, historical standards of consent are difficult to apply. Alternative models of consent have been proposed to increase patient understanding, and several have empirically demonstrated effectiveness. However, there is still a striking lack of consensus in the genetics community about what constitutes informed consent in the context of genomic sequencing. Multiple approaches are needed to address this challenge, including consensus building around standards, targeted use of genetic counselors in nongenetics clinics in which genomic testing is ordered, and the development and testing of alternative models for obtaining informed consent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shannon Rego
- Institute for Human Genetics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California 94143, USA
| | - Megan E Grove
- Stanford Medicine Clinical Genomics Program, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Mildred K Cho
- Division of Medical Genetics, Stanford University Department of Pediatrics, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| | - Kelly E Ormond
- Stanford Center for Biomedical Ethics, Stanford, California 94305, USA.,Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Quality of life drives patients' preferences for secondary findings from genomic sequencing. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:1178-1186. [PMID: 32424322 PMCID: PMC7609335 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0640-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Revised: 03/31/2020] [Accepted: 04/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
There is growing impetus to include measures of personal utility, the nonmedical value of information, in addition to clinical utility in health technology assessment (HTA) of genomic tests such as genomic sequencing (GS). However, personal utility and clinical utility are challenging to define and measure. This study aimed to explore what drives patients’ preferences for hypothetically learning medically actionable and non-medically actionable secondary findings (SF), capturing clinical and personal utility; this may inform development of measures to evaluate patient outcomes following return of SF. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with adults with a personal or family cancer history participating in a trial of a decision aid for selection of SF from genomic sequencing (GS) (www.GenomicsADvISER.com). Interviews were analyzed thematically using constant comparison. Preserving health-related and non-health-related quality of life was an overarching motivator for both learning and not learning SF. Some participants perceived that learning SF would help them “have a good quality of life” through informing actions to maintain physical health or leading to psychological benefits such as emotional preparation for disease. Other participants preferred not to learn SF because results “could ruin your quality of life,” such as by causing negative psychological impacts. Measuring health-related and non-health-related quality of life may capture outcomes related to clinical and personal utility of GS and SF, which have previously been challenging to measure. Without appropriate measures, generating and synthesizing evidence to evaluate genomic technologies such as GS will continue to be a challenge, and will undervalue potential benefits of GS and SF.
Collapse
|
12
|
Genome-Wide Sequencing for Unexplained Developmental Disabilities or Multiple Congenital Anomalies: A Health Technology Assessment. ONTARIO HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT SERIES 2020; 20:1-178. [PMID: 32194879 PMCID: PMC7080457] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND People with unexplained developmental disabilities or multiple congenital anomalies might have had many biochemical, metabolic, and genetic tests for a period of years without receiving a diagnosis. A genetic diagnosis can help these people and their families better understand their condition and may help them to connect with others who have the same condition. Ontario Health (Quality), in collaboration with the Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health (CADTH) conducted a health technology assessment about the use of genome-wide sequencing for patients with unexplained developmental disabilities or multiple congenital anomalies. Ontario Health (Quality) evaluated the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and budget impact of publicly funding genome-wide sequencing. We also conducted interviews with patients and examined the quantitative evidence of preferences and values literature to better understand the patient preferences and values for these tests. METHODS Ontario Health (Quality) performed a systematic literature search of the clinical evidence. We assessed the risk of bias of each included study using the Risk of Bias Assessment tool for Non-randomized Studies (RoBANS) and the quality of the body of evidence according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) Working Group criteria. We also performed a search of the quantitative evidence and undertook direct patient engagement to ascertain patient preferences for genetic testing for unexplained developmental disabilities or multiple congenital anomalies. CADTH performed a review of qualitative literature about patient perspectives and experiences, and a review of ethical issues.Ontario Health (Quality) performed an economic literature review of genome-wide sequencing in people with unexplained developmental disabilities or multiple congenital anomalies. Although we found eight published cost-effectiveness studies, none completely addressed our research question. Therefore, we conducted a primary economic evaluation using a discrete event simulation model. Owing to its high cost and early stage of clinical implementation, whole exome sequencing is primarily used for people who do not have a diagnosis from standard testing (referred to here as whole exome sequencing after standard testing; standard testing includes chromosomal microarray and targeted single-gene tests or gene panels). Therefore, in our first analysis, we evaluated the cost-effectiveness of whole exome sequencing after standard testing versus standard testing alone. In our second analysis, we explored the cost-effectiveness of whole exome and whole genome sequencing used at various times in the diagnostic pathway (e.g., first tier, second tier, after standard testing) versus standard testing. We also estimated the budget impact of publicly funding genome-wide sequencing in Ontario for the next 5 years. RESULTS Forty-four studies were included in the clinical evidence review. The overall diagnostic yield of genome-wide sequencing for people with unexplained development disability and multiple congenital anomalies was 37%, but we are very uncertain about this estimate (GRADE: Very Low). Compared with standard genetic testing of chromosomal microarray and targeted single-gene tests or gene panels, genome-wide sequencing could have a higher diagnostic yield (GRADE: Low). As well, for some who are tested, genome-wide sequencing prompts some changes to medications, treatments, and referrals to specialists (GRADE: Very Low).Whole exome sequencing after standard testing cost an additional $3,261 per patient but was more effective than standard testing alone. For every 1,000 persons tested, using whole exome sequencing after standard testing would lead to an additional 240 persons with a molecular diagnosis, 272 persons with any positive finding, and 46 persons with active treatment change (modifications to medications, procedures, or treatment). The resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were $13,591 per additional molecular diagnosis. The use of genome-wide sequencing early in the diagnostic pathway (e.g., as a first- or second-tier test) can save on costs and improve diagnostic yields over those of standard testing. Results remained robust when parameters and assumptions were varied.Our budget impact analysis showed that, if whole exome sequencing after standard testing continues to be funded through Ontario's Out-of-Country Prior Approval Program, its budget impact would range from $4 to $5 million in years 1 to 5. If whole exome sequencing becomes publicly funded in Ontario (not through the Out-of-Country Prior Approval Program), the budget impact would be about $9 million yearly. We also found that using whole exome sequencing as a second-tier test would lead to cost savings ($3.4 million per 1,000 persons tested yearly).Participants demonstrated consistent motivations for and expectations of obtaining a diagnosis for unexplained developmental delay or congenital anomalies through genome-wide sequencing. Patients and families greatly value the support and information they receive through genetic counselling when considering genome-wide sequencing and learning of a diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Genome-wide sequencing could have a higher diagnostic yield than standard testing for people with unexplained developmental disabilities or multiple congenital anomalies. Genome-wide sequencing can also prompt some changes to medications, treatments, and referrals to specialists for some people tested; however, we are very uncertain about this. Genome-wide sequencing could be a cost-effective strategy when used after standard testing to diagnose people with unexplained developmental disabilities or multiple congenital anomalies. It could also lead to cost savings when used earlier in the diagnostic pathway. Patients and families consistently noted a benefit from seeking a diagnosis through genetic testing.
Collapse
|
13
|
Parents' motivations, concerns and understanding of genome sequencing: a qualitative interview study. Eur J Hum Genet 2020; 28:874-884. [PMID: 32001839 PMCID: PMC7316711 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-020-0575-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
The 100,000 Genomes Project is a hybrid clinical and research project in which patients and parents are offered genome sequencing for cancer and rare and inherited disease diagnosis; all participants receive their main findings and contribute their data for research, and are offered optional secondary findings. Our aim was to explore participating parents' attitudes towards and understanding of genome sequencing in this hybrid context. We conducted in-depth telephone interviews with 20 parents of children with rare diseases participating in the 100,000 Genomes Project. Parents were positive about contributing to research, although some had needed reassurance about data protections. Although most felt positive about secondary findings, some could not recall or misunderstood key aspects. Some were also concerned about potential emotional impact of results and a few raised concerns about life insurance implications, and the impact of future legal changes. Participants were generally positive about consent appointments, but several raised concerns about 'information overload' because of deciding about secondary findings at the same time as about the main diagnostic genome sequencing and data contribution. Additional information resources, particularly online tools, were highlighted as potentially useful ways of supporting the consent process. We conclude that parents offered genome sequencing as part of a national hybrid clinical and research project report many positive attitudes and experiences, but also concerns and misunderstandings. Further research is needed on how best to support informed consent, particularly about secondary findings. Additional resources such as online tools might usefully support future genome sequencing consent processes.
Collapse
|
14
|
Effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER decision aid for the selection of secondary findings from genomic sequencing: a randomized clinical trial. Genet Med 2019; 22:727-735. [PMID: 31822848 DOI: 10.1038/s41436-019-0702-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Revised: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 11/06/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the effectiveness of the Genomics ADvISER (www.genomicsadviser.com) decision aid (DA) for selection of secondary findings (SF), compared with genetic counseling alone. METHODS A randomized controlled trial (RCT) was conducted to evaluate whether the Genomics ADvISER is superior to genetic counseling when hypothetically selecting SF. Participants were randomized to use the DA followed by discussion with a genetic counselor, or to genetic counseling alone. Surveys were administered at baseline and post-intervention. Primary outcome was decisional conflict. Secondary outcomes were knowledge, preparation for, and satisfaction with decision-making, anxiety, and length of counseling session. RESULTS Participants (n = 133) were predominantly White/European (74%), female (90%), and ≥50 years old (60%). Decisional conflict (mean difference 0.05; P = 0.60), preparation for decision-making (0.17; P = 0.95), satisfaction with decision (-2.18; P = 0.06), anxiety (0.72; P = 0.56), and knowledge of sequencing limitations (0.14; P = 0.70) did not significantly differ between groups. However, intervention participants had significantly higher knowledge of SF (0.39; P < 0.001) and sequencing benefits (0.97; P = 0.01), and significantly shorter counseling time (24.40 minutes less; P < 0.001) CONCLUSIONS: The Genomics ADvISER did not decrease decisional conflict but reduced counseling time and improved knowledge. This decision aid could serve as an educational tool, reducing in-clinic time and potentially health care costs.
Collapse
|
15
|
Shickh S, Clausen M, Mighton C, Gutierrez Salazar M, Zakoor KR, Kodida R, Reble E, Elser C, Eisen A, Panchal S, Aronson M, Graham T, Armel SR, Morel CF, Fattouh R, Glogowski E, Schrader KA, Hamilton JG, Offit K, Robson M, Carroll JC, Isaranuwatchai W, Kim RH, Lerner-Ellis J, Thorpe KE, Laupacis A, Bombard Y. Health outcomes, utility and costs of returning incidental results from genomic sequencing in a Canadian cancer population: protocol for a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031092. [PMID: 31594892 PMCID: PMC6797333 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Genomic sequencing has rapidly transitioned into clinical practice, improving diagnosis and treatment options for patients with hereditary disorders. However, large-scale implementation of genomic sequencing faces challenges, especially with regard to the return of incidental results, which refer to genetic variants uncovered during testing that are unrelated to the primary disease under investigation, but of potential clinical significance. High-quality evidence evaluating health outcomes and costs of receiving incidental results is critical for the adoption of genomic sequencing into clinical care and to understand the unintended consequences of adoption of genomic sequencing. We aim to evaluate the health outcomes and costs of receiving incidental results for patients undergoing genomic sequencing. METHODS AND ANALYSIS We will compare health outcomes and costs of receiving, versus not receiving, incidental results for adult patients with cancer undergoing genomic sequencing in a mixed-methods randomised controlled trial. Two hundred and sixty patients who have previously undergone first or second-tier genetic testing for cancer and received uninformative results will be recruited from familial cancer clinics in Toronto, Ontario. Participants in both arms will receive cancer-related results. Participants in the intervention arm have the option to receive incidental results. Our primary outcome is psychological distress at 2 weeks following return of results. Secondary outcomes include behavioural consequences, clinical and personal utility assessed over the 12 months after results are returned and health service use and costs at 12 months and 5 years. A subset of participants and providers will complete qualitative interviews about utility of incidental results. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has been approved by Clinical Trials Ontario Streamlined Research Ethics Review System that provides ethical review and oversight for multiple sites participating in the same clinical trial in Ontario.Results from the trial will be shared through stakeholder workshops, national and international conferences, and peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03597165.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salma Shickh
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marc Clausen
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chloe Mighton
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Mariana Gutierrez Salazar
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kathleen-Rose Zakoor
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rita Kodida
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Emma Reble
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christine Elser
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andrea Eisen
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Seema Panchal
- Marvelle Koffler Breast Centre, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Melyssa Aronson
- Zane Cohen Centre for Digestive Diseases, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Tracy Graham
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Susan Randall Armel
- Familial Breast Ovarian Cancer Clinic, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Chantal F Morel
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Fred A. Litwin Centre in Genetic Medicine, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ramzi Fattouh
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Kasmintan A Schrader
- Department of Molecular Oncology and Hereditary Cancer Program, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
- Department of Medical Genetics, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jada G Hamilton
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Mark Robson
- Clinical Genetics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
- Breast Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - June C Carroll
- Ray D Wolfe Department of Family Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Wanrudee Isaranuwatchai
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Centre for exceLlence in Economic Analysis Research (CLEAR), Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Raymond H Kim
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jordan Lerner-Ellis
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin E Thorpe
- Applied Health Research Centre, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Andreas Laupacis
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Palliative Care, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Genomics Health Services Research Program, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ganguli I, Simpkin AL, Lupo C, Weissman A, Mainor AJ, Orav EJ, Rosenthal MB, Colla CH, Sequist TD. Cascades of Care After Incidental Findings in a US National Survey of Physicians. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e1913325. [PMID: 31617925 PMCID: PMC6806665 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.13325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Incidental findings on screening and diagnostic tests are common and may prompt cascades of testing and treatment that are of uncertain value. No study to date has examined physician perceptions and experiences of these cascades nationally. OBJECTIVE To estimate the national frequency and consequences of cascades of care after incidental findings using a national survey of US physicians. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS Population-based survey study using data from a 44-item cross-sectional, online survey among 991 practicing US internists in a research panel representative of American College of Physicians national membership. The survey was emailed to panel members on January 22, 2019, and analysis was performed from March 11 to May 27, 2019. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Physician report of prior experiences with cascades, features of their most recently experienced cascade, and perception of potential interventions to limit the negative consequences of cascades. RESULTS This study achieved a 44.7% response rate (376 completed surveys) and weighted responses to be nationally representative. The mean (SE) age of respondents was 43.4 (0.7) years, and 60.4% of respondents were male. Almost all respondents (99.4%; percentages were weighted) reported experiencing cascades, including cascades with clinically important and intervenable outcomes (90.9%) and cascades with no such outcome (94.4%). Physicians reported cascades caused their patients psychological harm (68.4%), physical harm (15.6%), and financial burden (57.5%) and personally caused the physicians wasted time and effort (69.1%), frustration (52.5%), and anxiety (45.4%). When asked about their most recent cascade, 33.7% of 371 respondents reported the test revealing the incidental finding may not have been clinically appropriate. During this most recent cascade, physicians reported that guidelines for follow-up testing were not followed (8.1%) or did not exist to their knowledge (53.2%). To lessen the negative consequences of cascades, 62.8% of 376 respondents chose accessible guidelines and 44.6% chose decision aids as potential solutions. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The survey findings indicate that almost all respondents had experienced cascades after incidental findings that did not lead to clinically meaningful outcomes yet caused harm to patients and themselves. Policy makers and health care leaders should address cascades after incidental findings as part of efforts to improve health care value and reduce physician burnout.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ishani Ganguli
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Arabella L. Simpkin
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - Claire Lupo
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Alexander J. Mainor
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - E. John Orav
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Biostatistics, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Meredith B. Rosenthal
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Carrie H. Colla
- The Dartmouth Institute for Health Policy and Clinical Practice, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Thomas D. Sequist
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Ittenbach RF, Corsmo JJ, Miller RV, Korbee LL. Older Teens' Understanding and Perceptions of Risks in Studies With Genetic Testing: A Pilot Study. AJOB Empir Bioeth 2019; 10:173-181. [PMID: 31002290 DOI: 10.1080/23294515.2019.1577313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Background: The consent process used in clinical research today falls markedly short of the ideal process envisioned nearly 30 years ago. Critics have suggested that the informed consent process has become challenging, formalistic, and incompletely understood by researchers and participants alike. Hence, the purpose of this pilot study was to identify and characterize important aspects of the informed consent process that teens believe impact their understanding of risks of participation in studies with genetic testing. Methods: The personal research experiences of 15 teens regarding consent/assent and research participation in studies with genetic testing were solicited through focus-group interviews. All participants had enrolled in at least one research study involving genetic testing in the prior 2 years. All groups were facilitated by the same experienced focus-group moderator. Themes and subthemes were identified, summarized, and interpreted using conventional qualitative content analysis. Results: Three overarching themes emerged from the interviews: fear of what could happen, need for additional information regarding risks, and need for autonomy and decision-making control throughout the consent process. Conclusion: Results of this pilot study provide preliminary evidence that teens can identify and characterize key issues in the informed consent/assent process when it comes to the risks of research participation. These findings are consistent with other research regarding teens' perceptions and recommendations for genetic testing research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard F Ittenbach
- a Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology (MLC 5041), Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center , Cincinnati , Ohio , USA
| | - Jeremy J Corsmo
- b Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Office of Research Compliance and Regulatory Affairs (MLC 7040) , Cincinnati , Ohio , USA
| | | | - Leslie L Korbee
- d Academic and Regulatory Monitoring Services, LLC , Cincinnati , Ohio , USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Mighton C, Carlsson L, Clausen M, Casalino S, Shickh S, McCuaig L, Joshi E, Panchal S, Graham T, Aronson M, Piccinin C, Winter-Paquette L, Semotiuk K, Lorentz J, Mancuso T, Ott K, Silberman Y, Elser C, Eisen A, Kim RH, Lerner-Ellis J, Carroll JC, Glogowski E, Schrader K, Bombard Y. Development of patient "profiles" to tailor counseling for incidental genomic sequencing results. Eur J Hum Genet 2019; 27:1008-1017. [PMID: 30846854 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-019-0352-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2018] [Revised: 12/12/2018] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Guidelines recommend that providers engage patients in shared decision-making about receiving incidental results (IR) prior to genomic sequencing (GS), but this can be time-consuming, given the myriad of IR and variation in patients' preferences. We aimed to develop patient profiles to inform pre-test counseling for IR. We conducted semi-structured interviews with participants as a part of a randomized trial of the GenomicsADvISER.com, a decision aid for selecting IR. Interviews explored factors participants considered when deliberating over learning IR. Interviews were analyzed by thematic analysis and constant comparison. Participants were mostly female (28/31) and about half of them were over the age of 50 (16/31). We identified five patient profiles that reflect common contextual factors, attitudes, concerns, and perceived utility of IR. Information Enthusiasts self-identified as "planners" and valued learning most or all IR to enable planning and disease prevention because "knowledge is power". Concerned Individuals defined themselves as "anxious," and were reluctant to learn IR, anticipating negative psychological impacts from IR. Contemplators were discerning about the value and limitations of IR, weighing health benefits with the impacts of not being able to "un-know" information. Individuals of Advanced Life Stage did not consider IR relevant for themselves and primarily considered their implications for family members. Reassurance Seekers were reassured by previous negative genetic test results which shaped their expectations for receiving no IR: "hopefully [GS will] be negative, too. And then I can rest easy". These profiles could inform targeted counseling for IR by providing a framework to address common values, concerns. and misconceptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chloe Mighton
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | | | - Salma Shickh
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura McCuaig
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Esha Joshi
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Seema Panchal
- Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Tracy Graham
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Melyssa Aronson
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Laura Winter-Paquette
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kara Semotiuk
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Talia Mancuso
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karen Ott
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Andrea Eisen
- Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Raymond H Kim
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada.,The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jordan Lerner-Ellis
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - June C Carroll
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Mount Sinai Hospital, Sinai Health System, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Yvonne Bombard
- University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bombard Y, Clausen M, Mighton C, Carlsson L, Casalino S, Glogowski E, Schrader K, Evans M, Scheer A, Baxter N, Hamilton JG, Lerner-Ellis J, Offit K, Robson M, Laupacis A. The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:984-995. [PMID: 29703952 PMCID: PMC6018661 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0144-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2018] [Accepted: 03/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Guidelines recommend patients be informed of their incidental results (IR) when undergoing genomic sequencing (GS), yet there are limited tools to support patients' decisions about learning IR. The aim of this study is to develop and test the usability of a decision aid (DA) to guide patients' selection of IR, and to describe patients' preferences for learning IR following use of the DA. We developed and evaluated a DA using an iterative, mixed-methods process consisting of (1) prototype development, (2) feasibility testing, (3) cognitive interviews, (4) design and programming, and (5) usability testing. We created an interactive online DA called the Genomics ADvISER, a genomics decision AiD about Incidental SEquencing Results. The Genomics ADvISER begins with an educational whiteboard video, and then engages users in a values clarification exercise, knowledge quiz and final choice step, based on a 'binning' framework. Participants found the DA acceptable and intuitive to use. They were enthusiastic towards GS and IR; all selected multiple categories of IR. The Genomics ADvISER is a new patient-centered tool to support the clinical delivery of incidental GS results. The Genomics ADvISER fills critical care gaps, given the health care system's limited genomics expertise and capacity to convey the large volume of IR and their myriad of implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Bombard
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| | - Marc Clausen
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Chloe Mighton
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Selina Casalino
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Michael Evans
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Adena Scheer
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Nancy Baxter
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Cancer Care Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Jordan Lerner-Ellis
- Mount Sinai Health System, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kenneth Offit
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Mark Robson
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Andreas Laupacis
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute of St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
A randomized controlled study of a consent intervention for participating in an NIH genome sequencing study. Eur J Hum Genet 2018; 26:622-630. [PMID: 29453419 DOI: 10.1038/s41431-018-0105-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2017] [Revised: 11/22/2017] [Accepted: 01/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
To make an informed choice to participate in a genome sequencing study that may yield primary and secondary findings, one understands relevant information in the context of personal values. Consent forms to enroll in a sequencing study can be long and complex. The efficacy of the professional encounter to consider the information contained in the consent form and make an informed choice is unknown. Women diagnosed with primary ovarian insufficiency and eligible for a sequencing study were randomized to participate in one of two encounters with a genetic counselor: a consent intervention using a lower literacy, less dense form or a standard consent encounter. Data were complete for 188 of 225 participants. The average time was 32 min for the intervention and 34 min for the standard, with the intervention encounter generating more questions from participants. At six weeks following consent, no differences were found between the two groups in primary outcomes: 'sequencing benefits' knowledge (d = 0.12, 95%CI: -0.03,0.27), 'sequencing limitations' knowledge (d = 0.04, 95%CI: -0.13,0.21), expected personal benefits (d = -0.01, 95%CI: -0.26,0.23), and decisional conflict (d = 0.04, 95%CI: -0.14,0.21). Although intentions to learn secondary variants were high, only 60% (113) of participants made an informed choice as defined by the multi-dimensional model of informed choice. We found that a modified consent intervention was as effective as a standard encounter and led to more interaction. Our data suggest that making decisions to receive secondary findings may be particularly challenging and in need of further investigation to achieve informed choice.
Collapse
|