Investigation of perioperative work processes in provision of antibiotic prophylaxis: a prospective descriptive qualitative study across surgical specialties in Norway

Physician-reported barriers and challenges to antibiotic prescribing in surgical prophylaxis: a structured systematic review

Objectives

The purpose of the study is to identify and analyse the barriers in surgical procedures where antibiotic dissipation is habitual.

Methods

Extensive literature search is carried out using different electronic databases (PubMed, Europe PMC, PLoS and Google Scholar) between January 2000 and December 2020. The articles were selected purely based on the inclusion criteria. Only qualitative and cross-sectional studies were selected to reduce the risk of bias. The JBI and AXIS checklists were used to assessed the quality of the enrolled articles. Data extractions were done by using a predesigned standardized data collection form.

Key findings

A total of 2067 articles were electronically retrieved but only 14 articles met the eligibility criteria. About 15 902 healthcare professionals (HCPs) with an average response rate of 64.7% were pooled for evidence synthesis. The majority of respondents (50%) discussed different barriers in their practice site for surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) administration. Barriers were categorized into four themes: lack of guideline availability and knowledge, lack of adherence to guidelines, lack of guideline knowledge and adherence and physician perceptions or off-label practices. A total of 723 (56.3%) out of 1282 HCPs from nine different studies reported a lack of adherence to guidelines during the perioperative process. The majority of respondents in three studies, 318 (82%) out of 386 HCPs, reported that physicians’ perceptions play a crucial role in prescribing SAP during surgeries.

Conclusion

This study concluded that the barriers within the practice site play a decisive role in SAP optimization and therefore all HCPs are recommended to maintain local/standard guidelines and adhere to them while prescribing SAP.

Exploring staff turnover, burnout, and resilience in cytology reference laboratories: A workforce qualitative study

OBJECTIVES

The aims of the study were to investigate cytology laboratory staff turnover in the context of workplace stressors and burnout and to explore qualities associated with long career tenure, in order to facilitate the development of future workplace intervention programs.

METHODS

Using an interpretive qualitative approach, semi-structured interviews were conducted and analysed using a directed and conventional content analysis. Seven participants who had left large cytology reference laboratories were purposively sampled to interview about their experience of leaving their former laboratories. Conventional content analysis was used to inductively generate themes and deductive content analysis was conducted with categories from the Transactional Model of Stress and Coping (ie, stress appraisal and coping style).

RESULTS

Three main themes were discerned from the interviews: concerns about the cytology workplace, reasons for choosing to leave, and strategies for coping with stress. Demand for productivity was the most commonly cited concern among cytotechnologists, followed by work-life balance, and musculoskeletal strain related to microscopic screening. The top reason given for people choosing to leave the commercial laboratories was the lack of work-life balance, and the second was the lack of professional challenges and growth opportunities. Participants with longer job tenure who experienced a promotion described coping with job stress as more optimistic and problem focused.

CONCLUSIONS

Opportunities exist within large commercial laboratories for improving the work environment to reduce workplace burnout and turnover.

Causes and Effects of Introducing Surgery Safety Checklist: A Review

The medical treatment process, particularly surgery, is inescapably bound to potential complications or undesirable adverse events. This narrative review aims to present the causes and effects of the introduction of the WHO Surgery Safety Checklist (SSC), the use of which is expected to reduce the number of perioperative errors, complications, and mortality. To achieve this objective, we performed a bibliometric analysis of medical citations indexed in the PubMed database using the SSC subject heading. Findings revealed a total of 1441 articles meeting inclusion status, with 1171 published during the last decade. After the screening of titles and abstracts, the members of the research team selected 75 articles, deemed most relevant for inclusion in the review, which were then thoroughly analyzed. All in all, the findings were that the use of SSC appreciably reduced the number of simple logistic errors in the perioperative period decreasing the frequency of resulting complications and mortality.

Compliance with national guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis in hip fracture patients: a quality assessment study of 13 329 patients in the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register

OBJECTIVE

We assessed compliance with new guidelines for prophylactic antibiotics in hip fracture surgery in Norway introduced in 2013.

DESIGN

The data from the Norwegian Hip Fracture Register was used to assess the proportion of antibiotics given according to the national guidelines.

SETTING

All hospitals in Norway performing hip fracture surgery in the period from 2011 to 2016.

PARTICIPANTS

We studied 13 329 hemiarthroplasties (HAs) for acute hip fracture.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Type and timing between first and last dose of prophylactic antibiotics compared with the national guidelines.

RESULTS

Before the guidelines were introduced, the recommended drugs cephalotin or clindamycin was used in only 86.2% of all HAs. In 2016, one of the two recommended drugs was administered in 99.2% of HAs. However, hospitals' adaption of the recommended administration of the two drugs improved slowly, and by the end of the study period, only three out of five HAs were performed with the correct drug administered in the correct manner. We found major differences in compliance between hospitals.

CONCLUSIONS

The change towards correct administration of antibiotic prophylaxis was varied both when investigating university and non-university hospitals. We suggest that both hospital leaders and the national Directorate of Health need to investigate routines for better dissemination of information and education to involved parties. Strong leadership concerning evidence-based guidelines on antibiotic prophylaxis in surgery may take away some autonomy from executing healthcare professionals, but will result in better patient care and antibiotic stewardship.