Performance of the Safer Nursing Care Tool to measure nurse staffing requirements in acute hospitals: a multicentre observational study

A new tool to measure acuity in the community: a case study

The provision of acute healthcare within patients own home (i.e. hospital in the home) is an important method of providing individualised patient-centred care that reduces the need for acute hospital admissions and enables early hospital discharge for appropriate patient groups. The Hospital in the Home (HitH) model of care ensures that this approach maximises patient safety and limits potential risk for patients. As HitH services have seen record numbers of patient referrals in the past 2 years, there is now a greater need to measure and understand the acuity and dependency levels of the caseload. Through an expert clinician development process at one NHS trust, aspects of procedural complexity, interdisciplinary working, risk stratification and comorbidities were used to quantify acuity and dependency. This paper uses a case study approach to present a new method of measuring this important concept.

Morbidity and mortality analysis in general surgery operations. Is there any room for improvement?

BACKGROUND

The aim of this work is to examine the performance of surgeries, by evaluating the results. The evaluation of the results, with particular attention to complications, is the corner stone to identify the causes leading to correction of any predisposing factors and reducing risks, to improve quality of care.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of 952 consecutive patients who had elective or emergency surgery from November 1, 2018 to October 31, 2019. We classified surgical intervention according to their complexity. The Clavien Dindo classification was used to categorize the complications. We performed a stepwise multivariate logistic-regression analysis, with the presence of post-operative complications as dependent variable and age, gender, BMI, ASA, type of surgery procedures, complexity of surgery, operative time as covariates.

RESULTS

A total of 952 surgical procedures were included in this study. Abdominal procedures were the most frequent type of surgery performed (52.1%). Post-operative complications occurred in 120 surgical procedures (12.6%), these are related to the increase of the ASA score and the longer average operative time, with an increase of developing complication of 5% for each additional 10 minutes of surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

many factors influence postoperative morbidity and mortality. Particular attention was due to complication's evaluation, about all in abdominal surgery and high complexity procedures. We argue that key factors which influence the favourable surgical outcome are: compliance with standardized safety procedures, volume of activity of the structure, presence of interdisciplinary care groups, and ability of health professionals in recognizing and promptly treating complications.

The association between 12-hour shifts and nurses-in-charge's perceptions of missed care and staffing adequacy: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study

Background

Due to worldwide nursing shortages and difficulty retaining staff, long shifts for nursing staff (both registered nurses and nursing assistants) working in hospitals have been adopted widely. Because long shifts reduce the daily number of shifts from three to two, many assume that long shifts improve productivity by removing one handover and staff overlap. However, it is unclear whether staffing levels are more likely to be perceived as adequate when more long shifts are used.

Objectives

To investigate the association between the proportion of long (≥12‐hour) shifts worked on a ward and nurses-in-charge's perceptions that the staffing level was sufficient to meet patient need.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study using routinely collected data (patient administrative data and rosters) linked to nurses-in-charge's reports from 81 wards within four English hospitals across 1 year (2017). Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to determine associations between the proportion of long shifts and nurses-in-charge's reports of having enough staff for quality or leaving necessary nursing care undone, after controlling for the staffing level relative to demand (shortfall). We tested for interactions between staffing shortfall and the proportion of long shifts.

Results

The sample comprised 19648 ward days. On average across wards, 72% of shifts were long. With mixed short and long shifts, the odds of nurses-in-charge reporting that there were enough staff for quality were 14-17% lower than when all shifts were long. For example, the odds of reporting enough staff for quality with between 60-80% long shifts was 15% lower (95% confidence interval 2% to 27%) than with all long shifts. Associations with nursing care left undone were consistent with this pattern. Although including interactions between staffing shortfalls and the proportion of long shifts did not improve model fit, the effect of long shifts did appear to differ according to shortfall, with lower proportions of long shifts associated with benefits when staffing levels were high relative to current norms.

Conclusions

Rather than a clear distinction between wards using short and long shifts, we found that a mixed pattern operated on most days and wards, with no wards using all short shifts. We found that when wards use exclusively long shifts rather than a mixture, nurses-in-charge are more likely to judge that they have enough staff. However, the adverse effects of mixed shifts on perceptions of staffing adequacy may be reduced or eliminated by higher staffing levels.

ISRCTN 12307968.

Tweetable abstract

12-hour shifts in nursing: a mix of short and long shifts may be worse than all long shifts.

The association between 12-hour shifts and nurses-in-charge's perceptions of missed care and staffing adequacy: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study

BACKGROUND

Due to worldwide nursing shortages and difficulty retaining staff, long shifts for nursing staff (both registered nurses and nursing assistants) working in hospitals have been adopted widely. Because long shifts reduce the daily number of shifts from three to two, many assume that long shifts improve productivity by removing one handover and staff overlap. However, it is unclear whether staffing levels are more likely to be perceived as adequate when more long shifts are used.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between the proportion of long (≥12-hour) shifts worked on a ward and nurses-in-charge's perceptions that the staffing level was sufficient to meet patient need.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study using routinely collected data (patient administrative data and rosters) linked to nurses-in-charge's reports from 81 wards within four English hospitals across 1 year (2017). Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to determine associations between the proportion of long shifts and nurses-in-charge's reports of having enough staff for quality or leaving necessary nursing care undone, after controlling for the staffing level relative to demand (shortfall). We tested for interactions between staffing shortfall and the proportion of long shifts.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 19648 ward days. On average across wards, 72% of shifts were long. With mixed short and long shifts, the odds of nurses-in-charge reporting that there were enough staff for quality were 14-17% lower than when all shifts were long. For example, the odds of reporting enough staff for quality with between 60-80% long shifts was 15% lower (95% confidence interval 2% to 27%) than with all long shifts. Associations with nursing care left undone were consistent with this pattern. Although including interactions between staffing shortfalls and the proportion of long shifts did not improve model fit, the effect of long shifts did appear to differ according to shortfall, with lower proportions of long shifts associated with benefits when staffing levels were high relative to current norms.

CONCLUSIONS

Rather than a clear distinction between wards using short and long shifts, we found that a mixed pattern operated on most days and wards, with no wards using all short shifts. We found that when wards use exclusively long shifts rather than a mixture, nurses-in-charge are more likely to judge that they have enough staff. However, the adverse effects of mixed shifts on perceptions of staffing adequacy may be reduced or eliminated by higher staffing levels. ISRCTN 12307968. Tweetable abstract 12-hour shifts in nursing: a mix of short and long shifts may be worse than all long shifts.

The association between 12-hour shifts and nurses-in-charge's perceptions of missed care and staffing adequacy: a retrospective cross-sectional observational study

BACKGROUND

Due to worldwide nursing shortages and difficulty retaining staff, long shifts for nursing staff (both registered nurses and nursing assistants) working in hospitals have been adopted widely. Because long shifts reduce the daily number of shifts from three to two, many assume that long shifts improve productivity by removing one handover and staff overlap. However, it is unclear whether staffing levels are more likely to be perceived as adequate when more long shifts are used.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between the proportion of long (≥12-hour) shifts worked on a ward and nurses-in-charge's perceptions that the staffing level was sufficient to meet patient need.

METHODS

A retrospective cross-sectional study using routinely collected data (patient administrative data and rosters) linked to nurses-in-charge's reports from 81 wards within four English hospitals across 1 year (2017). Hierarchical logistic regression models were used to determine associations between the proportion of long shifts and nurses-in-charge's reports of having enough staff for quality or leaving necessary nursing care undone, after controlling for the staffing level relative to demand (shortfall). We tested for interactions between staffing shortfall and the proportion of long shifts.

RESULTS

The sample comprised 19648 ward days. On average across wards, 72% of shifts were long. With mixed short and long shifts, the odds of nurses-in-charge reporting that there were enough staff for quality were 14-17% lower than when all shifts were long. For example, the odds of reporting enough staff for quality with between 60-80% long shifts was 15% lower (95% confidence interval 2% to 27%) than with all long shifts. Associations with nursing care left undone were consistent with this pattern. Although including interactions between staffing shortfalls and the proportion of long shifts did not improve model fit, the effect of long shifts did appear to differ according to shortfall, with lower proportions of long shifts associated with benefits when staffing levels were high relative to current norms.

CONCLUSIONS

Rather than a clear distinction between wards using short and long shifts, we found that a mixed pattern operated on most days and wards, with no wards using all short shifts. We found that when wards use exclusively long shifts rather than a mixture, nurses-in-charge are more likely to judge that they have enough staff. However, the adverse effects of mixed shifts on perceptions of staffing adequacy may be reduced or eliminated by higher staffing levels. ISRCTN 12307968. Tweetable abstract 12-hour shifts in nursing: a mix of short and long shifts may be worse than all long shifts.