1
|
Phetsouphanh C, Jacka B, Ballouz S, Jackson KJL, Wilson DB, Manandhar B, Klemm V, Tan HX, Wheatley A, Aggarwal A, Akerman A, Milogiannakis V, Starr M, Cunningham P, Turville SG, Kent SJ, Byrne A, Brew BJ, Darley DR, Dore GJ, Kelleher AD, Matthews GV. Improvement of immune dysregulation in individuals with long COVID at 24-months following SARS-CoV-2 infection. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3315. [PMID: 38632311 PMCID: PMC11024141 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47720-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
This study investigates the humoral and cellular immune responses and health-related quality of life measures in individuals with mild to moderate long COVID (LC) compared to age and gender matched recovered COVID-19 controls (MC) over 24 months. LC participants show elevated nucleocapsid IgG levels at 3 months, and higher neutralizing capacity up to 8 months post-infection. Increased spike-specific and nucleocapsid-specific CD4+ T cells, PD-1, and TIM-3 expression on CD4+ and CD8+ T cells were observed at 3 and 8 months, but these differences do not persist at 24 months. Some LC participants had detectable IFN-γ and IFN-β, that was attributed to reinfection and antigen re-exposure. Single-cell RNA sequencing at the 24 month timepoint shows similar immune cell proportions and reconstitution of naïve T and B cell subsets in LC and MC. No significant differences in exhaustion scores or antigen-specific T cell clones are observed. These findings suggest resolution of immune activation in LC and return to comparable immune responses between LC and MC over time. Improvement in self-reported health-related quality of life at 24 months was also evident in the majority of LC (62%). PTX3, CRP levels and platelet count are associated with improvements in health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brendan Jacka
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Sara Ballouz
- Garvan Institute for Medical research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- School of Computer Science and Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Daniel B Wilson
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bikash Manandhar
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Vera Klemm
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Hyon-Xhi Tan
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, Victoria, VIC, Australia
| | - Adam Wheatley
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, Victoria, VIC, Australia
| | - Anupriya Aggarwal
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Anouschka Akerman
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Mitchell Starr
- NSW State Reference Laboratory for HIV, St. Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Phillip Cunningham
- NSW State Reference Laboratory for HIV, St. Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stuart G Turville
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Stephen J Kent
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Peter Doherty Institute, University of Melbourne, Victoria, VIC, Australia
| | - Anthony Byrne
- Heart Lung Clinic, St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney and Faculty of Medicine and Health (UNSW), Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Bruce J Brew
- Peter Duncan Neurosciences Unit- St Vincent's Centre for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | | - Gregory J Dore
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia
| | - Anthony D Kelleher
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
| | - Gail V Matthews
- The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
- St. Vincent's Hospital, Darlinghurst, NSW, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Holch P, Turner G, Keetharuth AD, Gibbons E, Cocks K, Absolom KL. The impact of COVID-19 on PRO development, collection and implementation: views of UK and Ireland professionals. J Patient Rep Outcomes 2023; 7:121. [PMID: 38010558 PMCID: PMC10682296 DOI: 10.1186/s41687-023-00663-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/30/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND PROs are valuable tools in clinical care to capture patients' perspectives of their health, symptoms and quality of life. However the COVID-19 pandemic has had profound impacts on all aspects of life, in particular healthcare and research. This study explores the views of UK and Irish health professionals, third sector and pharmaceutical industry representatives and academic researchers on the impact of COVID-19 on PRO collection, use and development in clinical practice. METHODS A volunteer sample took part in a 10 question cross sectional qualitative survey, on the impact of COVID-19, administered online via Qualtrics. Demographic data was descriptively analysed, and the qualitative free text response data was subject to thematic analysis and summarised within the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) framework. RESULTS Forty nine participants took part located in a range of UK settings and professions. Participants highlighted staff strengths during the pandemic including colleagues' flexibility and ability to work collaboratively and the adoption of novel communication tools. Weaknesses were a lack of staff capacity to continue or start PRO projects and insufficient digital infrastructure to continue studies online. Opportunities included the added interest in PROs as useful outcomes, the value of electronic PROs for staff and patients particularly in relation to integration into systems and the electronic patient records. However, these opportunities came with an understanding that digital exclusion may be an issue for patient groups. Threats identified included that the majority of PRO research was stopped or delayed and funding streams were cut. CONCLUSIONS Although most PRO research was on hold during the pandemic, the consensus from participants was that PROs as meaningful outcomes were valued more than ever. From the opportunities afforded by the pandemic the development of electronic PROs and their integration into electronic patient record systems and clinical practice could be a lasting legacy from the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Holch
- Department of Psychology, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Portland Building, Room PD402, City Campus, Leeds, LS1 9HE, UK.
| | - Grace Turner
- Institute of Applied Health Research, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
| | - Anju D Keetharuth
- School of Health and Related Research, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, S1 4DA, UK
| | - E Gibbons
- Evidera Ltd, 201 Talgarth Rd, The Ark, London, W6 8BJ, UK
| | - Kim Cocks
- Adelphi Values, Patient-Centered Outcomes, Bollington, Cheshire, SK10 5JB, UK
| | - Kate L Absolom
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, St James's Hospital, Bexley Wing, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF, UK
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qaseem A, Yost J, Abraham GM, Andrews R, Jokela JA, Miller MC, Humphrey LL, Dunn A, Haeme R, Lee R, Saini SD, Tschanz CMP, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Harrod C, Shamliyan T, Umana K. Outpatient Treatment of Confirmed COVID-19: Living, Rapid Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 2). Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:1396-1404. [PMID: 37722112 PMCID: PMC10620951 DOI: 10.7326/m23-1636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/20/2023] Open
Abstract
DESCRIPTION Evidence for the use of outpatient treatments in adults with confirmed COVID-19 continues to evolve with new data. This is version 2 of the American College of Physicians (ACP) living, rapid practice points focusing on 22 outpatient treatments for COVID-19, specifically addressing the dominant SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. METHODS The Population Health and Medical Science Committee (formerly the Scientific Medical Policy Committee) developed this version of the living, rapid practice points on the basis of a living, rapid review done by the ACP Center for Evidence Reviews at Cochrane Austria at the University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems). This topic will be maintained as living and rapid by continually monitoring and assessing the impact of new evidence. PRACTICE POINT 1 Consider molnupiravir to treat symptomatic patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting who are within 5 days of the onset of symptoms and at a high risk for progressing to severe disease. PRACTICE POINT 2 Consider nirmatrelvir-ritonavir combination therapy to treat symptomatic patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting who are within 5 days of the onset of symptoms and at a high risk for progressing to severe disease. PRACTICE POINT 3 Do not use ivermectin to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 4 Do not use sotrovimab to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Qaseem
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (A.Q.)
| | - Jennifer Yost
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, and Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania (J.Y.)
| | - George M Abraham
- University of Massachusetts Medical School and Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts (G.M.A.)
| | | | - Janet A Jokela
- Carle Illinois College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois (J.A.J.)
| | | | - Linda L Humphrey
- Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.L.H.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Araya-Quintanilla F, Sepulveda-Loyola W, Cuyul-Vásquez I, Alvarez-Bustos A, Gutiérrez-Espinoza H, Suziane Probst V, Camp PG, Rodríguez-Mañas L. Recommendations and Effects of Rehabilitation Programs in Older Adults After Hospitalization for COVID-19: A Scoping Review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2023; 102:653-659. [PMID: 36762849 PMCID: PMC10259172 DOI: 10.1097/phm.0000000000002183] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT The aims of this review were to identify studies on physical rehabilitation programs and describe the potential effects on functional outcomes in patients older than 60 yrs at discharge from acute care post-COVID-19. The literature search was conducted in the MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, EMBASE, PEDro, LILACS, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, Web of Science, and The Living OVerview of Evidence (L-OVE) COVID-19 databases. Studies with patients older than 60 yrs, hospitalized with COVID-19, and admitted to a rehabilitation program after discharge from acute care were included. Ten studies were included with a total of 572 patients. The prevalence of patients who received post-intensive care rehabilitation was 53% (95% confidence interval, 0.27-0.79; P = 0.001). The rehabilitation program included physiotherapy in nine studies, occupational therapy in three studies, and psychotherapy in two studies. The rehabilitation programs increased aerobic capacity, functional independence in basic activities of daily living, muscle strength, muscle mass, dynamic balance, physical performance, pulmonary function, quality of life, cognitive capacity and mental health. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programs are necessary for older adults after hospitalization for COVID-19, especially those coming from intensive care units, as rehabilitation has a positive effect on important clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
5
|
Keeley TJH, Satram S, Ghafoori P, Reyes C, Birch HJ, Raymond K, Gelhorn HL, Kosinski M, Saucier CD, Mitchell Foster A, Lopuski A, Powers JH 3rd. Content validity and psychometric properties of the inFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome Plus (FLU-PRO Plus(©)) instrument in patients with COVID-19. Qual Life Res 2023;:1-13. [PMID: 36703019 DOI: 10.1007/s11136-022-03336-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE A well-defined and reliable patient-reported outcome instrument for COVID-19 is important for assessing symptom severity and supporting research studies. The InFLUenza Patient-Reported Outcome (FLU-PRO) instrument has been expanded to include loss of taste and smell in the FLU-PRO Plus, to comprehensively cover COVID-19 symptoms. Our studies were designed to evaluate and validate the FLU-PRO Plus among patients with COVID-19. METHODS Two studies were conducted: (1) a qualitative, non-interventional, cross-sectional study of patients with COVID-19 involving hybrid concept elicitation and cognitive debriefing interviews; (2) a psychometric evaluation of the measurement properties of FLU-PRO Plus, using data from COMET-ICE (COVID-19 Monoclonal antibody Efficacy Trial-Intent to Care Early). RESULTS In the qualitative interviews (n = 30), all 34 items of the FLU-PRO Plus were considered relevant to COVID-19, and participants determined the questionnaire was easily understood, well written, and comprehensive. In the psychometric evaluation (n = 845), the internal consistency reliability of FLU-PRO Plus total score was 0.94, ranging from 0.71 to 0.90 for domain scores. Reproducibility (Day 20-21) was 0.83 for total score, with domain scores of 0.67-0.89. Confirmatory factor analysis with the novel smell/taste domain demonstrated an acceptable fit to the data. CONCLUSION The content, reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the FLU-PRO Plus in the COVID-19 population were supported. Our results suggest that FLU-PRO Plus is a content- and psychometrically-valid, fit-for-purpose measure which is easily understood by patients. FLU-PRO Plus is a suitable PRO measure for evaluating symptoms of COVID-19 and treatment benefit directly from the patient perspective. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT04545060, September 10, 2020; retrospectively registered.
Collapse
|
6
|
Qaseem A, Yost J, Miller MC, Andrews R, Jokela JA, Forciea MA, Abraham GM, Humphrey LL, Lee RA, Tschanz MP, Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta I, Harrod C, Shamliyan T, Umana K. Outpatient Treatment of Confirmed COVID-19: Living, Rapid Practice Points From the American College of Physicians (Version 1). Ann Intern Med 2023; 176:115-124. [PMID: 36442061 PMCID: PMC9707698 DOI: 10.7326/m22-2249] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
DESCRIPTION Strategies to manage COVID-19 in the outpatient setting continue to evolve as new data emerge on SARS-CoV-2 variants and the availability of newer treatments. The Scientific Medical Policy Committee (SMPC) of the American College of Physicians (ACP) developed these living, rapid practice points to summarize the best available evidence on the treatment of adults with confirmed COVID-19 in an outpatient setting. These practice points do not evaluate COVID-19 treatments in the inpatient setting or adjunctive COVID-19 treatments in the outpatient setting. METHODS The SMPC developed these living, rapid practice points on the basis of a living, rapid review done by the ACP Center for Evidence Reviews at Cochrane Austria at the University for Continuing Education Krems (Danube University Krems). The SMPC will maintain these practice points as living by monitoring and assessing the impact of new evidence. PRACTICE POINT 1 Consider molnupiravir to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting who are within 5 to 7 days of the onset of symptoms and at high risk for progressing to severe disease. PRACTICE POINT 2 Consider nirmatrelvir-ritonavir combination therapy to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting who are within 5 days of the onset of symptoms and at high risk for progressing to severe disease. PRACTICE POINT 3 Consider remdesivir to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting who are within 7 days of the onset of symptoms and at high risk for progressing to severe disease. PRACTICE POINT 4 Do not use azithromycin to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 5 Do not use chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 6 Do not use ivermectin to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 7 Do not use nitazoxanide to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 8 Do not use lopinavir-ritonavir combination therapy to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 9 Do not use casirivimab-imdevimab combination therapy to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting unless it is considered effective against a SARS-CoV-2 variant or subvariant locally in circulation. PRACTICE POINT 10 Do not use regdanvimab to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting unless it is considered effective against a SARS-CoV-2 variant or subvariant locally in circulation. PRACTICE POINT 11 Do not use sotrovimab to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting unless it is considered effective against a SARS-CoV-2 variant or subvariant locally in circulation. PRACTICE POINT 12 Do not use convalescent plasma to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 13 Do not use ciclesonide to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting. PRACTICE POINT 14 Do not use fluvoxamine to treat patients with confirmed mild to moderate COVID-19 in the outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir Qaseem
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania (A.Q.)
| | - Jennifer Yost
- American College of Physicians, Philadelphia, and Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania (J.Y.)
| | | | | | - Janet A Jokela
- University of Illinois College of Medicine at Urbana-Champaign, Champaign, Illinois (J.A.J.)
| | | | - George M Abraham
- University of Massachusetts Medical School and Saint Vincent Hospital, Worcester, Massachusetts (G.M.A.)
| | - Linda L Humphrey
- Portland Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon (L.L.H.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Richard SA, Epsi NJ, Lindholm DA, Malloy AMW, Maves RC, Berjohn CM, Lalani T, Smith AG, Mody RM, Ganesan A, Huprikar N, Colombo RE, Colombo CJ, Madar C, Jones MU, Larson DT, Ewers EC, Bazan S, Fries AC, Maldonado CJ, Simons MP, Rozman JS, Andronescu L, Mende K, Tribble DR, Agan BK, Burgess TH, Pollett SD, Powers JH. COVID-19 patient reported symptoms using FLU-PRO Plus in a cohort study: associations with infecting genotype, vaccine history, and return-to-health. Open Forum Infect Dis 2022; 9:ofac275. [PMID: 35873301 PMCID: PMC9214183 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofac275] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
Patient reported outcomes of SARS-CoV-2 infection are an important measure of the full burden of COVID. Here, we examine how 1) infecting genotype and COVID-19 vaccination correlate with FLU-PRO Plus score, including by symptom domains, and 2) FLU-PRO Plus scores predict return to usual activities and health.
Methods
The EPICC study was implemented to describe the short- and long-term consequences of SARS-CoV-2 infection in a longitudinal, observational cohort. Multivariable linear regression models were run with FLU-PRO Plus scores as the outcome variable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated effects of FLU-PRO Plus scores on return to usual health or activities.
Results
Among the 764 participants included in this analysis, 63% were 18-44 years old, 40% were female, and 51% were white. Being fully vaccinated was associated with lower total scores (β=-0.39 (95% confidence interval (CI) -0.57, -0.21)). The Delta variant was associated with higher total scores (β=0.25 (95% CI 0.05, 0.45)). Participants with higher FLU-PRO Plus scores were less likely to report returning to usual health and activities (Health: hazard ratio (HR) 0.46 (95% CI 0.37, 0.57); Activities: HR 0.56 (95% CI 0.47, 0.67)). Fully vaccinated participants were more likely to report returning to usual activities (HR 1.24 (95% CI 1.04, 1.48)).
Conclusions
Full SARS-CoV-2 vaccination is associated with decreased severity of patient-reported symptoms across multiple domains, which in turn is likely to be associated with earlier return to usual activities. In addition, infection with the Delta variant was associated with higher FLU-PRO Plus scores than previous variants, even after controlling for vaccination status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A. Richard
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nusrat J. Epsi
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - David A. Lindholm
- Brooke Army Medical Center , Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | - Ryan C. Maves
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- Naval Medical Center San Diego , San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Catherine M. Berjohn
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- Naval Medical Center San Diego , San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Tahaniyat Lalani
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. , Bethesda, MD, USA
- Naval Medical Center Portsmouth , Portsmouth, VA, USA
| | | | - Rupal M. Mody
- William Beaumont Army Medical Center , El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Anuradha Ganesan
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. , Bethesda, MD, USA
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Nikhil Huprikar
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- Walter Reed National Military Medical Center , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rhonda E. Colombo
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. , Bethesda, MD, USA
- Madigan Army Medical Center , Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA, USA
| | - Christopher J. Colombo
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- Madigan Army Medical Center , Joint Base Lewis McChord, WA, USA
| | | | - Milissa U. Jones
- Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- Tripler Army Medical Center , Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Derek T. Larson
- Naval Medical Center San Diego , San Diego, CA, USA
- Fort Belvoir Community Hospital , Fort Belvoir, VA, USA
| | - Evan C. Ewers
- Fort Belvoir Community Hospital , Fort Belvoir, VA, USA
| | - Samantha Bazan
- Carl R. Darnall Army Medical Center , Fort Hood, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Mark P. Simons
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Julia S. Rozman
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Liana Andronescu
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Katrin Mende
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. , Bethesda, MD, USA
- Brooke Army Medical Center , Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA
| | - David R. Tribble
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Brian K. Agan
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Timothy H. Burgess
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Simon D. Pollett
- Infectious Disease Clinical Research Program, Department of Preventive Medicine and Biostatistics, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences , Bethesda, MD, USA
- The Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc. , Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - John H Powers
- Clinical Research Directorate, Frederick National Laboratory for Cancer Research , Frederick, MD, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Antoniou KM, Vasarmidi E, Russell AM, Andrejak C, Crestani B, Delcroix M, Dinh-Xuan AT, Poletti V, Sverzellati N, Vitacca M, Witzenrath M, Tonia T, Spanevello A. European Respiratory Society Statement on Long COVID-19 Follow-Up. Eur Respir J 2022; 60:13993003.02174-2021. [PMID: 35144991 PMCID: PMC9349784 DOI: 10.1183/13993003.02174-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 12/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Patients diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection frequently experience symptom burden post-acute infection or post-hospitalisation. We aimed to identify optimal strategies for follow-up care that may positively impact the patient's quality of life (QoL). A European Respiratory Society (ERS) Task Force convened and prioritised eight clinical questions. A targeted search of the literature defined the timeline of “long COVID” as 1–6 months post-infection and identified clinical evidence in the follow-up of patients. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria report an association of characteristics of acute infection with persistent symptoms, thromboembolic events in the follow-up period, and evaluations of pulmonary physiology and imaging. Importantly, this statement reviews QoL consequences, symptom burden, disability and home care follow-up. Overall, the evidence for follow-up care for patients with long COVID is limited. Follow-up care of patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 is crucial and may improve their quality of life. More evidence and research is emerging to understand the causes, mechanisms and risks of long COVID consequences.https://bit.ly/3J1WMWy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katerina M Antoniou
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pneumonology, Department of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Eirini Vasarmidi
- Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Pneumonology, Department of Respiratory Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece.,Université de Paris, Inserm U1152, Labex Inflamex, Paris, France.,Authors contributed equally
| | - Anne-Marie Russell
- College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.,Authors contributed equally
| | - Claire Andrejak
- Service de Pneumologie, CHU Amiens-Picardie, UR 4294 AGIR, université Picardie Jules-Verne, Amiens, France
| | - Bruno Crestani
- Université de Paris, Inserm U1152, Labex Inflamex, Paris, France.,Centre de Référence des Maladies Pulmonaires Rares (site Constitutif), AP-HP, Service de Pneumologie, Hôpital Bichat, Paris, France
| | - Marion Delcroix
- Department of Pneumonology, KU Leuven University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Anh Tuan Dinh-Xuan
- AP-HP Centre, Hôpital Cochin, Respiratory Physiology Unit, Thoracic Diseases Department, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Venerino Poletti
- Pulmonology Unit, Thoracic Diseases Department, G.B. Morgagni Hospital, Forlì, Italy.,Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Nicola Sverzellati
- Division of Radiology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University Hospital of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Michele Vitacca
- Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, Respiratory Rehabilitation of the Institute of Lumezzane, Brescia, Italy
| | - Martin Witzenrath
- Department of Internal Medicine/Infectious Diseases and Respiratory Medicine, Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomy Tonia
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Antonio Spanevello
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Insubria, Varese.,Department of Medicine and Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, Maugeri Care and Research Institute, IRCCS Tradate, Varese, Italy
| |
Collapse
|