Improving prediction of response to neoadjuvant treatment in patients with breast cancer by combining liquid biopsies with multiparametric MRI: protocol of the LIMA study - a multicentre prospective observational cohort study

Predicting response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy with liquid biopsies and multiparametric MRI in patients with breast cancer

Accurate prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) can help tailor treatment to individual patients' needs. Little is known about the combination of liquid biopsies and computer extracted features from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for the prediction of NAC response in breast cancer. Here, we report on a prospective study with the aim to explore the predictive potential of this combination in adjunct to standard clinical and pathological information before, during and after NAC. The study was performed in four Dutch hospitals. Patients without metastases treated with NAC underwent 3 T multiparametric MRI scans before, during and after NAC. Liquid biopsies were obtained before every chemotherapy cycle and before surgery. Prediction models were developed using penalized linear regression to forecast residual cancer burden after NAC and evaluated for pathologic complete response (pCR) using leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV). Sixty-one patients were included. Twenty-three patients (38%) achieved pCR. Most prediction models yielded the highest estimated LOOCV area under the curve (AUC) at the post-treatment timepoint. A clinical-only model including tumor grade, nodal status and receptor subtype yielded an estimated LOOCV AUC for pCR of 0.76, which increased to 0.82 by incorporating post-treatment radiological MRI assessment (i.e., the "clinical-radiological" model). The estimated LOOCV AUC was 0.84 after incorporation of computer-extracted MRI features, and 0.85 when liquid biopsy information was added instead of the radiological MRI assessment. Adding liquid biopsy information to the clinical-radiological resulted in an estimated LOOCV AUC of 0.86. In conclusion, inclusion of liquid biopsy-derived markers in clinical-radiological prediction models may have potential to improve prediction of pCR after NAC in breast cancer.

Deep Learning-Based Segmentation of Locally Advanced Breast Cancer on MRI in Relation to Residual Cancer Burden: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

While several methods have been proposed for automated assessment of breast-cancer response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy on breast MRI, limited information is available about their performance across multiple institutions.

PURPOSE

To assess the value and robustness of deep learning-derived volumes of locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) on MRI to infer the presence of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

SUBJECTS

Training cohort: 102 consecutive female patients with LABC scheduled for neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) from a single institution (age: 25-73 years). Independent testing cohort: 55 consecutive female patients with LABC from four institutions (age: 25-72 years).

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Training cohort: single vendor 1.5 T or 3.0 T. Testing cohort: multivendor 3.0 T. Gradient echo dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences.

ASSESSMENT

A convolutional neural network (nnU-Net) was trained to segment LABC. Based on resulting tumor volumes, an extremely randomized tree model was trained to assess residual cancer burden (RCB)-0/I vs. RCB-II/III. An independent model was developed using functional tumor volume (FTV). Models were tested on an independent testing cohort and response assessment performance and robustness across multiple institutions were assessed.

STATISTICAL TESTS

The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was used to calculate the area under the ROC curve (AUC). DeLong's method was used to compare AUCs. Correlations were calculated using Pearson's method. P values <0.05 were considered significant.

RESULTS

Automated segmentation resulted in a median (interquartile range [IQR]) Dice score of 0.87 (0.62-0.93), with similar volumetric measurements (R = 0.95, P < 0.05). Automated volumetric measurements were significantly correlated with FTV (R = 0.80). Tumor volume-derived from deep learning of DCE-MRI was associated with RCB, yielding an AUC of 0.76 to discriminate between RCB-0/I and RCB-II/III, performing similar to the FTV-based model (AUC = 0.77, P = 0.66). Performance was comparable across institutions (IQR AUC: 0.71-0.84).

DATA CONCLUSION

Deep learning-based segmentation estimates changes in tumor load on DCE-MRI that are associated with RCB after NAC and is robust against variations between institutions.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

2.

TECHNICAL EFFICACY

Stage 4.

Human stefin B: from its structure, folding, and aggregation to its function in health and disease

Mutations in the gene for human stefin B (cystatin B) cause progressive myoclonic epilepsy type 1 (EPM1), a neurodegenerative disorder. The most common change is dodecamer repeats in the promoter region of the gene, though missense and frameshift mutations also appear. Human stefin B primarily acts as a cysteine cathepsin inhibitor, and it also exhibits alternative functions. It plays a protective role against oxidative stress, likely via reducing mitochondrial damage and thus generating fewer mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS). Accordingly, lack of stefin B results in increased inflammation and NLRP3 inflammasome activation, producing more ROS. The protein is cytosolic but also has an important role in the nucleus, where it prevents cleavage of the N terminal part of histone 3 by inhibiting cathepsins L and B and thus regulates transcription and cell cycle. Furthermore, it has been shown that stefin B is oligomeric in cells and that it has a specific role in the physiology of the synapse and in vesicular transport. On the basis of my research team's data on the structure, folding, and aggregation of stefin B, we have proposed that it might regulate proteostasis, possessing a chaperone-like function. In this review, I synthesize these observations and derive some conclusions on possible sources of EPM1 pathology. The interaction partners of stefin B and other gene mutations leading to EPM1-like pathology are discussed and common pathways are pinpointed.