1
|
Badaoui A, Teles de Campos S, Fusaroli P, Gincul R, Kahaleh M, Poley JW, Sosa Valencia L, Czako L, Gines A, Hucl T, Kalaitzakis E, Petrone MC, Sadik R, van Driel L, Vandeputte L, Tham T. Curriculum for diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound training in Europe: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 2024; 56:222-240. [PMID: 38065561 DOI: 10.1055/a-2224-8704] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
The European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) has recognized the need to formalize and enhance training in diagnostic endoscopic ultrasound (EUS). This manuscript represents the outcome of a formal Delphi process resulting in an official Position Statement of the ESGE and provides a framework to develop and maintain skills in diagnostic EUS. This curriculum is set out in terms of the prerequisites prior to training; the recommended steps of training to a defined syllabus; the quality of training; and how competence should be defined and evidenced before independent practice. 1: Trainees should have achieved competence in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy before training in diagnostic EUS. 2: The development of diagnostic EUS skills by methods that do not involve patients is advisable, but not mandatory, prior to commencing formal training in diagnostic EUS. 3: A trainee's principal trainer should be performing adequate volumes of diagnostic EUSs to demonstrate maintenance of their own competence. 4: Training centers for diagnostic EUS should offer expertise, as well as a high volume of procedures per year, to ensure an optimal level of quality for training. Under these conditions, training centers should be able to provide trainees with a sufficient wealth of experience in diagnostic EUS for at least 12 months. 5: Trainees should engage in formal training and supplement this with a range of learning resources for diagnostic EUS, including EUS-guided fine-needle aspiration and biopsy (FNA/FNB). 6: EUS training should follow a structured syllabus to guide the learning program. 7: A minimum procedure volume should be offered to trainees during diagnostic EUS training to ensure that they have the opportunity to achieve competence in the technique. To evaluate competence in diagnostic EUS, trainees should have completed a minimum of 250 supervised EUS procedures: 80 for luminal tumors, 20 for subepithelial lesions, and 150 for pancreaticobiliary lesions. At least 75 EUS-FNA/FNBs should be performed, including mostly pancreaticobiliary lesions. 8: Competence assessment in diagnostic EUS should take into consideration not only technical skills, but also cognitive and integrative skills. A reliable valid assessment tool should be used regularly during diagnostic EUS training to track the acquisition of competence and to support trainee feedback. 9: A period of supervised practice should follow the start of independent activity. Supervision can be delivered either on site if other colleagues are already practicing EUS or by maintaining contacts with the training center and/or other EUS experts. 10: Key performance measures including the annual number of procedures, frequency of obtaining a diagnostic sample during EUS-FNA/FNB, and adverse events should be recorded within an electronic documentation system and evaluated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdenor Badaoui
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, CHU UCL NAMUR, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Sara Teles de Campos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Pietro Fusaroli
- Unit of Gastroenterology, University of Bologna, Hospital of Imola, Imola, Italy
| | - Rodica Gincul
- Department of Gastroenterology, Jean Mermoz Private Hospital, Lyon, France
| | - Michel Kahaleh
- Division of Gastroenterology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Jan-Werner Poley
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht UMC+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Leonardo Sosa Valencia
- IHU Strasbourg - Institute of Image-Guided Surgery - Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Laszlo Czako
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
| | - Angels Gines
- Endoscopy Unit, Gastroenterology Department, ICMDM, Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Tomas Hucl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Evangelos Kalaitzakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - Maria Chiara Petrone
- Division of Pancreatobiliary Endoscopy and Endosonography, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Riadh Sadik
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Medicine, Institute of Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Academy, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lydi van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lieven Vandeputte
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AZ Sint-Jan Brugge-Oostende AV, Bruges, Belgium
| | - Tony Tham
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Ulster Hospital, Dundonald, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Schutz HM, Quispel R, Veldt BJ, Smedts FM, Anten MPG, Hoogduin KJ, Honkoop P, van Nederveen FH, Hol L, Kliffen M, Fitzpatrick CE, Erler NS, Bruno MJ, van Driel LM. Cumulative sum learning curves guiding multicenter multidisciplinary quality improvement of EUS-guided tissue acquisition of solid pancreatic lesions. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E549-E557. [PMID: 35433206 PMCID: PMC9010081 DOI: 10.1055/a-1766-5259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims In this study, we evaluated the performance of community hospitals involved in the Dutch quality in endosonography team regarding yield of endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided tissue acquisition (TA) of solid pancreatic lesions using cumulative sum (CUSUM) learning curves. The aims were to assess trends in quality over time and explore potential benefits of CUSUM as a feedback-tool. Patients and methods All consecutive EUS-guided TA procedures for solid pancreatic lesions were registered in five community hospitals between 2015 and 2018. CUSUM learning curves were plotted for overall performance and for performance per center. The American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy-defined key performance indicators, rate of adequate sample (RAS), and diagnostic yield of malignancy (DYM) were used for this purpose. Feedback regarding performance was provided on multiple occasions at regional interest group meetings during the study period. Results A total of 431 EUS-guided TA procedures in 403 patients were included in this study. The overall and per center CUSUM curves for RAS improved over time. CUSUM curves for DYM revealed gradual improvement, reaching the predefined performance target (70 %) overall, and in three of five contributing centers in 2018. Analysis of a sudden downslope development in the CUSUM curve of DYM in one center revealed temporary absence of a senior cytopathologist to have had a temporary negative impact on performance. Conclusions CUSUM-derived learning curves allow for assessment of best practices by comparison among peers in a multidisciplinary multicenter quality improvement initiative and proved to be a valuable and easy-to-interpret means to evaluate EUS performance over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M. Schutz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Rutger Quispel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Bart J. Veldt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Frank M.M. Smedts
- Department of Cyto- and Histopathology, Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - Marie-Paule G.F. Anten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis en Vlietland, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Klaas J. Hoogduin
- Department of Cyto- and Histopathology, Pathan B.V., Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Pieter Honkoop
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Albert Schweitzer Ziekenhuis, Dordrecht, the Netherlands
| | | | - Lieke Hol
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mike Kliffen
- Department of Cyto- and Histopathology, Maasstad Ziekenhuis, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Claire E. Fitzpatrick
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, IJsselland Ziekenhuis, Capelle aan den Ijssel, the Netherlands
| | - Nicole S. Erler
- Department of Biostatistics, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marco J. Bruno
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lydi M.J.W. van Driel
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|