Adenocarcinoma arising in villous adenoma of the ampulla of Vater with synchronous malignant gastrointestinal stromal tumour of the duodenum: a case report

The occurrence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with second malignancies - Case series of a single institution experience

INTRODUCTION

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) may coexist with different types of malignancies, either synchronously or metachronously. The aim of this study was to characterize the clinical and histopathological features of GIST coexisting with other neoplasms.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 76 GISTs cases diagnosed at our institution between January 2003 and March 2020 was performed. A subgroup of cases with concomitant second malignancy was selected. The clinical and pathologic records were reviewed.

RESULTS

18 out of 76 patients (23.7%) with GISTs were diagnosed with the second neoplasms. In 11 cases GISTs were diagnosed metachronously to the second malignancy, whereas 7 cases of GIST were synchronous. The most common concomitant neoplasms were breast cancer and gastric cancer. The concomitant GIST were located mainly in small intestine (52.6%). 14 GISTs were classified as very low or low-risk (77.8%), 3 as moderate risk (16.7%) and 1 as high risk tumors (5.6%).

CONCLUSION

The coexistence of GIST with other malignancies may be more common, than it has been considered. As the most of concomitant GISTs occurs metachronously to the second malignancy, studying of this phenomenon requires a long-term follow-up.

Gastrointestinal Stromal Tumor of the Ampulla of Vater: A Narrative Review

Background

Gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) of the ampulla of Vater is a rare occurrence. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no published review on this rare tumor in the English literature so far.

Summary

In this review, we will discuss all the reported details of the published cases, including demography, clinical presentation, imaging, gross pathology and histopathology, immunohistochemical findings, treatment modalities, and outcome of cases with the diagnosis GIST from the ampulla of Vater in the last 20 years.

Key Message

Twenty-five cases of GIST in the ampulla of Vater have been reported in the last 20 years in the English literature. GIST in the ampulla of Vater are usually small tumors (<5 cm) in middle-age patients. The majority of the patients present with lower GI bleeding and abdominal pain. Imaging findings are not characteristic, and most of the patients without biopsy and with no histologic diagnosis were operated with the primary impression of adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine tumor, and GIST. Perioperative tissue biopsy has been accurate in <70% of the cases. The majority of the reported cases of GISTs in the ampulla of Vater have been low risk with spindle-cell morphology, low mitotic figures, and minimal atypia; reactive for C-KIT and DOG-1; and nonreactive for SMA, desmin, and S100. In the majority of the cases, duodenectomy with or without Whipple's operation has been performed, and most of the cases showed good prognosis.

Clinicopathological features, surgical strategy and prognosis of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors: a series of 300 patients

BACKGROUND

The relatively low incidence of duodenal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and the unique anatomy make the surgical management and outcomes of this kind of tumor still under debate. Thus, this study aimed to explore the optimal surgical strategy and prognosis of duodenal GISTs.

METHODS

A total of 300 cases of duodenal GISTs were obtained from our center (37 cases) and from case reports or series (263 cases) extracted from MEDLINE. Clinicopathological features, type of resections and survivals of duodenal GISTs were analyzed.

RESULTS

The most common location of duodenal GISTs was descending portion (137/266, 51.5%). The median tumor size was 4 cm (0.1-28). Most patients (66.3%) received limited resection (LR). Pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) was mainly performed for GISTs with larger tumor size or arose from descending portion (both P < 0.05). For both the entire cohort and tumors located in the descending portion, PD was not an independent risk factor for disease-free survival (DFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) (both P > 0.05). Duodenal GISTs were significantly different from gastric GISTs with respect to tumor size, mitotic index and NIH risk category (all P < 0.05). The DFS and DSS of duodenal GISTs was significantly worse than that of gastric GISTs (both P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LR was a more prevalent surgical procedure and PD was mainly performed for tumors with larger diameter or located in descending portion. Type of resection was not an independent risk factor for the prognosis of duodenal GISTs. Prognosis of duodenal GISTs was significantly worse than that of gastric GISTs.

Coexistence of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST) and malignant neoplasms of different origin: prognostic implications

BACKGROUND

Over the past decade, several changes occurred in diagnostics, treatment and understanding of pathogenesis of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). However, their coexistence with other malignancies of different histogenetic origin remains a challenging issue.

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with GIST in a 10-years period were identified retrospectively and clinical history and findings thoroughly explored for the presence of associated other malignancies. Follow up data were obtained and analysed for prognostic impact of the concurrent malignancy and/or GIST.

RESULTS

Thirty seven (27 males, 10 females) of 86 GIST-patients (43%) had another malignancy. Mean age was 70 years. Associated malignancies were gastrointestinal (n = 29; 69%), renal-/urological (n = 5; 12%), haematological (n = 4; 9.5%), cutaneous (n = 3; 7%) and thyroid (n = 1; 2.5%) in origin. Majority of GISTs occurred in stomach (65%) and small intestine (30.6%) and most (78%) were asymptomatic incidental findings during diagnostic or therapeutic procedures for associated malignancies. GIST size ranged from 0.1 cm to 9 cm (mean, 2.2 cm) and all of them had a low (<5/50 HPFs) or no mitotic activity. Thirty-one tumours (84%) were of no/very low/low risk and 6 were of intermediate risk. During follow-up (range 3-160 months, mean; 60 months), one patient suffered from distant metastases of GIST. Seven patients (19%) died of associated malignancies and three patients (8%) of other non-tumour-associated cause, but none died of GIST.

CONCLUSION

Coexistence of GIST with other malignancies is higher than previously reported and should draw attention of clinicians towards these incidental findings. Prognosis in these patients is usually determined by other malignancy and not significantly influenced by GIST. Therefore treatment algorithms should be focused on prognostically relevant malignancy.

Prognostic factors for survival post surgery for patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal neoplasms located in the alimentary tract. Our aim was to assess the influence of prognostic factors on survival in patients surgically treated for GISTs.

STUDY

One hundred and five patients treated between January 1989 and December 2008 were available for study. A retrospective analysis of prognostic factors (age, gender, mitotic index, tumor location, tumor size, risk of malignant behavior, and coexisting other neoplasm) was performed. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were undertaken.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses revealed the importance of patient gender (p = 0.007), disease location (p = 0.055), mitotic index (p = 0.054) and coexistence with other neoplasms (p = 0.004). However, multivariate analysis showed 3 independently statistically significant factors: coexistence with other neoplasm (RR = 3.53, p = 0.004), male gender (RR = 2.60, p = 0.011) and mitotic index ≥10/50 HPF, (RR = 2.60, p = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has shown that male gender, a high mitotic index ≥10/50 HPF, and coexistence with other malignant neoplasms were independent poor prognostic factors in patients with GIST. The presence of middle or lower gut disease location leads to an increased risk of mortality when compared with the upper gut.

Synchronous incidental gastrointestinal stromal and epithelial malignant tumors

AIM: To investigate the incidence of incidental gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST) and its etiopathogenesis.

METHODS: From January 1, 2000 to December 31, 2007, 13 804 cases of gastrointestinal epithelial malignant tumor (EMT) and 521 cases of pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAC) were successfully treated with surgery at the Department of General Surgery and the Department of Thoracic Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, China. The clinical and pathologic data of 311 cases of primary GIST, including 257 cases with clinical GIST and 54 cases of incidental GIST were analyzed.

RESULTS: Of the 311 patients, 54 had incidental GIST, accounting for 17.4%. Of these tumors, 27 were found in 1.13% patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), 22 in 0.53% patients with gastric adenocarcinoma (GAC), 2 in 0.38% patients with PAC, 2 in 0.03% patients with colorectal adenocarcinoma, and 1 in one patient with GAC accompanying ESCC, respectively. Patients with incidental GIST presented symptoms indistinguishable from those with EMT. All incidental GIST lesions were small in size, and the majority had a low mitotic activity while only 1.9% (5/257) of clinical GIST lesions had a high risk.

CONCLUSION: Incidental GIST may occur synchronously with other tumors and has a high prevalence in males. Surgery is its best treatment modality.

Coexistence of gastrointestinal stromal tumors with other neoplasms

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the prevalence of other neoplasms in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and to compare clinical and histopathological data in patients with a GIST and accompanying neoplasms and in patients with GIST only.

METHODS

The analysis encompassed 82 patients with a GIST from among 330 300 patients whose surgical specimens, biopsies, and autopsies were evaluated between January 1989 and June 2006. A subgroup of patients with other types of neoplasms was selected.

RESULTS

Other neoplasms in patients with a GIST were diagnosed in 22 of the 82 (26.8%) patients. The most common accompanying neoplasms were colorectal (nine cases) and gastric (four cases) adenocarcinoma, as well as pancreatic adenocarcinoma (three cases). There was a tendency toward more common localization of a GIST in the small intestine in patients with other neoplasms than in patients with a GIST alone (P < 0.09). Tumors with very low risk of aggressive behavior were more frequent in patients with a GIST accompanied by other neoplasms than in the other group (P < 0.05). No phenotypic differences in GIST cells were found between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In almost 27% of the study population, GISTs coexisted with other neoplasms. A greater proportion of patients with a GIST localized in the small intestine and/or characterized by a very low risk of aggressive behavior and accompanying other neoplasms, compared with a GIST alone, most likely reflects the fact that in the first group, GISTs tended to be an incidental finding during surgery. The results were affected by patient selection and the type of tissue material available.