Microdeletion in the FMR-1 gene: an apparent null allele using routine clinical PCR amplification

Clinical and molecular characteristics of FMR1 microdeletion in patient with fragile X syndrome and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is mainly caused by FMR1 CGG repeat expansions. Other types of mutations, particularly deletions, are also responsible for FXS phenotypes, however these mutations are often missed by routine clinical testing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Molecular diagnosis in cases of suspected FXS was a combination of PCR and Southern blot. Measurement of the FMRP protein level was useful for detecting potentially deleterious impact.

RESULTS

PCR analysis and Southern blot revealed a case with premutation and suspected deletion alleles. Sanger sequencing showed that the deletion involved 313 bp upstream of repeats and some parts of CGG repeat tract, leaving transcription start site. FMRP was detected in 5.5 % of blood lymphocytes.

CONCLUSION

According to our review of case reports, most patients carrying microdeletion and full mutation had typical features of FXS. To our knowledge, our case is the first to describe mosaicism of a premutation and microdeletion in the FMR1 gene. The patient was probably protected from the effects of the deletion by mosaicism with premutation allele, leading to milder phenotype. It is thus important to consider appropriate techniques for detecting FMR1 variants other than repeat expansions which cannot be detected by routine FXS diagnosis.

Evaluating the clinical utility of a long-read sequencing-based approach in genetic testing of fragile-X syndrome

BACKGROUND

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) arises from the FMR1 CGG expansion. Comprehensive genetic testing for FMR1 CGG expansions, AGG interruptions, and microdeletions is essential to provide genetic counseling for females carrying premutation alleles. However, conventional PCR-based FMR1 assays mainly focus on CGG repeats, and could detect AGG interruption only in males.

METHODS

The clinical utility of a long-read sequencing-based assay termed comprehensive analysis of FXS (CAFXS) was evaluated in 238 high-risk samples by comparing to conventional PCR assays.

RESULTS

PCR assays identified five premuation and three full mutation categories alleles in all the samples, and CAFXS successfully called all the FMR1 CGG expansion. CAFXS identified 24-bp microdeletions upstream to the trinucleotide region with 30 CGG repeats, which was miscalled by the length-based PCR methods. CAFXS also identified a 187-bp deletion in about 1/7 of the sequencing reads in a male patient with mosaic full mutation alleles. CAFXS allowed for precise constructing the FMR1 CGG repeat and AGG interruption pattern in all the samples, and identified a novel and alternative CGA interruption in one normal female sample.

CONCLUSIONS

CAFXS represents a more comprehensive and accurate approach for FXS genetic testing that potentially enables more informed genetic counseling compared to PCR-based methods.

Comprehensive Analysis of Fragile X Syndrome: Full Characterization of the FMR1 Locus by Long-Read Sequencing

BACKGROUND

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most frequent cause of inherited X-linked intellectual disability. Conventional FXS genetic testing methods mainly focus on FMR1 CGG expansions and fail to identify AGG interruptions, rare intragenic variants, and large gene deletions.

METHODS

A long-range PCR and long-read sequencing-based assay termed comprehensive analysis of FXS (CAFXS) was developed and evaluated in Coriell and clinical samples by comparing to Southern blot analysis and triplet repeat-primed PCR (TP-PCR).

RESULTS

CAFXS accurately detected the number of CGG repeats in the range of 93 to at least 940 with mass fraction of 0.5% to 1% in the background of normal alleles, which was 2-4-fold analytically more sensitive than TP-PCR. All categories of mutations detected by control methods, including full mutations in 30 samples, were identified by CAFXS for all 62 clinical samples. CAFXS accurately determined AGG interruptions in all 133 alleles identified, even in mosaic alleles. CAFXS successfully identified 2 rare intragenic variants including the c.879A > C variant in exon 9 and a 697-bp microdeletion flanking upstream of CGG repeats, which disrupted primer annealing in TP-PCR assay. In addition, CAFXS directly determined the breakpoints of a 237.1-kb deletion and a 774.0-kb deletion encompassing the entire FMR1 gene in 2 samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Long-read sequencing-based CAFXS represents a comprehensive assay for identifying FMR1 CGG expansions, AGG interruptions, rare intragenic variants, and large gene deletions, which greatly improves the genetic screening and diagnosis for FXS.

Beyond Trinucleotide Repeat Expansion in Fragile X Syndrome: Rare Coding and Noncoding Variants in FMR1 and Associated Phenotypes

FMR1 (FMRP translational regulator 1) variants other than repeat expansion are known to cause disease phenotypes but can be overlooked if they are not accounted for in genetic testing strategies. We collected and reanalyzed the evidence for pathogenicity of FMR1 coding, noncoding, and copy number variants published to date. There is a spectrum of disease-causing FMR1 variation, with clinical and functional evidence supporting pathogenicity of five splicing, five missense, one in-frame deletion, one nonsense, and four frameshift variants. In addition, FMR1 deletions occur in both mosaic full mutation patients and as constitutional pathogenic alleles. De novo deletions arise not only from full mutation alleles but also alleles with normal-sized CGG repeats in several patients, suggesting that the CGG repeat region may be prone to genomic instability even in the absence of repeat expansion. We conclude that clinical tests for potentially FMR1-related indications such as intellectual disability should include methods capable of detecting small coding, noncoding, and copy number variants.

Molecular Correlates and Recent Advancements in the Diagnosis and Screening of FMR1-Related Disorders

Fragile X syndrome (FXS) is the most common monogenic cause of intellectual disability and autism. Molecular diagnostic testing of FXS and related disorders (fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI) and fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS)) relies on a combination of polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and Southern blot (SB) for the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) CGG-repeat expansion and methylation analyses. Recent advancements in PCR-based technologies have enabled the characterization of the complete spectrum of CGG-repeat mutation, with or without methylation assessment, and, as a result, have reduced our reliance on the labor- and time-intensive SB, which is the gold standard FXS diagnostic test. The newer and more robust triplet-primed PCR or TP-PCR assays allow the mapping of AGG interruptions and enable the predictive analysis of the risks of unstable CGG expansion during mother-to-child transmission. In this review, we have summarized the correlation between several molecular elements, including CGG-repeat size, methylation, mosaicism and skewed X-chromosome inactivation, and the extent of clinical involvement in patients with FMR1-related disorders, and reviewed key developments in PCR-based methodologies for the molecular diagnosis of FXS, FXTAS and FXPOI, and large-scale (CGG)_n expansion screening in newborns, women of reproductive age and high-risk populations.

EMQN best practice guidelines for the molecular genetic testing and reporting of fragile X syndrome and other fragile X-associated disorders

Different mutations occurring in the unstable CGG repeat in 5' untranslated region of FMR1 gene are responsible for three fragile X-associated disorders. An expansion of over ∼200 CGG repeats when associated with abnormal methylation and inactivation of the promoter is the mutation termed ‘full mutation' and is responsible for fragile X syndrome (FXS), a neurodevelopmental disorder described as the most common cause of inherited intellectual impairment. The term ‘abnormal methylation' is used here to distinguish the DNA methylation induced by the expanded repeat from the ‘normal methylation' occurring on the inactive X chromosomes in females with normal, premutation, and full mutation alleles. All male and roughly half of the female full mutation carriers have FXS. Another anomaly termed ‘premutation' is characterized by the presence of 55 to ∼200 CGGs without abnormal methylation, and is the cause of two other diseases with incomplete penetrance. One is fragile X-associated primary ovarian insufficiency (FXPOI), which is characterized by a large spectrum of ovarian dysfunction phenotypes and possible early menopause as the end stage. The other is fragile X-associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS), which is a late onset neurodegenerative disorder affecting males and females. Because of the particular pattern and transmission of the CGG repeat, appropriate molecular testing and reporting is very important for the optimal genetic counselling in the three fragile X-associated disorders. Here, we describe best practice guidelines for genetic analysis and reporting in FXS, FXPOI, and FXTAS, including carrier and prenatal testing.

Mosaic FMR1 deletion causes fragile X syndrome and can lead to molecular misdiagnosis: a case report and review of the literature

The most common cause of fragile X syndrome is expansion of a CGG trinucleotide repeat in the 5'UTR of FMR1. This expansion leads to transcriptional silencing of the gene. However, other mutational mechanisms, such as deletions of FMR1, also cause fragile X syndrome. The result is the same for both the expansion mediated silencing and deletion, absence of the gene product, FMRP. We report here on an 11-year-old boy with a cognitive and behavioral profile with features compatible with, but not specific to, fragile X syndrome. A mosaic deletion of 1,013,395 bp was found using high-density X chromosome microarray analysis followed by sequencing of the deletion breakpoints. We review the literature of FMR1 deletions and present this case in the context of other FMR1 deletions having mental retardation that may or may not have the classic fragile X phenotype.

Mosaicism for a full mutation, premutation, and deletion of the CGG repeats results in 22% FMRP and elevated FMR1 mRNA levels in a high-functioning fragile X male

The molecular basis in the majority of fragile X patients results from expansion of the CGG repeats in the FMR1 gene causing its transcriptional silencing and deficiency of its encoded protein FMRP. In this communication, we report on a male patient who lacks the characteristic physical features of fragile X and carries a fully methylated mutation, a premutation, a non-methylated full mutation, and a microdeletion encompassing the entire CGG repeat region and 42 bp of upstream flanking sequence. Southern blot analysis revealed that the methylated full mutation accounted for only 10% of his genotype while the premutation/non-methylated full mutation and the microdeletion constituted 37% and 53%, respectively. Immunofluorescent staining of FMRP demonstrated the presence of 22% FMRP in his peripheral blood leukocytes and quantitative RT-PCR revealed a 3.6-fold elevation of FMR1 mRNA levels. Developmental assessments indicated that while he has a learning disability, he does not have mental retardation. Because previous reports had noted that 28% FMRP expression is associated with a characteristic fragile X phenotype, we propose that in our patient the association of 22% FMRP levels with normal physical features and a high-functioning status may have resulted from increased FMRP stability by a mechanism that takes into account the CGG microdeletion and elevated mRNA levels.

The mutational spectrum of human autosomal tetranucleotide microsatellites

We studied by multiplex amplification and single-run electrophoretic analysis 10 microsatellite loci, composed of nine tetranucleotide-repeats (D1S1612, D3S2387, D4S2431, D5S2501, D10S1237, D15S657, D16S2622, D18S1270, and IFNAR-ALU) and one trinucleotide repeat (D2S1353). After elimination of proven null allele events involving D1S1612 and D5S2501 and of all data of D3S2387, in which we suspected but could not prove the occurrence of null alleles, we were left with nine loci, encompassing 24,224 meioses and 23 mutations. Twenty-two of the mutations (96%) were single-step events. Moreover, 18 of the mutations were paternal, four were maternal, and one was indeterminate. There was no significant difference between the number of additions and deletions in the mutants. Our findings are compatible with a simple model in which tetranucleotide microsatellites mutate primarily in paternal germinative cells by DNA slippage, such that the vast majority of mutations are equiprobable additions or deletions of a single-repeat unit. By combining the data from our tetranucleotide loci with literature information of highly and lowly mutable microsatellites, we observed a very highly significant correlation between mutation rate and the geometric mean of the length of the longest perfect repeat region (LRPR), compatible with a power or exponential relationship. The variation of the length of the LRPR explained as much as 80% of the variance of the mutation rate of autosomal tetranucleotide microsatellites.