Botulinum toxin type A in the treatment of upper limb spasticity among patients with traumatic brain injury

Current Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is one of the leading causes of morbidity, disability and mortality across all age groups globally. Currently, only palliative treatments exist, but these are suboptimal and do little to combat the progressive damage to the brain that occurs after a TBI. However, multiple experimental treatments are currently available that target the primary and secondary biochemical and cellular changes that occur after a TBI. Some of these drugs have progressed to clinical trials and are currently being evaluated for their therapeutic benefits in TBI patients. The aim of this study was to identify which drugs are currently being evaluated in clinical trials for TBI. A search of ClinicalTrials.gov was performed on 3 December 2021 and all clinical trials that mentioned “TBI” OR “traumatic brain injury” AND “drug” were searched, revealing 362 registered trials. Of the trials, 46 were excluded due to the drug not being mentioned, leaving 138 that were completed and 116 that were withdrawn. Although the studies included 267,298 TBI patients, the average number of patients per study was 865 with a range of 5–200,000. Of the completed studies, 125 different drugs were tested in TBI patients but only 7 drugs were used in more than three studies, including amantadine, botulinum toxin A and tranexamic acid (TXA). However, previous clinical studies using these seven drugs showed variable results. The current study concludes that clinical trials in TBI have to be carefully conducted so as to reduce variability across studies, since the severity of TBI and timing of therapeutic interventions were key aspects of trial success.

Upper Limb Motor Improvement after Traumatic Brain Injury: Systematic Review of Interventions

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of adult morbidity and mortality. Individuals with TBI have impairments in both cognitive and motor domains. Motor improvements post-TBI are attributable to adaptive neuroplasticity and motor learning. Majority of the studies focus on remediation of balance and mobility issues. There is limited understanding on the use of interventions for upper limb (UL) motor improvements in this population.

OBJECTIVE

We examined the evidence regarding the effectiveness of different interventions to augment UL motor improvement after a TBI.

METHODS

We systematically examined the evidence published in English from 1990-2020. The modified Downs and Black checklist helped assess study quality (total score: 28). Studies were classified as excellent: 24-28, good: 19-23, fair: 14-18, and poor: ≤13 in quality. Effect sizes helped quantify intervention effectiveness.

RESULTS

Twenty-three studies were retrieved. Study quality was excellent (n = 1), good (n = 5) or fair (n = 17). Interventions used included strategies to decrease muscle tone (n = 6), constraint induced movement therapy (n = 4), virtual reality gaming (n = 5), non-invasive stimulation (n = 3), arm motor ability training (n = 1), stem cell transplant (n = 1), task-oriented training (n = 2), and feedback provision (n = 1). Motor impairment outcomes included Fugl-Meyer Assessment, Modified Ashworth Scale, and kinematic outcomes (error and movement straightness). Activity limitation outcomes included Wolf Motor Function Test and Motor Activity Log (MAL). Effect sizes for majority of the interventions ranged from medium (.5-.79) to large (≥.8). Only ten studies included retention testing.

CONCLUSION

There is preliminary evidence that using some interventions may enhance UL motor improvement after a TBI. Answers to emergent questions can help select the most appropriate interventions in this population.

Baclofen in the Therapeutic of Sequele of Traumatic Brain Injury: Spasticity

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an alteration in brain function, caused by an external force, which may be a hit on the skull, rapid acceleration or deceleration, penetration of an object, or shock waves from an explosion. Traumatic brain injury is a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, with a high prevalence rate in pediatric patients, in which treatment options are still limited, not available at present neuroprotective drugs. Although the therapeutic management of these patients is varied and dependent on the severity of the injury, general techniques of drug types are handled, as well as physical and surgical. Baclofen is a muscle relaxant used to treat spasticity and improve mobility in patients with spinal cord injuries, relieving pain and muscle stiffness. Pharmacological support with baclofen is contradictory, because disruption of its oral administration may cause increased muscle tone syndrome and muscle spasm, prolonged seizures, hyperthermia, dysesthesia, hallucinations, or even multisystem organ failure. Combined treatments must consider the pathophysiology of broader alterations than only excitation/inhibition context, allowing the patient's reintegration with the greatest functionality.

[The efficacy of botulinum toxin therapy in patients with upper limb spasticity due to traumatic brain injury]

Spasticity is a type of muscle hyperactivity that occurs in patients after focal lesions of the Central nervous system due to various diseases: stroke, traumatic brain injury or spinal cord injury, neurosurgical intervention, as well as multiple sclerosis and other diseases of the Central nervous system and is the most disability manifestation of the syndrome of upper motor neuron (UMNS). Focal spasticity of the upper limb requires a complex treatment. Botulinum toxin therapy is an effective treatment for focal/multifocal spasticity in reducing muscle tone and improving function with the highest level of evidence according to the latest American and European guidelines for treatment of spasticity. There are many publications devoted to BTA use in post-stroke patients. This article provides a review of the BTA use in patients with the upper limb spasticity due to severe traumatic brain injury. Some local data on the BTA efficacy in the cohort of patients with traumatic brain injury are also presented.

Therapeutic use of botulinum toxin in neurorehabilitation. J Toxicol. 2012;2012:802893. [PMID: 21941544 PMCID: PMC3172973 DOI: 10.1155/2012/802893]

The botulinum toxins (BTX), type A and type B by blocking vesicle acetylcholine release at neuro-muscular and neuro-secretory junctions can result efficacious therapeutic agents for the treatment of numerous disorders in patients requiring neuro-rehabilitative intervention. Its use for the reduction of focal spasticity following stroke, brain injury, and cerebral palsy is provided. Although the reduction of spasticity is widely demonstrated with BTX type A injection, its impact on the improvement of dexterity and functional outcome remains controversial. The use of BTX for the rehabilitation of children with obstetrical brachial plexus palsy and in treating sialorrhea which can complicate the course of some severe neurological diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and Parkinson's disease is also addressed. Adverse events and neutralizing antibodies formation after repeated BTX injections can occur. Since impaired neurological persons can have complex disabling feature, BTX treatment should be viewed as adjunct measure to other rehabilitative strategies that are based on the individual's residual ability and competence and targeted to achieve the best functional recovery. BTX therapy has high cost and transient effect, but its benefits outweigh these disadvantages. Future studies must clarify if this agent alone or adjunctive to other rehabilitative procedures works best on functional outcome.

The use of botulinum toxin for spasticity after spinal cord injury

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use and effects of botulinum toxin (BTX) injections in persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) and focal spasticity.

DESIGN

Chart review of patients with SCI receiving their first injection of BTX for spasticity control at a freestanding urban rehabilitation hospital. Charts were reviewed for history and level of SCI, one of five self-identified goals (ambulation, positioning, upper-extremity function, hygiene, and pain control) before and after injection; site and doses of BTX used; and self-reported outcome on clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Charts of 28 adults receiving BTX were reviewed. All patients received BTX type A. Dosages of BTX ranged from 10 to 119 units per muscle. Improvement was noted for 56% in ambulation and 71% in positioning. Overall, upper-extremity function improved in 78%, hygiene improved in 66.6%, and pain decreased in 83.3%. Early use of BTX injections (less than a year after onset of symptoms) vs. late use of BTX injections did not influence effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

BTX seems to be an effective treatment for focal spasticity and for reducing disability in persons with SCI. Randomized trials are needed to confirm the value of this treatment in the setting of SCI.

Botulinum Toxin for Post-stroke Spastic Hypertonia: A Review of its Efficacy and Application in Clinical Practice

Botulinum toxins (BTX) have revolutionised the management of focal post-stroke spastic hypertonia. Published literature has supported the efficacy and safety of BTX in reducing spastic hypertonia but has not convincingly demonstrated the ability to enhance function. While clinicians and stroke survivors have reported impressive clinical outcomes, randomised, con-trolled trials (RCTs), have demonstrated only significant improvement in muscle tone but not functional changes. This paper will review the evidence supporting the efficacy of BTX for spastic hypertonia and discuss current clinical practice. Key words: Botulinum toxins, Cerebrovascular accident, Spasticity, Stroke

The lowest effective dose of botulinum A toxin in adult patients with upper limb spasticity

OBJECTIVE

To define the lowest effective dose of botulinum toxin type A (Dysport) and safety in the treatment of adult patients with upper limb spasticity.

DESIGN

This was a prospective, randomized, double-blind, dose-ranging study. Patients received either a placebo or one of three does of Dysport (350, 500 100) U) into five muscles of affected arm by anatomical and electromyography guidance. Efficacy was assessed periodically throughout the 6-month study period by the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), the Action Research Arm Test (ARA), the Barthel Index (BI) and the Visual Analogue Pain Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

fifty patients were recruited. The four study groups were comparable at baseline with respect to their demographical characteristics and severity of spasticity. All doses of Dysport studied showed a significant reduction from baseline of muscle tone and pain compared to placebo. However, the effect of functional disability was best at a dose of 500 U and the peak improvement was at week 8 after injection. A dose of 1000 U Dysport produced such an excess degree of muscle weakening that the number of randomized patients was reduced to five. BI and ARA of all patients were decrease after injection. No other adverse event was considered related to the study medication.

CONCLUSION

This study suggest that treatment with Dysport reduces muscle tone in adult patients with upper limb spasticity. The optimal dose for treatment of patients with residual voluntary movement in the upper limb appears to be 500 U.

Membres supérieurs fonctionnels hypertoniques et toxine botulique. Quels résultats fonctionnels ?

OBJECTIVES

To assess the efficacy of botulinum toxin injections for hypertonic upper limbs in patients with residual motricity that allows a functional use of the hand.

METHODS

Patients were seen between February 2000 and November 2002, before and after botulinum toxin injections for hypertonic upper limbs due to upper motor neuron syndrome. All patients had voluntary motricity in fingers and wrist extensors. Impairment (range of motion, spasticity [Ashworth's scale]), pain (10 centimeters visual analog scale) prehension (400-point measure) and patients' satisfaction were recorded. Two or three functional goals were predefined. Patients were injected after locating the target area with neurostimulation. The aim of the injections was functional improvement.

RESULTS

Eight patients were included. After injections, mean pain score decreased by 3.4 points; mean spasticity decreased by 1.0; and prehension improved, especially for bimanual functions. Three-quarters of the functional goals were reached. Optimal efficacy required repeated injections, with modification of muscle targets and doses.

CONCLUSION

Botulinum toxin injection is efficient for impairment, pain and prehension in hypertonic upper limbs, even if the hypertonic hand is still the "nondominant" hand. Motricity in antagonist muscles is essential for functional improvement, and the assessment must include bimanual tasks. Intrinsic as well as extrinsic muscles must be injected and a neurostimulator used for forearm muscles. Comparative studies are required to define more clearly the place of this treatment among medical and surgical treatments of spasticity.

Botulinum toxin: dosing and dilution

In the United States, the popularity of botulinum toxins as agents to treat muscle hypertonia has grown significantly over the last decade, despite lack of approval from the Food and Drug Administration for the indication of spasticity. Botox (botulinum toxin type A) and Myobloc (botulinum toxin type B) are Food and Drug Administration-approved for other indications, such as cervical dystonia. Another commercial preparation of type A, Dysport, has yet to reach the United States market as of this writing. Although botulinum toxin's efficacy in influencing spastic hypertonia is well accepted, the impact of certain clinical issues, such as dosing and dilution, on treatment outcome is not well established by published studies. This article will review important articles and selected abstracts on the use of botulinum toxin, specifically for spastic hypertonia in adults, with emphasis on current clinical practices as they relate to dosing and dilution.

Pain Management in Trauma Patients

Trauma is a major cause of mortality throughout the world. In recent years, major advances have been made in the management of trauma, the end result of which has been reduced mortality and enhanced function. One of these areas is pain control. Improved pain management has not only led to increased comfort in trauma patients, but has also been shown to reduce morbidity and improve long-term outcomes. This review focuses on the treatment of pain in the setting of acute injury and on pain management in trauma patients who go on to develop chronic pain. Emphasis is placed on pharmacologic interventions, invasive and noninvasive pain management techniques, analgesia in challenging patients, and pain control in commonly encountered trauma conditions.

[Botulinum toxin and traumatic brain injury]

Botulinum toxin is a successful focal spasticity therapy. The aim of this article is to study the data of the literature concerning its utilisation in traumatic brain injured patients, whom motor and tonus disturbances are polymorphic, in their clinical presentation as well as in their evolution. Although there are few studies concerning its utilisation in such patients, none of them being controlled, its use seems interesting in focal spasticity treatment. It can contribute to improve functional abilities and comfort for these patients.

Treatment of spasticity with botulinum toxin

Spasticity is an abnormal increase in muscle contraction often caused by damage to central motor pathways that control voluntary movement. During clinical examination, spasticity manifests as an increase in stretch reflexes, producing tendon jerks and resistance appearing as muscle tone. There are many causes of spasticity, including demyelination from multiple sclerosis, congenital damage from diseases such as cerebral palsy, trauma to the brain or spinal cord, hemorrhage or infarction, and other pathologic conditions that interrupt neural pathways. Effects of spasticity range from mild muscle stiffness to severe, painful muscle contractures and repetitive spasms that reduce mobility and substantially impede normal activities of daily living. Botulinum toxin therapy reduces spasticity and pain associated with several disorders. Local treatment with botulinum toxins can be used as adjunctive therapy, along with oral antispasticity medications, or alone to provide localized decrease in symptoms of spasticity and pain. Botulinum toxin therapy may be particularly useful for patients with spasticity due to stroke, whose treatment can be tailored based on recovery of function over time. In addition, botulinum toxin therapy is safe for pediatric patients, including children with cerebral palsy, who may not be able to tolerate the cognitive side effects of oral medications. Results of studies evaluating botulinum toxin for the treatment of spasticity due to various causes are presented here.

Botulinum toxin in motor disorders

Advances in the clinical use of botulinum neurotoxins continue. Of interest to the neurologist is the advanced practice in the treatment of focal dystonia and the new developments on other dyskinesias and on autonomic control of smooth muscle motility. New toxin serotypes are now being tested; their availability will improve clinical practice and will possibly lead to combined treatments. Indications in spasticity and in juvenile cerebral palsy are now under scrutiny. The combination of focal chemodenervation with specific rehabilitation procedures enables new development in this field.