|
1
|
Leonardi MC, Zerella MA, Lazzeroni M, Fusco N, Veronesi P, Galimberti VE, Corso G, Dicuonzo S, Rojas DP, Morra A, Gerardi MA, Lorubbio C, Zaffaroni M, Vincini MG, Orecchia R, Jereczek-Fossa BA, Magnoni F. Tools to Guide Radiation Oncologists in the Management of DCIS. Healthcare (Basel) 2024; 12:795. [PMID: 38610216 PMCID: PMC11011767 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12070795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Similar to invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ is also going through a phase of changes not only from a technical but also a conceptual standpoint. From prescribing radiotherapy to everyone to personalized approaches, including radiotherapy omission, there is still a lack of a comprehensive framework to guide radiation oncologists in decision making. Many pieces of the puzzle are finding their place as high-quality data mature and are disseminated, but very often, the interpretation of risk factors and the perception of risk remain very highly subjective. Sharing the therapeutic choice with patients requires effective communication for an understanding of risks and benefits, facilitating an informed decision that does not increase anxiety and concerns about prognosis. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarize the current state of knowledge to highlight the tools available to radiation oncologists for managing DCIS, with an outlook on future developments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Cristina Leonardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Maria Alessia Zerella
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Matteo Lazzeroni
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Genetics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Nicola Fusco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Pathology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo Veronesi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Viviana Enrica Galimberti
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Giovanni Corso
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| | - Samantha Dicuonzo
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Damaris Patricia Rojas
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Anna Morra
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Marianna Alessandra Gerardi
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Chiara Lorubbio
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Mattia Zaffaroni
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Maria Giulia Vincini
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
| | - Roberto Orecchia
- Scientific Directorate, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Barbara Alicja Jereczek-Fossa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (M.C.L.); (S.D.); (D.P.R.); (A.M.); (M.A.G.); (C.L.); (M.Z.); (M.G.V.); (B.A.J.-F.)
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20141 Milan, Italy; (N.F.); (P.V.); (G.C.)
| | - Francesca Magnoni
- Division of Breast Surgery, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy; (V.E.G.); (F.M.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Huang K, Dufresne M, Baksh M, Nussbaum S, Abbaszadeh Kasbi A, Mohammed A, Advani P, Morozov A, Bagaria S, McLaughlin S, Gabriel E. How Well Does Non-mass Enhancement Correlate With DCIS/Invasive Cancer? Am Surg 2023; 89:5414-5420. [PMID: 36788122 DOI: 10.1177/00031348231156776] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/16/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Contiguous non-mass enhancement (NME) often coexists with a solid tumor component on MRI, but it can be challenging to predict whether NME represents invasive breast cancer, ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), benign disease, or biopsy site reaction. The purpose of this study was to determine the association between the size/extent of NME and the presence of invasive cancer and/or DCIS on final pathology. METHODS This was a single institution retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained breast cancer registry (2010-2020). Female patients who underwent surgical resection were included if they had a diagnosis of invasive breast cancer (with or without DCIS) and had an MRI showing both a solid mass and contiguous NME. The size of NME on MRI was compared with the size of invasive cancer and/or DCIS on the final pathology. RESULTS From a total of 3443 patients, 225 patients were included. 86.2% had invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), and 12.0% had invasive lobular carcinoma 76.9% were ER+, 16.4% were HER2+, and 13.3% were triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). 18.7% received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) of whom 31% achieved a complete radiographic/pathologic response. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) between the size of NME and invasive cancer/DCIS showed a strong and positive correlation of MRI NME with DCIS on pathology in patients without NCT. Subgroup analysis showed the strongest correlations for NME and DCIS among non-white (r = .70) and HER2 + patients (r = .74) who did not receive NCT. CONCLUSIONS Strong correlations between NME and DCIS were found for HER2 + disease and non-white patients, but only modest correlations were found for other patient/disease characteristics. These correlations may impact decisions in surgical approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai Huang
- Department of Surgery, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Maria Dufresne
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Mizba Baksh
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Samuel Nussbaum
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | | | - Ashary Mohammed
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Pooja Advani
- Department of Hematology/Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Andrey Morozov
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Sanjay Bagaria
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Sarah McLaughlin
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Emmanuel Gabriel
- Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Pan J, Huang X, Yang S, Ouyang F, Ouyang L, Wang L, Chen M, Zhou L, Du Y, Chen X, Deng L, Hu Q, Guo B. The added value of apparent diffusion coefficient and microcalcifications to the Kaiser score in the evaluation of BI-RADS 4 lesions. Eur J Radiol 2023; 165:110920. [PMID: 37320881 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.110920] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2023] [Revised: 05/22/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the added value of combining microcalcifications or apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) with the Kaiser score (KS) for diagnosing BI-RADS 4 lesions. METHODS This retrospective study included 194 consecutive patients with 201 histologically verified BI-RADS 4 lesions. Two radiologists assigned the KS value to each lesion. Adding microcalcifications, ADC, or both these criteria to the KS yielded KS1, KS2, and KS3, respectively. The potential of all four scores to avoid unnecessary biopsies was assessed using the sensitivity and specificity. Diagnostic performance was evaluated by the area under the curve (AUC) and compared between KS and KS1. RESULTS The sensitivity of KS, KS1, KS2, and KS3 ranged from 77.1% to 100.0%.KS1 yielded significantly higher sensitivity than other methods (P < 0.05), except for KS3 (P > 0.05), most of all, when assessing NME lesions. For mass lesions, the sensitivity of these four scores was comparable (p > 0.05). The specificity of KS, KS1, KS2, and KS3 ranged from 56.0% to 69.4%, with no statistically significant differences(P > 0.05), except between KS1 and KS2 (p < 0.05).The AUC of KS1 (0.877) was significantly higher than that of KS (0.837; P = 0.0005), particularly for assessing NME (0.847 vs 0.713; P < 0.0001). CONCLUSION KS can stratify BI-RADS 4 lesions to avoid unnecessary biopsies. Adding microcalcifications, but not adding ADC, as an adjunct to KS improves diagnostic performance, particularly for NME lesions. ADC provides no additional diagnostic benefit to KS. Thus, only combining microcalcifications with KS is most conducive to clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jialing Pan
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiyi Huang
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Lecong Hospital of Shunde, Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Shaomin Yang
- Department of Radiology, Lecong Hospital of Shunde, Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Fusheng Ouyang
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Lizhu Ouyang
- Department of Ultrasound, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Liwen Wang
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Ming Chen
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Lanni Zhou
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Yongxing Du
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Xinjie Chen
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Lingda Deng
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Qiugen Hu
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
| | - Baoliang Guo
- Department of Radiology, Shunde Hospital, Southern Medical University(The First People's Hospital of Shunde, Foshan), Foshan, Guangdong, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Nissan N, Bauer E, Moss Massasa EE, Sklair-Levy M. Breast MRI during pregnancy and lactation: clinical challenges and technical advances. Insights Imaging 2022; 13:71. [PMID: 35397082 PMCID: PMC8994812 DOI: 10.1186/s13244-022-01214-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The breast experiences substantial changes in morphology and function during pregnancy and lactation which affects its imaging properties and may reduce the visibility of a concurrent pathological process. The high incidence of benign gestational-related entities may further add complexity to the clinical and radiological evaluation of the breast during the period. Consequently, pregnancy-associated breast cancer (PABC) is often a delayed diagnosis and carries a poor prognosis. This state-of-the-art pictorial review illustrates how despite currently being underutilized, technical advances and new clinical evidence support the use of unenhanced breast MRI during pregnancy and both unenhanced and dynamic-contrast enhanced (DCE) during lactation, to serve as effective supplementary modalities in the diagnostic work-up of PABC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noam Nissan
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel. .,Sackler Medicine School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Ethan Bauer
- Sackler Medicine School, New-York Program, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Efi Efraim Moss Massasa
- Joint Medicine School Program of Sheba Medical Center, St. George's, University of London and the University of Nicosia, Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Miri Sklair-Levy
- Radiology Department, Sheba Medical Center, 5265601, Tel Hashomer, Israel.,Sackler Medicine School, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|