Deep Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Responses from Twitter Data

Retracted: Deep Learning-Based Sentiment Analysis of COVID-19 Vaccination Responses from Twitter Data

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2021/4321131.].

Exploring public sentiment and vaccination uptake of COVID-19 vaccines in England: a spatiotemporal and sociodemographic analysis of Twitter data

Objectives

Vaccination is widely regarded as the paramount approach for safeguarding individuals against the repercussions of COVID-19. Nonetheless, concerns surrounding the efficacy and potential adverse effects of these vaccines have become prevalent among the public. To date, there has been a paucity of research investigating public perceptions and the adoption of COVID-19 vaccines. Therefore, the present study endeavours to address this lacuna by undertaking a spatiotemporal analysis of sentiments towards vaccination and its uptake in England at the local authority level, while concurrently examining the sociodemographic attributes at the national level.

Methods

A sentiment analysis of Twitter data was undertaken to delineate the distribution of positive sentiments and their demographic correlates. Positive sentiments were categorized into clusters to streamline comparison across different age and gender demographics. The relationship between positive sentiment and vaccination uptake was evaluated using Spearman's correlation coefficient. Additionally, a bivariate analysis was carried out to further probe public sentiment towards COVID-19 vaccines and their local adoption rates.

Result

The results indicated that the majority of positive tweets were posted by males, although females expressed higher levels of positive sentiment. The age group over 40 dominated the positive tweets and exhibited the highest sentiment polarity. Additionally, vaccination uptake was positively correlated with the number of positive tweets and the age group at the local authority level.

Conclusion

Overall, public opinions on COVID-19 vaccines are predominantly positive. The number of individuals receiving vaccinations at the local authority level is positively correlated with the prevalence of positive attitudes towards vaccines, particularly among the population aged over 40. These findings suggest that targeted efforts to increase vaccination uptake among younger populations, particularly males, are necessary to achieve widespread vaccination coverage.

Aspect-based classification of vaccine misinformation: a spatiotemporal analysis using Twitter chatter

BACKGROUND

The spread of misinformation of all types threatens people's safety and interrupts resolutions. COVID-19 vaccination has been a widely discussed topic on social media platforms with numerous misleading and fallacious information. This false information has a critical impact on the safety of society as it prevents many people from taking the vaccine, decelerating the world's ability to go back to normal. Therefore, it is vital to analyze the content shared on social media platforms, detect misinformation, identify aspects of misinformation, and efficiently represent related statistics to combat the spread of misleading information about the vaccine. This paper aims to support stakeholders in decision-making by providing solid and current insights into the spatiotemporal progression of the common misinformation aspects of the various available vaccines.

METHODS

Approximately 3800 tweets were annotated into four expert-verified aspects of vaccine misinformation obtained from reliable medical resources. Next, an Aspect-based Misinformation Analysis Framework was designed using the Light Gradient Boosting Machine (LightGBM) model, which is one of the most advanced, fast, and efficient machine learning models to date. Based on this dataset, spatiotemporal statistical analysis was performed to infer insights into the progression of aspects of vaccine misinformation among the public. Finally, the Pearson correlation coefficient and p-values are calculated for the global misinformation count against the vaccination counts of 43 countries from December 2020 until July 2021.

RESULTS

The optimized classification per class (i.e., per an aspect of misinformation) accuracy was 87.4%, 92.7%, 80.1%, and 82.5% for the "Vaccine Constituent," "Adverse Effects," "Agenda," "Efficacy and Clinical Trials" aspects, respectively. The model achieved an Area Under the ROC Curve (AUC) of 90.3% and 89.6% for validation and testing, respectively, which indicates the reliability of the proposed framework in detecting aspects of vaccine misinformation on Twitter. The correlation analysis shows that 37% of the countries addressed in this study were negatively affected by the spread of misinformation on Twitter resulting in reduced number of administered vaccines during the same timeframe.

CONCLUSIONS

Twitter is a rich source of insight on the progression of vaccine misinformation among the public. Machine Learning models, such as LightGBM, are efficient for multi-class classification and proved reliable in classifying vaccine misinformation aspects even with limited samples in social media datasets.

Crisis Communication during COVID-19: English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish Discourse of AstraZeneca Vaccine and Omicron Variant on Social Media

Social media have been the arena of different types of discourse during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aim to characterize public discourse during health crises in different international communities. Using Tweetpy and keywords related to the research, we collected 3,748,302 posts from the English, French, Portuguese, and Spanish Twitter communities related to two crises during the pandemic: (a) the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, and (b) the Omicron variant. In relation to AstraZeneca, 'blood clot' was the main focus of public discourse. Using quantitative classifications and natural language processing algorithms, results are obtained for each language. The English and French discourse focused more on "death", and the most negative sentiment was generated by the French community. The Portuguese discourse was the only one to make a direct reference to a politician, the former Brazilian President Bolsonaro. In the Omicron crisis, the public discourse mainly focused on infection cases follow-up and the number of deaths, showing a closer public discourse to the actual risk. The public discourse during health crises might lead to different behaviours. While public discourse on AstraZeneca might contribute as a barrier for preventive measures by increasing vaccine hesitancy, the Omicron discourse could lead to more preventive behaviours by the public, such as the use of masks. This paper broadens the scope of crisis communication by revealing social media's role in the constructs of public discourse.

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy: A Global Public Health and Risk Modelling Framework Using an Environmental Deep Neural Network, Sentiment Classification with Text Mining and Emotional Reactions from COVID-19 Vaccination Tweets

Popular social media platforms, such as Twitter, have become an excellent source of information with their swift information dissemination. Individuals with different backgrounds convey their opinions through social media platforms. Consequently, these platforms have become a profound instrument for collecting enormous datasets. We believe that compiling, organizing, exploring, and analyzing data from social media platforms, such as Twitter, can offer various perspectives to public health organizations and decision makers in identifying factors that contribute to vaccine hesitancy. In this study, public tweets were downloaded daily from Tweeter using the Tweeter API. Before performing computation, the tweets were preprocessed and labeled. Vocabulary normalization was based on stemming and lemmatization. The NRCLexicon technique was deployed to convert the tweets into ten classes: positive sentiment, negative sentiment, and eight basic emotions (joy, trust, fear, surprise, anticipation, anger, disgust, and sadness). t-test was used to check the statistical significance of the relationships among the basic emotions. Our analysis shows that the p-values of joy-sadness, trust-disgust, fear-anger, surprise-anticipation, and negative-positive relations are close to zero. Finally, neural network architectures, including 1DCNN, LSTM, Multiple-Layer Perceptron, and BERT, were trained and tested in a COVID-19 multi-classification of sentiments and emotions (positive, negative, joy, sadness, trust, disgust, fear, anger, surprise, and anticipation). Our experiment attained an accuracy of 88.6% for 1DCNN at 1744 s, 89.93% accuracy for LSTM at 27,597 s, while MLP achieved an accuracy of 84.78% at 203 s. The study results show that the BERT model performed the best, with an accuracy of 96.71% at 8429 s.

Omicron virus emotions understanding system based on deep learning architecture

Emotions understanding has acquired a significant interest in the last few years because it has introduced remarkable services in many aspects regarding public opinion mining and recognition in the field of marketing, seeking product reviews, reviews of movies, and healthcare issues based on sentiment understanding. This conducted research has utilized the issue of Omicron virus as a case study to implement a emotions analysis framework to explore the global attitude and sentiment toward Omicron variant as an expression of Positive feeling, Neutral, and Negative feeling. Because since December 2021. Omicron variant has gained obvious attention and wide discussions on social media platforms that revealed lots of fears and anxiety feeling, due to its rapid spreading and infection ability between humans that could exceed the Delta variant infection. Therefore, this paper proposes to develop a framework utilizes techniques of natural languages processing (NLP) in deep learning methods using neural network model of Bidirectional-Long-Short-Term-Memory (Bi-LSTM) and deep neural network (DNN) to achieve accurate results. This study utilizes textual data collected and pulled from the Twitter platform (users' tweets) for the time interval from 11-Dec.-2021 to 18-Dec.-2021. Consequently, the overall achieved accuracy for the developed model is 0.946%. The produced results from carrying out the proposed framework for sentiment understanding have recorded Negative sentiment at 42.3%, Positive sentiment at 35.8%, and Neutral sentiment at 21.9% of overall extracted tweets. The acquired accuracy using data of validation for the deployed model  is 0.946%.

Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Analysis of Statin-Related Topics and Sentiments on Social Media

Importance

Despite compelling evidence that statins are safe, are generally well tolerated, and reduce cardiovascular events, statins are underused even in patients with the highest risk. Social media may provide contemporary insights into public perceptions about statins.

Objective

To characterize and classify public perceptions about statins that were gleaned from more than a decade of statin-related discussions on Reddit, a widely used social media platform.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This qualitative study analyzed all statin-related discussions on the social media platform that were dated between January 1, 2009, and July 12, 2022. Statin- and cholesterol-focused communities, were identified to create a list of statin-related discussions. An artificial intelligence (AI) pipeline was developed to cluster these discussions into specific topics and overarching thematic groups. The pipeline consisted of a semisupervised natural language processing model (BERT [Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers]), a dimensionality reduction technique, and a clustering algorithm. The sentiment for each discussion was labeled as positive, neutral, or negative using a pretrained BERT model.

Exposures

Statin-related posts and comments containing the terms statin and cholesterol.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Statin-related topics and thematic groups.

Results

A total of 10 233 unique statin-related discussions (961 posts and 9272 comments) from 5188 unique authors were identified. The number of statin-related discussions increased by a mean (SD) of 32.9% (41.1%) per year. A total of 100 discussion topics were identified and were classified into 6 overarching thematic groups: (1) ketogenic diets, diabetes, supplements, and statins; (2) statin adverse effects; (3) statin hesitancy; (4) clinical trial appraisals; (5) pharmaceutical industry bias and statins; and (6) red yeast rice and statins. The sentiment analysis revealed that most discussions had a neutral (66.6%) or negative (30.8%) sentiment.

Conclusions and Relevance

Results of this study demonstrated the potential of an AI approach to analyze large, contemporary, publicly available social media data and generate insights into public perceptions about statins. This information may help guide strategies for addressing barriers to statin use and adherence.

Temporal analysis and opinion dynamics of COVID-19 vaccination tweets using diverse feature engineering techniques

The outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic has also triggered a tsunami of news, instructions, and precautionary measures related to the disease on social media platforms. Despite the considerable support on social media, a large number of fake propaganda and conspiracies are also circulated. People also reacted to COVID-19 vaccination on social media and expressed their opinions, perceptions, and conceptions. The present research work aims to explore the opinion dynamics of the general public about COVID-19 vaccination to help the administration authorities to devise policies to increase vaccination acceptance. For this purpose, a framework is proposed to perform sentiment analysis of COVID-19 vaccination-related tweets. The influence of term frequency-inverse document frequency, bag of words (BoW), Word2Vec, and combination of TF-IDF and BoW are explored with classifiers including random forest, gradient boosting machine, extra tree classifier (ETC), logistic regression, Naïve Bayes, stochastic gradient descent, multilayer perceptron, convolutional neural network (CNN), bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT), long short-term memory (LSTM), and recurrent neural network (RNN). Results reveal that ETC outperforms using BoW with a 92% of accuracy and is the most suitable approach for sentiment analysis of COVID-19-related tweets. Opinion dynamics show that sentiments in favor of vaccination have increased over time.

Sentiment Analysis of Online Patient-Written Reviews of Vascular Surgeons

BACKGROUND

Online patient reviews influence a patient's choice of a vascular surgeon. The aim of this study is to examine underlying factors that contribute to positive and negative patient reviews by leveraging sentiment analysis and machine learning methods.

METHODS

The Society of Vascular Surgeons publicly accessible member directory was queried and cross-referenced with a popular patient-maintained physician review website, healthgrades.com. Sentiment analysis and machine learning methods were used to analyze several parameters. Demographics (gender, age, and state of practice), star rating (of 5 stars), and written reviews were obtained for corresponding vascular surgeons. A sentiment analysis model was applied to patient-written reviews and validated against the star ratings. Student's t-test or one-way analysis of variance assessed demographic relationships with reviews. Word frequency assessments and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted to identify common and determinative components of written reviews.

RESULTS

A total of 1,799 vascular surgeons had public profiles with reviews. Female gender of surgeon was associated with lower star ratings (male = 4.19, female = 3.95, P < 0.01) and average sentiment score (male = 0.50, female = 0.40, P < 0.01). Younger physician age was associated with higher star rating (P = 0.02) but not average sentiment score (P = 0.12). In the Best reviews, the most commonly used one-words were Care (N = 999), Caring (N = 767), and Kind (N = 479), while the most commonly used two-word pairs were Saved/Life (N = 189), Feel/Comfortable (N = 106), and Kind/Caring (N = 104). For the Worst reviews, the most commonly used one-words were Pain (N = 254) and Rude (N = 148), while the most commonly used two-word pairs were No/One (N = 27), Waste/Time (N = 25), and Severe/Pain (N = 18). In a multiple logistic regression, satisfactory reviews were associated with words such as Confident (odds ratio [OR] = 8.93), Pain-free (OR = 4.72), Listens (OR = 2.55), and Bedside Manner (OR = 1.70), while unsatisfactory reviews were associated with words such as Rude (OR = 0.01), Arrogant (OR = 0.09), Infection (OR = 0.20), and Wait (OR = 0.48).

CONCLUSIONS

Female surgeons received significantly worse reviews and younger surgeons tended to receive better reviews. The positivity and negativity of reviews were largely related to words associated with the patient-doctor experience and pain. Vascular surgeons should focus on these 2 areas to improve patient experiences and their own reviews.

A novel TCNN-Bi-LSTM deep learning model for predicting sentiments of tweets about COVID-19 vaccines

Many researchers in various disciplines have focused on extracting meaningful information from social media platforms in recent years. Identification of behaviors and emotions from user posts is examined under the heading of sentiment analysis (SA) studies using the natural language processing (NLP) techniques. In this study, a novel TCNN-Bi-LSTM model using the two-stage convolutional neural network (TCNN) and bidirectional long short-term memory (Bi-LSTM) architectures was proposed. While TCNN layers enable the extraction of strong local features, the output of these layers feeds the Bi-LSTM model that remembers forward-looking information and capture long-term dependencies. In this study, first, preprocessing steps were applied to the raw dataset. Thus, strong features were extracted from the obtained quality dataset using the FastText word embedding technique that pre-trained with location-based and sub-word information features. The experimental results of the proposed method are promising compared to the baseline deep learning and machine learning models. Also, experimental results show that while the FastText data embedding technique achieves the best performance compared to other word embedding techniques in all deep learning classification models, it has not had the same outstanding success in machine learning models. This study aims to investigate the sentiments of tweets about the COVID-19 vaccines and comments on these tweets among Twitter users by using the power of Twitter data. A new dataset collected from Twitter was constructed to be used in experimental results. This study will facilitate detecting inappropriate, incomplete, and erroneous information about vaccination. The results of this study will enable society to broaden its perspective on the administered vaccines. It can also assist the government and healthcare agencies in planning and implementing the vaccination's promotion on time to achieve the herd immunity provided by the vaccination.

COVID-19 vaccination motivation and underlying believing processes: A comparison study between individuals with affective disorder and healthy controls

Background

Believing processes represent fundamental brain functions between cognition and emotion. Shortly before the introduction of a compulsory vaccination against COVID-19 in Austria, motives and underlying believing processes regarding the vaccination were collected in individuals with affective disorder (AD) and healthy controls (HC).

Methods

79 individuals with AD and 173 HC were surveyed online to assess believing processes with the parameters of the credition model (narratives, certainty, emotion, mightiness) about (1) the coronavirus itself and (2) why someone is vaccinated or not. In addition, we calculated congruence scores between content of narrative and type of emotion and divided the narrative content into positive, negative, and indifferent.

Results

There were no differences in vaccination status between AD and HC. Higher levels of certainty were observed in HC compared to AD in both vaccinated and unvaccinated individuals. The effects were higher when asked about the motivation to vaccinate or not than about the coronavirus itself. In HC, more positive emotions and more congruence between emotions and narratives were reported during believing in their vaccination motives. No group differences were found in mightiness for both items. Independently from diagnosis, unvaccinated people had high levels of certainty and more negative emotions and narratives while believing in their motives for not getting vaccinated.

Conclusion

When believing about the COVID-19 vaccination, individuals with AD were more uncertain and experienced fewer positive emotions than HC, although both groups did not differ in vaccination status. These effects were not that strong when believing about the coronavirus in general.

Enhanced sentiment analysis regarding COVID-19 news from global channels

For a healthy society to exist, it is crucial for the media to focus on disease-related issues so that more people are widely aware of them and reduce health risks. Recently, deep neural networks have become a popular tool for textual sentiment analysis, which can provide valuable insights and real-time monitoring and analysis regarding health issues. In this paper, as part of an effort to develop an effective model that can elicit public sentiment on COVID-19 news, we propose a novel approach Cov-Att-BiLSTM for sentiment analysis of COVID-19 news headlines using deep neural networks. We integrate attention mechanisms, embedding techniques, and semantic level data labeling into the prediction process to enhance the accuracy. To evaluate the proposed approach, we compared it to several deep and machine learning classifiers using various metrics of categorization efficiency and prediction quality, and the experimental results demonstrate its superiority with 0.931 testing accuracy. Furthermore, 73,138 pandemic-related tweets posted on six global channels were analyzed by the proposed approach, which accurately reflects global coverage of COVID-19 news and vaccination.

Analyzing the public sentiment on COVID-19 vaccination in social media: Bangladesh context

Since December 2019, the world has been fighting against the COVID-19 pandemic. This epidemic has revealed a bitter truth that though humans have advanced to unprecedented heights in the last few decades in terms of technology, they are lagging far behind in the fields of medical science and health care. Several institutes and research organizations have stepped up to introduce different vaccines to combat the pandemic. Bangladesh government has also taken steps to provide widespread vaccinations from January 2021. The Bangladeshi netizens are frequently sharing their thoughts, emotions, and experiences about the COVID-19 vaccines and the vaccination process on different social media sites like Facebook, Twitter, etc. This study has analyzed the views and opinions that they have expressed on different social media platforms about the vaccines and the ongoing vaccination program. For performing this study, the reactions of the Bangladeshi netizens on social media have been collected. The Latent Dirichlet Allocation (LDA) model has been used to extract the most common topics expressed by the netizens regarding the vaccines and vaccination process in Bangladesh. Finally, this study has applied different deep learning as well as traditional machine learning algorithms to identify the sentiments and polarity of the opinions of the netizens. The performance of these models has been assessed using a variety of metrics such as accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score to identify the best one. Sentiment analysis lessons from these opinions can help the government to prepare itself for the future pandemic.

Multilayer hybrid ensemble machine learning model for analysis of Covid-19 vaccine sentiments

This work presents the analysis of significant sentiments and attitudes of people towards the COVID-19 vaccination. The tweeter messages related to the COVID-19 vaccine is used for sentiment evaluation in this work. The proposed work consists of two steps: (i) natural processing language (NLP) and (ii) classification. The NLP is utilized for text pre-processing, tokenization, data labelling, and feature extraction. Further, a stack-based ensemble machine learning model is used to classify sentiments as positive, negative, or neutral. The stack ensemble machine learning model includes seven heterogeneous machine learning techniques namely, Naive Bayes, Logistic regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, AdaBoost Classifier, Gradient Boosting, and extreme Gradient Boosting (XGB). The highest classification accuracy of 97.2%, 88.34%, 88.22%, 85.23%, 86.30%, 87.54%, 86.63%, and 88.78% is achieved by ensemble machine learning model, Logistic regression, AdaBoost, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, Random Forest, Gradient Boosting, and XGB Classifier, respectively.

Social media and attitudes towards a COVID-19 vaccination: A systematic review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Vaccine hesitancy continues to limit global efforts in combatting the COVID-19 pandemic. Emerging research demonstrates the role of social media in disseminating information and potentially influencing people's attitudes towards public health campaigns. This systematic review sought to synthesize the current evidence regarding the potential role of social media in shaping COVID-19 vaccination attitudes, and to explore its potential for shaping public health interventions to address the issue of vaccine hesitancy.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the studies published from inception to 13 of March2022 by searching PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, PsychNET, Scopus, CINAHL, and MEDLINE. Studies that reported outcomes related to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine (attitudes, opinion, etc.) gathered from the social media platforms, and those analyzing the relationship between social media use and COVID-19 hesitancy/acceptance were included. Studies that reported no outcome of interest or analyzed data from sources other than social media (websites, newspapers, etc.) will be excluded. The Newcastle Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess the quality of all cross-sectional studies included in this review. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42021283219).

FINDINGS

Of the 2539 records identified, a total of 156 articles fully met the inclusion criteria. Overall, the quality of the cross-sectional studies was moderate - 2 studies received 10 stars, 5 studies received 9 stars, 9 studies were evaluated with 8, 12 studies with 7,16 studies with 6, 11 studies with 5, and 6 studies with 4 stars. The included studies were categorized into four categories. Cross-sectional studies reporting the association between reliance on social media and vaccine intentions mainly observed a negative relationship. Studies that performed thematic analyses of extracted social media data, mainly observed a domination of vaccine hesitant topics. Studies that explored the degree of polarization of specific social media contents related to COVID-19 vaccines observed a similar degree of content for both positive and negative tone posted on different social media platforms. Finally, studies that explored the fluctuations of vaccination attitudes/opinions gathered from social media identified specific events as significant cofactors that affect and shape vaccination intentions of individuals.

INTERPRETATION

This thorough examination of the various roles social media can play in disseminating information to the public, as well as how individuals behave on social media in the context of public health events, articulates the potential of social media as a platform of public health intervention to address vaccine hesitancy.

FUNDING

None.

Knowledge distillation approach towards melanoma detection

Melanoma is regarded as the most threatening among all skin cancers. There is a pressing need to build systems which can aid in the early detection of melanoma and enable timely treatment to patients. Recent methods are geared towards machine learning based systems where the task is posed as image recognition, tag dermoscopic images of skin lesions as melanoma or non-melanoma. Even though these methods show promising results in terms of accuracy, they are computationally quite expensive to train, that questions the ability of these models to be deployable in a clinical setting or memory constraint devices. To address this issue, we focus on building simple and performant models having few layers, less than ten compared to hundreds. As well as with fewer learnable parameters, 0.26 million (M) compared to 42.5 M using knowledge distillation with the goal to detect melanoma from dermoscopic images. First, we train a teacher model using a ResNet-50 to detect melanoma. Using the teacher model, we train the student model known as Distilled Student Network (DSNet) which has around 0.26 M parameters using knowledge distillation achieving an accuracy of 91.7%. We compare against ImageNet pre-trained models such MobileNet, VGG-16, Inception-V3, EfficientNet-B0, ResNet-50 and ResNet-101. We find that our approach works well in terms of inference runtime compared to other pre-trained models, 2.57 s compared to 14.55 s. We find that DSNet (0.26 M parameters), which is 15 times smaller, consistently performs better than EfficientNet-B0 (4 M parameters) in both melanoma and non-melanoma detection across Precision, Recall and F1 scores.

COVID-19 vaccine sentiment analysis using public opinions on Twitter

Twitter, as is well known, is one of the most active social media platforms, with millions of tweets posted every day, in which different people express their opinions on topics such as travel, economic concerns, political decisions, and so on. As a result, it is a useful source of knowledge. We offer Sentiment Analysis using Twitter Data for the research. Initially, our technology retrieves currently accessible tweets and hashtags about various types of covid vaccinations posted on Twitter through using Twitter's API. Following that, the imported Tweets are automatically configured to generate a collection of untrained rules and random variables. To create our model, we're utilizing, Tweepy, which is a wrapper for Twitter's API. Following that, as part of the sentiment analysis of new Messages, the software produces donut graphs.

Deep Learning for Ocular Disease Recognition: An Inner-Class Balance

It can be challenging for doctors to identify eye disorders early enough using fundus pictures. Diagnosing ocular illnesses by hand is time-consuming, error-prone, and complicated. Therefore, an automated ocular disease detection system with computer-aided tools is necessary to detect various eye disorders using fundus pictures. Such a system is now possible as a consequence of deep learning algorithms that have improved image classification capabilities. A deep-learning-based approach to targeted ocular detection is presented in this study. For this study, we used state-of-the-art image classification algorithms, such as VGG-19, to classify the ODIR dataset, which contains 5000 images of eight different classes of the fundus. These classes represent different ocular diseases. However, the dataset within these classes is highly unbalanced. To resolve this issue, the work suggested converting this multiclass classification problem into a binary classification problem and taking the same number of images for both classifications. Then, the binary classifications were trained with VGG-19. The accuracy of the VGG-19 model was 98.13% for the normal (N) versus pathological myopia (M) class; the model reached an accuracy of 94.03% for normal (N) versus cataract (C), and the model provided an accuracy of 90.94% for normal (N) versus glaucoma (G). All of the other models also improve the accuracy when the data is balanced.

Computational Intelligence-Based Model for Exploring Individual Perception on SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine in Saudi Arabia

Countries around the world are facing so many challenges to slow down the spread of the current SARS-CoV-2 virus. Vaccination is an effective way to combat this virus and prevent its spreading among individuals. Currently, there are more than 50 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine candidates in trials; only a few of them are already in use. The primary objective of this study is to analyse the public awareness and opinion toward the vaccination process and to develop a model that predicts the awareness and acceptability of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in Saudi Arabia by analysing a dataset of Arabic tweets related to vaccination. Therefore, several machine learning models such as Support Vector Machine (SVM), Naïve Bayes (NB), and Logistic Regression (LR), sideways with the N-gram and Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) techniques for feature extraction and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model used with word embedding. LR with unigram feature extraction has achieved the best accuracy, recall, and F1 score with scores of 0.76, 0.69, and 0.72, respectively. However, the best precision value of 0.80 was achieved using SVM with unigram and NB with bigram TF-IDF. However, the Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) model outperformed the other models with an accuracy of 0.95, a precision of 0.96, a recall of 0.95, and an F1 score of 0.95. This model will help in gaining a complete idea of how receptive people are to the vaccine. Thus, the government will be able to find new ways and run more campaigns to raise awareness of the importance of the vaccine.