Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of inguinal lymph node

Clinicopathologic analysis of primary gastroenteropancreatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma; A ten year retrospective study of 68 cases at Moffit Cancer Center

Objective:

To assess clinicopathological characteristics of primary gastro-entero-pancreatic poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-PDNECAs) and evaluate overall survival in patients treated with systemic platinum and etoposide therapy.

Methods:

A detailed retrospective review of clinico-pathologic data (1999-2009) on 68 consecutive adult patients with primary GEP-PDNECAs was carried out, from H Lee Moffit Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, Florida; USA, based on electronic patient records, specialty consultation files, tumor registry, social security index and pathology archives. All available tumor slides were reviewed and subtyped by neuro-endocrine pathologists. Clinicopathologic data and patient survival were analyzed.

Results:

Of 68 patients 41 were males and 27 females with a mean age of 42 years (range: 25-76 years). Regarding the site of origin, 39 patients were of the colorectal location, 19 from the pancreas, 04 from small intestines, 03 from stomach and 03 were multi-focal from colon, small intestine and pancreas. Sixty three of 68 (93%) patients presented with lymph node/distant metastases. Of 68 tumors 37 (54%) were classified as small cell carcinoma (SCCA), 16 (24%) large cell carcinoma (LCCA), 5 (7%) mixed small and large cell (MSLCCA) and 10 (15%) poorly differentiated carcinoma with neuroendocrine features (PDCA-NEF). Neuroendocrine differentiation was confirmed by positivity for chromogranin in 38/65 (55%), synaptophysin in 62/67 (92%) and CD56 in 17/21 (81%) cases. One neuroendocrine marker was positive in 22/68 (32%), 2 in 40/68 (59%) and all 3 were positive in 9/68 (13%) cases. Fifty-eight of 68 (85%) patients were treated with platinum and etoposide. Overall patient survival at 1, 3 5 and 10 years was 85%, 40%, 16% and 1.5% respectively. Patient survival was independent of age (r= 0.1022), sex (r= -0.909) and histologic tumor subtype (r=0.1028) (p= 0.128) but was related to distant metastases (r=0.306; p=0.0383).

Conclusions:

GEP-PDNECA occurred in many part of the GI tract, most commonly in the colorectal region. Positivity of neuroendocrine markers was variable, which helped to confirm neuro-endocrine differentiation and to avoid under-diagnosis of GEP-PDNECA, especially in metastatic setting. Overall prognosis of GEP-PDNECA patients following platinum and etoposide therapy in our series was relatively favorable but remained poor in the presence of distant metastases.

Working formulation of neuroendocrine tumors of the skin and breast

In the skin and breast, endocrine tumors are composed of a heterogeneous mixture of endocrine and exocrine cells. The definition of "pure" endocrine carcinomas is a matter for debate, and as a consequence, there is lack of uniform diagnostic criteria. There are no significant clinical differences in either overall or disease-free survival between matched neoplasms with endocrine and without endocrine differentiation nor between the degree of endocrine differentiation and tumor size, stage, or prevalence of vascular invasion for both sites (skin and breast). Here, endocrine tumors of the skin and breast are grouped respectively into three categories that include most of the neuroendocrine tumors of the skin and breast as seen in routine practice. It was felt that the number of different types of neuroendocrine tumors is so conspicuous that it is impossible to organize them in an orderly classification. It has been proposed therefore, for practical diagnostic routine purposes, to arrange these neoplasms into a working formulation. The latter includes heterogeneous lesions respectively of the skin and breast within the same group that have clinical features in common.

Trisomy of chromosome 6 in Merkel cell carcinoma within lymph nodes

Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) of the skin is a neuroendocrine tumor with characteristic histological and immunohistochemical features. Among various cytogenetic changes, trisomy of chromosome 6 has been reported in 47% of cases using in situ hybridization. Primary tumors, morphologically and immunohistochemically identical to MCCs of the skin, have been described in other organs, including lymph nodes. Here, a cytogenetic study of four cases of MCC of lymph nodes is presented. Four cases of primary MCCs of lymph nodes and ten cases of cutaneous MCCs were studied for chromosome 6 using fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH). All cases showed typical features of MCC both at hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and immunohistochemistry. FISH showed trisomy 6 in two out of the four cases ofMCCs of lymph node as well as in 6 out 10 cases of MCCs of skin. Lymph nodal and cutaneous MCCs share same histological and immunohistochemical features, as well as same cytogenetic alteration for chromosome 6. It seems that there are more similarities than differences between cutaneous and lymph nodal MCCs. Whether lymph nodal MCCs are primary tumors or metastases from regressed skin lesions is still questionable, although several findings indicate a primary origin.