Cardiovascular Risk in Polycythemia Vera: Thrombotic Risk and Survival: Can Cytoreductive Therapy Be Useful in Patients with Low-Risk Polycythemia Vera with Cardiovascular Risk Factors?

Optimization of cardiovascular risk factor management in patients with BCR::ABL1 negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms, current knowledge, and perspectives

The exact prognostic role of cardiovascular (CV) risk factors in patients with BCR::ABL1 negative chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPNs) remains unknown as it is often masked by other MPN-related features that bear strong prognostic impact on thrombotic risk. Therefore, current MPN treatment is not primarily guided by presence of CV risk factors. Treatment of CV risk factors in MPN patients usually mirrors that from the general population, despite the fact that CV risk factors in MPNs have their own specificities. Moreover, the optimal target levels for different metabolic deflections in MPNs (i.e., low-density lipoprotein, serum uric acid, or glycated hemoglobin levels) have not been defined. In the current review, we separately discuss the most important aspects of every individual CV risk factor (arterial hypertension, hyperlipidemia, chronic kidney disease, smoking, diabetes mellitus, hyperuricemia, and obesity and cachexia) in MPNs, summarize recent advances in the field, and propose future directions and research areas which may be needed to appropriately manage CV risk factors in MPNs.

Distinct clinico-molecular arterial and venous thrombosis scores for myeloproliferative neoplasms risk stratification

Current recommended risk scores to predict thrombotic events associated with myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) do not discriminate between arterial and venous thrombosis despite their different physiopathology. To define novel stratification systems, we delineated a comprehensive landscape of MPN associated thrombosis across a large long-term follow-up MPN cohort. Prior arterial thrombosis, age >60 years, cardiovascular risk factors and presence of TET2 or DNMT3A mutations were independently associated with arterial thrombosis in multivariable analysis. ARTS, an ARterial Thrombosis Score, based on these four factors, defined low- (0.37% patients-year) and high-risk (1.19% patients-year) patients. ARTS performance was superior to the two-tiered conventional risk stratification in our training cohort, across all MPN subtypes, as well as in two external validation cohorts. Prior venous thrombosis and presence of a JAK2V617F mutation with a variant allelic frequency ≥50% were independently associated with venous thrombosis. The discrimination potential of VETS, a VEnous Thrombosis Score based on these two factors, was poor, similar to the two-tiered conventional risk stratification. Our study pinpoints arterial and venous thrombosis clinico-molecular differences and proposes an arterial risk score for more accurate patients' stratification. Further improvement of venous risk scores, accounting for additional factors and considering venous thrombosis as a heterogeneous entity is warranted.

Polycythemia Vera: Barriers to and Strategies for Optimal Management

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a subtype of myeloproliferative neoplasms characterized by impaired quality of life and severe complications. Despite the increasingly in-depth knowledge of this condition, it necessitates a multifaceted management approach to mitigate symptoms and prevent thrombotic and hemorrhagic events, ensuring prolonged survival. The therapeutic landscape has been revolutionized in recent years, where venesection and hydroxycarbamide associated with antiplatelet therapy have a central role and are now accompanied by other drugs, such as interferon and Janus kinase inhibitors. Ongoing research and advancements in targeted therapies hold promise for further enhancing the therapeutic choice for PV management.

Management of classical Philadelphia chromosome-negative myeloproliferative neoplasms in Asia: consensus of the Asian Myeloid Working Group

Myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are a heterogeneous group of clonal hematopoietic stem cell disorders characterized clinically by the proliferation of one or more hematopoietic lineage(s). The classical Philadelphia-chromosome (Ph)-negative MPNs include polycythemia vera (PV), essential thrombocythemia (ET) and primary myelofibrosis (PMF). The Asian Myeloid Working Group (AMWG) comprises representatives from fifteen Asian centers experienced in the management of MPN. This consensus from the AMWG aims to review the current evidence in the risk stratification and treatment of Ph-negative MPN, to identify management gaps for future improvement, and to offer pragmatic approaches for treatment commensurate with different levels of resources, drug availabilities and reimbursement policies in its constituent regions. The management of MPN should be patient-specific and based on accurate diagnostic and prognostic tools. In patients with PV, ET and early/prefibrotic PMF, symptoms and risk stratification will guide the need for early cytoreduction. In younger patients requiring cytoreduction and in those experiencing resistance or intolerance to hydroxyurea, recombinant interferon-α preparations (pegylated interferon-α 2A or ropeginterferon-α 2b) should be considered. In myelofibrosis, continuous risk assessment and symptom burden assessment are essential in guiding treatment selection. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) in MF should always be based on accurate risk stratification for disease-risk and post-HSCT outcome. Management of classical Ph-negative MPN entails accurate diagnosis, cytogenetic and molecular evaluation, risk stratification, and treatment strategies that are outcome-oriented (curative, disease modification, improvement of quality-of-life).

Diagnosis and Management of Cardiovascular Risk in Patients with Polycythemia Vera

Polycythemia vera (PV) is a myeloproliferative neoplasm characterized by aberrant myeloid lineage hematopoiesis with excessive red blood cell and pro-inflammatory cytokine production. Patients with PV present with a range of thrombotic and hemorrhagic symptoms that affect quality of life and reduce overall survival expectancy. Thrombotic events, transformation into acute myeloid leukemia, and myelofibrosis are largely responsible for the observed mortality. Treatment of PV is thus primarily focused on symptom control and survival extension through the prevention of thrombosis and leukemic transformation. Patients with PV frequently experience thrombotic events and have elevated cardiovascular risk, including hypertension, dyslipidemias, obesity, and smoking, all of which negatively affect survival. To reduce the risk of thrombotic complications, PV therapy should aim to normalize hemoglobin, hematocrit, and leukocytosis and, in addition, identify and modify cardiovascular risk factors. Herein, we review what is currently known about the associated cardiovascular risk and propose strategies for diagnosing and managing patients with PV.

Identifying Patients with Polycythemia Vera at Risk of Thrombosis after Hydroxyurea Initiation: The Polycythemia Vera-Advanced Integrated Models (PV-AIM) Project

Patients with polycythemia vera (PV) are at significant risk of thromboembolic events (TE). The PV-AIM study used the Optum® de-identified Electronic Health Record dataset and machine learning to identify markers of TE in a real-world population. Data for 82,960 patients with PV were extracted: 3852 patients were treated with hydroxyurea (HU) only, while 130 patients were treated with HU and then changed to ruxolitinib (HU-ruxolitinib). For HU-alone patients, the annualized incidence rates (IR; per 100 patients) decreased from 8.7 (before HU) to 5.6 (during HU) but increased markedly to 10.5 (continuing HU). Whereas for HU-ruxolitinib patients, the IR decreased from 10.8 (before HU) to 8.4 (during HU) and was maintained at 8.3 (after switching to ruxolitinib). To better understand markers associated with TE risk, we built a machine-learning model for HU-alone patients and validated it using an independent dataset. The model identified lymphocyte percentage (LYP), neutrophil percentage (NEP), and red cell distribution width (RDW) as key markers of TE risk, and optimal thresholds for these markers were established, from which a decision tree was derived. Using these widely used laboratory markers, the decision tree could be used to identify patients at high risk for TE, facilitate treatment decisions, and optimize patient management.

Polypharmacy, Potentially Inappropriate Medications, and Drug-to-Drug Interactions in Patients with Chronic Myeloproliferative Neoplasms

Polypharmacy, potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), and drug-to-drug interactions (DDIs) are highly prevalent in the elderly and may have adverse effects on health-related outcomes. Their occurrence and clinical and prognostic associations in patients with chronic myeloproliferative neoplasms (MPN) are unknown. We retrospectively evaluated polypharmacy, PIMs, and DDIs in a cohort of 124 MPN patients (essential thrombocythemia, ET = 63, polycythemia vera, PV = 44, myelofibrosis = 9, MPN unclassifiable = 8) from a single community hematology practice. There were 761 drug prescriptions with a median of five prescribed medications per patient. Polypharmacy, at least one PIM (calculated for persons >60 years of age, n = 101), and at least one DDI were recorded in 76 (61.3%), 46 (45.5%), and 77 (62.1%) of patients, respectively. Seventy-four (59.6%) and twenty-one (16.9%) patients had at least one C or at least one D interaction, respectively. Among other associations, polypharmacy and DDIs were associated with older age, management of disease-related symptoms, osteoarthritis/osteoporosis, and different CV disorders. In multivariate analyses adjusted for clinically meaningful parameters, both polypharmacy and DDIs were significantly associated with inferior overall survival (OS) and time to thrombosis (TTT), whereas PIMs had no significant associations with neither OS nor TTT. There were no associations with bleeding or transformation risks. Polypharmacy, DDIs, and PIMs are very frequent among MPN patients and may have important clinical associations.

Evaluating ropeginterferon alfa-2b for the treatment of adults with polycythemia vera

INTRODUCTION

Interferons (IFNs) have been used for decades to treat polycythemia vera (PV). Single-arm clinical trials assessing IFN in PV patients demonstrated high hematological and molecular response rates, indicating potential disease-modifying activity of IFN. However, discontinuation rates of IFNs have been rather high due to frequent treatment-related side-effects.

AREAS COVERED

Ropeginterferon alfa-2b (ROPEG) is a monopegylated IFN consisting of a single isoform, which differentiates it from previous IFNs with respect to tolerability and dosing frequency. ROPEG has improved pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, which allow extended dosing every 2 weeks and monthly administration during maintenance phase. This review covers ROPEG's pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties, presents results of randomized clinical trials (RCT) that evaluated ROPEG in the treatment of PV patients, and discusses contemporary findings regarding the potential disease-modifying activity of ROPEG.

EXPERT OPINION

RCT have demonstrated high rates of hematological and molecular responses in PV patients treated with ROPEG, irrespective of thrombotic risk. Drug discontinuation rates were generally low. However, even though RCT captured the most important surrogate endpoints of thrombotic risk and disease progression in PV, they were not statistically powered to fully determine whether therapeutic intervention with ROPEG indeed has a direct positive effect on these important clinical outcomes.

Advances in Risk Stratification and Treatment of Polycythemia Vera and Essential Thrombocythemia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Estimating and modifying thrombotic risk is currently the mainstay of care for patients with polycythemia vera (PV) and essential thrombocythemia (ET). In recent years, however, increased attention has shifted towards quality of life and disease modification. In this review, we discuss recent advances in risk stratification, present updated results for ruxolitinib and interferon randomized clinical trials, discuss new approaches in antiplatelet and anticoagulant treatment, and summarize early phase trials of novel agents and emerging therapeutic concepts for the treatment of PV and ET.

RECENT FINDINGS

International collaborations and novel technologies, i.e., next-generation sequencing and machine learning techniques, have demonstrated excellent abilities to improve thrombotic risk stratification in PV and ET. Updated results from ruxolitinib and interferon randomized clinical trials have confirmed excellent efficacy and safety of these agents, both as first- and second-line treatments. Early trials of novel agents (histone deacetylase inhibitors, telomerase inhibitors, lysine-specific demethylase-1 inhibitors, human double-minute 2 inhibitors, and hepcidin mimetics) have shown encouraging efficacy and safety in blood count control, reduction of splenomegaly, and alleviation of disease-related symptoms. Finally, accumulating evidence suggested that direct oral anticoagulants may be a valid therapeutic alternative to warfarin for prolonged thromboprophylaxis. International collaborations ("big data") with the help of new technologies represent an exciting new approach to analyze rare outcomes in rare diseases, especially for identifying novel prognostic biomarkers in PV and ET. Randomized clinical trials are also needed to fully elucidate whether novel agents may establish new standards of care.

Neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio and carotid plaque burden in patients with essential thrombocythemia and polycythemia vera

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Chronic inflammation plays a critical role in the pathogenesis of myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), and inflammatory conditions are closely related to the development and exacerbation of atherosclerosis. This study aimed to compare carotid plaque burden and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in the essential thrombocythemia (ET)/polycythemia vera (PV) and control groups.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We retrospectively assessed carotid plaque burden and NLR in patients with ET/PV between January 2010 and September 2021 and propensity-score matched these patients to control subjects from the general population. All patients underwent carotid imaging using carotid ultrasonography for atherosclerosis screening. After 3:1 propensity-score matching, 140 patients in the control group were matched to 51 patients in ET/PV group. The mean NLR was significantly higher in the MPN group than in the control group (4.77 ± 3.96 vs. 1.93 ± 1.03, p < 0.001). The carotid plaque score was also higher in MPN group than in the control group (2.37 ± 1.47 vs. 1.94 ± 1.17, p = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Patients with PV/ET show a higher NLR and carotid plaque burden than the normal population. This reflected that PV/ET was a highly inflammatory and atherosclerotic condition expressing potentially increased cardiovascular risk.

Anagrelide for platelet-directed cytoreduction in polycythemia vera: Insights into utility and safety outcomes from a large multi-center database

Anagrelide (ANA) is a platelet-specific cytoreductive agent utilized in the guideline-directed management of high-risk essential thrombocythemia. In the context of polycythemia vera (PV), ANA is occasionally employed in clinical practice, although data has not consistently demonstrated a benefit to targeting a platelet goal as a therapeutic endpoint. The aim of the current study was to delineate the patterns of ANA use in PV, and to describe outcomes and toxicities. Within a multi-center cohort of 527 patients with PV, 48 received ANA (9 excluded for absent data). 27 (69.2%) had high-risk PV, 10 (25.6%) had prior thrombosis, and none had extreme thrombocytosis, acquired von Willebrand disease, and/or documented resistance to hydroxyurea. While ANA effectively lowered median platelet count, 43.5% of patients had an unresolved thrombocytosis at time of ANA discontinuation. Treatment-emergent adverse events-including headaches, cardiac palpitations and arrhythmias, nausea, vomiting and/or diarrhea-led to ANA discontinuation in 76.9% of patients. Further, three patients experienced arterial thromboses during a median duration of 27.5 months of ANA therapy. In conclusion, this study highlights ANA's restrictive tolerability profile which, compounded by the absence of clear advantage to strict platelet control in PV, suggests the use of ANA should be limited in this setting.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is a novel predictor of venous thrombosis in polycythemia vera

We investigated the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a predictor of thrombosis in polycythemia vera (PV). After a median follow-up of 2.51 years, of 1508 PV patients enrolled in the ECLAP study, 82 and 84 developed arterial and venous thrombosis, respectively. Absolute counts of total leukocytes, neutrophils, lymphocytes, platelets, and the NLR were tested by generalized additive models (GAM) to evaluate their trend in continuous scale of thrombotic risk. Only for venous thrombosis, we showed that baseline absolute neutrophil and lymphocyte counts were on average respectively higher (median: 6.8 × 10⁹/L, p = 0.002) and lower (median: 1.4 × 10⁹/L, p = 0.001), leading to increased NLR values (median: 5.1, p = 0.002). In multivariate analysis, the risk of venous thrombosis was independently associated with previous venous events (HR = 5.48, p ≤ 0.001) and NLR values ≥5 (HR = 2.13, p = 0.001). Moreover, the relative risk in both low- and high-standard risk groups was almost doubled in the presence of NLR ≥ 5. These findings were validated in two Italian independent external cohorts (Florence, n = 282 and Rome, n = 175) of contemporary PV patients. Our data support recent experimental work that venous thrombosis is controlled by innate immune cells and highlight that NLR is an inexpensive and easily accessible prognostic biomarker of venous thrombosis.