1
|
Gupta AK, Polla Ravi S, Wang T, Talukder M, Starace M, Piraccini BM. Systematic review of mesotherapy: a novel avenue for the treatment of hair loss. J DERMATOL TREAT 2023; 34:2245084. [PMID: 37558233 DOI: 10.1080/09546634.2023.2245084] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
Mesotherapy is a technique by which lower doses of therapeutic agents and bioactive substances are administered by intradermal injections to the skin. Through intradermal injections, mesotherapy can increase the residence time of therapeutic agents in the affected area, thus allowing for the use of lower doses and longer intervals between sessions which may in turn improve the treatment outcome and patient compliance. This systematic review aims to summarize the current literature that evaluates the efficacy of this technique for the treatment of hair loss and provides an overview of the results observed. Of the 416 records identified, 27 articles met the inclusion criteria. To date, mesotherapy using 6 classes of agents and their combinations have been studied; this includes dutasteride, minoxidil, growth factors or autologous suspension, botulinum toxin A, stem cells, and mesh solutions/multivitamins. While several studies report statistically significant improvements in hair growth after treatment, there is currently a lack of standardized regimens. The emergence of adverse effects after mesotherapy has been reported. Further large-scale and controlled clinical trials are warranted to evaluate the utility of mesotherapy for hair loss disorders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aditya K Gupta
- Division of Dermatology, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto School of Medicine, Toronto, Canada
- Mediprobe Research Inc, London, Canada
| | | | - Tong Wang
- Mediprobe Research Inc, London, Canada
| | - Mesbah Talukder
- Mediprobe Research Inc, London, Canada
- School of Pharmacy, BRAC University, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Michela Starace
- Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Bianca Maria Piraccini
- Dermatology Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero, Universitaria di Bologna, Italy
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA), also known as male pattern hair loss (MPHL) or female pattern hair loss (FPHL), is the most common form of alopecia worldwide, and arises from an excessive response to androgens. AGA presents itself in a characteristic distribution unique to both sexes. Despite its prevalence, AGA can be quite challenging to treat. The condition is chronic in nature and stems from an interplay of genetic and environmental factors. There are only two US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs for the condition: topical minoxidil and oral finasteride. However, numerous non-FDA-approved treatments have been shown to be effective in treating AGA in various studies. Some of these treatments are relatively new and still to be explored, thus emphasizing the need for an updated review of the literature. In this comprehensive review, we discuss the evaluation of AGA and the mechanisms of action, costs, efficacies, and safety profiles of existing, alternative, and upcoming therapeutics for this widespread condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shivali Devjani
- Department of Dermatology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 67 South Bedford St, #100, Burlington, MA, 01803, USA
| | - Ogechi Ezemma
- Department of Dermatology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 67 South Bedford St, #100, Burlington, MA, 01803, USA
| | - Kristen J Kelley
- Department of Dermatology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 67 South Bedford St, #100, Burlington, MA, 01803, USA
| | - Emma Stratton
- Department of Dermatology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 67 South Bedford St, #100, Burlington, MA, 01803, USA
| | - Maryanne Senna
- Department of Dermatology, Lahey Hospital and Medical Center, 67 South Bedford St, #100, Burlington, MA, 01803, USA.
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kohli M, Ganjoo A, Sharma A, Patil CY, Sethi S, Patel B. Prospective Efficacy and Safety Study of an Innovative Kerascalp Hair Growth Serum in Mild-to-Moderate Alopecia in India: Regrowth Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e38742. [PMID: 37303414 PMCID: PMC10247907 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38742] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Male and female pattern baldness, commonly known as androgenetic alopecia is the most common type of alopecia, often predetermined genetically, which generally affects the scalp and is characterized by progressive terminal hair loss, known as miniaturization. This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of Kerascalp hair serum, a unique combination of esculin, ximenynic acid, and lauric acid, extracted from natural sources in subjects with mild to moderate androgenetic alopecia. METHODS An open-label, single-arm clinical study was conducted on healthy males and females aged 18-60 years. Each subject applied the hair serum once daily for 90 days. The efficacy of hair serum was evaluated in terms of the following outcome variables: anagen and telogen ratio (A:T ratio), hair thickness, hair density, hair fall, and hair strength assessment. Subjects were assessed on day 0, day 30, day 60, day 90, and on follow-up day 120. RESULTS Thirty subjects completed all assessment visits. After using the hair serum for 90 days, statistically significant (p<0.0001) improvement was observed in A:T ratio, hair density, hair thickness, and hair strength; a statistically significant reduction (p<0.0001) in hair fall was also observed. Moreover, improvement in general appearance of hair (in terms of hair volume and density) and scalp (in terms of itchiness, redness, roughness, and dryness) was recorded through dermatological assessment at each treatment visit and at follow-up visit compared to baseline. No adverse event was recorded during the study period, and on follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The results of this clinical study suggest that a 90 days treatment with a phyto-ingredient-based Kerascalp hair serum is safe and effective in significantly improving A:T ratio, hair density, hair thickness, and hair strength, while reducing hair shedding. The improvement in the test parameters persists, even 30 days after stopping the usage of the serum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anil Ganjoo
- Dermatology and Laser Surgery, Skinnovation Clinics, New Delhi, IND
| | - Aseem Sharma
- Dermatology, Skin Saga Centre for Dermatology, Mumbai, IND
| | | | - Simran Sethi
- General Practice, Cliantha Research, Ahmedabad, IND
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kaiser MA, Almeida SM, Rodriguez M, Issa N, Issa NT, Jimenez JJ. Low-Level Light Therapy and Minoxidil Combination Treatment in Androgenetic Alopecia: A Review of the Literature. Skin Appendage Disord 2023; 9:104-110. [PMID: 36937156 PMCID: PMC10015651 DOI: 10.1159/000527782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction We analyzed randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy of combined therapy with low-level light therapy (LLLT) and topical minoxidil for treatment of androgenetic alopecia (AGA). Methods A literature search within PubMed identified RCTs evaluating hair regrowth following LLLT and minoxidil. Selection criteria were 600-1,100 nm wavelengths, treatment time ≥16 weeks, and objective evaluation for hair regrowth. Results Five RCTs compared LLLT with minoxidil (2% or 5%) to 5% minoxidil treatment or LLLT treatment. One study showed combination therapy of LLLT, and 5% minoxidil improved hair density more than monotherapy. Another found combination LLLT with 2% minoxidil induced hair regrowth equivalent to 5% minoxidil. Similarly, another study described LLLT with 5% minoxidil versus minoxidil monotherapy to increase the number of hairs with no statistical difference between groups. One trial found that combination group increased hair regrowth in the first 2 months. The last study found a statistically significant increase in hair density with combined therapy compared to monotherapy. Conclusion The studies describe either superiority or equivalence of combination therapy to minoxidil monotherapy for AGA. Early outcomes appear to support the superiority of combination therapy, but this advantage wanes at the end of the study periods.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A. Kaiser
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Stephanie M. Almeida
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Mario Rodriguez
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Najy Issa
- St. George's University School of Medicine, St. George's, Grenada
| | - Naiem Tony Issa
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Joaquin J. Jimenez
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Saceda-Corralo D, Domínguez-Santas M, Vañó-Galván S, Grimalt R. What's New in Therapy for Male Androgenetic Alopecia? Am J Clin Dermatol 2023; 24:15-24. [PMID: 36169916 DOI: 10.1007/s40257-022-00730-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
Male androgenetic alopecia is a common condition and represents a major concern for patients who experience this condition. While there are different treatments to stop hair loss and improve hair density, the 5-alpha reductase inhibitors have demonstrated to be effective in improving androgenetic alopecia in men and can maintain a positive response for many years. Oral finasteride 1 mg is a US FDA-approved option, but dutasteride 0.5 mg has been proven to induce better responses, especially in the frontal area. Both have been shown to be safe in clinical trials but there is widespread concern about sexual adverse effects among patients. The use of topical finasteride has increased during the last few years as a useful option to avoid systemic therapy. The efficacy of topical finasteride 0.25% daily has been demonstrated in clinical trials, with a less marked decrease in serum dihydrotestosterone levels than with oral intake. Mesotherapy with dutasteride has also become more widespread recently, although evidence of its effectiveness is limited to retrospective studies in real clinical practice. The use of oral minoxidil in androgenetic alopecia has not been approved by the FDA, however several clinical studies have shown that it is an effective treatment option. The initial dose recommended to treat male hair loss is 2.5 mg daily, although the dose is frequently increased to 5 mg daily. The main adverse effect of oral minoxidil is hypertrichosis, followed by dizziness or lower limb edema, which are much less common. Platelet-rich plasma is a non-pharmacological option to treat male androgenetic alopecia, with some clinical trials demonstrating an improvement in hair count after several months. Among the published studies, the main limitation to compare its efficacy is the heterogeneity of the procedure. The most frequent regimens propose treatment every 4 weeks for 3 months initially to assess the individual response. Another treatment alternative is the use of light devices with wavelengths of between 630 and 660 nm, known as low-level laser therapy. These devices can be used at home every day for 15-30 min. Their efficacy has been shown in a limited number of clinical trials; however, there is a lack of evidence about the efficacy of these devices compared with other medical options or as a complementary therapy in hair loss. The pipeline of potential new treatments for male androgenetic alopecia is strong. Pyrilutamide and GT20029 are being studied as topical antagonists of the androgen receptor, while cetirizine is another topical option with some initial promising results. Furthermore, according to isolated studies with heterogeneous treatment schemes, the use of botulinum toxin in the scalp might improve androgenetic alopecia, and lastly, scalp threading might increase the total hair count as growth factors are released during implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Saceda-Corralo
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Carretera Colmenar Viejo km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain. .,Trichology Unit, Grupo de Dermatología Pedro Jaén, Madrid, Spain.
| | - Miguel Domínguez-Santas
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Carretera Colmenar Viejo km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.,Trichology Unit, Grupo de Dermatología Pedro Jaén, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sergio Vañó-Galván
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Carretera Colmenar Viejo km 9.100, 28034, Madrid, Spain.,Trichology Unit, Grupo de Dermatología Pedro Jaén, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ramon Grimalt
- Facultat de Medicina i Ciències de la Salut, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gomez-Zubiaur A, Andres-Lencina JJ, Cabezas V, Corredera C, di Brisco F, Ferrer B, Rodriguez-Villa A, Subiabre-Ferrer D, Valenzuela C, Diez DV, Ricart JM. Mesotherapy with Bicalutamide: A New Treatment for Androgenetic Alopecia. Int J Trichology 2023; 15:39-40. [PMID: 37305191 PMCID: PMC10251290 DOI: 10.4103/ijt.ijt_78_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 06/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Bicalutamide is a selective androgen receptor antagonist. To date, it has been used orally with good efficacy results, but not in mesotherapy. In our center, we assessed whether patients undergoing bicalutamide mesotherapy showed positive responses and tolerated the local administration of bicalutamide. Six premenopausal women, with a mean age of 35.7 years and clinical diagnosis of Olsen Grade II or III female androgenetic alopecia accompanied by significant seborrhea were treated with 1 ml bicalutamide 0.5% mesotherapy. Three monthly sessions were performed. A subtle improvement in hair density was described after the third session. The overall satisfaction of the patients with the treatment was 6.3, on a scale of 1-10. Premenopausal women require several therapeutic approaches to combat severe androgenetic alopecia. Our data showed that bicalutamide mesotherapy was well tolerated and welcomed by the patients; we, therefore, provide a new tool for the management of this pathology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Víctor Cabezas
- Trichology Unit, Ricart Medical Institute, Madrid and Valencia, Spain
| | | | - Fabio di Brisco
- Pharmacy Unit, Ricart Medical Institute, Madrid and Valencia, Spain
| | - Blanca Ferrer
- Trichology Unit, Ricart Medical Institute, Madrid and Valencia, Spain
| | | | | | | | - David Vega Diez
- Trichology Unit, Ricart Medical Institute, Madrid and Valencia, Spain
| | - Jose Maria Ricart
- Trichology Unit, Ricart Medical Institute, Madrid and Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Issa NT, Kaiser M, Martinez-Velasco A, Tosti A. Alopecia After Cosmetic Injection Procedures: A Review. Dermatol Surg 2022. [PMID: 35642921 DOI: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000003498] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cosmetic procedures for antiaging carry inherent risks of adverse events. One that has not yet been well characterized is transitory or permanent alopecia. This is attributable to numerous mechanisms including pressure, ischemia, inflammation, and necrosis. Cases of postcosmetic procedure alopecia have been reported after mesotherapy as well as hyaluronic acid filler, deoxycholic acid, and botulinum toxin injections. OBJECTIVE This review serves to describe the currently known causes of postcosmetic procedure alopecia and the mechanisms by which alopecia is attained. Furthermore, this review highlights the risk of unregulated mesotherapy injections for cosmetic enhancement and to bring attention to the increasing number reports of alopecia after these procedures. METHODS A systematic review of the literature from 2000 to 2022 was conducted looking for keywords such as "alopecia," "cosmetic procedures," "mesotherapy," and "hyaluronic acid" in Google Scholar and PubMed. RESULTS Ten articles met the criteria set forth in the authors' literature review. Many of the procedures resulted in partial or complete resolution of alopecia. CONCLUSION Alopecia after cosmetic injection procedures is an underreported adverse effect. More research is needed to further characterize the risk of alopecia after mesotherapy and other injection procedures.
Collapse
|
8
|
Melo DF, Saceda-Corralo D, Tosti A, Weffort F, Carla Jorge M, de Barros CC, de Melo Carvalho R, Starace M. Frontal edema due to mesotherapy for androgenetic alopecia: A case series. Dermatol Ther 2021; 35:e15247. [PMID: 34877759 DOI: 10.1111/dth.15247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Revised: 10/27/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common form of non-cicatricial alopecia in both genders. Currently approved drugs for the treatment of AGA include topical minoxidil in women and topical minoxidil and oral finasteride in men. Other routes of administration of approved drugs have been proposed to enhance therapeutic results for AGA, including intradermal injections, known as mesotherapy. Mesotherapy-or intradermotherapy-is a non-surgical procedure, consisting of multiple intradermal injections of pharmacological substances diluted in small doses. Although minimally invasive, mesotherapy may be related to mild side effects like burning, erythema and headaches, as a few reports indicate. Among the most serious adverse events, subcutaneous necrosis, scalp abscesses, and angioedema have been described. This multicenter retrospective, descriptive study aims to report 14 cases of frontal edema resulting from mesotherapy for AGA treatment. In our patients, the edema mostly arose in the first two sessions and lasted between 1 and 4 days, with a favorable outcome after a local cold compress. In all our cases of edema, lidocaine was the anesthetic used. Minoxidil and dutasteride might also play a role as causative agents. To the best of our knowledge, this is the largest case series focused on frontal edema after mesotherapy for AGA and gives clinicians helpful information for when performing this technique. Dermatologists should already consider and be conscious of this possible mesotherapy side effect, as it can be remarkably disruptive to affected patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Fernandes Melo
- Department of Dermatology, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - David Saceda-Corralo
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Alcalá, IRYCIS, Madrid, Spain
| | - Antonella Tosti
- Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, School of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Flavia Weffort
- Department of Dermatology, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Machado Carla Jorge
- Department of Preventive and Social Medicine, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Claudia Carreira de Barros
- Department of Dermatology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.,Department of Dermatology, Santa Casa de Misericórdia of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Raquel de Melo Carvalho
- Department of Dermatology, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Michela Starace
- Dermatology - IRCCS, Policlinico Sant'Orsola, Department of Specialized, Experimental and Diagnostic Medicine, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Nestor MS, Ablon G, Gade A, Han H, Fischer DL. Treatment options for androgenetic alopecia: Efficacy, side effects, compliance, financial considerations, and ethics. J Cosmet Dermatol 2021; 20:3759-3781. [PMID: 34741573 PMCID: PMC9298335 DOI: 10.1111/jocd.14537] [Citation(s) in RCA: 59] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
Background Androgenetic alopecia (AGA) is the most common form of hair loss consisting of a characteristic receding frontal hairline in men and diffuse hair thinning in women, with frontal hairline retention, and can impact an individual's quality of life. The condition is primarily mediated by 5‐alpha‐reductase and dihydrotestosterone (DHT) which causes hair follicles to undergo miniaturization and shortening of successive anagen cycles. Although a variety of medical, surgical, light‐based and nutraceutical treatment options are available to slow or reverse the progression of AGA, it can be challenging to select appropriate therapies for this chronic condition. Aims To highlight treatment options for androgenetic alopecia taking into consideration the efficacy, side effect profiles, practicality of treatment (compliance), and costs to help clinicians offer ethically appropriate treatment regimens to their patients. Materials and Methods A literature search was conducted using electronic databases (Medline, PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, EBSCO) and textbooks, in addition to the authors' and other practitioners' clinical experiences in treating androgenetic alopecia, and the findings are presented here. Results Although topical minoxidil, oral finasteride, and low‐level light therapy are the only FDA‐approved therapies to treat AGA, they are just a fraction of the treatment options available, including other oral and topical modalities, hormonal therapies, nutraceuticals, PRP and exosome treatments, and hair transplantation. Discussion Androgenetic alopecia therapy remains challenging as treatment selection involves ethical, evidence‐based decision‐making and consideration of each individual patient's needs, compliance, budget, extent of hair loss, and aesthetic goals, independent of potential financial benefits to the practitioners.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark S Nestor
- Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research, Aventura, Florida, USA.,Dr. Phillip Frost Department of Dermatology and Cutaneous Surgery, Miami, Florida, USA.,Department of Surgery, Division of Plastic Surgery, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Glynis Ablon
- Ablon Skin Institute & Research Center, Manhattan Beach, California, USA.,Department of Dermatology, University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Anita Gade
- Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research, Aventura, Florida, USA
| | - Haowei Han
- Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research, Aventura, Florida, USA
| | - Daniel L Fischer
- Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research, Aventura, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|