Iatrogenic Biliary Injury during Cholecystectomy: Critical Review of a Historical Case and Its Political Consequences

Endoscopic application of magnetic compression anastomosis: a review

Magnetic compression anastomosis (MCA) is a new method that provides sutureless passage construction for tubular organs. Due to the high recurrence rate of conventional endoscopic treatment and the high morbidity and mortality of surgical procedures, the MCA technique shows promise. The aim of this review is to comprehensively examine the literature related to the use of MCA in different gastrointestinal diseases over the past few years, categorizing them according to the anastomotic site and describing in detail the various methods of magnet delivery and the clinical outcomes of MCA. MCA is an innovative technique, and its use represents an advancement in the field of minimally invasive interventions. Comparison studies have shown that the anastomosis formed by MCA is comparable to or better than surgical sutures in terms of general appearance and histology. Although most of the current research has involved animal studies or studies with small populations, the safety and feasibility of MCA have been preliminarily demonstrated. Large prospective studies involving populations are still needed to guarantee the security of MCA. For technologies that have been initially used in clinical settings, effective measures should also be implemented to identify, even prevent, complications. Furthermore, specific commercial magnets must be created and optimized in this emerging area.

Long-term Outcomes of Combined Endoscopic-Radiological Approach for the Management of Complete Transection of the Biliary Tract

BACKGROUND

Complete transection of the main bile duct (CTMD) is a major complication during hepato-bilio-pancreatic (HBP) surgery and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, a combined endoscopic-radiological approach (CERA) for minimally invasive treatment of CTMD has been introduced, but evidence on its long-term outcomes is limited. Our aim is to report efficacy, safety, and long-term outcomes of CERA for the management of post-surgical CTMD in a tertiary referral center.

METHODS

All consecutive patients referred for CTMD after HBP surgery between February 2012 and January 2021 were included in this study. CERA was first performed to re-establish biliary tree continuity, and then multiple biliary plastic stents were deployed to guarantee biliary tree reconstruction. Anthropometric, clinical, procedural (endoscopic/radiologic/surgical), and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. Each lesion was classified according to Strasberg classification.

RESULTS

Overall, 60 patients (age 60.5 years, range 28-91), 38 F (61.7%), underwent CERA. Mean interval from surgery to endoscopic treatment was 13.2 days. Mean treatment duration was 526 days (SD ± 415) with a median number of 8 endoscopic sessions (range 1-33). Mean length of the biliary defect was 17.6 mm (SD ± 11.5). Long-term clinical success was achieved in 33/49 (67.3%) of patients. Treatment failure was experienced in 16/49 (32.7%) patients, while after an average follow-up of 41 months, stricture recurrence was observed in 3/36 (8.3%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

CERA is a minimally invasive and effective technique to re-establish the continuity of the biliary tract after CTMD, achieving permanent restoration in over half of treated patients.

An Iatrogenic Injury? Anthony Eden and the Suez Crisis of 1956

In 1953, Eden, then Britain's Foreign Secretary, sustained a bile duct injury during a cholecystectomy. After reconstructive surgery at the Lahey Clinic, he continued to experience episodes of cholangitis, notably during the Suez Crisis of 1956. By then prime minister, the crisis ended in a humiliating retreat for Eden and for Britain. The role that his iatrogenic injury, its long term sequelae, and the cocktail of drugs he took to treat them played in his decision making has been an ongoing source of debate almost from the time of the crisis. This article reviews the Suez crisis, Eden's medical history, and the debate over Eden's health.

Injuries during Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Scoping Review of the Claims and Civil Action Judgements

Background. To define what type of injuries are more frequently related to medicolegal claims and civil action judgments. Methods. We performed a scoping review on 14 studies and 2406 patients, analyzing medicolegal claims related to laparoscopic cholecystectomy injuries. We have focalized on three phases associated with claims: phase of care, location of injuries, type of injuries. Results. The most common phase of care associated with litigation was the improper intraoperative surgical performance (47.6% ± 28.3%), related to a “poor” visualization, and the improper post-operative management (29.3% ± 31.6%). The highest rate of defense verdicts was reported for the improper post-operative management of the injury (69.3% ± 23%). A lower rate was reported in the incorrect presurgical assessment (39.7% ± 24.4%) and in the improper intraoperative surgical performance (21.39% ± 21.09%). A defense verdict was more common in cystic duct injuries (100%), lower in hepatic bile duct (42.9%) and common bile duct (10%) injuries. Conclusions. During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the most common cause of claims, associated with lower rate of defense verdict, was the improper intraoperative surgical performance. The decision to take legal action was determined often for poor communication after the original incident.