Treatment of Ureteral Stent-Related Symptoms

Comparing the effect of peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis only with continuous low-dose antibiotic treatment on the incidence of urinary tract infection and stent related-symptoms in patients undergoing Double-J (DJ) stent insertion following transurethral lithotripsy (TUL)

PURPOSE

There are some controversial data about the peri operative use of antibiotics after double-J (DJ) insertion. This study aimed to compare the rates of urinary tract infections (UTI) and stent-related symptoms (SRSs) in patients who received only perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis and those given continuous low-dose antibiotic therapy for the entire stent-indwelling time following transurethral lithotripsy (TUL).

METHODS

In this randomized clinical trial 178 patients received intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis (ciprofloxacin 400 mg) before the TUL and then randomly divided into two groups to either receive no antibiotic treatment after procedure (group A, 90 patients) or to additionally receive a continuous low-dose antibiotic treatment with one ciprofloxacin 500 mg every 12 h for 3 days and then ciprofloxacin 250 mg once daily for the entire stent-indwelling time (group B, 88 patients). The rates of UTIs, SRSs and incidence of drug side-effects were evaluated in groups.

RESULTS

A total of 7 patients had positive urine culture [group A: 4 (4.4%) vs. group B: 3 (3.4%); P = 0.722]. Only 1 patient in group B had febrile UTI in the mean duration of indwelling stent in situ. The rate of SRSs was 92.2% and 89.8% in Group A and B, respectively, with no significant difference (P = 0.609). A total of 4 patients in Group B complained of gastrointestinal side effects of ciprofloxacin.

CONCLUSION

Continuous low-dose antibiotic treatment has no role in reducing the incidence of UTIs and SRSs during the indwelling time of ureteral stents compared with the peri-operative antibiotic prophylaxis only.

Distal end of Double-J ureteral stent position on ureteral stent-related symptoms: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Most patients suffer from ureteral stent-related symptoms (USRS) caused by indwelling ureteral stents. Nevertheless, various medications to alleviate discomfort as well as novel stents are continually being developed, and in recent years, some researchers have believed that proper intravesical stent placement can relieve USRS.

Objective

To determine appropriate intravesical ureteral stent position may alleviate USRS.

Methods

Up to May 1, 2022, the PubMed, Embase, Scopus and Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched, and two independent reviewers included relevant studies that met the PICO (Patient, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) criteria. Studies methodological quality were assessed by ROB2 and ROBINS-I. Ureteral stent symptom questionnaire (USSQ), international prostate symptom score (IPSS) and quality of life (QoL) was used to quantify the USRS. According to intravesical ureteral stent position, Group A was defined as the contralateral group, that is distal end of ureteral stent crossed the bladder midline, whereas Group B was classified as ipsilateral group, meaning stent end did not cross the midline.

Results

Six studies incorporating a total of 590 patients were eligible. In terms of USSQ score, the meta-analysis showed that contralateral group was associated with a significant increase in USSQ total (MD, 17.55; 95% CI, 12.04 to 23.07; P < 0.001), urinary symptoms (MD, 2.74; 95% CI, 0.48 to 5.01; P = 0.02), general health (MD, 4.04; 95% CI, 2.66 to 5.42; P < 0.001), work performance (MD, 1.36; 95% CI, 0.75 to 1.98; P < 0.001) and additional problems (MD, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.47 to 1.32; P < 0.001) scores while not associated with a significant increase in body pain (MD, 3.13; 95% CI, −0.19 to 6.44; P = 0.06) and sexual matters (MD, 1.01; 95% CI, −0.03 to 2.06; P = 0.06). As for IPSS, although no significant differences in IPSS total (MD, 2.65; 95% CI, −0.24 to 5.54; P = 0.07) or voiding symptoms (MD, −0.84; 95% CI, −3.16 to 1.48; P = 0.48) scores were found, ipsilateral group was associated with a significant decrease in storage symptoms (MD, 1.92; 95% CI, 0.91 to 2.93; P = 0.0002). Furthermore, ipsilateral group was linked to a significant decrease in QoL score (MD, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.18 to 1.82; P = 0.02).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis proven that correct intravesical stent position was critical, and patients with stents crossing the midline experienced more severe USRS than those who did not. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to corroborate our findings.