Long-Acting Growth Hormone Preparations and Their Use in Children with Growth Hormone Deficiency

Novel therapies for growth disorders

As we continue to understand more about the complex mechanism of growth, a plethora of novel therapies have recently been developed that aim to address barriers and optimize efficacy. This review aims to explore these novel therapies and provide a succinct review based on the latest clinical studies in order to introduce clinicians to therapies that will soon constitute the future in the field of short stature.  Conclusion: The review focuses on long-acting growth hormone formulations, a novel growth hormone oral secretagogue, novel treatments for children with achondroplasia, and targeted therapies for rare forms of skeletal dysplasias. What is Known: • Recombinant human growth hormone has been the mainstay of treatment for children with short stature for years. • Such therapy is not always effective based on the underlying diagnosis (e.g achondroplasia, Turner syndrome). Compliance with daily injections is challenging and can directly affect efficacy. What is New: • Recent development of long-acting growth hormone regimens and oral secretagogues can overcome some of these barriers, however several limitations need to be taken into consideration. • Newer therapies for achondroplasia, and other rare forms of skeletal dysplasias introduce us to a new era of targeted therapies for children with short stature. Clinicians ought to be aware of pitfalls and caveats before introducing these novel therapies to every day practice.

[Growth hormone - 30 years of clinical practice: past, present, future]

The recombinant technologies era, which began in the second half of the XX century, made it possible to produce recombinant growth hormone (rGH) necessary for the treatment of stunting of various genesis. The time of practically unlimited possibilities of rGH production has come, which served as a stimulus for studying the efficacy and safety of rGH application, searching for optimal ways of its use and dosing regimes. Many years of experience in the use of somatropin in clinical practice allowed us to obtain data on its effectiveness primarily in somatotropic insufficiency in children, to study its effect on the functional state of various organs and systems, and to expand the indications for the use of RGR.

The Treatment of Growth Disorders in Childhood and Adolescence

BACKGROUND

3% of all children are unusually short, and 3% are unusually tall. New approaches have broadened the range of therapeutic options in treating growth disorders.

METHODS

This review is based on publications retrieved by a selective review of the literature and on the authors' clinical experience.

RESULTS

Pituitary growth hormone deficiency is treated with recombinant growth hormone. Long-acting preparations of this type became available recently, but their long-term safety and efficacy are still unknown. Vosoritide, a CNP analogue, has also been approved for the treatment of achondroplasia, and severe primary deficiency of insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) can be treated with recombinant IGF-1. In the treatment of excessively tall stature, new information on the safety of growth-attenuating treatment and an altered perception of above-average height in society have led to a change in management.

CONCLUSION

There are new options for the treatment of rare causes of short stature, while new information on the safety of treatment strategies for excessive tallness have led to a reconsideration of surgical intervention. There is insufficient evidence on the benefits and risks of supraphysiological GH therapy and of newer treatment options for which there are as yet no robust data on adult height. Therefore, before any treatment is provided, physicians should give patients and their families detailed information and discuss their expectations from treatment and the goals that treatment can be expected to achieve.

Physician experience with once-weekly somatrogon versus once-daily rhGH regimen in pediatric patients with growth hormone deficiency: a cross-sectional survey of physicians from the global phase 3 study

Introduction

The standard of care for pediatric growth hormone deficiency (pGHD) is once-daily recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH). Somatrogon, a long-acting rhGH, requires less frequent, once-weekly, dosing. We describe physicians' preference for, experiences, and satisfaction with once-weekly somatrogon vs once-daily rhGH.

Methods

English-speaking investigators from somatrogon's global phase III study (NCT02968004) with prior experience using once-daily rhGH were included. Participants answered an online survey containing 14 closed- and open-ended items.

Results

Twenty-four pediatric endocrinologists (41.7% men; 79.2% practiced at public/private hospitals) from 12 countries with 25.8 ± 12.0 years' experience treating pGHD completed the survey. In terms of the time and effort required to explain device instructions, injection regimen, procedure for missed injection, and address patients'/caregivers' concerns, a similar proportion of physicians chose once-weekly somatrogon and once-daily rhGH; 62.5% physicians indicated that once-daily rhGH required greater effort to monitor adherence. Overall, 75% preferred once-weekly somatrogon over once-daily rhGH, 79.2% considered once-weekly somatrogon to be more convenient and less burdensome, and 83.3% were likely to prescribe somatrogon in the future. Overall, 50% felt that once-weekly somatrogon was more beneficial to patients, while 50% chose "No difference". Most physicians (62.5%) felt both regimens were equally likely to support positive long-term growth outcomes and reduce healthcare utilization. More physicians were "very satisfied" with once-weekly somatrogon (62.5%) than with once-daily rhGH (16.7%). Reduced injection frequency, patient and caregiver burden, increased convenience, and improved adherence were reasons for these choices.

Conclusion

Physicians had a positive experience with, and perception of, treating pGHD with once-weekly somatrogon.

Longitudinal unraveling: The impact of recombinant human growth hormone on spontaneous brain activity in children with short stature-A resting-state fMRI study

Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) is an approved method to improve the growth and ameliorate behavioral issues in children with short stature. However, the data concerning the effects of rhGH treatment on spontaneous brain activity remains unclear. This study included 35 children with short stature, categorized into two groups: the treated group (n = 14) and the untreated group (n = 21). All participants underwent resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) and neuropsychological assessments at baseline and at the end of a one-year follow-up. The rs-fMRI based amplitude of low frequency fluctuation (ALFF) analysis method was employed to assess spontaneous brain activity. Interaction effects between rhGH and time on ALFF were detected using a mixed-effects analysis. Additionally, Stepwise regression analysis was conducted to investigate the associations between ALFF values and significant clinical indicators. The treated group exhibited significant improvements in height, weight, insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1) levels, insulin-like growth factor binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) levels, and processing speed index (PSI) when reevaluated from baseline. The interaction effect of rhGH × time was evident in the right putamen (RPUT), where the ALFF value showed a significant increase following rhGH treatment, while also demonstrating a notable positive correlation with height. Moreover, The main effect of time was manifested as a significant decrease in the ALFF value of the left dorsolateral superior frontal gyrus (LSFG) within the untreated group during the follow-up period, concurrently displaying a positive correlation with age. In conclusion, rhGH treatment not only has a positive effect on the growth, cognition, and behavior of children with short stature, but also improves and normalizes spontaneous brain activity.

Weekly Somapacitan in GH Deficiency: 4-Year Efficacy, Safety, and Treatment/Disease Burden Results From REAL 3

CONTEXT

Growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children is currently treated with daily injections of GH, which can be burdensome for patients and their parents/guardians. Somapacitan is a GH derivative in development for once-weekly treatment of GHD.

OBJECTIVE

This work aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of somapacitan, and associated disease/treatment burden, after 4 years of treatment and 1 year after switching to somapacitan from daily GH.

METHODS

This long-term safety extension of a multicenter, controlled phase 2 trial (NCT02616562) took place at 29 sites in 11 countries. Patients were prepubertal, GH-naive children with GHD. Fifty patients completed 4 years of treatment. Patients in the pooled group received somapacitan (0.04, 0.08, 0.16 mg/kg/week) for 1 year, followed by the highest dose (0.16 mg/kg/week) for 3 years. Patients in the switched group received daily GH 0.034 mg/kg/day for 3 years, then somapacitan 0.16 mg/kg/week for 1 year. Main outcome measures were height velocity (HV), change from baseline in HV SD score (SDS), change from baseline in height SDS, disease burden, and treatment burden for patients and parents/guardians.

RESULTS

Changes from baseline in HV and HV SDS were similar and as expected in both groups. Observer-reported outcomes showed that patients and parents/guardians seem to have experienced a reduced treatment burden when switching from daily GH to somapacitan. Most parents/guardians (81.8%) strongly/very strongly preferred somapacitan over daily GH.

CONCLUSIONS

Somapacitan showed similar efficacy and safety in patients who continued somapacitan treatment and those who switched from daily GH to somapacitan. Once-weekly injections may lead to a reduced treatment burden relative to once-daily injections. A plain-language summary of this work is available.

Growth Hormone Injection Log Analysis with Electronic Injection Device for Qualifying Adherence to Low-Irritant Formulation and Exploring Influential Factors on Adherence

Introduction

Although the treatment success of long-term growth hormone therapy (GHT) is dependent on maintaining patients' adherence to treatment, marked variations in adherence levels among children with GHT (eg, 7-71% nonadherence) have been reported. Barriers to or promoters of GHT adherence have been discussed and investigated, and digital health technologies, such as electronic GH injection devices, may have the potential to assess adherence to GHT more accurately. Thus, we conducted a multicenter, retrospective cohort study using GH injection log analysis of an electronic GH device, GROWJECTOR®L, to qualify adherence and explore the factors influencing adherence.

Methods

This study enrolled 41 patients (median[range] age, 5.8[3.0 ~ 17.0] years) with short stature from nine Japanese medical institutions. The injection log data (12-48 weeks) were read by smartphones and collected into the data center through a cloud server.

Results

Although cumulative adherence rates remained higher than 95% throughout the observation period, five (12.2%) patients had low adherence (<85%). Subsequently, subgroup and logistic regression analyses for exploring factors affecting adherence revealed that self-selection of GH device and irregular injection schedule (ie, frequent injections after midnight) significantly affected adherence rate (p=0.034 and 0.048, respectively). In addition, higher rates of irregular injections significantly affected low adherence (median[range], 11.26[0.79 ~ 30.50]% vs 0.26[0.00 ~ 33.33]%, p = 0.029).

Discussion

Our study indicated that injection log analysis using an electronic GH device could detect irregular injection schedules due to a night owl or disturbance in lifetime rhythm affecting low adherence and had significant potential to encourage collaborative monitoring of adherence with healthcare providers and patients themselves/caregivers, along with growing autonomy and shared decision-making. Our study suggests the significance of narrative and personal approaches to adherence of patients with GHT and the usefulness of digital devices for such an approach and for removing various barriers to patient autonomy, leading to improvement and maintenance of adherence.

Treatment burden, adherence, and quality of life in children with daily GH treatment in France

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe in a real-life setting the treatment burden and adherence and quality of life (QOL) of children treated with daily injections of growth hormone and their relationship with treatment duration.

DESIGN

This non-interventional, multicenter, cross-sectional French study involved children aged 3-17 years treated with daily growth hormone injections.

METHODS

Based on a recent validated dyad questionnaire, the mean overall life interference total score (100 = most interference) was described, with treatment adherence and QOL, using the Quality of Life of Short Stature Youth questionnaire (100 = best). All analyses were performed according to treatment duration prior to inclusion.

RESULTS

Among the 275/277 analyzed children, 166 (60.4%) had only growth hormone deficiency (GHD). In the GHD group, the mean age was 11.7 ± 3.2 years; median treatment duration was 3.3 years (interquartile range 1.8-6.4). The mean overall life interference total score was 27.7 ± 20.7 (95% CI (24.2; 31.2)), with non-significant correlation with treatment duration (P = 0.1925). Treatment adherence was good (95.0% of children reported receiving >80% of planned injections over the last month); it slightly decreased with treatment duration (P = 0.0364). Children's overall QOL was good (81.5 ± 16.6 and 77.6 ± 18.7 according to children and parents, respectively), but subscores of the coping and treatment impact domains were <50. Similar results were observed in all patients independently of the condition requiring treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-life French cohort confirms the treatment burden of daily growth hormone injections, as previously reported in an interventional study.

The Changing Face of Paediatric Human Growth Hormone Therapy

Human growth hormone (hGH) has been used therapeutically to promote growth in children for over 60 years. Pituitary-extracted hGH has demonstrated positive growth promotion since the early 1960s. In 1985, prion-induced contamination of hGH triggered a global epidemic of Creutzfeldt–Jakob disease that was responsible for its discontinuation. Recombinant hGH immediately replaced pituitary hGH and, being available in large amounts, was used and licenced for therapy in GH-deficient children, followed by approval for non-GH deficient disorders such as Turner syndrome, short stature related to birth size small for gestational age, idiopathic short stature, SHOX deficiency, Prader–Willi syndrome and Noonan syndrome. RhGH therapy was refined by the use of growth prediction models; however, unmet needs, such as the variability in response and non-adherence resulted in the development of long-acting rhGH (LArhGH) molecules, which are currently in clinical trials and have shown non-inferiority in comparison with daily rhGH. It is likely that LArhGH will enter clinical practice in 2022 and 2023 and will need to demonstrate safety in terms of immunogenicity, IGF-1 generation, metabolic status and tolerability of potential injection pain and local reactions.