Beneficial effects of dopamine combined with intravenous nitroglycerin on hemodynamics in patients with severe left ventricular failure

Circulatory management of the unstable cardiac patient

The objective of this article is to provide an orderly and concise approach to the treatment of the unstable cardiac surgery patient. The common causes of hemodynamic instability in this patient population are reviewed. The various pharmacologic, mechanical, and electric therapeutic options available for each clinical situation are explored, and a sequential treatment algorithm is developed.

Effects of intravenous nitroglycerin combined with dopamine on intracranial pressure and cerebral arteriovenous oxygen difference in patients with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage

The effects of intravenous nitroglycerin (NTG) combined with dopamine on intracranial pressure (ICP) and cerebral arteriovenous oxygen difference (AVDO2) were studied in 11 patients with acute subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). The study was performed on Days 1 to 3 of SAH after aneurysmal clipping. Treatment consisted of an intravenous drip infusion of NTG in increasing incremental doses of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, and 2.5 micrograms/kg/min at one-hour intervals. Dopamine (5 to 10 micrograms/kg/min) was also given concurrently to maintain systemic blood pressure. ICP values before NTG administration ranged from 7 to 24 mmHg (mean. 11.91 +/- 5.30 mmHg). ICP began to increase immediately after the administration of NTG 0.5 microgram/kg/min and peaked at 14.64 +/- 5.93 mmHg 10 minutes after onset of infusion. Thereafter, ICP gradually returned to pretreatment levels. Increasing the dose of NTG failed to induce further significant rises in ICP. Mean AVDO2 before NTG administration was 4.69 +/- 0.62 ml/dl. This parameter showed no significant change during NTG infusion, although cerebral perfusion pressure decreased to between 75% to 94% of the control value after NTG administration. These results indicate that continuous NTG infusion combined with dopamine does not have adverse effects on ICP (the ICP increase is minimal and transient) and may even have beneficial effects on CBF in patients with acute SAH.

Nitrates in congestive heart failure

Nitrates are commonly used in the therapy of congestive heart failure (CHF). They exert beneficial hemodynamic effects by decreasing left ventricular filling pressure and systemic vascular resistance while modestly improving cardiac output. The improvement in left ventricular function caused by nitrates is the result of combined reduction in outflow resistance and mitral regurgitation, while decreased pericardial constraint and subendocardial ischemia may also contribute to the process. With continuous nitrate administration, complete arterial tolerance develops, while venous tolerance appears to be only partial. The major mechanism of tolerance is loss of vascular smooth muscle sensitivity to nitrates. An increase in total blood volume occurring during the first few hours of an acute administration may partly contribute to tolerance. The importance of reflex neurohumoral activation is controversial; although it may contribute to tolerance in CHF, its role does not appear to be major. Chronic continuous nitrate therapy in CHF improves submaximal and maximal exercise tolerance. In combination therapy with hydralazine, isosorbide dinitrate reduces mortality, although to a lesser extent than the angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor enalapril. Intravenous or sublingual nitrates are first-line agents in the therapy of acute pulmonary edema. In severe CHF, refractory to standard medical therapy, a short course of intravenous nitroglycerin, with or without inotropic agents, can help break the vicious spiral of CHF. Because tolerance occurs without nitrate-free intervals and until an optimal schedule of administration is determined, it makes good sense to include a nightly nitrate-free interval when prescribing nitrates for CHF in order to maintain maximal benefit during the hours of activity.

Inotropic support of the critically ill patient. A review of the agents

Intensive care patients often require inotropic support to stabilise circulation and to optimise oxygen supply. In this context, the catecholamines norepinephrine (noradrenaline), epinephrine (adrenaline), dopamine and dobutamine are still the mainstay of therapy. They provide, to different extents, a variety of adrenoceptor-mediated actions comprising vasoconstriction (via alpha-receptors) as well as vasodilatation (via beta 1-receptors), and an increase in cardiac output by enhancing inotropy and heart rate (again via beta 1-receptors). Because of their favourable pharmacokinetic profile (plasma half-lives of about 2 minutes) their actions can easily be controlled. Combinations of different catecholamines with each other or with other drugs such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or nitrates lead to a broad spectrum of possible haemodynamic actions. However, the use of catecholamines is limited by side effects like tachycardia, hypertension and disturbances of organ perfusion caused by vasoconstriction. Furthermore, as a result of receptor downregulation during long term therapy, the efficacy of catecholamine treatment decreases. These shortfalls stimulated the search for alternatives to catecholamine treatment. Among these, phosphodiesterase inhibitors (e.g. enoximone and amrinone) appear to be the most promising drugs which have been introduced into acute clinical practice up to now. They act via inhibition of the phosphodiesterase isoenzyme III, leading to higher intracellular calcium levels by increasing cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP) levels. These agents improve cardiac performance by enhancing contractility, reducing left ventricular afterload and improve diastolic relaxation. In cases of failing catecholamine therapy due to receptor downregulation, treatment with phosphodiesterase inhibitors may still be effective since their action is not receptor-mediated. Inhibition of the phosphodiesterase enzyme in vascular smooth muscle leads to vasodilatation. Therefore, in low cardiac output states combined with increased total peripheral or pulmonary vascular resistance, phosphodiesterase inhibitor therapy is particularly effective. Depending on the dosage and the speed of intravenous administration, the use of phosphodiesterase inhibitors sometimes results in pronounced decrease of blood pressure which may require vasopressor therapy. Other drugs including histamine H2-agonists are currently under investigation. Their value in the treatment of intensive care patients has still to be evaluated.

The rational selection of inotropic drugs in cardiac surgery

Despite improvements in surgical technique and intraoperative myocardial protection, certain patients have need for inotropic drug support after cardiac surgery. This review examines drugs that are currently in use for inotropic support of the heart, including calcium, epinephrine, dopamine, dobutamine, isoproterenol, and amrinone. Patient factors that may have an impact on the selection of appropriate drugs are also examined. Application of these data to specific patients must be guided by the particular hemodynamic derangements present. Careful analysis of the specific hemodynamic disorder and tailoring of inotropic therapy to these abnormalities are crucial. Such a rational approach to the selection of inotropic agents requires continuous hemodynamic assessment and recognition that the patient's condition and needs may change rapidly early after heart surgery dictating adjustment of subsequent therapy.

Cardiovascular alterations in severe pregnancy-induced hypertension: effects of intravenous nitroglycerin coupled with blood volume expansion

Control of blood pressure in severe pregnancy-induced hypertension has often relied on agents with an unpredictable onset and duration of action. Because intravenous nitroglycerin is a potent, rapidly acting agent with a hemodynamic half-life measured in minutes, we evaluated its cardiovascular effects with and without volume expansion in six patients with severe pregnancy-induced hypertension. Nitroglycerin alone reduced mean arterial pressure by 27.5% without any significant changes in heart rate, central venous pressure, or stroke volume. The pulmonary capillary wedge pressure fell from 9 +/- 3 to 4 +/- 2 mm Hg (p less than 0.05) while the cardiac index decreased from 3.51 +/- 0.67 to 2.87 +/- 0.76 L/min X m2. Oxygen delivery fell significantly (p less than 0.05), from 617 +/- 78 to 491 +/- 106 ml/min X m2. While volume expansion alone had no effect on mean arterial pressure, the combination of blood volume expansion and nitroglycerin resulted in a marked resistance to the hypotensive effect of nitroglycerin. Cardiac index, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and oxygen utilization were not significantly different from baseline values when volume expansion preceded nitroglycerin. We conclude that the ease with which nitroglycerin reduces blood pressure is dependent on the individual patient's volume status. Although volume expansion allows one to maintain cardiac index, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure, and oxygen utilization when used in combination with nitroglycerin, this benefit may be offset by a concomitant reduction in hypotensive capability.

Pharmacologic support of the myocardium following aortocoronary bypass surgery: a comparative study

To evaluate the hemodynamic effects of simultaneous nitroglycerin and epinephrine infusion following aortocoronary bypass surgery, 16 patients were monitored and studied in the early postoperative period. All patients were given intravenous nitroglycerin, epinephrine, epinephrine combined with nitroglycerin, and dobutamine in a randomized manner. The dose of pharmacologic agent was gradually increased to achieve the required circulatory response. The measured variables included heart rate (HR), central venous pressure (CVP), arterial blood pressure (BP), pulmonary artery pressure (PA), pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP), cardiac output, and arterial and venous oxygen saturations. A nitroglycerin infusion at 1.1 +/- 2 micrograms/kg/min caused the PAWP to decrease by 37% (P less than or equal to .005). All other parameters were not significantly different from control. Epinephrine at a dose of 0.06 +/- 0.02 micrograms/kg/min increased the mean blood pressure by 21% (P less than or equal to .005). The rate-pressure product (RPP) and PAWP were elevated by 18% and 12%, respectively (P less than or equal to .005). Cardiac index, however, was not increased. When nitroglycerin was added to the epinephrine infusion, a PAWP increase was not seen. Also the right ventricular stroke work index was increased by 23% (P less than or equal to .01), and the left ventricular stroke work index increased by 21% (P less than or equal to .01). Dobutamine 4.8 +/- 1.0 micrograms/kg/min caused ventricular stroke work indexes to increase significantly (P less than or equal to .005). The CVP and PAWP were unchanged with this mode of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparative immediate hemodynamic and hormonal effects of amrinone and captopril in patients with severe chronic heart failure

To compare the responses to oral inotropic and vasodilator drugs, maximally effective doses of amrinone (300 mg over 3 hours) and captopril (25 mg orally) were administered to 21 patients with severe chronic heart failure, who had not received either agent previously. Despite similar decreases in systemic vascular resistance with both drugs, amrinone produced greater increases in cardiac index (+ 0.56 vs. + 0.41/min/m2, p less than 0.05) and smaller decreases in mean arterial pressure (-11.1 vs. -15.2 mm Hg, p less than 0.05) than did captopril; three patients became symptomatically hypotensive with captopril, but none did so after amrinone. These differences were due to a significant decrease in heart rate with captopril (-6.3 beats/min, p less than 0.01), whereas heart rate increased with amrinone (+ 4.3 beats/min, p less than 0.01); the increases in stroke volume index with both drugs were similar. Despite similar decreases in left ventricular filling pressures, the decrease in mean right atrial pressure with amrinone was greater than with captopril (-5.6 vs. -3.2 mm Hg, p less than 0.01). This difference was the result of the greater decrease in pulmonary arteriolar resistance, and hence in right ventricular afterload, with amrinone than with captopril, (-33% vs. -16%, respectively), p less than 0.01. Despite these superior hemodynamic responses to amrinone, when patients received sequential long-term treatment with both drugs during the follow-up period, only 12% of patients benefitted during therapy with amrinone, whereas 64% improved clinically with captopril.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)