A recombinant, chimeric enzyme with a novel mechanism of action leading to greater potency and selectivity than tissue-type plasminogen activator

New thrombolytic agents and strategies

Despite their widespread use in patients with acute myocardial infarction, all currently available thrombolytic agents suffer from a number of significant limitations, including resistance to reperfusion, the occurrence of acute coronary reocclusion, and bleeding complications. Several lines of research towards improvement of thrombolytic therapy are being explored, including strategies to enhance the fibrinolytic potency of plasminogen activators and to improve conjunctive antiplatelet or antithrombotic agents. Mutants and variants of plasminogen activators, chimeric plasminogen activators, and conjugates of plasminogen activators with monoclonal antibodies have been constructed, and plasminogen activators from animal or bacterial origin have been evaluated. Some of these new thrombolytic agents have shown promise in animal models of venous or arterial thrombosis and in pilot studies in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Such molecules include mutants of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA) with prolonged half-life and/or resistance to protease inhibitors and staphylokinase. Antiplatelet strategies include the use of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor blocking agents, of thromboxane synthase inhibitors and endoperoxide receptor antagonists. Antithrombotic strategies include the use of selective inhibitors of thrombin, tissue factor or factor Xa. The efficiency and safety of these new agents in man will have to be carefully evaluated.

Plasminogen acceleration of urokinase thrombolysis

PURPOSE

A relative deficiency of plasminogen within the thrombus may be the rate limiting factor in clot lysis.

METHODS

To investigate this hypothesis, we used an in vitro perfusion system and expanded polytetrafluoroethylene graft segments filled with radiolabeled human thrombus. Three groups of five perfusions were compared: (1) urokinase infusion (333 IU/min) into clots laced with buffer, (2) urokinase infusion (333 IU/min) into clots laced with plasminogen (44 CU), and (3) control, D5W infusion into clots laced with buffer. Two end points were measured over time: the amount of lysed thrombus and the flow through the graft.

RESULTS

Urokinase infusion resulted in augmented flow through the graft when compared with control (p < 0.05). Lacing with plasminogen resulted in more rapid restoration of flow when compared with urokinase infusion alone (p < 0.05). Similarly, the rate of clot dissolution was significantly greater in plasminogen-laced thrombi (p < 0.05) when compared with the control and urokinase groups. Embolization of particles of thrombus was uniformly observed in the urokinase group, resulting in a temporary decrease in flow through the thrombosed graft. This event characteristically occurred after 60 minutes of infusion but was never seen in the urokinase/plasminogen treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that plasminogen supplementation of urokinase thrombolysis may result in significant clinical benefits with respect to the rate of clot lysis and the uniformity of clot dissolution with a lower likelihood of secondary embolization.

Chemical derivatization of therapeutic proteins

Despite major advances in redesigning and producing proteins through recombinant DNA technology, many therapeutic proteins are still produced by extraction from biological tissues or fluids, or from nonrecombinant microorganisms. Modification of such proteins, to improve potency and bioavailability and reduce immunogenicity, can only be carried out post-translationally by chemical-derivatization methods. Genetic- and chemical-modification methods are not mutually exclusive, however, and may be combined to optimize protein-engineering strategies, because chemical modification can introduce structural changes that are not encoded by DNA into both recombinant, and nonrecombinant proteins.

Development of thrombolytic agents

Despite their widespread use in patients with acute myocardial infarction, all currently available thrombolytic agents suffer from a number of significant limitations, including resistance to reperfusion, the occurrence of acute coronary reocclusion and bleeding complications. Furthermore, the therapeutic use of plasminogen activators as thrombolytic agents requires intravenous infusion of relatively large amounts of material. Therefore, the quest for thrombolytic agents with a higher thrombolytic potency, specific thrombolytic activity and/or a better fibrin-selectivity continues. Several lines of research towards improvement of thrombolytic agents are being explored, including the construction of mutants and variants of plasminogen activators, chimeric plasminogen activators, conjugates of plasminogen activators with monoclonal antibodies, or plasminogen activators from animal or bacterial origin.