Large change in voltage at phase reversal improves biphasic defibrillation thresholds. Parallel-series mode switching

Comparison of rectilinear biphasic waveform with biphasic truncated exponential waveform in a pediatric defibrillation model

OBJECTIVE

To compare the rectilinear biphasic waveform with a biphasic truncated exponential waveform for pediatric defibrillation.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Experimental laboratory of a university-affiliated research institute.

SUBJECTS

Male domestic piglets (4-24 kg).

INTERVENTIONS

Eleven piglets (4-8 kg), which represented a patient <1 yr old, and ten piglets (16-24 kg), which represented a pediatric patient between the ages of 2 and 8 yrs, were anesthetized, intubated, and mechanically ventilated. Ventricular fibrillation was induced and maintained for 30 secs, and a predetermined shock was then delivered to defibrillate. Following defibrillation, the animal was permitted to stabilize hemodynamically for 4 mins. Fifty shocks were applied to each animal using a randomization schedule based on a predetermined permutation of 50. The 50 shocks were 25 shocks for each rectilinear biphasic and biphasic truncated exponential waveforms, comprising five shocks at five energy settings. Each group of five shocks was fixed at a predetermined energy value, depending on the body weight of the animal. Dose-response curves were constructed using logistic regression. Aortic pressure, electrocardiogram, left ventricular pressure, and left ventricular pressure value of 40 mm Hg were continually measured.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Dose-response curves determined defibrillation thresholds at 50% (D50) and 90% (D90) probability of success. The rectilinear biphasic waveform defibrillated with <90% of the D50 and D90 energies required for a biphasic truncated exponential waveform. The rectilinear biphasic waveform also successfully defibrillated with significantly less energy per body weight and per heart weight compared with a biphasic truncated exponential waveform.

CONCLUSIONS

The rectilinear biphasic waveform has superior defibrillation performance compared with a biphasic truncated exponential waveform in a piglet defibrillation model for young children.

Stepped defibrillation waveform is substantially more efficient than the 50/50% tilt biphasic

BACKGROUND

Even with biphasic waveforms, patients with high defibrillation thresholds (DFTs) still are seen; thus, improved defibrillation waveforms may be of clinical utility. The stepped waveform has three parts: the first portion is positive with two capacitors in parallel, the second is positive with the capacitors in series, and the last portion is negative, also with the capacitors in series.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the clinical utility of improved defibrillation waveforms.

METHODS

We measured the delivered energy DFT in 20 patients in a dual-site study using the stepped waveform and a 50/50% tilt biphasic truncated exponential as the control. All shocks were delivered using an arbitrary waveform defibrillator, which was programmed to mimic two 220-microF capacitors (110 microF in series and 440 microF in parallel).

RESULTS

The peak voltage at DFT was reduced in 19 of the 20 patients. The median peak voltage was reduced by 32.0%, from 472 V to 321 V (P <.001). The median energy DFT was reduced by 33%, from 11.7 J to 7.8 J (P = .008). The mean voltage and energy were reduced by 25.3% and 20.2%, respectively. On average, the stepped waveform was able to defibrillate as well as the 50/50% tilt biphasic, with 33% more energy. The benefit was more pronounced in patients with either a lower ejection fraction or a superior vena cava coil. The benefit of the stepped waveform had an inverse quadratic correlation with the resistance (r(2) = 0.47), suggesting that the capacitance values chosen for the stepped waveform were close to optimal for a 35-Omega resistance.

CONCLUSION

The stepped waveform reduced the DFT compared to the 50/50% tilt waveform in this preliminary study.

Effects of Angiotensin Converting Enzyme Inhibitor and Angiotensin II Receptor Blocker on Ventricular Defibrillation Threshold

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and Angiotensin II (AII) receptor blockers have previously been shown to be beneficial in treating patients with not only hypertension but also with cardiovascular diseases. Therefore, such drugs may potentially be used in patients with an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) who show cardiac dysfunctions.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine effects of short-term administration of the ACE inhibitor (CV-3317) and the AII receptor blocker (CV-11974, an active form of candesartan) on internal defibrillation threshold (DFT) in anesthetized canine hearts.

METHODS

DFTs were evaluated using a "hot can" defibrillation lead system in: (a) seven dogs following three intravenous administrations of 20 cc saline; (b) 11 dogs that received intravenous CV-3317 doses of 1 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 50 mg/kg; and in (c) 10 dogs that were intravenously given 0.1 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg CV-11974. DFTs were determined using a "down-up down-up" protocol.

RESULTS

Mean DFT delivered energies at baseline and following three consecutive intravenous saline injections were 16.4 +/- 9.3 J, 15.3 +/- 7.5 J, 15.9 +/- 7.1 J, and 15.5 +/- 5.6 J, respectively. Those at baseline and following 1 mg/kg, 10 mg/kg, and 50 mg/kg intravenous CV-3317 were 12.9 +/- 6.4 J, 12.2 +/- 6.4 J, 11.0 +/- 6.6 J, and 11.9 +/- 6.6 J, respectively. Similarly, those at baseline and after 0.1 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 10 mg/kg CV-11974 were 13 +/- 6.6 J, 12.5 +/- 6 J, 12.9 +/- 5.8 J, and 13.2 +/- 6.6 J, respectively. There were no significant differences between DFT at baseline and the others in each treatment group.

CONCLUSIONS

Since an ACE inhibitor and an AII receptor blocker did not alter DFT, such drugs may be useful in ICD patients without a decrease in safety margins.

Quadriphasic waveforms are superior to triphasic waveforms for transthoracic defibrillation in a cardiac arrest swine model with high impedance

BACKGROUND

We have demonstrated previously that triphasic waveform shocks were superior to biphasic waveform shocks for transthoracic defibrillation. Our purpose was to compare the efficacy and safety of quadriphasic versus triphasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation in a porcine model.

METHODS

Sixteen adult swine (19-25 kg, mean: 21.5 kg) were deeply anesthetized and intubated. To simulate impedance of the human chest, fixed electrical resistors (25 or 50 ohms) was placed in series with the defibrillator and the chest of each pig. After 30 s of electrically induced VF, each pig received transthoracic shocks, using either a truncated exponential triphasic waveform (5 ms positive pulse duration, 5 ms negative pulse duration and 5 ms positive pulse duration, total waveform duration 15 ms) or a quadriphasic waveform (5/5/5/5 ms, total waveform duration 20 ms). Each pig received transthoracic triphasic and quadriphasic shocks at three selected energy levels (50, 100 and 150 J) in random sequence. Four shocks were delivered at each energy level to construct an energy versus % success curve. Success was defined as VF termination at 5 s after shock. The total shocks were divided into three groups based on the delivered energy actually delivered to the animal: <40, 40-65 and >65 J. Delivered energy = (animal impedance/total impedance) times selected energy of the shock.

RESULTS

For high-impedance animals (86-102 ohms), quadriphasic waveform shocks achieved significantly higher percent shock success than triphasic shocks for the termination of VF at the energy levels of >65 J actually delivered (quadriphasic 72.7+/-12.2%, triphasic 38.9+/-7.7%, p<0.02). No differences in the shock success between quadriphasic and triphasic waveforms were found for other two energy levels. There were no differences in ventricular tachycardia or asystole after shocks between quadriphasic and triphasic waveforms.

CONCLUSION

In this porcine model, 20 ms (5/5/5/5) quadriphasic shocks were superior to 15 ms (5/5/5) triphasic shocks for transthoracic defibrillation in animals with impedances that simulated high impedance in humans.

The Strength-Duration Relationship of Monophasic Waveforms with Varying Capacitance Sizes in External Defibrillation

The shape of the shock waveform influences defibrillation efficacy. However, the optimal combination between capacitance size and truncation/tilt which can determine monophasic waveform's shape, has not been determined for external defibrillation. The purpose of this study was to assess the effects of varying capacitance and tilt on external defibrillation using exponential monophasic waveforms. In a pig model of external defibrillation (n = 10, 30 +/- 6 kg), nine exponential monophasic waveforms combining three capacitance values (30 microF, 60 microF, and 120 microF) and three tilt values (55%, 75%, and 95%) were tested randomly. The energy and leading edge voltage at 50% defibrillation success (E50 and V50) were used to evaluate defibrillation efficacy. E50 and V50 were determined by the Bayesian technique. The lowest stored E50 for the 30microF, 60 microF, and 120 microF waveforms were 90 +/- 12 J (95% tilt), 106 +/- 45 J (55% tilt), and 107 +/- 52 J (75% tilt), respectively. The lowest V50 for the 30 microF, 60 microF, and 120 microF waveforms were 2,439 +/- 166 V (95% tilt), 1,849 +/- 375 V (55% tilt), and 1,301 +/- 322 V (75% tilt), respectively. The average current at external defibrillation threshold demonstrated a strength versus pulse duration relationship similar to that seen with pacing. Reducing capacitance has the same effect as truncating the waveform. The E50 is more sensitive to tilt values changes in larger capacitance waveforms. This study suggests that the optimal combination between capacitance and tilt may be 120 microF and 55%-75% for external defibrillation.

New approach to biphasic waveforms for internal defibrillation: fully discharging capacitors

INTRODUCTION

The use of two independent, fully discharging capacitors for each phase of a biphasic defibrillation waveform may lead to the design of a simpler, smaller, internal defibrillator. The goal of this study was to determine the optimal combination of capacitor sizes for such a waveform.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eight full-discharge (95/95% tilt), biphasic waveforms produced by several combinations of phase-1 capacitors (30, 60, and 90 microF) and phase-2 capacitors (1/3, 2/3, and 1.0 times the phase-1 capacitor) were tested and compared to a single-capacitor waveform (120 microF, 65/65% tilt) in a pig ventricular fibrillation model (n = 12, 23+/-2 kg). In the full-discharge waveforms, phase-2 peak voltage was equal to phase-1 peak voltage. Shocks were delivered between a right ventricular lead and a left pectoral can electrode. E50s and V50s were determined using a ten-step Bayesian process. Full-discharge waveforms with phase-2 capacitors of < or =40 microF had the same E50 (6.7+/-1.7 J to 7.3+/-3.9 J) as the single-capacitor truncated waveform (7.3+/-3.7 J), whereas waveforms with phase-2 capacitors of > or =60 microF had an extremely high E50 (14.5+/-10.8 J or greater, P < 0.05). Moreover, of the former set of energy-efficient waveforms, those with phase-1 capacitors of > or =60 microF additionally exhibited V50s that were equivalent to the V50 of the single-capacitor waveform (344+/-65 V to 407+/-50 V vs 339+/-83 V).

CONCLUSION

Defibrillation efficacy can be maintained in a full-discharge, two-capacitor waveform with the proper choice of capacitors.

Comparison of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. ZOLL Investigators

OBJECTIVES

We compared the efficacy of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform, consisting of a constant current first phase, with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform during transthoracic defibrillation.

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have shown that for endocardial defibrillation, biphasic waveforms have a greater efficacy than monophasic waveforms. More recently, a 130-J truncated exponential biphasic waveform was shown to have equivalent efficacy to a 200-J damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. However, the optimal type of biphasic waveform is unknown.

METHODS

In this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, 184 patients who underwent ventricular defibrillation were randomized to receive a 200-J damped sine wave monophasic or 120-J rectilinear biphasic shock.

RESULTS

First-shock efficacy of the biphasic waveform was significantly greater than that of the monophasic waveform (99% vs. 93%, p = 0.05) and was achieved with nearly 60% less delivered current (14 +/- 1 vs. 33 +/- 7 A, p < 0.0001). Although the efficacy of the biphasic and monophasic waveforms was comparable in patients with an impedance < 70 ohms (100% [biphasic] vs. 95% [monophasic], p = NS), the biphasic waveform was significantly more effective in patients with an impedance > or = 70 ohms (99% [biphasic] vs. 86% [monophasic], p = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates a superior efficacy of rectilinear biphasic shocks as compared with monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation, particularly in patients with a high transthoracic impedance. More important, biphasic shocks defibrillated with nearly 60% less current. The combination of increased efficacy and decreased current requirements suggests that biphasic shocks as compared with monophasic shocks are advantageous for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation.

Biventricular shocking leads improve defibrillation efficacy

INTRODUCTION

A single lead active can configuration has been widely used in patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. Occasionally, however, such a defibrillation lead configuration may not achieve adequate defibrillation threshold (DFT). The purpose of this study was to determine whether addition of a left ventricular (LV) lead can improve defibrillation efficacy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Three transvenous defibrillation leads (8.3-French with a 5-cm long unipolar coil) were placed in the right ventricle (RV), LV, and superior vena cava (SVC), along with an active can (92 cm2) in the left subpectoral area. The DFT stored energy of seven combinations of these defibrillation leads were compared in a pig ventricular fibrillation model using a biphasic defibrillation waveform (125 microF, 6.5/3.5 msec). A biventricular leads active can configuration in which the RV and LV leads were of the same polarity reduced the DFT stored energy by approximately 35% when compared to a single RV lead active can configuration (9.6 +/- 3.0 J vs 15.0 +/- 7.2 J, respectively, P = 0.02). Moreover, adding a SVC lead further reduced the DFT energy (8.4 +/- 3.3 J).

CONCLUSION

A biventricular leads active can configuration can significantly improve defibrillation efficacy as compared to a single lead active can configuration. In such a defibrillation lead configuration, the polarity of RV and LV leads should be the same.

Transmembrane potential changes caused by monophasic and biphasic shocks

Transmembrane potential change (DeltaVm) during shocks was recorded by a double-barrel microelectrode in 12 isolated guinea pig papillary muscles. After 10 S1 stimuli, square-wave S2 shocks of both polarities were given consisting of 10-ms monophasic and 10/10-ms and 5/5-ms biphasic waveforms that created potential gradients from 1.1 +/- 0.3 to 11.9 +/- 0.4 V/cm. S2 shocks were applied with 30, 60- to 70-, and 90- to 130-ms S1-S2 coupling intervals so that they occurred during the plateau, late portion of the plateau, and phase 3 of the action potential, respectively. Some shocks were given across as well as along the fiber orientation. The shocks caused hyperpolarization with one polarity and depolarization with the opposite polarity. The ratio of the magnitude of hyperpolarization to that of depolarization at the three S1-S2 coupling intervals was 1.5 +/- 0.3, 1.1 +/- 0.2, and 0.5 +/- 0.2, respectively. DeltaVm during the shock was significantly greater for the monophasic than for the two biphasic shocks. The prolongation of total repolarizing time (TRT) was significantly greater for monophasic (119.8 +/- 19.1%) and 10/10-ms biphasic (120.5 +/- 18.2%) than for 5/5-ms biphasic (113.0 +/- 12.9%) waveforms. The dispersion of the normalized TRT between instances of hyperpolarization and depolarization caused by the two shock polarities was 7.4 +/- 7.1% for monophasic, 3.0 +/- 4.1% for 10/10-ms biphasic, and 2.8 +/- 3.1% for 5/5-ms biphasic shocks (P < 0.05 for monophasic vs. biphasic). Shock fields along fibers produced a larger DeltaVm and prolongation of TRT than those across fibers. We conclude that 1) a change in shock polarity causes an asymmetrical change in membrane polarization depending on shock timing; 2) the 5/5-ms biphasic waveform causes the smallest DeltaVm, prolongs repolarization the least, and causes the smallest polarity-dependent dispersion; and 3) the changes in transmembrane potential and repolarization are influenced by fiber orientation.

Effects of respiration phase on ventricular defibrillation threshold in a hot can electrode system

The impedance of defibrillation pathways is an important determinant of ventricular defibrillation efficacy. The hypothesis in this study was that the respiration phase (end-inspiration versus end-expiration) may alter impedance and/or defibrillation efficacy in a "hot can" electrode system. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) parameters were evaluated at end-expiration and at end-inspiration phases in random order by a biphasic waveform in ten anesthetized pigs (body weight: 19.1 +/- 2.4 kg; heart weight: 97 +/- 10 g). Pigs were intubated with a cuffed endotracheal tube and ventilated through a Drager SAV respirator with tidal volume of 400-500 mL. A transvenous defibrillation lead (6 cm long, 6.5 Fr) was inserted into the right ventricular apex. A titanium can electrode (92-cm2 surface area) was placed in the left pectoral area. The right ventricular lead was the anode for the first phase and the cathode for the second phase. The DFT was determined by a "down-up down-up" protocol. Statistical analysis was performed with a Wilcoxon matched pair test. The median impedance at DFT for expiration and inspiration phases were 37.8 +/- 3.1 omega, and 39.3 +/- 3.6 omega, respectively (P = 0.02). The stored energy at DFT for expiration and inspiration phases were 5.7 +/- 1.9 J and 6.0 +/- 1.0 J, respectively (P = 0.594). Shocks delivered at end-inspiration exhibited a statistically significant increase in electrode impedance in a " hot can" electrode system. The finding that DFT energy was not significantly different at both respiration phases indicates that respiration phase does not significantly affect defibrillation energy requirements.

Sawtooth first phase biphasic defibrillation waveform: a comparison with standard waveform in clinical devices

INTRODUCTION

A major limitation in a conventional truncated exponential waveform is the rapid drop in current that results in short duration of high current or longer duration with a lower average current. We hypothesized that increasing the first phase average current by boosting the decaying waveform prior to phase reversal may improve defibrillation efficacy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

To better simulate a "rectangular" waveform during the first phase, a "sawtooth" defibrillation waveform was constructed using "parallel-series" switching of capacitances (each 30 microF) during the first phase. This permitted a boost in the voltage late in the first phase. This sawtooth biphasic waveform (sawtooth) was compared to two clinical waveforms: a 135-microF capacitance (control-1) and a 90-microF capacitance (control-2) waveform. Defibrillation threshold (DFT) parameters were evaluated in 13 anesthetized pig models using a system consisting of a transvenous right ventricular apex lead (anode) and a left pectoral "hot can" electrode (cathode) system. DFT was determined by a "down-up down-up" protocol. The stored energy for sawtooth, control-1, and control-2 was 10.5 +/- 2.8 J, 12.3 +/- 3.7 J*, and 12.2 +/- 2.8 J*, respectively (*P < or = 0.01 vs sawtooth). The average current of the first phase for sawtooth, control-1, and control-2 was 7.6 +/- 1.3 A, 4.7 +/- 0.9 A*, and 6.2 +/- 0.9 A*, respectively (*P = 0.0001 vs sawtooth).

CONCLUSION

A sawtooth biphasic waveform utilizing a "parallel-series" switching system of smaller capacitors can improve defibrillation efficacy. A higher average current in the first phase generated by such a waveform may contribute to more efficient defibrillation by facilitating myocyte capture.

[Influence of waveform and configuration of electrodes on the defibrillation threshold of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators]

The defibrillation threshold (DFT) is no threshold in the true sense. Between energy levels which defibrillate in all cases and energy levels which never defibrillate, a broad range of energies exists which might or might not defibrillate. Thus, the value of the DFT is dependant on the protocol used for its determination. Usually the DFT presents an energy at which the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) will defibrillate successfully at a rate of approximately 75%. To achieve a 100% success rate the energy has to be programmed 15 J above the DFT or twice the DFT.Using DFT measurements the energy needed for internal defibrillation could be gradually reduced in the last years. Major break throughs have been the introduction of the biphasic defibrillation waveform and the use of pectorally implanted ICD shells as defibrillation electrodes. The shortening of the defibrillation impulse by the use of lower capacitances could not improve DFTs but allowed to construct ICDs of smaller volume. Addition of a superior vena cava electrode or a subcutaneous array electrode at the left lateral chest to the standard bipolar electrode system (right ventricle, pectoral ICD can) allowed for tri- and quadripolar lead configurations which reduced DFTs on average only slightly but reduced the standard deviation of DFTs significantly and thus helped to avoid high DFTs. Besides building smaller ICDs, reduction of DFTs and thus programming of lower defibrillation ICD energies allows for improved battery longevities and reduced capacitor charging times and thus a lower incidence of syncopes.