Clinical Outcomes of Rhythm Control Strategies for Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation According to the Quality-of-Life Score: The CODE-AF (Comparison Study of Drugs for Symptom Control and Complication Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation) Registry

Assessment and management of asymptomatic atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac dysrhythmia encountered in practice. It is currently estimated that AF affects approximately 2% of the general population; however, the true prevalence of AF is likely to be at least 3%-4% when asymptomatic AF is considered. For clinically apparent AF, the investigations and management are relatively well established. The identification of minimally symptomatic patients is challenging, and furthermore, the optimal management is less certain. Although there is some debate about the ideal treatment pathway for asymptomatic AF, in most cases, the investigations and comprehensive management follow the same recommendations as clinically apparent AF. In contrast, beyond risk factor optimisation, the ideal management of subclinical or device-detected AF remains undefined. The purpose of the current review is to discuss the assessment and management of asymptomatic AF.

Clinical outcomes with the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors in patients with atrial fibrillation and type 2 diabetes mellitus: a multi-centre, real-world cohort study

AIMS

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) have been shown to improve cardiovascular outcomes and reduce the incidence of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). We investigated the clinical outcomes with and without the use of SGLT2is in patients with T2DM and concomitant AF.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We derived patient data from a clinical data warehouse constructed from the electronic medical records of seven medical centres. Data for 11 012 patients diagnosed with both AF and T2DM were analysed. New SGLT2i users were classified into the SGLT2i group and those who were not prescribed SGLT2is were classified into the control group. We performed a 1:2 propensity score (PS)-matching analysis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause death or hospitalization due to heart failure (HF) events in 3 years. The PS-matched population consisted of 1115 patients in the SGLT2i group and 2050 patients in the control group. Incidence of the primary endpoint was significantly lower in the SGLT2i group [8.4 vs. 14.6%, hazard ratio (HR) 0.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.55-0.87]. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors use was associated with significantly lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.43, 95% CI 0.29-0.67) and HF hospitalization (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.59-0.99). Adverse renal events, defined as >50% increase in serum creatinine level or initiation of dialysis, occurred less often in the SGLT2i group (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.38-0.66, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Use of SGLT2is in patients with T2DM and concomitant AF was associated with reduced mortality or HF hospitalization events.

2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation: A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines

AIM

The "2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Atrial Fibrillation" provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate.

STRUCTURE

Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the "2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" and the "2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation" have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Comparison of the 11-Day Adhesive ECG Patch Monitor and 24-h Holter Tests to Assess the Response to Antiarrhythmic Drug Therapy in Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Accurate assessment of the response to the antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) in atrial fibrillation (AF) is crucial to achieve adequate rhythm control. We evaluated the effectiveness of extended cardiac monitoring using an adhesive ECG patch in the detection of drug-refractory paroxysmal AF. Patients diagnosed with paroxysmal AF and receiving AAD therapy were enrolled. The subjects simultaneously underwent 11-day adhesive ECG patch monitoring and a 24-h Holter test. The primary study outcome was a detection rate of drug-refractory AF or atrial tachycardia (AT) lasting ≥30 s. A total of 59 patients were enrolled and completed the study examinations. AF or AT was detected in 28 (47.5%) patients by an 11-day ECG patch monitor and in 8 (13.6%) patients by a 24-h Holter test (p < 0.001). The 11-day ECG patch monitor identified an additional 20 patients (33.8%) with drug-refractory AF not detected by the 24-h Holter, and as a result, the treatment plan was changed in 11 patients (10 catheter ablations, one medication change). In conclusion, extended cardiac rhythm monitoring using an adhesive ECG patch in patients with paroxysmal AF under AAD therapy led to over a threefold higher detection of drug-refractory AF episodes, compared to the 24-h Holter test.

[Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation : Screening and therapy]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia affecting millions of people worldwide and poses a significant burden to the health care system. AF screening of the general population or of a specific higher-risk population could not only lead to earlier detection of AF but also to a prompt initiation of an adequate therapy to prevent complications such as stroke or death and consecutively to a potential reduction of health care costs, especially in asymptomatic AF patients. To conduct screening programs, accessible new technology devices such as "wearables", smartwatches, and implantable event recorders provide an innovative solution. However, as data regarding screening are inconclusive, routine AF screening of the population is currently not recommended by the European Society of Cardiology. Recently published studies have indicated that anticoagulation and early rhythm control of asymptomatic AF could avoid occurrence of clinical endpoints. This article reports on the scientific results of the current literature as well as gaps of evidence and discusses possible treatment options of asymptomatic AF.