Patent Foramen Ovale and Cryptogenic Strokes in the Stroke in Young Fabry Patients Study

In young patients with stroke of undetermined etiology, large vessel occlusions are less frequent in the group with high-risk patent foramen ovale

INTRODUCTION

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is present in a significant proportion of young patients with stroke of undetermined etiology, but is not always causal. Therefore, classifications (RoPE, PASCAL) have been developed to determine the probability that PFO is the stroke cause. However, the presence of an initial arterial occlusion as a prediction factor was not studied when these classifications were built. Our aim was to evaluate the presence of arterial occlusion in young patients with stroke of undetermined etiology with/without high-risk PFO.

METHODS

From a prospectively-built monocentric database, we identified patients aged≥18 to<60-years with strokes of undetermined etiology and complete etiological work-up, including transesophageal echocardiography. We divided patients in two groups: (i) with high-risk PFO [i.e. PFO with large interatrial shunt (>30 microbubbles) or associated with atrial septal aneurysm] and (ii) with low-risk/without PFO. We recorded the presence of arterial occlusion and large vessel occlusion (LVO) in the acute phase.

RESULTS

We included 96 patients; 55 (57%) had high-risk PFO. Their median age was 48 (40-52) years, and 28 (29%) were women. The percentages of patients with arterial occlusion and with LVO were lower in the high-risk PFO group than in the low-risk/without PFO group: 11 (20%) versus 19 (46%) (P=0.008), and 5 (9%) versus 15 (37%) (P=0.002), respectively. There was no difference in the median RoPE score between groups (P=0.30).

CONCLUSION

The presence of LVO could represent a "red flag" of PFO causality in stroke of undetermined etiology, and could be implemented in future PFO-related stroke classifications.

Patent foramen ovale-associated stroke repeatedly misdiagnosed as cerebral small vessel disease: A case report

BACKGROUND

Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) is the most commonly used screening method for cardiac structural abnormalities. However, it may lead to a missed diagnosis of partial patent foramen ovale (PFO)-associated stroke.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 60-year-old male was admitted to the hospital for recurrent left limb weakness with or without slurred speech for 14 months. No stroke-related cardiac structural abnormality was detected during repeated TTE, and the patient was diagnosed with cerebral small vessel disease. Finally, right-to-left shunt was detected by contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler. Subsequently, the patient was diagnosed with PFO-associated stroke by transesophageal echocardiography and contrast transesophageal echocardiography.

CONCLUSIONS

TTE has a low detection rate of PFO, such that it is easily missed. Contrast-enhanced transcranial Doppler is easy to operate and should be promoted as a supplementary measure to stroke etiological investigation and primary PFO screening.

Low Diagnostic Yield of Routine Cerebrospinal Fluid Analysis in Juvenile Stroke

Background: The diagnostic value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) analysis in juvenile stroke, i.e., stroke in young adult patients, is not well studied. We sought to determine the therapeutic impact of routine CSF-analysis in young adults with acute ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA).

Methods: We abstracted data from patients with acute cerebral ischemia aged 18–45 years who were consecutively admitted to our stroke center between 01/2008 and 12/2015. We routinely performed CSF-analysis in patients with hitherto unknown stroke etiology after complete diagnostic work up. We assessed the frequency and underlying causes of abnormal CSF-findings and their impact on secondary stroke prevention therapy.

Results: Among 379 patients (median [IQR:IQR3-IQR1] age 39 [10:43-33] years, 48% female) with acute ischemic stroke (n = 306) or TIA (n = 73), CSF analysis was performed in 201 patients (53%). Of these, 25 patients (12.4 %) had CSF pleocytosis (leucocyte cell count ≥ 5 Mpt/L), that was rated as non-specific (e.g., traumatic lumbar puncture, reactive pleocytosis) in 22 patients. Only 3 patients (1.5% of all patients who underwent CSF-analysis) with CSF-pleocytosis had specific CSF-findings that were related to stroke etiology and affected secondary stroke prevention therapy. Imaging findings had already suggested cerebral vasculitis in two of these patients.

Conclusions: The diagnostic yield of routine CSF-analysis in juvenile stroke was remarkably low in our study. Our data suggest that CSF-analysis should only be performed if further findings raise the suspicion of cerebral vasculitis.