Lamotrigine treatment of rapid cycling bipolar disorder

Rapid cycling bipolar disorder: Literature review on pharmacological treatment illustrated by a case report on ketamine

INTRODUCTION

Rapid cycling bipolar disorder (RCBD) is defined as four or more affective episodes (depression, mania or hypomania) within 1 year. RCBD has a high point of prevalence (from 10% to 20% among clinical bipolar samples) and is associated with greater severity, longer illness duration, worse global functioning and higher suicidal risk, but there is no consensus on treatment option. The use of several pharmacological agents has been reported (levothyroxine, antipsychotics, antidepressants and mood stabilizers).

OBJECTIVE

The main objective of this review was to propose a critical review of the literature and to rank the pharmacological agent using a level of evidence (LEO) adapted from the Center for Evidence-Based Medicine, and to illustrate it with a case report on off-label intravenous ketamine.

METHOD

We conducted a review using the MeSH terms and keywords (bipolar [Title/Abstract]) AND (rapid [Title/Abstract]) AND (cycling [Title/Abstract]) AND (treatment [Title/Abstract]). Alexis Bourla and Stéphane Mouchabac screened 638 documents identified through literature search in Medline (PubMed) or by bibliographic references and 164 abstracts were then analyzed. Nonpharmacological treatments were excluded.

RESULT

Seventy articles were included in the review and divided into six categories: mood stabilizers, antipsychotics, hormonal treatments, ketamine and other pharmacological treatments.

DISCUSSION

Our review highlights the heterogeneity of the pharmacological treatment of RCBD and no clear consensus can emerge.

Lamotrigine in bipolar affective disorder

Aims and method

The study aimed to assess the available data on the use of lamotrigine as a mood stabilising agent. We reviewed all published and unpublished data available to us through a Medline search from 1987–1998 and from our own files, which include reference materials presented at conferences as well as published reports.

Results

Most of the data found were derived from case reports or open trials. We could find no published double-blind, placebo-controlled studies. The data from initial open trials suggest that lamotrigine may be effective in bipolar disorder, but futher data are required before specific treatment recommendations can be made.

Clinical implications

At this early stage, there are too few data to recommend lamotrigine for first or second line therapy in bipolar disorder. However, initial reports are very promising and this agent may eventually be unequivocally shown to be useful in treating mania, hypomania, depression, rapid cycling and mixed affective states in people with bipolar disorder.

Circadian Gene Circuitry Predicts Hyperactive Behavior in a Mood Disorder Mouse Model

Bipolar disorder, also known as manic-depressive illness, causes swings in mood and activity levels at irregular intervals. Such changes are difficult to predict, and their molecular basis remains unknown. Here, we use infradian (longer than a day) cyclic activity levels in αCaMKII (Camk2a) mutant mice as a proxy for such mood-associated changes. We report that gene-expression patterns in the hippocampal dentate gyrus could retrospectively predict whether the mice were in a state of high or low locomotor activity (LA). Expression of a subset of circadian genes, as well as levels of cAMP and pCREB, possible upstream regulators of circadian genes, were correlated with LA states, suggesting that the intrinsic molecular circuitry changes concomitant with infradian oscillatory LA. Taken together, these findings shed light onto the molecular basis of how irregular biological rhythms and behavior are controlled by the brain.

A critical review of the recent literature and selected therapy guidelines since 2006 on the use of lamotrigine in bipolar disorder

The anticonvulsant drug lamotrigine (LTG), a sodium channel blocker and inhibitor of glutamate release, has been found to have antidepressant effects in the treatment of bipolar disorder. It is recommended by certain therapy guidelines as a first-line agent for acute and maintenance therapy in bipolar depression, but there have been only some promising results of placebo-controlled trials on its acute antidepressant effects, and the recommendation in therapy guidelines has been reconsidered. On the contrary, positive results for maintenance therapy could be confirmed, and LTG is still a well-tolerated option, especially in patients with predominant depressive episodes. Antimanic effects are not shown in the literature, and its use is not advised in any guidelines that were examined. In conclusion, the findings of the present review article on treatment guidelines for bipolar disorder question the role of LTG in acute depressive states, and critically discusses its use, particularly in acute depressive states.

Management options for bipolar disorder in children and adolescents

During recent years there has been a dramatic increase in the use of psychotropic medication for the treatment of bipolar disorder (BPD) in children. There is an emerging set of data to support this use.Mood stabilizers, including lithium and valproic acid (valproate sodium), have generally formed the mainstay of treatment in children and adolescents with BPD. However, the atypical antipsychotics, such as risperidone, aripiprazole, and quetiapine may be more effective as first-line treatment options and in some ways easier to use than the traditional mood stabilizers. As in adults, mood stabilization is often difficult to achieve in pediatric patients with BPD, and combined treatment with mood stabilizers and atypical antipscyhotics is commonly used. Data from controlled trials of psychotropic medications in children and adolescents with BPD are very limited, and hence, in the majority of cases physicians base their treatment decisions on data from case reports, case series, or open trials. More controlled studies of both monotherapy and polypharmacotherapy for BPD in children and adolescents are needed.

Lamotrigine use in geriatric patients with bipolar depression

OBJECTIVE

To study the effectiveness of adding lamotrigine to the treatment of inpatient geriatric patients with bipolar disorder (BD) who were in the depressed phase and had been on lithium and valproate for at least 3 months.

METHOD

Lamotrigine was started at 25 mg given at bedtime, with weekly incremental increases of 12.5 mg daily until a total dosage of either 75 mg or 100 mg was obtained. Improvement was measured by clinical interview and Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) scores. Patients were reassessed at 6 weeks, and if their HDRS score had decreased by at least 50%, they were considered to have improved.

RESULTS

The study group comprised 5 women with an average age of 71.5 years (range 65 to 85). Four had rapid-cycling BD, and 1 had mixed BD. All patients had early age of onset, as judged by their first contact with a psychiatrist or their first hospitalization. The average initial HDRS score was 27 (range 20 to 35). Of the patients, 3 out of the 5 had remission of symptoms, as judged by clinical interview and reduction of their HDRS score by 50%. At 3 months follow-up, these 3 patients had not required rehospitalization and were doing well. Lamotrigine was well tolerated, and none of the patients developed a rash. One patient did develop coarse hand tremor that improved when the lamotrigine dosage was decreased.

CONCLUSIONS

Lamotrigine in conjunction with lithium and valproate may be effective in treating geriatric patients with BD and depression.

Lamotrigine monotherapy improves health-related quality of life in epilepsy: a double-blind comparison with valproate

The effects of monotherapy with lamotrigine on health-related quality of life were compared with those of valproate monotherapy in a randomized, double-blind trial designed to evaluate treatment-emergent weight changes in patients with epilepsy. At the end of 8 months of treatment, significantly more patients using lamotrigine compared with valproate experienced quality-of-life improvements on the Health Perceptions (42% vs 15%), Energy/Fatigue (47% vs 28%), and Social Isolation (35% vs 16%) subscales of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy-89 (QOLIE-89) questionnaire (P<0.05). Compared with valproate-treated patients, lamotrigine-treated patients were four times more likely to experience improvement in Health Perceptions, 2.3 times more likely to experience improvement in Energy/Fatigue, and 2.8 times more likely to experience improvement in Social Isolation (P<0.05). These quality-of-life improvements are consistent with the improvements in mood measured with the Beck Depression Inventory, the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale, and the Profile of Mood States among patients receiving lamotrigine. These data show that lamotrigine monotherapy provides benefits over valproate monotherapy in improving several aspects of health-related quality of life in patients with epilepsy. The observation that quality-of-life improvements during lamotrigine monotherapy occurred concurrently with improvements in mood suggests that the quality-of-life and mood changes may be causally related.

Lamotrigine update and its use in mood disorders

OBJECTIVE

To provide a qualitative, systematic update and review of the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, efficacy in mood disorders, adverse effects, and costs of lamotrigine.

DATA SOURCES

Citations obtained from MEDLINE searches (1985-September 2001) using lamotrigine as a text word, articles identified in reference lists of pertinent articles, abstracts presented at conferences, and research data from GlaxoSmithKline.

DATA EXTRACTION

English-language articles were considered for possible inclusion. Each title and abstract was examined to determine whether the publication contained up-to-date information relevant to the objective. Twenty clinical trials that provided data on response rates in mood disorders were tabulated.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Lamotrigine's primary action is to modulate voltage-gated sodium channels. Evidence suggests that it decreases glutamate transmission, directly reduces calcium influx, mildly blocks transmitter reuptake, and alters intracellular mechanisms of resting transmitter release. The average half-life of lamotrigine is approximately 24 hours, but decreases to approximately 7.4 hours when used concurrently with phenytoin, and increases to approximately 59 hours with valproic acid. Seven of the 20 clinical trials were randomized, double-blind, and controlled. Existing data are inadequate to evaluate lamotrigine use in major depression. The pooled response rates for patients with depressed, manic, mixed, and rapid cycling bipolar disorder were similar, ranging from 52% to 63%. Adverse effects are infrequent when the drug is used alone, but become more frequent when lamotrigine is combined with other anticonvulsants. While most rashes are mild, approximately 1 in 500 patients develops exfoliative dermatitis. A slow upward dose titration is recommended to reduce the incidence of serious rash, but this may delay the attainment of adequate dosage for 6 weeks. Lamotrigine has positive effects on cognitive function, but occasionally produces insomnia. Lamotrigine costs 2-4 times more than lithium, carbamazepine, and generic valproic acid.

CONCLUSIONS

When efficacy, adverse effects, and cost are considered, lamotrigine should probably be reserved as a second-line agent for bipolar depression.

Lamotrigine: a review of clinical studies in bipolar disorders

OBJECTIVE

This article reviews published studies on the use of lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar disorder (BD).

METHOD

We performed a Medline search to identify the literature data base available on double-blind, open-label studies and case series on the use of lamotrigine to treat BD.

RESULTS

Three double-blind studies, 3 open-label studies, and 2 case series have been conducted to date (n = 401 patients). Most patients were either nonresponders or partial responders to other mood stabilizers. Overall, 50% to 83% of the patients responded to lamotrigine; doses in the studies ranged from 50 to 400 mg daily. Switching to mania while on 200 mg of lamotrigine or more was extremely rare, and there were no reports of serious adverse effects during the study periods.

CONCLUSION

Lamotrigine is proving to be an effective agent in the treatment of BD and may be useful for patients who have not responded to other mood stabilizers.

Lamotrigine Monotherapy Improves Depressive Symptoms in Epilepsy: A Double-Blind Comparison with Valproate

Depressive symptoms are highly prevalent in patients with epilepsy. The antiepileptic drug lamotrigine has been shown to be an effective treatment for the depressive phase of bipolar disorder and to enhance mood and well-being in epilepsy patients. The effects of lamotrigine monotherapy on depressive symptoms in epilepsy have not been evaluated to date in a controlled clinical trial. A recently completed double-blind epilepsy trial comparing the effects of lamotrigine monotherapy and valproate monotherapy on weight change incorporated a battery of standard mood assessments. Mean screening Beck Depression Inventory scores showed that both lamotrigine and valproate groups suffered from mild depression at baseline. Lamotrigine monotherapy was reliably associated with earlier and larger improvements than valproate in mood assessed with the Beck Depression Inventory, the Cornell Dysthymia Rating Scale, and the Profile of Mood States. Considered in the context of other data showing lamotrigine's antidepressant efficacy in bipolar depression, these results suggest that lamotrigine improves mood in mildly depressed patients with epilepsy. Lamotrigine may be particularly useful in treating epilepsy patients with comorbid depression, the most common psychiatric illness in epilepsy.

An open longitudinal study of patients with bipolar rapid cycling treated with lithium or lamotrigine for mood stabilization

OBJECTIVES

Patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder are frequently observed to fail conventional treatment. We conducted a preliminary study to explore the potential efficacy of lamotrigine in the treatment of this refractory patient population.

METHODS

In an open longitudinal investigation, 14 patients with rapid cycling bipolar disorder were treated for 1 year with either lithium or lamotrigine as mood stabilizer.

RESULTS

Out of the seven patients with lithium, three out of seven (43%) had less than four and four out of seven (57%) had four or more episodes. In the lamotrigine group, six out of seven (86%) had less than four and one out of seven (14%) had more than four affective episodes (depressive, manic, hypomanic or mixed). In fact, three out of seven (43%) of the patients who were on lamotrigine therapy were without any further affective episodes. There was no evidence of a preferential antidepressant versus antimanic efficacy.

CONCLUSIONS

Although the study is limited by the small number of patients, the results are in line with other investigations, suggesting efficacy for lamotrigine and a suboptimal response for lithium in rapid cycling bipolar disorder. These preliminary data need to be confirmed with controlled double blind studies.

Lamotrigine for the treatment of bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

To describe the available data regarding the clinical efficacy of lamotrigine for the treatment of bipolar disorder.

SUMMARY

Anticonvulsants have emerged as alternative mood-stabilizing agents for patients with bipolar disorder who do not respond to lithium. Data regarding the efficacy of lamotrigine have been generated primarily from case reports, small open trials, and one large, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. These reports suggest that lamotrigine may be effective for the management of bipolar disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Although current data are limited, treatment-refractory patients with bipolar disorder may benefit from lamotrigine therapy. Several studies are currently underway to determine the appropriate role of lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar disorder.

Bipolarity in children

Childhood and adolescent bipolar disorder have been less studied than adult onset bipolar illness. However, case reports of mania in childhood can be found as early as the mid 19th century. Historically, several factors have made the accurate diagnosis of bipolar disorder in childhood difficult: clinical bias against the diagnosis of mania in children; low base rate of disorder; symptom overlap between bipolar disorder and other more prevalent childhood-onset psychiatric disorders; and developmental constraints and variability in clinical presentation. The epidemiology of juvenile-onset bipolar disorder remains an open topic for research. The disorder appears to increase in prevalence with advancing age until young adulthood. Reported phenomenology of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents indicates a highly variable presentation with a developmental trend towards increased resemblance to the adult phenotype with increasing age of onset. Diagnostic accuracy for the disorder is improved by adherence to diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM) criteria and may be aided by structured or semistructured diagnostic interviews. The course of bipolar disorder in children and adolescents has also received limited systematic study. However, research to date supports a clinical picture of a relapsing, recurrent illness with substantial morbidity. Systematic studies of pharmacologic treatments of acute mania in children and adolescents are limited in number and scope. Clinical justification for the use of acute antimanic treatments such as lithium and valproic acid is still based upon studies conducted in adults. There remains an immediate and significant need for additional research into all aspects of juvenile-onset bipolar disorder.

The nature and management of mania in old age

Mania in old age represents a syndrome involving affective vulnerability in association with neurologic lesions that affect specific areas of the brain. Most patients suffering from mania in late life have converted to bipolarity later in life after many years and often repeated episodes of depression or else have developed mania in association with specific neurologic insults, particularly cerebrovascular disease (vascular mania). The outcome is generally worse in mania than in depression with higher prevalence of cognitive dysfunction, persistent symptoms, and greater mortality. The management of elderly bipolar patients with mood stabilizers reflects the experience with a mixed age population primarily involving the use of lithium carbonate and valproate in appropriately adjusted dosages and serum levels, with valproate having an edge on better tolerability. The use of neuroleptics is often unavoidable in initial stabilization, and electroconvulsive therapy can be life-saving in severely overactive or refractory patients.

Lamotrigine in the treatment of bipolar depression

Several case reports and open studies have reported the efficacy of lamotrigine in bipolar depression. A randomised placebo-controlled 7-week study comparing two doses of lamotrigine with placebo in 195 patients with moderate to severe bipolar depression has now been completed. Lamotrigine was superior to placebo after 3 weeks as assessed by changes in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS). A response, defined as more than 50% improvement on the MADRS occurred in 56 and 48% of the lamotrigine 200 and 50 mg/day groups, respectively, compared with 29% for placebo (P<0.05). There was no evidence that lamotrigine destabilised mood or precipitated mania. Tolerability was good and there were no cases of serious rashes. Preliminary results from an ongoing study also indicate that lamotrigine is more effective than gabapentin in bipolar depression. In conclusion, lamotrigine is effective in alleviating bipolar depression, without causing mood destabilisation. Slow dosage escalation yields good tolerability.

Lamotrigine--an effective mood stabilizer?

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature regarding the use of lamotrigine as a mood stabilizer, and to discuss its efficacy in treating this condition.

DATA SOURCES

Data were obtained from MEDLINE, Micromedex, and Cochrane collaboration searches from January 1985 to July 1998.

DATA SUMMARY

There are insufficient data to confirm that lamotrigine is an effective mood stabilizer. There are no controlled studies, and the current evidence is from case studies and open trials. Furthermore, only one study shows any evidence of effectiveness in the manic phase, although this may be because the data tend to relate to a treatment-refractory population.

CONCLUSIONS

From the current evidence, lamotrigine cannot be recommended as a mood stabilizer except when conventional therapies have failed.

Use of topiramate, a new anti-epileptic as a mood stabilizer

RATIONALE

Because some anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs) are effective in bipolar affective disorders, the new AED topiramate (TPM) may be effective in psychiatric illnesses. TPM was evaluated in mood disorders refractory to previous therapies including newer AEDs.

METHODS

Charts of 58 consecutive patients, 39 outpatients (15 males, 24 females) and 19 inpatients (6 males, 13 females) were reviewed. TPM 25 mg. b.i.d. was added to existing therapy and titrated in 50 mg increments every 3-7 days. Improvement was rated on a Likert global assessment scale of marked, moderate, mild, or no improvement or worse, based on quality of sleep, appetite, mood, and concentration.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients with psychiatric disorders, 44 patients had rapid cycling bipolar disorders characterized by manic, hypomanic, or mixed episodes. Eighteen patients had previously failed to respond to lamotrigine and/or gabapentin in addition to conventional mood stabilizers. Fourteen were Bipolar I, six Bipolar II, and seven mixed, ten patients had cyclothymic disorder, seven had bipolar disorder not otherwise specified. Of the remaining 14 patients, nine had schizoaffective disorder, three patients had dementia and two had psychosis. Mean duration of TPM treatment was 16.0 weeks; mean TPM dosage approximately 200 mg/day. Thirty-six of 58 (62%) patients exhibited marked or moderate improvement, usually within days or weeks. Twenty-three of 44 (52%) patients with bipolar affective disorders showed marked or moderate improvement. Minimal/no improvement was observed in 16; six were rated as worse. Adverse events included delirium in one patient with Bipolar Disorder Type I who overmedicated with TPM (800 mg) and tranylcypromine sulfate (170 mg) combined with alcohol. Other adverse effects were minor and included: paresthesias, somnolence, fatigue, impaired concentration and memory, nausea, and diarrhoea.

LIMITATIONS

This study was performed in a nonrandom open and retrospective fashion. Therefore, any findings are limited by the design of this study.

CONCLUSION

TPM may be useful in patients with mood disorders unresponsive to traditional therapy and warrants further clinical investigation.