|
1
|
Ashby NE. Donation After Cardiac Death: Origins, Current State, and New Directions. Adv Anesth 2023; 41:225-238. [PMID: 38251620 DOI: 10.1016/j.aan.2023.06.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Donation after cardiac death (DCD) is a growing source of organs for transplantation. DCD can be challenging to understand due to variations in practice. DCD also holds great potential for ethical compromise making it uncomfortable for many practitioners. This article traces the origin of DCD from the beginnings of organ transplant and lays out the general pattern of the process before touching on advances to this rapidly changing field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathan E Ashby
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, 1211 21st Avenue South, MAB Suite 422, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Jochmans I, Hessheimer AJ, Neyrinck AP, Paredes D, Bellini MI, Dark JH, Kimenai HJAN, Pengel LHM, Watson CJE. Consensus statement on normothermic regional perfusion in donation after circulatory death: report from the European Society for Organ Transplantation's Transplant Learning Journey. Transpl Int 2021; 34:2019-2030. [PMID: 34145644 DOI: 10.1111/tri.13951] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) in donation after circulatory death (DCD) is a safe alternative to in situ cooling and rapid procurement. An increasing number of countries and centres are performing NRP, a technically and logistically challenging procedure. This consensus document provides evidence-based recommendations on the use of NRP in uncontrolled and controlled DCDs. It also offers minimal ethical, logistical and technical requirements that form the foundation of a safe and effective NRP programme. The present article is based on evidence and opinions formulated by a panel of European experts of Workstream 04 of the Transplantation Learning Journey project, which is part of the European Society for Organ Transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina Jochmans
- Transplantation Research Group, Department of Microbiology, Immunology, and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Abdominal Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Amelia J Hessheimer
- Department of General & Digestive Surgery, Institut Clínic de Malalties Digestives i Metabòliques (ICMDM), Hospital Clínic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arne P Neyrinck
- Anesthesiology and Algology, Department of Cardiovascular Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.,Department of Anesthesiology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - David Paredes
- Donation and Transplant Coordination Unit, Hospital Clínic Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maria Irene Bellini
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, Rome, Italy
| | - John H Dark
- Translational and Clinical Research Institute, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK
| | - Hendrikus J A N Kimenai
- Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Liset H M Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, Nuffield Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Christopher J E Watson
- University of Cambridge, Department of Surgery, Addenbrooke's Hospital, NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, Cambridge, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Abstract
More than 50 years after the publication of the Harvard Committee Report that sought to define death according to whole-brain function criteria, this document continues to generate a diversity of opinions regarding how death should be defined. The various perspectives show that doubts linger regarding when brain death should be diagnosed, the criteria to pinpoint the occurrence of death, and the alignment of medical practices seeking to establish human death with these criteria. This study reviews and assesses three perspectives that have made significant contributions to the debate. Attention is also given to definitions of death that depart from the recommendations of the Harvard Report. Appraisals of various arguments lead to the conclusion that changes in the definition of death have resulted from advances in knowledge of human biology, medical technology and diagnostic techniques. A commentary is included on expediting the time of death with the view of organ donation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francis J O'Keeffe
- School of Medicine, Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Darlinghurst, Australia
| | - George L Mendz
- School of Medicine, Sydney, The University of Notre Dame Australia, Darlinghurst, Australia
| |
Collapse
|