Primary Tumor Site, Size, Patients Age and Axillary Lymph Nodes in Breast Cancers

The value of level III clearance in patients with axillary and sentinel node positive breast cancer

BACKGROUND

The value of level III axillary clearance is contentious, with great variance worldwide in the extent and levels of clearance performed.

OBJECTIVE

To determine rates of level III positivity in patients undergoing level I-III axillary clearance, and identify which patients are at highest risk of involved level III nodes.

METHODS

From a database of 2850 patients derived from symptomatic and population-based screening service, 1179 patients who underwent level I-III clearance between the years 1999-2007 were identified. The pathology, surgical details, and prior sentinel nodes biopsies of patients were recorded.

RESULTS

Eleven hundred seventy nine patients had level I-III axillary clearance. Of the patients, 63% (n = 747) were node positive. Of patients with node positive disease, 23% (n = 168) were level II positive and 19% (n = 141) were level III positive. Two hundred fifty patients had positive sentinel node biopsies prior to axillary clearance. Of these, 12% (n = 30) and 9% (n = 22) were level II and level III positive, respectively. On multivariate analysis, factors predictive of level III involvement in patients with node positive disease were tumor size (P < 0.001, OR = 1.36; 95% CI: 1.2-1.5), invasive lobular disease (P < 0.001, OR = 3.6; 95% CI: 1.9-6.95), extranodal extension (P < 0.001, OR = 0.27; 95% CI: 0.18-0.4), and lymphovascular invasion (P = 0.04, OR = 0.58; 95% CI: 0.35-1). Lobular invasive disease (P = 0.049, OR = 4.1; 95% CI: 1-16.8), extranodal spread (P = 0.003, OR = 0.18; 95% CI: 0.06-0.57), and having more than one positive sentinel node (P = 0.009, OR = 4.9; 95% CI: 1.5-16.1) were predictive of level III involvement in patients with sentinel node positive disease.

CONCLUSION

Level III clearance has a selective but definite role to play in patients who have node positive breast carcinoma. Pathological characteristics of the primary tumor are of particular use in identifying those who are at various risk of level III nodal involvement.

Lymphatic invasion, tumor size, and age are independent predictors of axillary lymph node metastases in women with T1 breast cancers

OBJECTIVE

To identify characteristics of the primary tumor highly associated with lymph node metastases.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Recent enthusiasm for limiting axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) in women with breast cancer may increase the likelihood that nodal metastases will be missed. Identification of characteristics of primary tumors predictive of lymph node metastases may prompt a more extensive surgical and pathologic search for metastases in patients with negative sentinel lymph nodes or limited ALND.

METHODS

The authors studied 850 consecutive patients who underwent ALND for T1 breast cancer. Age, tumor size, histopathologic diagnosis, tumor differentiation, presence of lymphatic invasion, and estrogen and progesterone receptor results were studied prospectively. Stepwise logistic regression was used to identify variables independently associated with axillary lymph node metastases.

RESULTS

Lymphatic invasion, tumor size, and age were independently associated with lymph node metastases. Fifty-one percent of the 181 patients with lymphatic invasion had axillary lymph node metastases, compared with 19% of the 669 patients without lymphatic invasion. Thirty-five percent of the 470 patients with tumors >1 cm had nodal involvement compared with 13% of the 380 patients with smaller cancers. Thirty-seven percent of the 63 women younger than age 40 had lymph node involvement compared with 25% of the 787 women older than age 40. Significant correlations were noted between lymphatic invasion and patient age and between lymphatic invasion and tumor size. The proportion of tumors with lymphatic invasion decreased progressively with increasing age and increased with increasing tumor size.

CONCLUSIONS

Axillary lymph node metastases are most significantly related to lymphatic invasion in the primary tumor, followed, in order of significance, by tumor size and patient age. Axillary nodal metastases should be suspected in the presence of lymphatic invasion of large tumors in young patients.

Prognostic role of lymph-node level involvement in patients undergoing axillary dissection for breast cancer

AIMS

Clinical records of patients undergoing surgery for breast cancer were reviewed in order to evaluate the prognostic role of lymph-node level involvement.

METHODS

From 1982 to 1991, 1143 patients had radical mastectomy or conservative surgery with total axillary dissection: 461 patients of mean age 57.1 years (range: 25-89 years) were lymph-node positive (pN1); 369 patients (80%) had radical mastectomy; and 92 patients (20%) had conservative treatment plus post-operative radiotherapy, with the same mean number (n = 16) of lymph nodes collected in the surgical specimen. Data were analysed for the number of positive lymph nodes and level of involvement.

RESULTS

Level I, Levels I + II and Levels I + II + III were involved in 44.9, 18 and 21.4% of patients, respectively; 'skip metastases' occurred in 72 of 461 pN1 patients (15.5%). A univariate analysis showed that prognosis was directly related to the number of levels involved (P < 0.001), and skip metastases had the same prognostic role as Level I involvement. The numbers of involved lymph-node levels and metastatic lymph nodes were well correlated; multivariate analysis showed that involvement of Levels I and III was independently correlated with prognosis. After adjustment for age and number of positive lymph nodes, the number of involved lymph-node levels was an independent prognostic factor, with highest predictability when all three lymph-node levels were positive (P = 0.009).

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic value of lymph-node status should be defined not only by the number of metastatic lymph nodes, but also by the number of levels of involvement.

Modern thoughts on lymph nodes in breast cancer

Axillary lymph node status remains the single most useful prognostic parameter in breast cancer patients. As clinical examination, imaging techniques, and lymph node sampling methods cannot accurately assess the axillary node involvement, a complete axillary dissection should always be performed. Moreover, this technique provides an excellent treatment modality for regional disease, abolishing the need for radiotherapy to the axilla. The status of the internal mammary lymph nodes is of less importance in the management of the breast cancer patient.