Pediatric Palliative Care Program Implementation in LMICs: A Systematic Review using SWOT Analysis

CONTEXT

Of the estimated 21 million children world-wide who need access to pediatric palliative care (PPC), about 97% currently reside in low-and middle-income countries (LMIC). Access to PPC programs in LMIC are limited, and successful strategies and barriers to program implementation remain understudied.

OBJECTIVES

We conducted a systematic review to characterize the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) of PPC program implementation in LMIC.

METHODS

Using PRISMA guidelines, we searched key databases from inception to April 2022 and reviewed references manually. Eligible abstracts and articles included content related to composition, role, function, purpose, development, or implementation of PPC programs in LMIC.

RESULTS

From 7,846 titles and abstracts and 229 full-text articles, we identified 62 eligible abstracts and articles; 16 articles were added following manual searching of references, resulting in 78 items (28 abstracts, 50 articles). A total of 82 unique programs were described, including nine from low-income, 27 from lower-middle income, and 44 from upper-middle income countries. Common strengths included presence of multidisciplinary teams and psychosocial care. Common weaknesses included lack of PPC training and research infrastructure. Common opportunities involved collaboration between institutions, government support, and growth of PPC education. Common threats comprised limited access to PPC services, medications, and other resources.

CONCLUSION

PPC programs are being successfully implemented in resource limited settings. Hospice and palliative medicine organizations should sponsor PPC clinicians to describe and disseminate more detailed descriptions of successes and challenges with program implementation to help build and grow further PPC initiatives in LMICs.

Pediatric palliative care in sub-saharan Africa: a systematic review of the evidence for care models, interventions, and outcomes

CONTEXT

The progressive disease burden among children in sub-Saharan Africa means the provision of palliative care is essential and should be provided alongside treatment where it is available.

OBJECTIVES

To systematically review the evidence for pediatric palliative care models, interventions, and outcomes to appraise the state of the science and inform best practice.

METHODS

A systematic review search strategy was implemented in eight electronic databases, the search results reported using a PRISMA statement, and findings tabulated.

RESULTS

In terms of evidence of palliative care provision and outcomes, only five articles were identified. These represent a small range of acute, community, and hospice care and offer some limited guidance on the development and delivery of services.

CONCLUSION

Pediatric palliative care is a pressing clinical and public health challenge in sub-Saharan Africa. Explicit evidence-based models of service development, patient assessment, and evidence for control of prevalent problems (physical, psychological, social, spiritual, and developmental) are urgently needed. Greater research activity is urgently required to ensure an evidence-based response to the enormous need for pediatric palliative care in sub-Saharan Africa.

Pediatric palliative care provision around the world: a systematic review

Pediatric palliative care is recommended by many organizations. Yet, there is no information available on the progress that has been made in providing this care or the gaps that still exist in provision around the world. We conducted a systematic review to address this gap in knowledge. The systematic review identified 117 peer-reviewed and non-peer reviewed resources. Based on this information, each country was assigned a level of provision; 65.6% of countries had no known activities, 18.8% had capacity building activities, 9.9% had localized provision, and 5.7% had provision that was reaching mainstream providers. Understanding the geographic distribution in the level of provision is crucial for policy makers and funders.

Partnerships between pediatric palliative care and psychiatry

Children with life-threatening illnesses and their families may face physical, emotional, psychosocial, and spiritual challenges throughout the children's course of illness. Pediatric palliative care is designed to meet such challenges. Given the psychosocial and emotional needs of children and their families it is clear that psychiatrists can, and do, play a role in delivering pediatric palliative care. In this article the partnership between pediatric palliative care and psychiatry is explored. The authors present an overview of pediatric palliative care followed by a summary of some of the roles for psychiatry. Two innovative pediatric palliative care programs that psychiatrists may or may not be aware of are described. Finally, some challenges that are faced in further developing this partnership and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Effect of a pediatric palliative care program on nurses' referral preferences

PURPOSE

Florida was the first state to develop and implement a publicly funded pediatric palliative care program, which provides supportive care services to children and families from the point of diagnosis onward. Nurses employed by the Florida Department of Health, Children's Medical Services Network (CMSN) play an important role in this program as they are charged with identifying children with life-limiting illnesses in their caseloads for referral to the program. This study aims to estimate the differtences in referral preferences of nurses who work in Partners in Care: Together for Kids (PIC:TFK) program areas versus nurses who work in non-PIC:TFK areas.

METHODS

Mail and Web-based surveys were conducted with 279 nurses, 141 of whom work in a PIC:TFK site and 138 did not.

RESULTS

Results of the multivariate analyses suggest that few significant differences exist in the nurse's preferences to refer children to pediatric palliative care; however, there were significant differences in the preferred timing of referral. Nurses who work in an PIC:TFK area were 3.7 to 10.4 times as likely as nurses who do not work in a PIC:TFK area to refer children prior to the end of life.

CONCLUSION

Our study provides evidence that nurses who have experience with a pediatric palliative care program are more likely to refer children to programs before the end of life. While our study results are encouraging, they also suggest that as the PIC:TFK program expands nurse training will be essential for equitable and appropriate referrals across a diverse set of illnesses.