Reference Citation Analysis: Find an Article, Find a Category, Find a Journal, Find a Scholar

For: Zhenyang G, Nainong L, Xiaoxiong W, Maihong W, Xiaorui F, Zhao W, Hanyun R, Yuhang L, Xiaofan L, Yamei W, Yao L, Mingzhi Z, Yini W, Daihong L, Yujun D, Liangding H, Wenrong H. Myeloablative Haploidentical Transplant as an Alternative to Matched Sibling Transplant for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas. Cell Transplant 2021;30:963689721999615. [PMID: 33745341 PMCID: PMC7989122 DOI: 10.1177/0963689721999615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open

For:	Zhenyang G, Nainong L, Xiaoxiong W, Maihong W, Xiaorui F, Zhao W, Hanyun R, Yuhang L, Xiaofan L, Yamei W, Yao L, Mingzhi Z, Yini W, Daihong L, Yujun D, Liangding H, Wenrong H. Myeloablative Haploidentical Transplant as an Alternative to Matched Sibling Transplant for Peripheral T-Cell Lymphomas. Cell Transplant 2021;30:963689721999615. [PMID: 33745341 PMCID: PMC7989122 DOI: 10.1177/0963689721999615] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open

Number	Cited by Other Article(s)
1	Hamadani M, Ngoya M, Sureda A, Bashir Q, Litovich CA, Finel H, Chen Y, Boumendil A, Zain J, Castagna L, Cashen AF, Blaise D, Shadman M, Pastano R, Khimani F, Arat M, Dietrich S, Schmitz N, Glass B, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Corradini P, Sauter CS, Montoto S, Kwon M, Herrera AF, Dreger P. Outcome of Allogeneic Transplantation for Mature T-cell Lymphomas: Impact of Donor Source and Disease Characteristics. Blood Adv 2021:bloodadvances. [PMID: 34861680 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open Abstract OS (3-year) of patients with TCL getting haplo-HCT or MSD, MUD TCD+, or MUD TCD− allo-HCT was 60%, 63%, 59%, and 64%, respectively. PFS (3-year) of patients with TCL getting haplo-HCT or MSD, MUD TCD+, or MUD TCD− allo-HCT is 50%, 50%, 48%, and 52%, respectively. Mature T-cell lymphomas constitute the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) of all lymphomas. Large studies evaluating contemporary outcomes of allo-HCT in mature T-cell lymphomas relative to commonly used donor sources are not available. Included in this registry study were adult patients who had undergone allo-HCT for anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), or peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) between 2008 and 2018. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) platforms compared were posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based haploidentical (haplo-)HCT, matched sibling donor (MSD) HCT, matched unrelated donor HCT with in vivo T-cell depletion (MUD TCD+), and matched unrelated donor HCT without in vivo T-cell depletion (MUD TCD−). Coprimary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and relapse/progression incidence (RI). A total of 1942 patients were eligible (237 haplo-HCT; 911 MSD; 468 MUD TCD+; 326 MUD TCD−). Cohorts were comparable for baseline characteristics with the exception of higher proportions of patients with decreased performance status (PS) and marrow graft recipients in the haplo-HCT group. Using univariate and multivariate comparisons, OS, PFS, RI, and NRM were not significantly different among the haplo-HCT, MSD, MUD TCD+, and MUD TCD− cohorts, with 3-year OS and PFS of 60%, 63%, 59%, and 64%, respectively, and 50%, 50%, 48%, and 52%, respectively. Significant predictors of inferior OS and PFS on multivariate analysis were active disease status at HCT and decreased PS. AITL was associated with significantly reduced relapse risk and better PFS compared with PTCL-NOS. Allo-HCT can provide durable PFS in patients with mature T-cell lymphoma (TCL). Outcomes of haplo-HCT were comparable to those of matched donor allo-HCT. Collapse Key Words Collapse MESH Headings Collapse Grants Collapse Affiliation(s) Collapse

Number

Cited by Other Article(s)

Hamadani M, Ngoya M, Sureda A, Bashir Q, Litovich CA, Finel H, Chen Y, Boumendil A, Zain J, Castagna L, Cashen AF, Blaise D, Shadman M, Pastano R, Khimani F, Arat M, Dietrich S, Schmitz N, Glass B, Kharfan-Dabaja MA, Corradini P, Sauter CS, Montoto S, Kwon M, Herrera AF, Dreger P. Outcome of Allogeneic Transplantation for Mature T-cell Lymphomas: Impact of Donor Source and Disease Characteristics. Blood Adv 2021:bloodadvances. [PMID: 34861680 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2021005899] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open

Abstract

OS (3-year) of patients with TCL getting haplo-HCT or MSD, MUD TCD+, or MUD TCD− allo-HCT was 60%, 63%, 59%, and 64%, respectively.

PFS (3-year) of patients with TCL getting haplo-HCT or MSD, MUD TCD+, or MUD TCD− allo-HCT is 50%, 50%, 48%, and 52%, respectively.

Mature T-cell lymphomas constitute the most common indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT) of all lymphomas. Large studies evaluating contemporary outcomes of allo-HCT in mature T-cell lymphomas relative to commonly used donor sources are not available. Included in this registry study were adult patients who had undergone allo-HCT for anaplastic large cell lymphoma, angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL), or peripheral T-cell lymphoma not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS) between 2008 and 2018. Hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) platforms compared were posttransplant cyclophosphamide-based haploidentical (haplo-)HCT, matched sibling donor (MSD) HCT, matched unrelated donor HCT with in vivo T-cell depletion (MUD TCD+), and matched unrelated donor HCT without in vivo T-cell depletion (MUD TCD−). Coprimary end points were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary end points included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), and relapse/progression incidence (RI). A total of 1942 patients were eligible (237 haplo-HCT; 911 MSD; 468 MUD TCD+; 326 MUD TCD−). Cohorts were comparable for baseline characteristics with the exception of higher proportions of patients with decreased performance status (PS) and marrow graft recipients in the haplo-HCT group. Using univariate and multivariate comparisons, OS, PFS, RI, and NRM were not significantly different among the haplo-HCT, MSD, MUD TCD+, and MUD TCD− cohorts, with 3-year OS and PFS of 60%, 63%, 59%, and 64%, respectively, and 50%, 50%, 48%, and 52%, respectively. Significant predictors of inferior OS and PFS on multivariate analysis were active disease status at HCT and decreased PS. AITL was associated with significantly reduced relapse risk and better PFS compared with PTCL-NOS. Allo-HCT can provide durable PFS in patients with mature T-cell lymphoma (TCL). Outcomes of haplo-HCT were comparable to those of matched donor allo-HCT.

Collapse