Can mechanism of injury improve trauma diversion? A retrospective cross-sectional study

Objective:

The objective of this study was to determine the impact of adding selected mechanism of injury (MOI) to the existing trauma diversion criteria adopted in Hong Kong.

Method:

This is a cross-sectional study based on the trauma registry of New Territory West Cluster (NTWC) of Hospital Authority from January 2017 to December 2019. All adult patients aged 18 years or above were recruited if their injury occurred in the catchment area of Pok Oi Hospital (POH) or Tin Shui Wai Hospital (TSWH). Performance of the protocol before and after MOI criteria being added in terms of over-diversion and under-diversion rate was determined. Model discrimination was evaluated by plotting the receiver operating characteristic curve, and the area under the curve was compared before and after MOI criteria added. Net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement indices were evaluated.

Result:

A total of 502 patients were included for analysis. Before MOI criteria were added, the over-diversion rate and under-diversion rate were 31.1% and 54.7%, respectively. After MOI criteria were added, the over-diversion rate and under-diversion rate were 33.1% and 34.3%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic curve of current primary trauma diversion (PTD) criteria had an area under the curve of 66.9% (95% confidence interval: 63%–71%). After adding MOI criteria, the new receiver operating characteristic curve yielded an area under the curve of 73.7% (95% confidence interval: 70%–78%), which is significantly better (p < 0.001). Net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement indices indicated that including MOI criteria would improve the model prediction.

Conclusion:

Adding mechanism of injury can improve trauma diversion protocol performance.

Major trauma care in Hong Kong and Germany: a trauma registry data benchmark study

BACKGROUND

Trauma remains a leading cause of death and effective trauma management within a well-developed trauma system has been shown to reduce morbidity and mortality. A trauma registry, as an integral part of a mature trauma system, can be used to monitor the quality of trauma care and to provide a means to compare local versus international standards. Hong Kong and Germany both have highly developed health care services. We compared the performance of trauma systems including outcomes among major trauma victims (ISS > 15) over a 3-year period (2013-2015) in both settings using trauma registry data.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data from trauma registries in Hong Kong and Germany. Data from 01/2013 to 12/2015 were extracted from the trauma registries of the five trauma centers in Hong Kong and the TraumaRegister DGU^® (TR-DGU). The study cohort included adults (≥ 18 years) with major trauma (ISS > 15). Data related to patient characteristics, nature of the injury, prognostic parameters to calculate the RISC II score, outcomes and clinical management were collected and compared.

RESULTS

Datasets from 1,864 Hong Kong and 10,952 German trauma victims were retrieved from respective trauma registries. The unadjusted mortality in Hong Kong (22.4%) was higher compared to Germany (19.2%); the difference between observed and expected mortality was higher in Hong Kong (+ 2.7%) than in Germany (- 0.5%). The standardized mortality ratio (SMR) in Hong Kong and Germany were 1.138 (95% CI 1.033-1.252) and 0.974 (95% CI 0.933-1.016), respectively, and the adjusted death rate in Hong Kong was significantly higher compared to the calculated RISC II data. However, patients in Hong Kong were significantly older, had more pre-trauma co-morbidities, more head injuries, shorter hospital and ICU stays and lower ICU admission rates.

CONCLUSION

Hong Kong had a higher mortality rate and a statistically significantly higher standardized mortality ratio (SMR) after RISC II adjustment. However, multiple differences existed between trauma systems and patient characteristics.

A Comparison Between Differently Skilled Prehospital Emergency Care Providers in Major-Incident Triage in South Africa

IntroductionMajor-incident triage ensures effective emergency care and utilization of resources. Prehospital emergency care providers are often the first medical professionals to arrive at any major incident and should be competent in primary triage. However, various factors (including level of training) influence their triage performance.Hypothesis/ProblemThe aim of this study was to determine the difference in major-incident triage performance between different training levels of prehospital emergency care providers in South Africa utilizing the Triage Sieve algorithm.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study involving differently trained prehospital providers: Advanced Life Support (ALS); Intermediate Life Support (ILS); and Basic Life Support (BLS). Participants wrote a validated 20-question pre-test before completing major-incident training. Two post-tests were also completed: a 20-question written test and a three-question face-to-face evaluation. Outcomes measured were triage accuracy and duration of triage. The effect of level of training, gender, age, previous major-incident training, and duration of service were determined.

RESULTS

A total of 129 prehospital providers participated. The mean age was 33.4 years and 65 (50.4%) were male. Most (n=87; 67.4%) were BLS providers. The overall correct triage score pre-training was 53.9% (95% CI, 51.98 to 55.83), over-triage 31.4% (95% CI, 29.66 to 33.2), and under-triage 13.8% (95% CI, 12.55 to 12.22). Post-training, the overall correct triage score increased to 63.6% (95% CI, 61.72 to 65.44), over-triage decreased to 17.9% (95% CI, 16.47 to 19.43), and under-triage increased to 17.8% (95% CI, 16.40 to 19.36). The ALS providers had both the highest likelihood of a correct triage score post-training (odds ratio 1.21; 95% CI, 0.96-1.53) and the shortest duration of triage (median three seconds, interquartile range two to seven seconds; P=.034). Participants with prior major-incident training performed better (P=.001).

CONCLUSION

Accuracy of major-incident triage across all levels of prehospital providers in South Africa is less than optimal with non-significant differences post-major-incident training. Prior major-incident training played a significant role in triage accuracy indicating that training should be an ongoing process. Although ALS providers were the quickest to complete triage, this difference was not clinically significant. The BLS and ILS providers with major-incident training can thus be utilized for primary major-incident triage allowing ALS providers to focus on more clinical roles. AlenyoAN, SmithWP, McCaulM, Van HovingDJ. A comparison between differently skilled prehospital emergency care providers in major-incident triage in South Africa. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2018;33(6):575-580.

Over-Triage in Casevac Categorisation is Common in Hong Kong

Objective

To review the categorisation of patients who were transferred out from out-lying islands to urban hospitals utilising casualty evacuation (CASEVAC), and to search for possible patient characteristics which might have contributed to mis-categorisation during the ‘non-flying’ hours.

Methods

The medical records of 459 patients, who were transferred out in the year 2009 were reviewed. Correctness of categorisation was determined by 2 independent assessors according to the CASEVAC guidelines. The rates of mis-categorisation between ‘clinic hours’ and ‘AED hours’, and that between the ‘flying’ and ‘non-flying’ hours, were compared. The patients' demographic data and their presenting symptoms were collected and analysed using logistic regression models to identify factors contributing to mis-categorisation.

Results

The mis-categorisation rate was 60.1%. Among them, all were over-categorised. The over-categorisation rates between ‘clinic hours’ and ‘AED hours’, and between ‘flying’ and ‘non-flying’ hours, were not significantly different (p=0.07 and 0.09, respectively). Abnormal pulse rate was significantly associated with over-categorisation (p<0.01). Patients at extremes of age and psychiatric/drunk patients were significantly less likely to be over-categorised (p<0.05 and p<0.01, respectively). There was 20% disagreement between the two assessors when applying the existing CASEVACs guidelines (kappa score 0.58 or ‘moderate agreement’).

Conclusions

Over-triage in CASEVAC categorisation is common irrespective of the time of day. Revision of the current CASEVAC guidelines is recommended. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2013; 20:327-336)

Clinical Outcomes of Trauma Patients after Implementation of a Standardised Diversion Protocol for Trauma Patients in Two Regional Hospitals in Hong Kong

Introduction

Despite recent advance in prehospital trauma diversion, patients are triaged to the nearest medical facility before transferred to designated trauma centre. A new standardised diversion protocol for trauma patients was implemented on 1st April 2011 to facilitate trauma care. Severely-injured patients were transferred to designated trauma centre directly from emergency department of the regional hospital after initial resuscitation.

Objective

This study was undertaken to examine clinical outcomes of trauma patients after implementation of the new standardised diversion protocol for trauma patients in the emergency department.

Method

This was a before-and-after interventional study on trauma patients presenting to the emergency department in critical or emergency conditions during the study period from 1st April 2011 to 31st March 2012. Patients presented in the two-year period before implementation of the trauma protocol were used as historical control. Medical records of eligible cases were reviewed. Main outcome measures were 30-day mortality, length of hospital stay and time to definitive care. Mortality data was compared with oversea standard by TRISS methodology.

Results

There were 153 eligible patients in the study group and 355 in the historical control group. After new arrangement of trauma diversion, W-statistics improves from -1.26 to 0.09. Z-statistics was -2.03 before and 0.09 after implementation. M-statistics were 0.91 before and 0.88 after the new protocol. Mean time to definitive care was shortened by 33.4 minutes in the subgroup who were transferred to trauma centre after trauma team activation (p=0.005).

Conclusion

A trend of improved outcomes and shorter time to definitive care are observed after implementation of the new trauma diversion protocol. (Hong Kong j.emerg.med. 2015;22:201-209)

Performance of a prehospital trauma diversion system in Hong Kong, China

PURPOSE

To evaluate the performance of a prehospital trauma diversion system in Hong Kong, China.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data in the trauma registry of Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2013 was done. All adult patients aged 18 years or above, either primarily or secondarily diverted to Queen Mary Hospital according to the trauma patient diversion protocol, were recruited. Need for trauma center level of care was based on a consensus-based criterion standard published in 2014. Performance of the protocol in terms of over- diversion and under-diversion was determined.

RESULTS

A total of 209 patients were included for analysis. About 30% of the patients required trauma center level of care. The most common reason was the need for vascular, neurologic, abdominal, thoracic, pelvic, spine or limb-conserving surgery within 24 h of presentation. The over-diversion rate and under- diversion rate were 69.6% and 19.7% respectively.

CONCLUSION

The trauma patient diversion protocol currently in use in Hong Kong is not accurate enough. Further revision and refinement is needed.

Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation in Hong Kong: A Review of Practice and Research

Background. The rising public health concern regarding traumatic brain injury (TBI) implies a growing need for rehabilitation services for patients surviving TBI. Methods. To this end, this paper reviews the practices and research on TBI rehabilitation in Hong Kong so as to inform future developments in this area. This paper begins by introducing the general situation of TBI patients in Hong Kong and the need for rehabilitation. Next, the trauma system in Hong Kong is introduced. Following that is a detailed description of the rehabilitation services for TBI patients in Hong Kong, as exemplified by a rehabilitation hospital in Hong Kong. This paper will also review intervention studies on rehabilitating brain-injured populations in Hong Kong with respect to various rehabilitation goals. Lastly, the implications of culture-related issues will be discussed in relation to TBI. Results/Conclusions. The intervention studies conducted in Hong Kong are generally successful in achieving various rehabilitative outcomes. Additionally, certain cultural-related issues, such as the stigma associated with TBI, may impede the rehabilitative process and lead to various psychosocial problems.