Three-Dimensional Computer-Assisted Single-Splint 2-Jaw Cleft Orthognathic Surgery: Toward Patient-Centered Surgical Rationale

Facial Palsy after Orthognathic Surgery: Incidence, Causative Mechanism, Management, and Outcome

BACKGROUND

Facial palsy after orthognathic surgery is an uncommon but serious complication causing dissatisfaction and affecting quality of life. The occurrence could be underreported. Surgeons need to recognize this issue regarding the incidence, causative mechanism, managements, and outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective review of orthognathic surgery records between January of 1981 and May of 2022 was conducted in the authors' craniofacial center. Patients who developed facial palsy after the surgery were identified, and demographics, surgical methods, radiologic images, and photographs were collected.

RESULTS

A total of 20,953 sagittal split ramus osteotomies (SSROs) were performed in 10,478 patients. Twenty-seven patients developed facial palsy, resulting in an incidence of 0.13% per SSRO. In a comparison of SSRO technique, the Obwegeser-Dal Pont technique using osteotome for splitting had higher risk of facial palsy than the Hunsuck technique using the manual twist splitting ( P < 0.05). The severity of facial palsy was complete in 55.6% of patients and incomplete in 44.4%. All patients were treated conservatively, and 88.9% attained full recovery in a median duration of 3 months [interquartile range (IQR), 2.75 to 6 months] after surgery, whereas 11.1% attained partial recovery. Initial severity of facial palsy predicted the timing of recovery, with incomplete palsy patients having faster median recovery (3 months; IQR, 2 to 3 months) than the complete palsy patients (6 months; IQR, 4 to 6.25 months) ( P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of facial palsy after orthognathic surgery was 0.13%. Intraoperative nerve compression was the most likely causative mechanism. Conservative treatment is the mainstay of therapeutic strategy, and full functional recovery was anticipated.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, IV.

Comparison between one-jaw and two-jaw designs in virtual surgery planning for patients with class III malocclusion

Orthognathic surgery is highly effective for treating maxillomandibular discrepancies in patients with class III malocclusion. However, whether one- or two-jaw surgery should be selected remains controversial. Our study aimed to evaluate quantitative differences between one-jaw and two-jaw surgical designs. In total, 100 consecutive patients with skeletal class III malocclusion who underwent orthognathic surgery with preoperative three-dimensional simulation between August 2016 and November 2021 were recruited. Based on the same final occlusal setup, a two-jaw surgery design and two types of one-jaw design were created. In total, 400 image sets, including preoperative images and three types of surgical simulation, were measured and compared. The one-jaw mandibular setback design led to improvement in most cephalometric measurements and facial symmetry. Although the one-jaw maxillary advancement design improved the ANB angle and facial convexity, it induced maxillary protrusion and reduced facial symmetry. Compared with the other designs, the two-jaw design provided significantly closer cephalometric measurements to the normative values, better symmetry, and less occlusal cant. Overall, the two-jaw design provided a quantitatively better facial appearance in terms of symmetry, proportion, and profile. Although an optimal surgical design necessitates thorough preoperative evaluation and a shared decision-making process, two-jaw surgery can be considered for improving overall facial esthetics and harmony.

Surgery-First Orthognathic Approach for Correction of Dentofacial Deformity in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate

BACKGROUND

Although several studies have reported the advantages of the surgery-first approach for orthognathic correction of class III deformity, there is no report of the success of this approach for patients with cleft lip and palate. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to evaluate the stability and outcome of bimaxillary surgery for cleft-related dentofacial deformity using a surgery-first approach.

METHODS

Forty-one patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate who consecutively underwent Le Fort I and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies for skeletal class III deformity were included. Cone-beam computed tomographic scans before surgery, 1 week after surgery, and after orthodontic treatment were used to measure the surgical and postsurgical changes in jaw position by landmarks, and outcomes of jaw protrusion and relation, incisor angle and occlusion, and menton deviation after treatment. Self-report questionnaires regarding satisfaction with overall appearance of the face and seven facial regions were administered after treatment.

RESULTS

A clinically insignificant relapse was found in the maxilla (<1 mm) and mandible (<2 mm). There was a significant improvement in the jaw protrusion and relation, incisor angle and occlusion, and menton deviation. Responses from the self-report questionnaires completed after treatment indicated that patient satisfaction was high.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate surgical-orthodontic treatment with a surgery-first approach can successfully improve cleft-related dentofacial deformity in patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

Single-Splint, 2-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery for Correction of Facial Asymmetry: 3-Dimensional Planning and Surgical Execution

Three-dimensional (3D) planning of orthognathic surgery (OGS) improves the treatment of facial asymmetry and malocclusion, but no consensus exists among clinicians regarding technical details. This study verified the consistency of authors' workflow and strategies between 3D planning and surgical execution for facial asymmetry. This retrospective study recruited consecutive patients (n=54) with nonsyndromic facial asymmetry associated with malocclusion. The stepwise workflow included orthodontic treatment, 3D imaging-based evaluation, planning, and transferring the virtual of single-splint 2-jaw OGS to actual surgery in all patients. Seven landmark-based measurements were selected for postoperative assessment of facial symmetry. Fifty patients had no anesthetic/surgical-related episode and procedure-related complications. Others experienced wound infection (n=1), transient TMJ discomfort (n=1), and facial numbness (n=3). Two cases had minor residual asymmetry (cheek and chin, respectively), but did not request revisionary bone or soft tissue surgery. Comparisons between the planned and postoperative 3D images with quantitative measurement revealed acceptable outcome data. The results showed a significant increase in facial symmetry at 7 landmark-based postoperative measurements for both male and female. This 3D-assisted pathway of OGS permitted achievement of consistent satisfactory results in managing facial asymmetry, with low rate of complications and secondary management.

Long-term treatment outcome of patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Patients with cleft lip and palate have functional and esthetic impairment and typically require multiple interventions in their life. Long-term evaluation following a treatment protocol, especially for patients with complete bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP), is important but was rarely reported in the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on all patients with complete BCLP born between 1995 and 2002 and treated at our center. Inclusion criteria were having adequate medical records and receiving continuous multidisciplinary team care at least until 20 years of age. Exclusion criteria were lack of regular follow-up and congenital syndromic abnormalities. The medical records and photos were reviewed, and facial bone development was evaluated using cephalometric analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 122 patients were included, with a mean age of 22.1 years at the final evaluation in this study. Primary one-stage cheiloplasty was performed in 91.0% of the patients, and 9.0% underwent two-stage repair with an initial adhesion cheiloplasty. All patients underwent two-flap palatoplasty at an average of 12.3 months. Surgical intervention for velopharyngeal insufficiency was required in 59.0% of patients. Revisional lip/nose surgery was performed in 31.1% during growing age and in 64.8% after skeletal maturity. Orthognathic surgery was applied in 60.7% of patients with retruded midface, of which 97.3% underwent two-jaw surgery. The average number of operations to complete the treatment was 5.9 per patient.

CONCLUSION

Patients with complete BCLP remain the most challenging group to treat among the cleft. This review revealed certain suboptimal results, and modifications have been made to the treatment protocol. Longitudinal follow-up and periodic assessment help to establish an ideal therapeutic strategy and improve overall cleft care.

Facial palsy after orthognathic surgery: A systematic review

It was the aim of the systematic review to evaluate the incidence of facial palsy following orthognathic surgery, and to assess the possible mechanisms of injury, subsequent management, and eventual outcomes. The protocol of this systematic review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews. A thorough search of PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases up to April 2022 was conducted. In total, 34 articles were selected for this review, including 54 facial palsies in 53 patients. The incidence of facial palsy was estimated to range from 0.04% to 0.77%. Most of the possible etiologies proposed involved intraoperative nerve compression or postoperative edema. Physical therapy and steroid administration were the most frequently employed management approaches. Surgical exploration for the facial nerve was executed in one patient. Forty-three facial palsies (79.6%) attained complete recovery with conservative management, whereas 11 facial palsies (20.4%) continued to show incomplete recovery during the follow-up period. Earlier facial palsy onset (timing after surgery) was related to a higher risk of continuing palsy (p = 0.018). Within the limitations of this review it seems that facial palsy following orthognathic surgery should be treated conservatively whenever appropriate.

One-Jaw versus Two-Jaw Orthognathic Surgery for Patients with Cleft: A Comparative Study Using 3D Imaging Virtual Surgical Planning

Whether a one-jaw or two-jaw design is used in orthognathic surgery for patients with cleft remains varied and controversial. This study aimed to compare the two approaches using 3-dimensional imaging surgical simulation. This study was conducted on 41 consecutive patients with complete unilateral cleft lip and palate treated in the craniofacial center. All patients had original two-jaw virtual planning and orthognathic surgery. Simulation of one-jaw LeFort I surgery was performed using the same final dental occlusion on 3-dimensional images. Cephalometric data and asymmetry index were collected and compared among the designs. Average advancement of the maxilla was 7.46 mm in one-jaw and 4.80 mm in two-jaw design. SNA, SNB, and A-N perpendicular were significantly greater and close to normative data in the one-jaw design. ANB angles were similar in both designs. The anterior and posterior occlusal plane cants, the deviation of midline landmarks, and the asymmetry index were more improved in the two-jaw approach. It is concluded that the two-jaw cleft orthognathic surgery could significantly improve facial midline and symmetry compared with the one-jaw approach. However, the two-jaw surgery with mandibular setback produced less protrusive facial contour although a harmonious relationship between the maxilla and mandible was achieved.

Outcome of full digital workflow for orthognathic surgery planning in the treatment of asymmetric skeletal class III deformity

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Studies have reported the advantages of digital imaging-assisted orthognathic surgery planning, but there is scarce information about a full digital planning modality. This study evaluated the 3D cephalometric-based and patient-reported outcomes of a full digital workflow for orthognathic surgery planning in the treatment of asymmetric maxillomandibular disharmony.

METHODS

A postoperative 3D image dataset of 30 Taiwanese Chinese patients with asymmetric skeletal Class III deformities who underwent full digital planning for two-jaw surgery were retrieved from the authors' database. The 3D cephalometric data (dental, skeletal, and soft tissue evaluations) were compared to the ethnicity-matched 3D cephalometric normative values. Patient-reported outcome measure tools regarding postoperative overall appearance and satisfaction with facial areas (ranging from 0 to 100 and 0 to 10, respectively) were administered. The number of needed or requested revisionary surgery was collected.

RESULTS

No difference (all p > 0.05) was observed between the orthognathic-surgery-treated patients and the normative value for most of the tested 3D cephalometric parameters, with the exception (p < 0.05) of three mandible and occlusal-plane-related parameters. Both patient-reported outcome measure tools showed that patients' satisfaction with their postoperative appearance was high for overall face (89.7 ± 4.5) and specific facial regions (nose, 7.1 ± 1.3; lip, 8.3 ± 1.6; upper gum, 8.5 ± 1.2; cheek, 8.8 ± 1.1; chin, 9.2 ± 1.2; and teeth, 9.3 ± 0.8), with no need for revisionary surgery.

CONCLUSION

The patients treated with a full 3D digital planning-assisted two-jaw surgery had a similar 3D dental relation, facial convexity, and symmetry compared to healthy ethnicity-matched individuals, and they reported higher satisfaction levels with their postoperative facial appearance results.